Skip to main content
Log in

\(C^0\)-robustness of topological entropy for geodesic flows

  • Published:
Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we study the regularity of topological entropy, as a function on the space of Riemannian metrics endowed with the \(C^0\) topology. We establish several instances of entropy robustness (persistence of positive entropy after small \(C^0\) perturbations). A large part of this paper is dedicated to metrics on the two-dimensional torus, for which our main results are that metrics with a contractible closed geodesic have robust entropy (thus, generalizing and quantifying a result of Denvir–Mackay) and that metrics with robust positive entropy on the torus are \(C^{\infty }\) generic. Moreover, we quantify the asymptotic behavior of volume entropy in the Teichmüller space of hyperbolic metrics on a punctured torus, which bounds from below the topological entropy for these metrics. For general closed manifolds of dimension at least 2, we prove that the set of metrics with robust and large positive entropy is \(C^0\)-large in the sense that it is dense and contains cones and arbitrarily large balls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Moreover, the logarithms of these quantities are Lipschitz with respect to \(d_{C^0}\).

  2. We note that the continuity and local robustness results for \(h_{\mathrm {top}}\) in this paper still hold when considering \(d_\mathrm{RBM}\) instead of \(d_{C^0}\).

  3. In fact, it is an embedding into the space of metrics with fixed volume and diameter bounded by a fixed constant.

  4. To guarantee that we can find a uniform bound on the number of corners one uses that \((S,g_0)\) has geodesic boundary and that its convexity radius is therefore positive.

  5. Indeed, if a and b are both bounded and, we see that \(\cosh L_2\) is eventually negative as \(\gamma \rightarrow 0\), which is absurd. If only a tends to \(+\infty \) and b stays bounded, the same argument also applies because \(\cosh a\) is arbitrarily close to \(\sinh a\), when a tends to \(+\infty \).

  6. We use this setting to avoid working in the Fréchet manifold \(C^\infty (S^1,M)\). However, by bootstrapping every geodesic ends up being smooth.

References

  1. Abbondandolo, A., Alves, M. R. R., Saglam, M., Schlenk, F.: Entropy collapse versus entropy rigidity for Reeb and Finsler flows. Preprint arXiv:2103.01144 (2021)

  2. Alves, M.R.R.: Cylindrical contact homology and topological entropy. Geom. Topol. 20(6), 3519–3569 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alves, M.R.R., Meiwes, M.: Braid stability and the Hofer metric. Preprint arXiv:2112.11351 (2021)

  4. Angenent, S.: Parabolic equations for curves on surfaces. I. Curves with \(p\)-integrable curvature. Ann. Math. (2) 132(3), 451–483 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Angenent, S.: Parabolic equations for curves on surfaces. II. Intersections, blow-up and generalized solutions. Ann. Math. (2) 133(1), 171–215 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Angenent, S.: Curve shortening and the topology of closed geodesics on surfaces. Ann. Math. (2) 162(3), 1187–1241 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Alves, M.R.R., Pirnapasov, A.: Reeb orbits that force topological entropy. Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, pp. 1–44 (2021)

  8. Balacheff, F., Merlin, L.: A curvature-free log\((2k-1)\) theorem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (2020)

  9. Bott, R.: Nondegenerate critical manifolds. Ann. Math. 2(60), 248–261 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolotin, S.V., Rabinowitz, P.H.: Some geometrical conditions for the existence of chaotic geodesics on a torus. Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 22(5), 1407–1428 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Burtscher, A.Y.: Length structures on manifolds with continuous Riemannian metrics. N. Y. J. Math. 21, 273–296 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Buser, P.: Geometry and spectra of compact Riemann surfaces. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 106. Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Burns, K., Weiss, H.: Spheres with positive curvature and nearly dense orbits for the geodesic flow. Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 22(2), 329–348 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Chor, A., Meiwes, M.: Hofer’s geometry and topological entropy. Preprint arXiv:2112.04955 (2021)

  15. Contreras, G.: Regularity of topological and metric entropy of hyperbolic flows. Math. Z. 210(1), 97–111 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahinden, L.: \({C}^0\)-stability of topological entropy for contactomorphisms. Commun. Cont. Math. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199721500152

  17. de la Harpe, P.: Topics in Geometric Group Theory. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Denvir, J., MacKay, R.S.: Consequences of contractible geodesics on surfaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 350(11), 4553–4568 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Donnay, V.J.: Transverse homoclinic connections for geodesic flows. In: Hamiltonian dynamical systems (Cincinnati, OH, 1992), volume 63 of IMA Vol. Math. Appl., pages 115–125. Springer, New York, (1995)

