Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal seismic design of reinforced concrete structures under time-history earthquake loads using an intelligent hybrid algorithm

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A reliable seismic-resistant design of structures is achieved in accordance with the seismic design codes by designing structures under seven or more pairs of earthquake records. Based on the recommendations of seismic design codes, the average time-history responses (ATHR) of structure is required. This paper focuses on the optimal seismic design of reinforced concrete (RC) structures against ten earthquake records using a hybrid of particle swarm optimization algorithm and an intelligent regression model (IRM). In order to reduce the computational time of optimization procedure due to the computational efforts of time-history analyses, IRM is proposed to accurately predict ATHR of structures. The proposed IRM consists of the combination of the subtractive algorithm (SA), K-means clustering approach and wavelet weighted least squares support vector machine (WWLS-SVM). To predict ATHR of structures, first, the input-output samples of structures are classified by SA and K-means clustering approach. Then, WWLS-SVM is trained with few samples and high accuracy for each cluster. 9- and 18-storey RC frames are designed optimally to illustrate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed IRM. The numerical results demonstrate the efficiency and computational advantages of IRM for optimal design of structures subjected to time-history earthquake loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI 318 Committee (2011), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, Michigan, American Concrete Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balling RJ and Yao X (1997), “Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 123: 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calisir D and Dogantekin E (2011), “An Automatic Diabetes Diagnosis System Based on LDA-wavelet Support Vector Machine Classifier,” Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 8311–8315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp CV, Pezeshk S and Hansson H (2003), “Flexural Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using a Genetic Algorithm,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 129: 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu SL (1994), “Fuzzy Model Identification Based on Cluster Estimation,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2: 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coello Coello CA (2002), “Theoretical and Numerical Constraint-handling Techniques Used with Evaluation Algorithms: A Survey of the State of Art,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191: 1245–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadaee MJ and Grierson DE (1996), “Design Optimization of 3D Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 12: 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadaee MJ and Grierson DE (1998), “Design Optimization of 3D Reinforced Concrete Structures Having Shear Walls,” Engineering Computation, 14: 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharehbaghi S and Fadaee MJ (2012), “Design Optimization of RC Frames under Earthquake Loads,” International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 2: 459–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharehbaghi S, Salajegheh E and Khatibinia M (2011), “Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Moment Resistant Frames Based on Uniform Hysteretic Energy Distribution,” Proceeding of the 1st International Conference on Urban Construction in the Vicinity of Active Faults, Tabriz, Iran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gharehbaghi S, Salajegheh E and Khatibinia M (2012), “Evaluation of Seismic Energy Demand of Reinforced Concrete Moment Resistant Frames Considering Soil- Structure Interaction Effects,” Proceeding of the Eleventh International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, B.H.V. Topping, (Editor), Civil-Comp Press, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh S and Salajegheh E (2009), “Optimal Design of Structures Subjected to Time-history Loading by Swarm Intelligence and an Advanced Metamodel,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 198: 2936–2949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh S and Salajegheh E (2010), “Optimal Seismic Design of Steel Structures by an Efficient Soft Computing Based Algorithm,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66: 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra A and Kiousis PD (2006), “Design Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Computers and Structures, 3, 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A and Sabzi O (2012), “Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Big Bang-big Crunch Algorithm,” International Journal of Civil Engineering, IUST, 10: 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J and Eberhart RC (2001), Swarm Intelligence, Academic Press, San Diego, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatibinia M, Fadaee MJ, Salajegheh J and Salajegheh E (2013a), “Seismic Reliability Assessment of RC Structures Including Soil-structure Interaction Using Wavelet Weighted Least Squares Support Vector Machine,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 110: 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatibinia M and Khosravi S (2014), “A hybrid Approach Based on an Improved Gravitational Search Algorithm and Orthogonal Crossover for Optimal Shape Design of Concrete Gravity Dams,” Applied Soft Computing 16: 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatibinia M, Salajegheh E, Salajegheh J and Fadaee MJ (2013b), “Reliability-based Design Optimization of RC Structures Including Soil-structure Interaction Using a Discrete Gravitational Search Algorithm and a Proposed Metamodel,” Engineering Optimization, 45: 1147–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamoorthy CS and Munro J (1973), “Linear Program for Optimal Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames, Proceedings of IABSE, III: 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak HG and Kim J (2008), “Optimum Design of Reinforced Concrete Plane Frames Based on Predetermined Section Database,” Computer-aid ed Design, 40: 396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C and Ahn J (2003), “Flexural Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames by Genetic Algorithm,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 129: 762–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen JB (1967), “Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations,” Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, I: 281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinet RK, Morlet J and Grossmann A (1987), “Analysis of Sound Patterns through Wavelet Transforms,” International Journal of Pattern Recognition, 1: 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB (2010), The Language of Technical Computing, Math Works Inc,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckay MD, Beckman RJ and Conover WJ (1979), “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values on Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code,” Technometrics, 21: 439–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moharrami H and Grierson DE (1993), “Computer Automated Design of Reinforced Concrete Frameworks,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119: 2036–2058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OpenSEES (2012), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, Berkeley, (Release 2. 3.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paiva RP and Dourado R (2001), “Structure and Parameter Learning of Neuro-fuzzy Systems: a Methodology and a Comparative Study,” Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 11: 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEER Strong Motion Database (2012), http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/index.html.

  • Rajeev S and Krishnamoorthy CS (1992), “Discrete Optimization of Structures Using Genetic Algorithm,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 118(5): 1233–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajeev S and Krishnamoorthy CS (1998), “Genetic Algorithm-based Methodology for Design Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames,” Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13: 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salajegheh E, Gholizadeh S and Khatibinia M (2008), “Optimal Design of Structures for Earthquake Loads by a Hybrid RBF-BPSO Method,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 7: 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salajegheh E and Heidari A (2005), “Optimum Design of Structures against Earthquake by Wavelet Neural Network and Filter Banks,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic, 34(1): 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salajegheh E, Salajegheh J, Seyedpoor SM and Khatibinia M (2009), “Optimal Design of Geometrically Nonlinear Space Trusses Using Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference System,” Scientia Iranica, 16: 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharafi P, Hadi MNS and Teh LH (2012), “Heuristic Approach for Optimum Cost and Layout Design of 3D Reinforced Concrete Frames,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 138: 853–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y and Eberhart RC (1997), “A Modified Particle Swarm Optimizer,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard No. 2800 (2007), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, Building and Housing Research Center, 3rd Edition, Iran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suykens JAK, Brabanter JD, Lukas L and Vandewalle J (2002), “Weighted Least Squares Support Vector Machines: Robustness and Sparse Approximation,” Neurocomputing, 48: 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UBC (1997), Uniform Building Code, International Conference of Building Official, Whittier, California, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Val D, Bljuger F and Yankelevsky D (1996), “Optimization Problem Solution in Reliability Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Computers an d Structures, 60: 351–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q (2011), “Hybrid Model Based on Wavelet Support Vector Machine and Modified Genetic Algorithm Penalizing Gaussian Noises for Power Load Forecasts,” Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavar M, Rahati S, Akbarzadeh MR, and Ghasemifard H (2011), “Evolutionary Model Selection in a Waveletbased Support Vector Machine for Automated Seizure Detection,” Expert Systems with Applications, 38: 10751–10758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Zhou W and Jiao L (2004), “Wavelet Support Vector Machine,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 34: 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadjad Gharehbaghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gharehbaghi, S., Khatibinia, M. Optimal seismic design of reinforced concrete structures under time-history earthquake loads using an intelligent hybrid algorithm. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 14, 97–109 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0009-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0009-2

Keywords

Navigation