Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Comprehensive Review on Breast Cancer Detection, Classification and Segmentation Using Deep Learning

  • Review article
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incidence and mortality rate of Breast Cancer (BC) are global problems for women, with over 2.1 million new diagnoses each year worldwide. There is no age range, race, or ethnicity threshold, as all women are susceptible; however, no permanent remedy has been developed for it. Therefore, the survival of patients with BC can be improved significantly with an early and accurate diagnosis. There are a number of studies that have created automated approaches employing various types of medical imaging to detect the emergence of BC, but the accuracy of each method varies depending on the resources available, nature of the problem and dataset being employed. However, there is a dearth of review articles that summarize the current research on BC diagnosis. This manuscript addresses the current state of the art in artificial Deep Neural Network (DNN) techniques for BC detection, classification and segmentation using medical imaging. In addition, it emphasizes the working principles, benefits and limitations of imaging modalities used to detect BC, along with a comprehensive analysis of those modalities. The primary purpose of this paper is to identify the most effective imaging modalities and DL approaches that can handle the huge dataset with reliable predictions. The results of this review indicate that mammography and histopathologic images are primarily employed for BC classification. Furthermore, approximately 55% of the research used public datasets while the rest used private data sources. To reduce variability and overfitting in BC images, several studies have used pre-processing methods such as data augmentation, scaling, and normalization. Moreover, distinct neural network architectures, both shallow and deep, are used to analyze BC images. The CNN is widely employed to develop an efficient BC classification model and several studies either used a pre-trained model or created a new DNN. Lastly, this review addressed 13 significant challenges that are encountered throughout the course of the review for future researchers that aim to improve BC diagnosis models using a wide range of imaging techniques. This paper has the potential to be a helpful resource for both beginners and experts in the field of medical image analysis, particularly those who focus on DL based BC detection, classification and segmentation employing a variety of imaging modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availibility

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Łukasiewicz S, Czeczelewski M, Forma A, Baj J, Sitarz R, Stanisławek A (2021) Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, classification, prognostic markers, and current treatment strategies-an updated review. Cancers 13(17):4287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/understanding-a-breast-cancer-diagnosis/stages-of-breast-cancer.html

  3. Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H (2019) Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world. Breast Cancer Targets Ther 11:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellington TD, Henley SJ, Wilson RJ, Miller JW, Wu M, Richardson LC (2023) Trends in breast cancer mortality by race/ethnicity, age, and us census region, United States–1999-2020. Cancer 129(1):32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, Kramer JL, Newman LA, Minihan A, Jemal A, Siegel RL (2022) Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer J Clin 72(6):524–541

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schulz M, Spors E, Bates K, Michael S (2022) Spatial analysis of breast cancer mortality rates in a rural state. Prev Chronic Dis 19:65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pensabene M, Von Arx C, De Laurentiis M (2022) Male breast cancer: from molecular genetics to clinical management. Cancers 14(8):2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization (2021). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer

  9. Hirschman J, Whitman S, Ansell D (2007) The black: white disparity in breast cancer mortality: the example of Chicago. Cancer Causes Control 18:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research (2020). http://cancerindia.org.in/cancer-statistics/

  11. Mehrotra R, Yadav K (2022) Breast cancer in India: present scenario and the challenges ahead. World J Clin Oncol 13(3):209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhillon A, Singh A (2020) ebrecap: extreme learning-based model for breast cancer survival prediction. IET Syst Biol 14(3):160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh A, Dhillon A, Kumar N, Hossain MS, Muhammad G, Kumar M (2021) ediapredict: an ensemble-based framework for diabetes prediction. ACM Trans Multimed Comput Commun Appl 17(2s):1–26

    Google Scholar 

  14. Trang NTH, Long KQ, An PL, Dang TN (2023) Development of an artificial intelligence-based breast cancer detection model by combining mammograms and medical health records. Diagnostics 13(3):346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hodkinson A, Zhou A, Johnson J, Geraghty K, Riley R, Zhou A, Panagopoulou E, Chew-Graham CA, Peters D, Esmail A et al (2022) Associations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 378:e070442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Scroll.in (2021). https://scroll.in/article/1029766/how-true-is-the-health-ministers-claim-that-indias-doctor-population-ratio-exceeds-who-guidelines