  20. Glasmachers, E., Knieper, G.: Minimal geodesic foliation on \(T^2\) in case of vanishing topological entropy. J. Topol. Anal. 3(4), 511–520 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Grayson, M.A.: Shortening embedded curves. Ann. Math. (2) 129(1), 71–111 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Hartman, P.: Geodesic parallel coordinates in the large. Am. J. Math. 86, 705–727 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Hedlund, G.A.: Geodesics on a two-dimensional Riemannian manifold with periodic coefficients. Ann. Math. (2) 33(4), 719–739 (1932)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Jost, J.: Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis. Universitext, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Katok, A., Knieper, G., Weiss, H.: Formulas for the derivative and critical points of topological entropy for Anosov and geodesic flows. Comm. Math. Phys. 138(1), 19–31 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Klingenberg, W.: Lectures on closed geodesics. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 230. Springer, Berlin (1978)

  27. Manning, A.: Topological entropy for geodesic flows. Ann. Math. (2) 110(3), 567–573 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Mattila, P.: Geometry of sets and measures in Euclidean spaces. volume 44 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).. (Fractals and rectifiability)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Meiwes, M.: Rabinowitz Floer homology, leafwise intersections, and topological entropy. PhD thesis, (2018)

  30. Milnor, J.: Is entropy effectively computable? https://www.math.iupui.edu/~mmisiure/open/JM1.pdf, (2002)

  31. Mañé, R.: On the topological entropy of geodesic flows. J. Differ. Geom. 45(1), 74–93 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Morse, H.M.: A fundamental class of geodesics on any closed surface of genus greater than one. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 26(1), 25–60 (1924)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Nabutovsky, A.: Morse landscapes of Riemannian functionals and related problems. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Volume II, pages 862–881. Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi, (2010)

  34. Newhouse, S.E.: Continuity properties of entropy. Ann. Math. (2) 129(2), 215–235 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Oancea, A.: Morse theory, closed geodesics, and the homology of free loop spaces. In: Free loop spaces in geometry and topology, volume 24 of IRMA Lect. Math. Theor. Phys., pages 67–109. Eur. Math. Soc., Zürich, 2015. With an appendix by Umberto Hryniewicz

  36. Paternain, G.P.: On the topology of manifolds with completely integrable geodesic flows. Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst. 12(1), 109–121 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Petroll, D.: Existenz und Transversalität von homoklinen und heteroklinen Orbits beim geodätischen Fluss. Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Freiburg, (1996)

  38. Shiohama, K., Shioya, T., Tanaka, M.: The Geometry of Total Curvature on Complete Open Surfaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 159. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Schapira, B., Tapie, S.: Regularity of entropy, geodesic currents and entropy at infinity. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 54(1), 1–68 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Sullivan, D.: The density at infinity of a discrete group of hyperbolic motions. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 50, 171–202 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Stojisavljević, V., Zhang, J.: Persistence Modules, Symplectic Banach-Mazur Distance and Riemannian Metrics. arXiv:1810.11151 (2019)

  42. Usher, M.: Symplectic Banach-Mazur distances between subsets in \({\mathbb{C}}^n\). J. Topol. Anal. 14(1), 1–56 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo R. R. Alves.

Additional information

To Claude Viterbo on the occasion of his 60th birthday.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

M. R. R. Alves was supported by the ERC consolidator grant 646649 “SymplecticEinstein” and by the Senior Postdoctoral fellowship of the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) in fundamental research 1286921N.

L. Dahinden was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy EXC-2181/1-390900948 (the Heidelberg STRUCTURES Excellence Cluster).

M. Meiwes was supported by RWTH Aachen University and the Chair for Geometry and Analysis of the RWTH Aachen University.

L. Merlin was supported by RWTH Aachen University and the Chair for Geometry and Analysis of the RWTH Aachen University.

This article is part of the topical collection “Symplectic geometry—A Festschrift in honour of Claude Viterbo’s 60th birthday” edited by Helmut Hofer, Alberto Abbondandolo, Urs Frauenfelder, and Felix Schlenk.

Appendix A. Robustness of non-degenerate length spectrum

Appendix A. Robustness of non-degenerate length spectrum

Here, we prove Proposition 7. The aim is to use only a low amount of technology.

