Skip to main content
Log in

Recent Advances in Electrical Resistance Preheating of Aluminum Reduction Cells

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

There are two mainpreheating methods that are used nowadays for aluminum reduction cells. One is based on electrical resistance preheating with a thin bed of small coke and/or graphite particles between the anodes and the cathode carbon blocks. The other is flame preheating, where two or more gas or oil burners are used. Electrical resistance preheating is the oldest method, but is still frequently used by different aluminum producers. Many improvements have been made to this method by different companies over the last decade. In this paper, important points pertaining to the preparation and preheating of these cells, as well as measurements made during the preheating process and evaluation of the performance of the preheating, are illustrated. The preheating times of these cells were found to be between 36 h and 96 h for cell currents between 176 kA and 406 kA, while the resistance bed thickness was between 13 mm and 60 mm. The average cathode surface temperature at the end of the preheating was usually between 800°C and 950°C. The effect of the preheating methods on cell life is unclear and no quantifiable conclusions can be drawn. Some works carried out in the mathematical modeling area are also discussed. It is concluded that there is a need for more studies with real situations for preheated cells on the basis of actual measurements. The expected development in electrical resistance preheating of aluminum reduction cells is also summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.R. Hale, JOM 41, 20 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Sørlie and H. Øye, Cathodes in aluminium electrolysis, 2nd ed. (Düsseldorf: Aluminium-Verlag GmbH, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Berndt and I. Eick, TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2007), p. 1001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Clelland, J. Keniry and B. Welch, Light Metals 1982, pp. 299–309.

  5. C. Zangiacomi, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2005), p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.A. Rye, TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2008), p. 1007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.M. Ali, TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2010), p. 1057.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Kvande, The 20th International Course on Process Metallurgy of Aluminium (Trondheim: NTNU, 2001), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Kvande, The International Course on Process Metallurgy of Aluminium (Trondheim: NTNU, 2004), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.M. Peyneau, The 31th International Course on Process Metallurgy of Aluminium (Trondheim: NTNU, 2012), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Mohammed, B.K. Kakkar, and A. Kumar, TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2007), p. 997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Grjotheim and H. Kvande, Understanding the Hall-Héroult Process for Production of Aluminium (Düsseldorf: Aluminium-Verlag GmbH, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.B. Rickards, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 1983), p. 857.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Kvande and P.A. Drabløs, J. Occup. Environ. Med. 56, 23 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Kristensen, G. Höskuldsson, and B. Welch, TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2007), p. 411.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Bentzen, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 1991), p. 741.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Z. Shuiping, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2006), p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.M. Ali, JES 41, 2354 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Reverdy, The International Course on Process Metallurgy of Aluminium (Trondheim: NTNU, 1993), p. 10-1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.M. Ali and A.A. Ahmed: Report No. C-Pr01-06, Egyptalum, 2006.

  21. A. Arkhipov, et al., TMS Light Metals, TMS (Hoboken: Wiley, 2014), p. 445.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Arkhipov, et al., TMS Light Metals, TMS (Hoboken: Wiley, 2015), p. 777.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.A. Mohamed, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2006), p. 675.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.M. Ali, K.M. Ahmed and I.M. Nour: Report No. 1-2009-cells, Egyptalum, 2009.

  25. A. Al Zarouni, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2010), p. 1067.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Kangjian, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2009), p. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Refractories and Carbon Cathode Materials for Aluminium. http://www.springer.com/cda/content/.../cda.../9783319114415-c1.pdf.

  28. M.M. Ali, K.M. Ahmed and I.M. Nour: Report No. 8-2008-cells, Egyptalum, 2008.

  29. Y. Ban, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2010), p. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  30. F.M. Ahmed, M.M. Ali and A.A. Ahmed, Report (without number) about preheating and start-up experimental of potline No. 6 during the period from 1998 to 2000 at Egyptalum, 2000.

  31. W. Alsayed, et al., TMS Light Metals, TMS (Hoboken: Wiley, 2015), p. 505.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.M. Ali: Report (without number) about evaluation of preheating cell No 1324 at Egyptalum, 1997.

  33. M. Dunn, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 1997), p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Vanvoren, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2001), p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  35. O. Lorentsen and K. Rye, TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2008), p. 411.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Tessier, et al., Metall. Mater. Trans. B 41B, 612 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Jianping, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2011), p. 1023.

    Google Scholar 

  38. D. Marceau, et al., TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2011), p. 1041.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Désilets, D. Marceau, and M. Fafard, TMS Light Metals (Warrendale: TMS, 2003), p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The primary author (M.M.A) wants to express his appreciation to all the aluminum companies mentioned during this study. Special thanks go to the Egyptalum chairman for his support, to the heads of the production sectors, especially the team of the experimental cells, to the R&D manager and to the staff of production research at Egyptalum for their continuous encouragement and supply of valuable data during this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Mahmoud Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.M., Kvande, H. Recent Advances in Electrical Resistance Preheating of Aluminum Reduction Cells. JOM 69, 266–280 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1987-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-1987-x

Keywords

Navigation