  17. Graham LJ, Shupe MP, Schneble EJ, Flynt FL, Clemenshaw MN, Kirkpatrick AD, Gallagher C, Nissan A, Henry L, Stojadinovic A et al (2014) Current approaches and challenges in monitoring treatment responses in breast cancer. J Cancer 5(1):58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duffy MJ, Walsh S, McDermott EW, Crown J (2015) Biomarkers in breast cancer: where are we and where are we going? Adv Clin Chem 71:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dhillon A, Singh A, Bhalla VK (2023) A systematic review on biomarker identification for cancer diagnosis and prognosis in multi-omics: from computational needs to machine learning and deep learning. Arch Comput Methods Eng 30(2):917–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Toss A, Cristofanilli M (2015) Molecular characterization and targeted therapeutic approaches in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 17(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Oloomi M, Moazzezy N, Bouzari S (2020) Comparing blood versus tissue-based biomarkers expression in breast cancer patients. Heliyon 6(4):03728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Joseph C, Papadaki A, Althobiti M, Alsaleem M, Aleskandarany MA, Rakha EA (2018) Breast cancer intratumour heterogeneity: current status and clinical implications. Histopathology 73(5):717–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ravelli A, Reuben JM, Lanza F, Anfossi S, Cappelletti MR, Zanotti L, Gobbi A, Senti C, Brambilla P, Milani M et al (2015) Breast cancer circulating biomarkers: advantages, drawbacks, and new insights. Tumor Biol 36:6653–6665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nilashi M, Minaei-Bidgoli B, Alghamdi A, Alrizq M, Alghamdi O, Nayer FK, Aljehane NO, Khosravi A, Mohd S (2022) Knowledge discovery for course choice decision in massive open online courses using machine learning approaches. Expert Syst Appl 199:117092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alanazi A (2022) Using machine learning for healthcare challenges and opportunities. Inform Med Unlocked 30:100924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodrigues AP, Fernandes R, Shetty A, Lakshmanna K, Shafi RM et al (2022) Real-time twitter spam detection and sentiment analysis using machine learning and deep learning techniques. Comput Intell Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5211949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohanta BK, Jena D, Mohapatra N, Ramasubbareddy S, Rawal BS (2022) Machine learning based accident prediction in secure IoT enable transportation system. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 42(2):713–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ahmadian S, Ahmadian M, Jalili M (2022) A deep learning based trust-and tag-aware recommender system. Neurocomputing 488:557–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jin D, Sergeeva E, Weng W-H, Chauhan G, Szolovits P (2022) Explainable deep learning in healthcare: a methodological survey from an attribution view. WIREs Mech Dis 14(3):1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh C, Imam T, Wibowo S, Grandhi S (2022) A deep learning approach for sentiment analysis of covid-19 reviews. Appl Sci 12(8):3709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ravi C, Tigga A, Reddy GT, Hakak S, Alazab M (2022) Driver identification using optimized deep learning model in smart transportation. ACM Trans Int Technol 22(4):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Majumdar S, Pramanik P, Sarkar R (2023) Gamma function based ensemble of CNN models for breast cancer detection in histopathology images. Expert Syst Appl 213:119022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shen T, Wang J, Gou C, Wang F-Y (2020) Hierarchical fused model with deep learning and type-2 fuzzy learning for breast cancer diagnosis. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 28(12):3204–3218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prakash SS, Visakha K (2020) Breast cancer malignancy prediction using deep learning neural networks. In: 2020 second international conference on inventive research in computing applications (ICIRCA). IEEE, pp 88–92

  35. Houssein EH, Emam MM, Ali AA (2022) An optimized deep learning architecture for breast cancer diagnosis based on improved marine predators algorithm. Neural Comput Appl 34(20):18015–18033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Desai M, Shah M (2021) An anatomization on breast cancer detection and diagnosis employing multi-layer perceptron neural network (mlp) and convolutional neural network (cnn). Clin eHealth 4:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sannasi Chakravarthy S, Bharanidharan N, Rajaguru H (2022) Multi-deep CNN based experimentations for early diagnosis of breast cancer. IETE J Res 2022:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bie C, Li Y, Zhou Y, Bhujwalla ZM, Song X, Liu G, van Zijl PC, Yadav NN (2022) Deep learning-based classification of preclinical breast cancer tumor models using chemical exchange saturation transfer magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 35(2):4626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang X, Ahmad I, Javeed D, Zaidi SA, Alotaibi FM, Ghoneim ME, Daradkeh YI, Asghar J, Eldin ET (2022) Intelligent hybrid deep learning model for breast cancer detection. Electronics 11(17):2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Awotunde JB, Panigrahi R, Khandelwal B, Garg A, Bhoi AK (2023) Breast cancer diagnosis based on hybrid rule-based feature selection with deep learning algorithm. Res Biomed Eng 2023:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mokni R, Haoues M (2022) Cadnet157 model: fine-tuned resnet152 model for breast cancer diagnosis from mammography images. Neural Comput Appl 2022:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  42. Picard J (1998) History of mammography. Bulletin de l’Academie nationale de medecine 182(8):1613–1620

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu YC, Freedman MT, Hasegawa A, Zuurbier RA, Lo S-CB, Mun SK (1995) Classification of microcalcifications in radiographs of pathologic specimens for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Acad Radiol 2(3):199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ertosun MG, Rubin DL (2015) Probabilistic visual search for masses within mammography images using deep learning. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE, pp 1310–1315

  45. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Han EY, Jacobs N, Han Q, Wang X, Liu J (2017) Whole mammogram image classification with convolutional neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on bioinformatics and biomedicine (BIBM). IEEE, pp. 700–704

  46. Kassani SH, Kassani PH, Wesolowski MJ, Schneider KA, Deters R (2019) Breast cancer diagnosis with transfer learning and global pooling. In: 2019 international conference on information and communication technology convergence (ICTC). IEEE, pp 519–524

  47. Suh YJ, Jung J, Cho B-J (2020) Automated breast cancer detection in digital mammograms of various densities via deep learning. J Person Med 10(4):211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chan H-P, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Jokich PM (1987) Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys 14(4):538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dengler J, Behrens S, Desaga JF (1993) Segmentation of microcalcifications in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 12(4):634–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Li X, Zhao Z, Cheng H (1995) Fuzzy entropy threshold approach to breast cancer detection. Inf Sci Appl 4(1):49–56

    Google Scholar 

  51. Boukerroui D, Basset O, Guerin N, Baskurt A (1998) Multiresolution texture based adaptive clustering algorithm for breast lesion segmentation. Eur J Ultrasound 8(2):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Guliato D, Rangayyan RM, Carnielli WA, Zuffo J, Desautels J (1998) Segmentation of breast tumors in mammograms by fuzzy region growing. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, vol 20 biomedical engineering towards the year 2000 and beyond (Cat. No. 98CH36286). IEEE, vol 2, pp 1002–1005

  53. Petersen K, Nielsen M, Diao P, Karssemeijer N, Lillholm M (2014) Breast tissue segmentation and mammographic risk scoring using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the breast imaging: 12th international workshop, IWDM 2014, Gifu City, Japan, June 29–July 2. Springer, vol 12, pp 88–94

  54. Society AC (2020) American cancer society recommendations for the early detection of breast cancer. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  55. Elmoufidi A (2022) Deep multiple instance learning for automatic breast cancer assessment using digital mammography. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 71:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Nguyen HT, Tran SB, Nguyen DB, Pham HH, Nguyen HQ (2022) A novel multi-view deep learning approach for bi-rads and density assessment of mammograms. In: 2022 44th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine & biology society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 2144–2148