Remark 45

Unfortunately, one cannot say anything about the position of the geodesic that is found by Proposition 7. \(\square \)

Before we start the proof, let us fix the setup: Let (Mg) be a closed Riemannian manifold. Denote by \(\Omega =H^1(S^1,M)\) the Hilbert manifoldFootnote 6 of closed loops in M. The non-constant critical points of the energy functional \({\mathcal {E}}_g:\gamma \mapsto \frac{1}{2}\int _0^1 g(\dot{\gamma },\dot{\gamma })\;{\text {d}}t\) are exactly the closed geodesics. The negative gradient flow \(\varphi _g^t\) of \({\mathcal {E}}_g\) has the Palais–Smale property in this space. Denote the sublevel set \(\{\gamma \in \Omega \mid {\mathcal {E}}_g(\gamma )\leqslant a\}\) by \(\Omega ^a_g\).

That \(\gamma \) is non-constant and non-degenerate means that the connected component of \({\text {Crit}}{\mathcal {E}}_g\) containing \(\gamma \) is a circle and Morse–Bott. If all geodesics are non-degenerate, then the energy spectrum is discrete. The following statement describes what happens topologically at a critical energy level.

Proposition 46

([9], see also [35]) Assume that \(c\in (a,b)\) is the only critical value in [ab]. Denote \(N_1,\ldots ,N_r\) the components of \({\text {Crit}}({\mathcal {E}})\) with \({\mathcal {E}}(N_i)=c\) and with indices \(\lambda _1,\ldots ,\lambda _r\). Assume they are Morse–Bott. Then

  • Each manifold \(N_i\) carries a well defined vector bundle \(\nu ^-N_i\subset T\Omega |_{N_i}\) of rank \(\lambda _i\) consisting of negative directions of \(d^2 {\mathcal {E}}_g\).

  • The sublevel set \(\Omega ^b_g\) retracts onto a space homeomorphic to \(\Omega ^a_g\) with the disc bundles \(D\nu ^-N_i\) disjointly attached to \(\Omega ^a_g\) along their boundaries.

  • The retraction \(r:\Omega ^b_g\rightarrow \Omega ^a_g\bigcup _{\partial D\nu ^-N_i} D\nu ^-N_i\) can be chosen such that \({\mathcal {E}}_g\circ r\leqslant {\mathcal {E}}_g\) and such that \(r|_{N_i}=id\) and \(r|_{\Omega ^a_g}=id\).

Remark 47

This proposition gives inductive instructions to build a CW-complex homotopy equivalent to \(\Omega \). The building blocks are disk bundles, which are cell complexes. The retraction maps inductively provide the attaching maps.

Since we are only interested in the topology, we use the term topologically non-degenerate for a curve for which the conclusions of Proposition 46 hold:

Definition 48

We assume that \(c\ne 0\) is the only critical value in (ab). Denote \(N_i\) the components of \({\text {Crit}}({\mathcal {E}})\) and assume that they are all isolated circles representing reparametrizations of non-constant closed geodesic \(\gamma _i\) with energy c.

Then, we call \(\gamma _i\) topologically non-degenerate if there are vector bundles \(\nu ^-N_i\subseteq T\Omega |_N\) such that the sublevel set \(\Omega _g^b\) retracts onto a space homeomorphic to \(\Omega _g^a\) with the disc bundles \(D\nu ^-N_i\) attached to \(\Omega _g^a\) along the boundary via a retraction r with \({\mathcal {E}}_g\circ r\leqslant {\mathcal {E}}_g\) and such that \(r|_{N_i}=id\) and \(r|_{\Omega _g^a}=id\). \(\square \)

Remark 49

The assumption that the spectral value is isolated is actually too strong for our purpose; It would suffice to demand in Theorem 5 that a topologically non-degenerate \(\gamma \) be isolated in the space of loops. The proof below would then work by localizing the gradient flow. One can do this by multiplying the gradient vector field with a bump function around a neighborhood of \(N_i\) that is flow-invariant in the intended energy interval, and that separates \(\gamma \) from other geodesics. The argument would become much more complicated as the resulting flows only locally transport the respective sub-level sets into each other.

We shall use a minimax principle. We use the following formulation from Klingenberg [26]. A flow-family \({\mathcal {A}}\) for \({\mathcal {E}}_g\) is a collection of subsets of \(\Omega \) such that \({\mathcal {E}}_g|_{A}\) is bounded for all \(A\in {\mathcal {A}}\) and such that \(A\in {\mathcal {A}}\) implies \(\varphi _g^t A\in {\mathcal {A}}\) for \(t\geqslant 0\).

Proposition 50

([26, Theorem 2.1.1]) Let \({\mathcal {A}}\) be a flow-family for \({\mathcal {E}}_g\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} \inf _{A\in {\mathcal {A}}}\sup _{A} {\mathcal {E}}_g \end{aligned}$$

is a critical value of \({\mathcal {E}}_g\).

