Skip to main content
Log in

Baiting to protect maize against wireworms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireworms cause considerable damage to a wide range of crops, including maize which is susceptible to attack from emergence to the 10 to 12 leaf stages. One control strategy involves limiting the exposure of young maize were performed with granulated cereal-based baits. Then, this work was subsequently pursued and intensified with experiments based on the use of trap plants. These experimental works provided a description of the implementation conditions, e.g. choice of trap plant species, density, and positioning relative to maize seedlings—in which these trap plants can be used for the protection of maize crops against wireworm attacks. The technique that gave the more promising results in our experiments was based on the use of a mixture of wheat and maize as bait plants. Thus, the protection of maize against wireworm attacks has an efficacy of 55 to 60%, close to the level of protection of the chemical products currently available in Europe. This easy-to-use and effective strategy could help farmers reduce the use of insecticides in the future. Our work also allows us to identify the current benefits and weaknesses of this strategy and to propose research directions to optimise its effectiveness and facilitate its implementation by farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available.

References

  • Adhikari A, Reddy GV (2017) Evaluation of trap crops for the management of wireworms in spring wheat in Montana. Arthropod–Plant Interact 11(6):755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsics F, Haubruge É, Francis F, Verheggen F (2014) The role of olfaction in wireworms: a review on foraging behavior and sensory apparatus. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 18(4)

  • Chaton PF, Lempérière G, Tissut M, Ravanel P (2007) Biological traits and feeding capacity of Agriotes larvae (Coleoptera: Elateridae): a trial of seed coating to control larval populations with the insecticide fipronil. Pestic Biochem Physiol 90(2):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J, Cherry R, Daroub S (2019) Attraction of the corn wireworm, Melanotus communis (Coleoptera: Elateridae), to carbon dioxide. J Agric Urban Entomol 35(1):30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doane JF, Lee YW, Klingler J, Westcott ND (1975) The orientation response of Ctemcera destructor and other wireworms (Coleoptera: Elateridae) to germinating grain and to carbon dioxide. Can Entomol 107(12):1233–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham RW, Froese PS, Carter AH (2014) Tolerance of wheat (Poales: Poaceae) seedlings to wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae). J Econ Entomol 107(2):833–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirfman GW, Keaster AJ, Story RN (1986) An improved wireworm (Coleoptera: Elateridae) sampling technique for Midwest cornfields. J Kansas Entomol Soc 59(1):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • La Forgia D, Thibord JB, Larroudé P, Francis F, Lognay G, Verheggen F (2020) Linking variety-dependent root volatile organic compounds in maize with differential infestation by wireworms. J Pest Sci 93:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Forgia D, Bruno P, Campos-Herrera R, Turlings TC, Verheggen F (2021) The lure of hidden death: development of an attract-and-kill strategy against Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) combining semiochemicals and entomopathogenic nematodes. Turk J Zool. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-2106-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landl M, Glauninger J (2013) Preliminary investigations into the use of trap crops to control Agriotes spp. (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in potato crops. J Pest Sci 86:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Sandhi RK, Briar SS, Miller JH, Reddy GV (2019) Assessing the performance of pea and lentil at different seeding densities as trap crops for the management of wireworms in spring wheat. J Appl Entomol 143(4):460–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Jaronski S, Reddy GV (2020) Impact of granular carriers to improve the efficacy of entomopathogenic fungi against wireworms in spring wheat. J Pest Sci 93(1):275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudacher K, Schallhart N, Thalinger B, Wallinger C, Juen A, Traugott M (2013) Plant diversity affects behavior of generalist root herbivores, reduces crop damage, and enhances crop yield. Ecol Appl 23(5):1135–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thibord J-B (2017) Evaluation de la nuisibilité des ravageurs du maïs en France – CIRAA, Conférence Internationale sur les Ravageurs et Auxiliaires en Agriculture, Montpellier, France, 22–24 octobre 2017. Asso. Fr. de Protection des Plantes (AFPP). https://www.vegephyl.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/CIRAA2017_01_06_THIBORD_JEAN_BAPTISTE.pdf/ (accessed online on December 4, 2022)

  • Traugott M, Benefer CM, Blackshaw RP, van Herk WG, Vernon RS (2015) Biology, ecology, and control of elaterid beetles in agricultural land. Annu Rev Entomol 60:313–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon RS (2005) Aggregation and mortality of Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) at insecticide-treated trap crops of wheat. J Econ Entomol 98(6):1999–2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon RS, Kabaluk T, Behringer A (2000) Movement of Agriotes obscurus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in strawberry (Rosaceae) plantings with wheat (Gramineae) as a trap crop. Can Entomol 132(2):231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon RS, van Herk WG, Clodius M, Tolman J (2015) Companion planting attract-and-kill method for wireworm management in potatoes. J Pest Sci 89(2):375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed with financial support from the Compte d’Affectation Spécial pour le Développement Agricole et Rural (CASDAR; the Dedicated Account for Agricultural and Rural Development) of the French Ministry of Agriculture and Food and the French Biodiversity Agency, through support for the STARTAUP Project (The ECOPHYTO II Project managed by INRAE) and from SEMAE, through support for the TAUPINLAND Project. We thank the suppliers for providing the bait granules without active ingredient and the experimenters who believed in the baiting strategy and performed the many experiments described here, making it possible to glimpse possibilities for a new strategy for protecting maize against wireworms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-B. Thibord.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Todd Kabaluk.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thibord, JB., Larroude, P. Baiting to protect maize against wireworms. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 17, 507–515 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-09971-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-09971-y

Keywords

Navigation