  57. Jiang J, Peng J, Hu C, Jian W, Wang X, Liu W (2022) Breast cancer detection and classification in mammogram using a three-stage deep learning framework based on paa algorithm. Artif Intell Med 134:102419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hamed G, Marey M, Amin SE, Tolba MF (2021) Automated breast cancer detection and classification in full field digital mammograms using two full and cropped detection paths approach. IEEE Access 9:116898–116913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ting FF, Tan YJ, Sim KS (2019) Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification. Expert Syst Appl 120:103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Swiderski B, Gielata L, Olszewski P, Osowski S, Kołodziej M (2021) Deep neural system for supporting tumor recognition of mammograms using modified gan. Expert Syst Appl 164:113968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Singh VK, Rashwan HA, Romani S, Akram F, Pandey N, Sarker MMK, Saleh A, Arenas M, Arquez M, Puig D et al (2020) Breast tumor segmentation and shape classification in mammograms using generative adversarial and convolutional neural network. Expert Syst Appl 139:112855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Trister AD, Buist DS, Lee CI (2017) Will machine learning tip the balance in breast cancer screening? JAMA Oncol 3(11):1463–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Li S, Nguyen TL, Nguyen-Dumont T, Dowty JG, Dite GS, Ye Z, Trinh HN, Evans CF, Tan M, Sung J et al (2022) Genetic aspects of mammographic density measures associated with breast cancer risk. Cancers 14(11):2767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sahiner B, Chan H-P, Roubidoux MA, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Paramagul C, Bailey J, Nees AV, Blane C (2007) Malignant and benign breast masses on 3d us volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 242(3):716–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Qi X, Yi F, Zhang L, Chen Y, Pi Y, Chen Y, Guo J, Wang J, Guo Q, Li J et al (2022) Computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer in ultrasonography images by deep learning. Neurocomputing 472:152–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ding W, Wang J, Zhou W, Zhou S, Chang C, Shi J (2022) Joint localization and classification of breast cancer in b-mode ultrasound imaging via collaborative learning with elastography. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 26(9):4474–4485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Du H, Lu M, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Zuo S (2022) Scanning path planning of the robot for breast ultrasound examination based on binocular vision and nurbs. IEEE Access 10:85384–85398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Pal UM, Nayak A, Medisetti T, Gogoi G, Shekhar H, Prasad M, Vaidya JS, Pandya HJ (2021) Hybrid spectral-irdx: near-ir and ultrasound attenuation system for differentiating breast cancer from adjacent normal tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 68(12):3554–3563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wu L, Ye W, Liu Y, Chen D, Wang Y, Cui Y, Li Z, Li P, Li Z, Liu Z et al (2022) An integrated deep learning model for the prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with serial ultrasonography in breast cancer patients: a multicentre, retrospective study. Breast Cancer Res 24(1):81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Gu J, Tong T, He C, Xu M, Yang X, Tian J, Jiang T, Wang K (2021) Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography can predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer at an early stage of treatment: a prospective study. Eur Radiol 32:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  71. Balaha HM, Saif M, Tamer A, Abdelhay EH (2022) Hybrid deep learning and genetic algorithms approach (hmb-dlgaha) for the early ultrasound diagnoses of breast cancer. Neural Comput Appl 34(11):8671–8695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang Q, Chen H, Luo G, Li B, Shang H, Shao H, Sun S, Wang Z, Wang K, Cheng W (2022) Performance of novel deep learning network with the incorporation of the automatic segmentation network for diagnosis of breast cancer in automated breast ultrasound. Eur Radiol 32(10):7163–7172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Matsumoto Y, Katsumura A, Miki N (2022) Pressure-controlled ultrasound probe for reliable imaging in breast cancer diagnosis. Jpn J Appl Phys 61:1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Prasad S, Almekkawy M (2022) Deepuct: complex cascaded deep learning network for improved ultrasound tomography. Phys Med Biol 67(6):065008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Thompson JL, Wright GP (2021) The role of breast MRI in newly diagnosed breast cancer: an evidence-based review. Am J Surg 221(3):525–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Al Ewaidat H, Ayasrah M (2022) A concise review on the utilization of abbreviated protocol breast MRI over full diagnostic protocol in breast cancer detection. Int J Biomed Imaging 2022:8705531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Houssami N, Hayes DF (2009) Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin 59(5):290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Meyer A, Chlebus G, Rak M, Schindele D, Schostak M, van Ginneken B, Schenk A, Meine H, Hahn HK, Schreiber A et al (2021) Anisotropic 3d multi-stream CNN for accurate prostate segmentation from multi-planar MRI. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 200:105821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Piantadosi G, Sansone M, Fusco R, Sansone C (2020) Multi-planar 3d breast segmentation in MRI via deep convolutional neural networks. Artif Intell Med 103:101781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Corke L, Luzhna L, Willemsma K, Illmann C, Mcdermott M, Wilson C, Simmons C, LeVasseur N (2022) Clinical utility of MRI in the neoadjuvant management of early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 194(3):587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Kennard K, Wang O, Kjelstrom S, Larson S, Sizer LM, Carruthers C, Carter WB, Ciocca R, Sabol J, Frazier TG et al (2022) Outcomes of abbreviated MRI (ab-MRI) for women of any breast cancer risk and breast density in a community academic setting. Ann Surg Oncol 29(10):6215–6221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Galati F, Rizzo V, Moffa G, Caramanico C, Kripa E, Cerbelli B, D’Amati G, Pediconi F (2022) Radiologic-pathologic correlation in breast cancer: do MRI biomarkers correlate with pathologic features and molecular subtypes? Eur Radiol Exp 6(1):39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Mann RM, Athanasiou A, Baltzer PA, Camps-Herrero J, Clauser P, Fallenberg EM, Forrai G, Fuchsjäger MH, Helbich TH, Killburn-Toppin F et al (2022) Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European society of breast imaging (eusobi). Eur Radiol 32(6):4036–4045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Ming W, Li F, Zhu Y, Bai Y, Gu W, Liu Y, Sun X, Liu X, Liu H (2022) Predicting hormone receptors and pam50 subtypes of breast cancer from multi-scale lesion images of DCE-MRI with transfer learning technique. Comput Biol Med 150:106147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ren T, Lin S, Huang P, Duong TQ (2022) Convolutional neural network of multiparametric MRI accurately detects axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with pre neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Breast Cancer 22(2):170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kang BJ, Kim MJ, Shin HJ, Moon WK (2022) Acquisition and interpretation guidelines of breast diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI): breast imaging study group of korean society of magnetic resonance in medicine recommendations. Investig Magn Resonance Imaging 26(2):83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Bulas D, Egloff A (2013) Benefits and risks of MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 37:301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Leach MO (2009) Breast cancer screening in women at high risk using MRI. NMR Biomed 22(1):17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Nissan N, Bauer E, Moss Massasa EE, Sklair-Levy M (2022) Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances. Insights Imaging 13(1):71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Hermena S, Young M (2022) CT-scan image production procedures. StatPearls, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  91. Desperito E, Schwartz L, Capaccione KM, Collins BT, Jamabawalikar S, Peng B, Patrizio R, Salvatore MM (2022) Chest CT for breast cancer diagnosis. Life 12(11):1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Volterrani L, Gentili F, Fausto A, Pelini V, Megha T, Sardanelli F, Mazzei MA (2020) Dual-energy CT for locoregional staging of breast cancer: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 214(3):707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Yang X, Wu L, Ye W, Zhao K, Wang Y, Liu W, Li J, Li H, Liu Z, Liang C (2020) Deep learning signature based on staging CT for preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Acad Radiol 27(9):1226–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Evrimler S, Algin O (2021) CT and MR enterography and enteroclysis. In: Erturk SM, Ros PR, Ichikawa T, Saylisoy S (eds) Medical imaging contrast agents: a clinical manual. Springer, New York, pp 149–168