Proof of Proposition 7

We use Proposition 46 to define a suitable flow-family. For simplicity, assume that there is only one critical component. For Proposition 7 it is enough to consider the case \(N_1=N\cong S^1\). The fundamental class of the transverse bundle relative its boundary \([D\nu ^-N;\partial D\nu ^-N]\) has nonempty intersection with the core N since it has nonempty intersection with any interior point. By extension the same is true for the class \(\omega :=[\Omega ^a_g\bigcup _{\partial D\nu ^-N}D\nu ^-N;\Omega ^a_g]\). Denote by \(r^*\omega \) the set of maps \(u:(D\nu ^-N;\partial D\nu ^-N)\rightarrow (\Omega ^b_g,\Omega ^a_g)\) such that \([r\circ u]=\omega \). Then, the set of images of \(u\in r^*\omega \) defines a flow-family.

The minimax value for \(r^*\omega \) is the critical value c:

$$\begin{aligned} \inf _{u\in r^*\omega }\max {\mathcal {E}}_g\circ u \geqslant \inf _{u\in r^*\omega } \max {\mathcal {E}}_g\circ r\circ u \geqslant {\mathcal {E}}_g(N)=c. \end{aligned}$$

The other inequality is trivial since \({\mathcal {E}}_g\) restricted to the unstable disk bundle of N has maximum c.

The robustness statement now follows by using the very same retraction r to define a flow family for the perturbed metric \(\widetilde{g}\): Let \(\varepsilon >0\) be so small that c is the only critical value of \(\mathcal E_g\) in \([(1-3\varepsilon )c,(1+3\varepsilon )c]\). Let \(\widetilde{g}\) be a metric such that \(\Vert v\Vert ^2_{\widetilde{g}}\in (1-\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon ,1+\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon )\Vert v\Vert ^2_{g}\) for all v. Note that for such \(\varepsilon \) the following chain of inclusions holds

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^{(1-2\varepsilon )c}_{\widetilde{g}}\subseteq \Omega ^{(1-\varepsilon )c}_{g}\subseteq \Omega ^c_g\subseteq \Omega ^{(1+\varepsilon )c}_{\widetilde{g}}\subseteq \Omega ^{(1+2\varepsilon )c}_{g}. \end{aligned}$$

Let \(r:\Omega ^{(1+2\varepsilon )c}_g\rightarrow \Omega ^{(1-\varepsilon )c}_g\bigcup _{\partial D\nu ^-N} D\nu ^-N\) be the retraction constructed with \(\varphi _g^t\) and \(r^*\omega \) the class described above. Define the subset \(\widetilde{\omega }\subset r^*\omega \) by restriction of the target space \(u:(D\nu ^-N;\partial D\nu ^-N)\rightarrow (\Omega ^{(1+\varepsilon )c}_{\widetilde{g}},\Omega ^{(1-2\varepsilon )c}_{\widetilde{g}})\). The set of images of maps in \(\widetilde{\omega }\) is a flow-family for \(\varphi _{\widetilde{g}}^t\) since it is defined through sub-level sets of \({\mathcal {E}}_{\widetilde{g}}\), and it is nonempty since it contains the \(\varphi _g^t\)-unstable disk bundle around N. We have

$$\begin{aligned} \inf _{u\in \widetilde{\omega }}\max {\mathcal {E}}_{\widetilde{g}}\circ u \geqslant \inf \max _{u\in \widetilde{\omega }} (1-\varepsilon ){\mathcal {E}}_{g} \circ u \geqslant (1-\varepsilon )c. \end{aligned}$$

On the other hand for u the \(\varphi ^t_g\)-unstable disk bundle around N we have \(\max {\mathcal {E}}_{\widetilde{g}}\circ u\leqslant (1+\varepsilon )c\). Thus, the minimax principle produces some geodesic \(\widetilde{\gamma }\) of \({\mathcal {E}}_{\widetilde{g}}\) with energy \(|{\mathcal {E}}_{\widetilde{g}}(\widetilde{\gamma })-c|\leqslant \varepsilon c\).

Note that for any u in the flow-family, every path in the image of u is homotopic to a loop in N since the intersection of u and N is nonempty. Thus, also \(\widetilde{\gamma }\) is homotopic to the unperturbed geodesic. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alves, M.R.R., Dahinden, L., Meiwes, M. et al. \(C^0\)-robustness of topological entropy for geodesic flows. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 24, 42 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-022-00959-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-022-00959-4

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation