Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of process-induced damage based on dynamic recrystallization during hot caliber rolling

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The amount of damage induced during hot forming depends not only on the stress state but also on material softening due to dynamic recrystallization (DRX), which can be used to delay or reduce damage initiation. An extension to the Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) model has been proposed recently that includes a new coupled DRX-damage nucleation criterion taking DRX and the stress state into account. In the present paper, a 4-pass caliber rolling process is considered where the bar stock is rotated by 90° after each rolling pass. The extended GTN model is applied to the caliber rolling process to predict the internal damage induced during the rolling process. The simulation results show that the highest void volume fraction (VVF) occurs during the first rolling pass. However, the variations of stress state during each pass assist in reducing the damage in the subsequent passes. The material softening due to increasing DRX in subsequent passes also helps to reduce the void nucleation. The microscopic analysis of the rolled bar confirms the damage distribution predicted by the simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ervasti E, Ståhlberg U (2005) Void initiation close to a macro-inclusion during single pass reductions in the hot rolling of steel slabs: a numerical study. J Mater Process Technol 170(1–2):142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Børvik T, Hopperstad O, Berstad T et al (2001) A computational model of viscoplasticity and ductile damage for impact and penetration. Eur J Mech A Solids 20(5):685–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchely M, Aken D, O’Malley R et al (2017) Hot rolling effect upon the high temperature Johnson–Cook strength and failure models for a 15V38 grade steel. In: MS&T17, pp 1045–1053

  5. Oyane M, Sato T, Okimoto K et al (1980) Criteria for ductile fracture and their applications. J Mech Work Technol 4(1):65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang C, Geijselaers H, Omerspahic E et al (2016) Influence of ring growth rate on damage development in hot ring rolling. J Mater Process Technol 227:268–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Novella MF, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S et al (2015) Ductile damage modeling at elevated temperature applied to the cross wedge rolling of AA6082-T6 bars. J Mater Process Technol 222:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X, Chandrashekhara K, Rummel SA et al (2017) Modeling of mass flow behavior of hot rolled low alloy steel based on combined Johnson–Cook and Zerilli–Armstrong model. J Mater Sci 52(5):2800–2815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon HC, Lee HW, Kim HY et al (2009) Surface wrinkle defect of carbon steel in the hot bar rolling process. J Mater Process Technol 209(9):4476–4483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakai T, Satio Y, Hirano K et al (1988) Deformation and recrystallization behavior of low carbon steel in high speed hot rolling. Trans Iron Steel Inst Jpn 28(12):1028–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tekkaya AE, Ben Khalifa N, Hering O et al (2017) Forming-induced damage and its effects on product properties. CIRP Ann 66(1):281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32(1):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farrugia DCJ (2006) Prediction and avoidance of high temperature damage in long product hot rolling. J Mater Process Technol 177(1–3):486–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ying L, Liu W, Wang D et al (2016) Ductile failure analysis of high strength steel in hot forming based on micromechanical damage model. MATEC Web Conf 80(15):3002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Imran M, Bambach M (2018) Towards the damage evaluation using Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman (GTN) model for hot forming processes. In: Proceedings of the 21st international ESAFORM conference on material forming: ESAFORM 2018, p 170006

  16. Imran M, Szyndler J, Afzal MJ et al (2019) Dynamic recrystallization-dependent damage modeling during hot forming. Int J Damage Mech 55:105678951984847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bambach M, Imran M (2019) Extended Gurson–Tvergaard–Needleman model for damage modeling and control in hot forming. CIRP Ann 68(1):249–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the financial support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) through project A01 (Institute of Metal Forming, RWTH Aachen), B04 (Central Facility for Electron Microscopy, RWTH Aachen) and C03 (Chair of Mechanical Design and Manufacturing, BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg) of the Transregional Collaborative Research (Projektnummer 278868966-TRR 188) on “Damage Controlled Forming Processes”. We also thank the project partners in project S01 (Institute of Forming Technology and Lightweight Construction, TU Dortmund) for providing the original GTN model.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Imran.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imran, M., Afzal, M.J., Buhl, J. et al. Evaluation of process-induced damage based on dynamic recrystallization during hot caliber rolling. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 14, 5–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00932-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-019-00932-0

Keywords

Navigation