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  95. Yeh BM, FitzGerald PF, Edic PM, Lambert JW, Colborn RE, Marino ME, Evans PM, Roberts JC, Wang ZJ, Wong MJ et al (2017) Opportunities for new CT contrast agents to maximize the diagnostic potential of emerging spectral CT technologies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 113:201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Nicolas E, Khalifa N, Laporte C, Bouhroum S, Kirova Y (2021) Safety margins for the delineation of the left anterior descending artery in patients treated for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 109(1):267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Formaz E, Schmidt C, Berger N, Schönenberger AL, Wieler J, Frauenfelder T, Boss A, Marcon M (2023) Dedicated breast computed-tomography in women with a personal history of breast cancer: a proof-of-concept study. Eur J Radiol 158:110632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Shim S, Kolditz D, Steiding C, Ruth V, Hoetker AM, Unkelbach J, Boss A (2023) Radiation dose estimates based on Monte Carlo simulation for spiral breast computed tomography imaging in a large cohort of patients. Med Phys 50:2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Shim S, Cester D, Ruby L, Bluethgen C, Marcon M, Berger N, Unkelbach J, Boss A (2022) Fully automated breast segmentation on spiral breast computed tomography images. J Appl Clin Med Phys 23(10):13726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Hadebe B, Harry L, Ebrahim T, Pillay V, Vorster M (2023) The role of PET/CT in breast cancer. Diagnostics 13(4):597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Koh J, Yoon Y, Kim S, Han K, Kim E-K (2022) Deep learning for the detection of breast cancers on chest computed tomography. Clin Breast Cancer 22(1):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Ou X, Zhang J, Wang J, Pang F, Wang Y, Wei X, Ma X (2020) Radiomics based on 18f-fdg PET/CT could differentiate breast carcinoma from breast lymphoma using machine-learning approach: A preliminary study. Cancer Med 9(2):496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Katzenellenbogen JA (2021) The quest for improving the management of breast cancer by functional imaging: the discovery and development of 16\(\alpha\)-[18f] fluoroestradiol (fes), a PET radiotracer for the estrogen receptor, a historical review. Nucl Med Biol 92:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Volpe A, Lang C, Lim L, Man F, Kurtys E, Ashmore-Harris C, Johnson P, Skourti E, de Rosales RT, Fruhwirth GO (2020) Spatiotemporal PET imaging reveals differences in car-t tumor retention in triple-negative breast cancer models. Mol Ther 28(10):2271–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Mankoff DA, Sellmyer MA (2022) PET of fibroblast-activation protein for breast cancer diagnosis and staging. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook

    Book  Google Scholar 

  106. Bouron C, Mathie C, Seegers V, Morel O, Jézéquel P, Lasla H, Guillerminet C, Girault S, Lacombe M, Sher A et al (2022) Prognostic value of metabolic, volumetric and textural parameters of baseline [18f] FDG PET/CT in early triple-negative breast cancer. Cancers 14(3):637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Hildebrandt MG, Naghavi-Behzad M, Vogsen M (2022) A role of FDG-PET/CT for response evaluation in metastatic breast cancer? Semin Nucl Med 52:520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Simsek A, Kutluturk K, Comak A, Akatli A, Kekilli E, Unal B (2021) Factors affecting the accuracy of 18 f-FDG PET/CT in detecting additional tumor foci in breast cancer. Arch Hell Med/Arheia Ellenikes Iatrikes 38(2):63–68

    Google Scholar 

  109. Kwon Y (2019) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of Breast cancer heterogeneous for HER2 and EGFR using bispecific radioimmunoconjugates

  110. Ming Y, Wu N, Qian T, Li X, Wan DQ, Li C, Li Y, Wu Z, Wang X, Liu J et al (2020) Progress and future trends in PET/CT and PET/MRI molecular imaging approaches for breast cancer. Front Oncol 10:1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Ulaner GA (2019) PET/CT for patients with breast cancer: where is the clinical impact? Am J Roentgenol 213(2):254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Krajnc D, Papp L, Nakuz TS, Magometschnigg HF, Grahovac M, Spielvogel CP, Ecsedi B, Bago-Horvath Z, Haug A, Karanikas G et al (2021) Breast tumor characterization using [18f] fdg-pet/CT imaging combined with data preprocessing and radiomics. Cancers 13(6):1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Antunovic L, De Sanctis R, Cozzi L, Kirienko M, Sagona A, Torrisi R, Tinterri C, Santoro A, Chiti A, Zelic R et al (2019) PET/CT radiomics in breast cancer: promising tool for prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:1468–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Zhou X, Li C, Rahaman MM, Yao Y, Ai S, Sun C, Wang Q, Zhang Y, Li M, Li X et al (2020) A comprehensive review for breast histopathology image analysis using classical and deep neural networks. IEEE Access 8:90931–90956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Lal S, Das D, Alabhya K, Kanfade A, Kumar A, Kini J (2021) Nucleisegnet: robust deep learning architecture for the nuclei segmentation of liver cancer histopathology images. Comput Biol Med 128:104075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Salehi P, Chalechale A (2020) Pix2pix-based stain-to-stain translation: a solution for robust stain normalization in histopathology images analysis. In: 2020 international conference on machine vision and image processing (MVIP). IEEE, pp 1–7

  117. Boschman J, Farahani H, Darbandsari A, Ahmadvand P, Van Spankeren A, Farnell D, Levine AB, Naso JR, Churg A, Jones SJ et al (2022) The utility of color normalization for AI-based diagnosis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained pathology images. J Pathol 256(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Singh S, Kumar R (2022) Breast cancer detection from histopathology images with deep inception and residual blocks. Multimed Tools Appl 81(4):5849–5865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Sethy PK, Behera SK (2022) Automatic classification with concatenation of deep and handcrafted features of histological images for breast carcinoma diagnosis. Multimed Tools Appl 81(7):9631–9643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Krithiga R, Geetha P (2021) Breast cancer detection, segmentation and classification on histopathology images analysis: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28:2607–2619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Al-Haija QA, Adebanjo A (2020) Breast cancer diagnosis in histopathological images using resnet-50 convolutional neural network. In: 2020 IEEE international IOT, electronics and mechatronics conference (IEMTRONICS). IEEE, pp 1–7

  122. Karthik R, Menaka R, Siddharth M (2022) Classification of breast cancer from histopathology images using an ensemble of deep multiscale networks. Biocybern Biomed Eng 42(3):963–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Mashekova A, Zhao Y, Ng EY, Zarikas V, Fok SC, Mukhmetov O (2022) Early detection of the breast cancer using infrared technology-a comprehensive review. Therm Sci Eng Prog 27:101142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Gonçalves CB, Souza JR, Fernandes H (2022) CNN architecture optimization using bio-inspired algorithms for breast cancer detection in infrared images. Comput Biol Med 142:105205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Geetha P, UmaMaheswari S (2023) Heat transfer capacity in millimeter size breast cancer cells analysis through thermal imaging and FDNCNN for primary stage identification. Biomed Signal Process Control 80:104361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Pramanik R, Pramanik P, Sarkar R (2023) Breast cancer detection in thermograms using a hybrid of GA and GWO based deep feature selection method. Expert Syst Appl 219:119643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Torres-Galván JC, Guevara E, Kolosovas-Machuca ES, Oceguera-Villanueva A, Flores JL, González FJ (2022) Deep convolutional neural networks for classifying breast cancer using infrared thermography. Quant InfraRed Thermogr J 19(4):283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Na SP, Houserkovaa D (2007) The role of various modalities in breast imaging. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 151(2):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Hassan NM, Hamad S, Mahar K (2022) Mammogram breast cancer cad systems for mass detection and classification: a review. Multimed Tools Appl 81(14):20043–20075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Hussein H, Abbas E, Keshavarzi S, Fazelzad R, Bukhanov K, Kulkarni S, Au F, Ghai S, Alabousi A, Freitas V (2023) Supplemental breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts and negative mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 306:221785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Jabeen K, Khan MA, Alhaisoni M, Tariq U, Zhang Y-D, Hamza A, Mickus A, Damaševičius R (2022) Breast cancer classification from ultrasound images using probability-based optimal deep learning feature fusion. Sensors 22(3):807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Sahu A, Das PK, Meher S (2023) High accuracy hybrid CNN classifiers for breast cancer detection using mammogram and ultrasound datasets. Biomed Signal Process Control 80:104292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Chen LW, Cao Y, D’Rummo K, Shen X (2022) Estimation of patient out-of-pocket cost for radiation therapy by insurance type and treatment modality. Pract Radiat Oncol 12(6):481–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. van der Poort EK, van Ravesteyn NT, van den Broek JJ, de Koning HJ (2022) The early detection of breast cancer using liquid biopsies: model estimates of the benefits, harms, and costs. Cancers 14(12):2951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Boersma L, Sattler M, Maduro J, Bijker N, Essers M, van Gestel C, Klaver Y, Petoukhova A, Rodrigues M, Russell N et al (2022) Model-based selection for proton therapy in breast cancer: development of the national indication protocol for proton therapy and first clinical experiences. Clin Oncol 34(4):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Muñoz-Montecinos C, González-Browne C, Maza F, Carreño-Leiton D, González P, Chahuan B, Quirland C (2022) Cost-effectiveness of intraoperative radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of early breast cancer: a disinvestment analysis

