Skip to main content
Log in

Total variation image reconstruction algorithm based on non-convex function

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The total variation method has been widely used because it can preserve important sharp edges and target boundaries in the image, but one of its shortcomings is that the \(L_{1}\) norm would cause excessive punishment. To overcome excessive penalization, suppress step effects, and maintain a clean contour, this article introduces the \(L_{q}\) non-convex function to design a new regularization term and proposes a new non-convex variational model. For non-convex variational optimization problems, the algorithm employs the alternating direction method of multipliers to obtain optimal approximate solutions, and rigorous convergence proofs are provided based on rich mathematical theory. By comparing with advanced fractional-order and other total variation recovery algorithms, it can be observed that this algorithm achieves better visual effects and quantitative analysis results on images with complex texture structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Algorithm 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Interested researchers can contact the author [contact email] to obtain the corresponding data and code.

References

  1. Minaee, S., Boykov, Y., Porikli, F., et al.: Image segmentation using deep learning: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44(7), 3523–3542 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Masana, M., Liu, X., Twardowski, B., et al.: Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classification. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45(5), 5513–5533 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bi, S., Li, M., Cai, G.: Mixed fractional-Order and high-order adaptive image denoising algorithm based on weight selection function. Fractal Fract. 7(7), 566 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma, J., Chen, J., Ng, M., et al.: Loss odyssey in medical image segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 71, 102035 (2021)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D 60(1–4), 259–268 (1992)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, J., Huang, T.Z., Selesnick, I.W., et al.: Image restoration using total variation with overlapping group sparsity. Inf. Sci. 295, 232–246 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, T.F., Osher, S., Shen, J.: The digital TV filter and nonlinear denoising. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(2), 231–241 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tian, D., Xue, D., Wang, D.: A fractional-order adaptive regularization primal-dual algorithm for image denoising. Inf. Sci. 296, 147–159 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, K., Simon, S.: Bilateral spectrum weighted total variation for noisy-image super-resolution and image denoising. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 69, 6329–6341 (2021)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, D., Chen, Y.Q., Xue, D.: Fractional-order total variation image denoising based on proximity algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 257, 537–545 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotera J, \(\breve{s}\)roubek F, Milanfar P.: Blind deconvolution using alternating maximum a posteriori estimation with heavy-tailed priors. In: Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns: 15th International Conference, CAIP: York, UK, August 27–29, 2013, Proceedings, Part II 15, pp. 59–66. Springer, Berlin (2013)

  12. Chartrand, R.: Nonconvex splitting for regularized low-rank+ sparse decomposition. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 60(11), 5810–5819 (2012)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, X., Wang, L.: Fast half-quadratic algorithm for image restoration and reconstruction. Appl. Math. Model. 50, 92–104 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikolova, M., Ng, M.K., Tam, C.P.: Fast nonconvex nonsmooth minimization methods for image restoration and reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 19(12), 3073–3088 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., Ma, R., Zeng, X., et al.: An efficient non-convex total variation approach for image deblurring and denoising. Appl. Math. Comput. 397, 125977 (2021)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, X., Sun, T.: Hybrid non-convex regularizers model for removing multiplicative noise. Comput. Math. Appl. 126, 182–195 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lian, W., Liu, X.: Non-convex fractional-order TV model for impulse noise removal. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 417, 114615 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, B., Zhu, G., Zhu, Z., et al.: Alternating direction method of multipliers for nonconvex log total variation image restoration. Appl. Math. Model. 114, 338–359 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gabay, D., Mercier, B.: A dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite element approximation. Comput. Math. Appl. 2(1), 17–40 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bertsekas, D., Tsitsiklis, J.: Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods. Athena Scientific, Nashua (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Y., Yin, W., Zeng, J.: Global convergence of ADMM in nonconvex nonsmooth optimization. J. Sci. Comput. 78, 29–63 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, J., Huang, T.Z., Zhao, X.L., et al.: A novel non-convex low-rank tensor approximation model for hyperspectral image restoration. Appl. Math. Comput. 408, 126342 (2021)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu, J., Wei, Y., Wei, J., et al.: A non-convex hybrid overlapping group sparsity model with hyper-Laplacian prior for multiplicative noise. Fractal Fract. 7(4), 336 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mei, J.J., Dong, Y., Huang, T.Z., et al.: Cauchy noise removal by nonconvex ADMM with convergence guarantees. J. Sci. Comput. 74, 743–766 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohammed, S., Honarvar, M., Zeng, Q., et al.: Model-based quantitative elasticity reconstruction using ADMM. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 41(11), 3039–3052 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyu, Q., Lin, Z., She, Y., et al.: A comparison of typical \(\ell p\) minimization algorithms. Neurocomputing 119, 413–424 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ekeland, I., Temam, R.: Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar, A., Ahmad, M.O., Swamy, M.N.S.: Image denoising based on fractional gradient vector flow and overlapping group sparsity as priors. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30, 7527–7540 (2021)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wen, Y.W., Chan, R.H., Zeng, T.Y.: Primal-dual algorithms for total variation based image restoration under Poisson noise. Sci. China Math. 59, 141–160 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Pang, Z.F., Zhang, H.L., Luo, S., et al.: Image denoising based on the adaptive weighted TVp regularization. Signal Process. 167, 107325 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Guo, J., Chen, Q.: Image denoising based on nonconvex anisotropic total-variation regularization. Signal Process. 186, 108124 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this study was received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12361037) and the High Quality Postgraduate Courses of Yunnan Province (109920210027).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BS, CG and LM contributed to conceptualization, software, data curation and supervision; BS was responsible for methodology, formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing and project administration; BS and CG were involved in validation; BS and ZX took part in visualization; and CG acquired in funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangcheng Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

In our research, we adhere to relevant ethical committees, internal review boards, and guidelines, and have obtained consent from participants and publication consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bi, S., Li, M., Cai, G. et al. Total variation image reconstruction algorithm based on non-convex function. SIViP (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-024-03089-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-024-03089-1

Keywords

Navigation