  137. Madani M, Behzadi MM, Nabavi S (2022) The role of deep learning in advancing breast cancer detection using different imaging modalities: a systematic review. Cancers 14(21):5334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Broekx S, Hond ED, Torfs R, Remacle A, Mertens R, D’Hooghe T, Neven P, Christiaens M-R, Simoens S (2011) The costs of breast cancer prior to and following diagnosis. Eur J Health Econ 12:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Ramadan SZ (2020) Methods used in computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer detection using mammograms: a review. J Healthc Eng 2020:9162464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Rajasooriyar C, Sritharan T, Chenthuran S, Indranath K, Surenthirakumaran R (2020) The role of staging computed tomography on detection of occult metastasis in asymptomatic breast cancer patients. Cancer Rep 3(3):1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Han S, Choi JY (2021) Impact of 18f-fdg PET, PET/CT, and PET/MRI on staging and management as an initial staging modality in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 46(4):271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Ruan D, Sun L (2022) Diagnostic performance of PET/MRI in breast cancer: a systematic review and Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer 23:108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Bruckmann NM, Kirchner J, Umutlu L, Fendler WP, Seifert R, Herrmann K, Bittner A-K, Hoffmann O, Mohrmann S, Antke C et al (2021) Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18f-fdg PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Eur Radiol 31(11):8714–8724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Barrios CH (2022) Global challenges in breast cancer detection and treatment. Breast 62:3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Petrova D, Garrido D, Špacírová Z, Fernández-Martínez NF, Ivanova G, Rodríguez-Barranco M, Pollán M, Barrios-Rodríguez R, Sánchez MJ (2022) Duration of the patient interval in breast cancer and factors associated with longer delays in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology 32:13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Roh S, Lee Y-S (2023) Developing culturally tailored mobile web app education to promote breast cancer screening: knowledge, barriers, and needs among American Indian women. J Cancer Educ 2023:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  147. Zipkin RJ, Schaefer A, Wang C, Loehrer AP, Kapadia NS, Brooks GA, Onega T, Wang F, O’Malley AJ, Moen EL (2022) Rural-urban differences in breast cancer surgical delays in medicare beneficiaries. Ann Surg Oncol 29(9):5759–5769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Yusuf A, Okafor I, Olubodun T, Onigbogi O (2022) Breast cancer knowledge and screening practices among undergraduates in a Nigerian tertiary institution, southwest region. Afr Health Sci 4(4):16–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Lee J, Kang BJ, Park GE, Kim SH (2022) The usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of local recurrence after mastectomy with reconstructive surgery in breast cancer patients. Diagnostics 12(9):2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Thawani R, Gao L, Mohinani A, Tudorica A, Li X, Mitri Z, Huang W (2022) Quantitative DCE-MRI prediction of breast cancer recurrence following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a preliminary study. BMC Med Imaging 22(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Bowyer K, Kopans D, Kegelmeyer W, Moore R, Sallam M, Chang K, Woods K (1996) The digital database for screening mammography. In: Third international workshop on digital mammography

  152. Moreira IC, Amaral I, Domingues I, Cardoso A, Cardoso MJ, Cardoso JS (2012) Inbreast: toward a full-field digital mammographic database. Acad Radiol 19(2):236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Suckling J (1994) The mammographic images analysis society digital mammogram database. Exerpta Medica 1069:375–378

    Google Scholar 

  154. Oliveira JE, Gueld MO, Araújo AdA, Ott B, Deserno TM (2008) Toward a standard reference database for computer-aided mammography. In: Medical imaging 2008: computer-aided diagnosis. SPIE, vol 6915, pp 606–614

  155. Kooi T, Litjens G, Van Ginneken B, Gubern-Mérida A, Sánchez CI, Mann R, den Heeten A, Karssemeijer N (2017) Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions. Med Image Anal 35:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Zhang Q, Xiao Y, Dai W, Suo J, Wang C, Shi J, Zheng H (2016) Deep learning based classification of breast tumors with shear-wave elastography. Ultrasonics 72:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  157. Arevalo J, González FA, Ramos-Pollán R, Oliveira JL, Lopez MAG (2016) Representation learning for mammography mass lesion classification with convolutional neural networks. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 127:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Jeleń Ł, Krzyżak A, Fevens T, Jeleń M (2016) Influence of feature set reduction on breast cancer malignancy classification of fine needle aspiration biopsies. Comput Biol Med 79:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Suzuki S, Zhang X, Homma N, Ichiji K, Sugita N, Kawasumi Y, Ishibashi T, Yoshizawa M (2016) Mass detection using deep convolutional neural network for mammographic computer-aided diagnosis. In: 2016 55th annual conference of the society of instrument and control engineers of Japan (SICE). IEEE, pp 1382–1386

  160. de la Rosa RS, Lamard M, Cazuguel G, Coatrieux G, Cozic M, Quellec G (2015) Multiple-instance learning for breast cancer detection in mammograms. In: 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 7055–7058

  161. Xu J, Xiang L, Hang R, Wu J (2014) Stacked sparse autoencoder (SSAE) based framework for nuclei patch classification on breast cancer histopathology. In: 2014 IEEE 11th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI). IEEE, pp 999–1002

  162. Lu W, Li Z, Chu J (2017) A novel computer-aided diagnosis system for breast MRI based on feature selection and ensemble learning. Comput Biol Med 83:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Mehra R et al (2018) Breast cancer histology images classification: training from scratch or transfer learning? ICT Express 4(4):247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. PUB MH, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer P (1996) The digital database for screening mammography. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on digital mammography, Chicago, pp 9–12

  165. Mordang J-J, Janssen T, Bria A, Kooi T, Gubern-Mérida A, Karssemeijer N (2016) Automatic microcalcification detection in multi-vendor mammography using convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of breast imaging: 13th international workshop, IWDM 2016, Malmö, Sweden, June 19–22. Springer, vol 13, pp 35–42

  166. Wang J, Yang Y (2018) A context-sensitive deep learning approach for microcalcification detection in mammograms. Pattern Recogn 78:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Al-Dhabyani W, Gomaa M, Khaled H, Fahmy A (2020) Dataset of breast ultrasound images. Data Brief 28:104863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Al-Faris AQ, Ngah UK, Isa NAM, Shuaib IL (2014) Breast MRI tumour segmentation using modified automatic seeded region growing based on particle swarm optimization image clustering. In: Soft computing in industrial applications: proceedings of the 17th online world conference on soft computing in industrial applications. Springer, pp 49–60

  169. Saha A, Harowicz MR, Grimm LJ, Kim CE, Ghate SV, Walsh R, Mazurowski MA (2018) A machine learning approach to radiogenomics of breast cancer: a study of 922 subjects and 529 dce-MRI features. Br J Cancer 119(4):508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  170. Araújo T, Aresta G, Castro E, Rouco J, Aguiar P, Eloy C, Polónia A, Campilho A (2017) Classification of breast cancer histology images using convolutional neural networks. PLoS ONE 12(6):0177544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. Spanhol FA, Oliveira LS, Petitjean C, Heutte L (2015) A dataset for breast cancer histopathological image classification. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 63(7):1455–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Silva L, Saade D, Sequeiros G, Silva A, Paiva A, Bravo R, Conci A (2014) A new database for breast research with infrared image. J Med Imaging Health Inform 4(1):92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Piotrzkowska-Wróblewska H, Dobruch-Sobczak K, Byra M, Nowicki A (2017) Open access database of raw ultrasonic signals acquired from malignant and benign breast lesions. Med Phys 44(11):6105–6109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Yap MH, Pons G, Marti J, Ganau S, Sentis M, Zwiggelaar R, Davison AK, Marti R (2017) Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 22(4):1218–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Benjelloun M, El Adoui M, Larhmam MA, Mahmoudi SA (2018) Automated breast tumor segmentation in DCE-MRI using deep learning. In: 2018 4th international conference on cloud computing technologies and applications (Cloudtech). IEEE, pp 1–6

  176. Aljuaid H, Alturki N, Alsubaie N, Cavallaro L, Liotta A (2022) Computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer classification using deep neural networks and transfer learning. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 223:106951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Maqsood S, Damaševičius R, Maskeliūnas R (2022) Ttcnn: a breast cancer detection and classification towards computer-aided diagnosis using digital mammography in early stages. Appl Sci 12(7):3273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Joseph AA, Abdullahi M, Junaidu SB, Ibrahim HH, Chiroma H (2022) Improved multi-classification of breast cancer histopathological images using handcrafted features and deep neural network (dense layer). Intell Syst Appl 14:200066

    Google Scholar 

  179. Taheri S, Golrizkhatami Z (2022) Magnification-specific and magnification-independent classification of breast cancer histopathological image using deep learning approaches. Signal Image Video Process 2022:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  180. Luo Y, Huang Q, Li X (2022) Segmentation information with attention integration for classification of breast tumor in ultrasound image. Pattern Recogn 124:108427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. Podda AS, Balia R, Barra S, Carta S, Fenu G, Piano L (2022) Fully-automated deep learning pipeline for segmentation and classification of breast ultrasound images. J Comput Sci 63:101816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Hossain MS (2022) Microc alcification segmentation using modified u-net segmentation network from mammogram images. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci 34(2):86–94

    Google Scholar 

  183. Huang Q, Chen Y, Liu L, Tao D, Li X (2019) On combining biclustering mining and adaboost for breast tumor classification. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 32(4):728–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Hepsağ PU, Özel SA, Yazıcı A (2017) Using deep learning for mammography classification. In: 2017 international conference on computer science and engineering (UBMK). IEEE, pp 418–423

  185. Altameem A, Mahanty C, Poonia RC, Saudagar AKJ, Kumar R (2022) Breast cancer detection in mammography images using deep convolutional neural networks and fuzzy ensemble modeling techniques. Diagnostics 12(8):1812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Hu Q, Whitney HM, Li H, Ji Y, Liu P, Giger ML (2021) Improved classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using deep feature maximum intensity projection MRI in breast cancer diagnosis using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiology 3(3):200159

    Google Scholar 

  187. Mohamed A, Amer E, Eldin N, Hossam M, Elmasry N, Adnan GT et al (2022) The impact of data processing and ensemble on breast cancer detection using deep learning. J Comput Commun 1(1):27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Shen L, Margolies LR, Rothstein JH, Fluder E, McBride R, Sieh W (2019) Deep learning to improve breast cancer detection on screening mammography. Sci Rep 9(1):12495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. Pérez-Benito FJ, Signol F, Perez-Cortes J-C, Fuster-Baggetto A, Pollan M, Pérez-Gómez B, Salas-Trejo D, Casals M, Martínez I, LLobert R (2020) A deep learning system to obtain the optimal parameters for a threshold-based breast and dense tissue segmentation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 195:105668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Nagalakshmi T (2022) Breast cancer semantic segmentation for accurate breast cancer detection with an ensemble deep neural network. Neural Process Lett 54(6):5185–5198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Raaj RS (2023) Breast cancer detection and diagnosis using hybrid deep learning architecture. Biomed Signal Process Control 82:104558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. Yurdusev AA, Adem K, Hekim M (2023) Detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms images using difference filter and yolov4 deep learning model. Biomed Signal Process Control 80:104360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  193. Aslan MF (2023) A hybrid end-to-end learning approach for breast cancer diagnosis: convolutional recurrent network. Comput Electr Eng 105:108562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. Demir F (2021) Deepbreastnet: a novel and robust approach for automated breast cancer detection from histopathological images. Biocybern Biomed Eng 41(3):1123–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. Patil RS, Biradar N (2021) Automated mammogram breast cancer detection using the optimized combination of convolutional and recurrent neural network. Evol Intell 14:1459–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. Yao H, Zhang X, Zhou X, Liu S (2019) Parallel structure deep neural network using CNN and RNN with an attention mechanism for breast cancer histology image classification. Cancers 11(12):1901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. Pan P, Chen H, Li Y, Cai N, Cheng L, Wang S (2021) Tumor segmentation in automated whole breast ultrasound using bidirectional lSTM neural network and attention mechanism. Ultrasonics 110:106271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. Dewangan KK, Dewangan DK, Sahu SP, Janghel R (2022) Breast cancer diagnosis in an early stage using novel deep learning with hybrid optimization technique. Multimed Tools Appl 81(10):13935–13960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Saleh H, Alyami H, Alosaimi W et al (2022) Predicting breast cancer based on optimized deep learning approach. Comput Intell Neurosci 202:1820777

    Google Scholar 

  200. Roslidar R, Rahman A, Muharar R, Syahputra MR, Arnia F, Syukri M, Pradhan B, Munadi K (2020) A review on recent progress in thermal imaging and deep learning approaches for breast cancer detection. IEEE Access 8:116176–116194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  201. Li T, Nickel B, Ngo P, McFadden K, Brennan M, Marinovich ML, Houssami N (2023) A systematic review of the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Breast 67:78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. Nasser M, Yusof UK (2023) Deep learning based methods for breast cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and future direction. Diagnostics 13(1):161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. Nassif AB, Talib MA, Nasir Q, Afadar Y, Elgendy O (2022) Breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence techniques: a systematic literature review. Artif Intell Med 127:102276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  204. ElOuassif B, Idri A, Hosni M, Abran A (2021) Classification techniques in breast cancer diagnosis: a systematic literature review. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 9(1):50–77

    Google Scholar 

  205. Yassin NI, Omran S, El Houby EM, Allam H (2018) Machine learning techniques for breast cancer computer aided diagnosis using different image modalities: a systematic review. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 156:25–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. Yu C, Chen H, Li Y, Peng Y, Li J, Yang F (2019) Breast cancer classification in pathological images based on hybrid features. Multimed Tools Appl 78:21325–21345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  207. Saber A, Sakr M, Abo-Seida OM, Keshk A, Chen H (2021) A novel deep-learning model for automatic detection and classification of breast cancer using the transfer-learning technique. IEEE Access 9:71194–71209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Parvin F, Hasan MAM (2020) A comparative study of different types of convolutional neural networks for breast cancer histopathological image classification. In: 2020 IEEE region 10 symposium (TENSYMP). IEEE, pp 945–948

  209. Castro-Tapia S, Castañeda-Miranda CL, Olvera-Olvera CA, Guerrero-Osuna HA, Ortiz-Rodriguez JM, Martínez-Blanco M, Díaz-Florez G, Mendiola-Santibañez JD, Solís-Sánchez LO et al (2021) Classification of breast cancer in mammograms with deep learning adding a fifth class. Appl Sci 11(23):11398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. Hamdy E, Zaghloul MS, Badawy O (2021) Deep learning supported breast cancer classification with multi-modal image fusion. In: 2021 22nd international Arab conference on information technology (ACIT). IEEE, pp 1–7

  211. Moon WK, Lee Y-W, Ke H-H, Lee SH, Huang C-S, Chang R-F (2020) Computer-aided diagnosis of breast ultrasound images using ensemble learning from convolutional neural networks. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 190:105361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  212. Duanmu H, Huang PB, Brahmavar S, Lin S, Ren T, Kong J, Wang F, Duong TQ (2020) Prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using deep learning with integrative imaging, molecular and demographic data. In: Proceedings of medical image computing and computer assisted intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd international conference, Lima, Peru, October 4–8. Springer, Part II 23, pp 242–252

  213. Chen X, Men K, Chen B, Tang Y, Zhang T, Wang S, Li Y, Dai J (2020) CNN-based quality assurance for automatic segmentation of breast cancer in radiotherapy. Front Oncol 10:524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. Salama WM, Aly MH (2021) Deep learning in mammography images segmentation and classification: automated CNN approach. Alex Eng J 60(5):4701–4709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  215. Zeiser FA, da Costa CA, de Oliveira Ramos G, Bohn HC, Santos I, Roehe AV (2021) Deepbatch: a hybrid deep learning model for interpretable diagnosis of breast cancer in whole-slide images. Expert Syst Appl 185:115586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  216. Wadhwa G, Kaur A (2020) A deep cnn technique for detection of breast cancer using histopathology images. In: 2020 advanced computing and communication technologies for high performance applications (ACCTHPA). IEEE, pp 179–185

  217. Krithiga R, Geetha P (2020) Deep learning based breast cancer detection and classification using fuzzy merging techniques. Mach Vis Appl 31:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  218. Salama WM, Elbagoury AM, Aly MH (2020) Novel breast cancer classification framework based on deep learning. IET Image Proc 14(13):3254–3259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  219. Wadhwa G, Mathur M (2020) A convolutional neural network approach for the diagnosis of breast cancer. In: 2020 sixth international conference on parallel, distributed and grid computing (PDGC). IEEE, pp 357–361

  220. Jiménez-Sánchez A, Tardy M, Ballester MAG, Mateus D, Piella G (2023) Memory-aware curriculum federated learning for breast cancer classification. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 229:107318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  221. Li L, Xie N, Yuan S (2022) A federated learning framework for breast cancer histopathological image classification. Electronics 11(22):3767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  222. Tong L, Mitchel J, Chatlin K, Wang MD (2020) Deep learning based feature-level integration of multi-omics data for breast cancer patients survival analysis. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 20:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  223. Debelee TG, Schwenker F, Ibenthal A, Yohannes D (2020) Survey of deep learning in breast cancer image analysis. Evol Syst 11:143–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Saroj Kumar Biswas and Biswajit Purkayastha have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, NIT Road, Silchar, Assam, 788010, India

    Barsha Abhisheka, Saroj Kumar Biswas & Biswajit Purkayastha

Authors
  1. Barsha Abhisheka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saroj Kumar Biswas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Biswajit Purkayastha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barsha Abhisheka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abhisheka, B., Biswas, S.K. & Purkayastha, B. A Comprehensive Review on Breast Cancer Detection, Classification and Segmentation Using Deep Learning. Arch Computat Methods Eng 30, 5023–5052 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09968-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-09968-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation