Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Al- and Cu-based nanocomposites reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets: Fabrication and characterization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminum and copper matrix nanocomposites reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) were successfully fabricated by a wet mixing method followed by conventional powder metallurgy. The uniform dispersion of GNPs within the metal matrices showed that the wet mixing method has a great potential to be used as a mixing technique. However, by increasing the GNPs content, GNPs agglomeration was more visible. DSC and XRD of Al/GNPs nanocomposites showed that no new phase formed below the melting point of Al. Microstructural observations in both nanocomposites reveal the evident grain refinement effect as a consequence of GNPs addition. The interfacial bonding evaluation shows a poor interfacial bonding between GNPs and Al, while the interfacial bonding between Cu and GNPs is strong enough to improve the properties of the Cu/GNPs nanocomposites. In both composites, the coefficient of thermal expansion decreases as a function of GNPs while, their hardness is improved by increasing the GNPs content as well as their elastic modulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geim A K, Novoselov K S. The rise of graphene. Nature Materials, 2007, 6(3): 183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, et al. The electronic properties of graphene. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2009, 81(1): 109–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Balandin A A. Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. Nature Materials, 2011, 10(8): 569–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Molitor F, Güttinger J, Stampfer C, et al. Electronic properties of graphene nanostructures. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2011, 23(24): 243201

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ovid’ko I A. Review on grain boundaries in graphene. Curved poly- and nanocrystalline graphene structures as new carbon allotropes. Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, 2012, 30(3): 201–224

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rashad M, Pan F, Yu Z, et al. Investigation on microstructural, mechanical and electrochemical properties of aluminum composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2015, 25(5): 460–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rashad M, Pan F, Hu H, et al. Enhanced tensile properties of magnesium composites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2015, 630: 36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rashad M, Pan F, Tang A, et al. Effect of graphene nanoplatelets addition on mechanical properties of pure aluminum using a semipowder method. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2014, 24(2): 101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao D, et al. Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Progress in Polymer Science, 2010, 35(11): 1350–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Potts J R, Dreyer D R, Bielawski C W, et al. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites. Polymer, 2011, 52(1): 5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tapasztó O, Tapasztó L, Markó M, et al. Dispersion patterns of graphene and carbon nanotubes in ceramic matrix composites. Chemical Physics Letters, 2011, 511(4–6): 340–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker L S, Marotto V R, Rafiee M A, et al. Toughening in graphene ceramic composites. ACS Nano, 2011, 5(4): 3182–3190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kvetková L, Duszová A, Hvizdoš P, et al. Fracture toughness and toughening mechanisms in graphene platelet reinforced Si3N4 composites. Scripta Materialia, 2012, 66(10): 793–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Porwal H, Grasso S, Reece M J. Review of graphene–ceramic matrix composites. Advances in Applied Ceramics, 2013, 112(8): 443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Centeno A, Rocha V G, Alonso B, et al. Graphene for tough and electroconductive alumina ceramics. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2013, 33(15–16): 3201–3210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saboori A, Pavese M, Badini C, et al. Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), 2017 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nieto A, Lahiri D, Agarwal A. Graphene NanoPlatelets reinforced tantalum carbide consolidated by spark plasma sintering. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2013, 582(11): 338–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramirez C, Miranzo P, Belmonte M, et al. Extraordinary toughening enhancement and flexural strength in Si3N4 composites using graphene sheets. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2014, 34(2): 161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan Y, Estili M, Igarashi G, et al. The effect of homogeneously dispersed few-layer graphene on microstructure and mechanical properties of Al2O3 nanocomposites. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2014, 34(2): 443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Li Z, Fan G, et al. Reinforcement with graphene nanosheets in aluminum matrix composites. Scripta Materialia, 2012, 66(8): 594–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen L Y, Konishi H, Fehrenbacher A, et al. Novel nanoprocessing route for bulk graphene nanoplatelets reinforced metal matrix nanocomposites. Scripta Materialia, 2012, 67(1): 29–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koltsova T, Nasibulina L I, Anoshkin I V, et al. New hybrid copper composite materials based on carbon nanostructures. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering B, 2012, 2(4): 240–246

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nasibulin A G, Koltsova T, Nasibulina L I, et al. A novel approach to composite preparation by direct synthesis of carbon nanomaterial on matrix or filler particles. Acta Materialia, 2013, 61(6): 1862–1871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim Y, Lee J, Yeom M S, et al. Strengthening effect of singleatomic- layer graphene in metal–graphene nanolayered composites. Nature Communications, 2013, 4: 2114

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hwang J, Yoon T, Jin S H, et al. Enhanced mechanical properties of graphene/copper nanocomposites using a molecular-level mixing process. Advanced Materials, 2013, 25(46): 6724–6729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuang D, Xu L, Liu L, et al. Graphene–nickel composites. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 273: 484–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rashad M, Pan F, Tang A, et al. Synergetic effect of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs) on mechanical properties of pure magnesium. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2014, 603(9): 111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Neubauer E, Kitzmantel M, Hulman M, et al. Potential and challenges of metal-matrix-composites reinforced with carbon nanofibers and carbon nanotubes. Composites Science and Technology, 2010, 70(16): 2228–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Babu J S S, Prabhakaran Nair K, Unnikrishnan G, et al. Development of aluminum-based hybrid composites with graphite nanofibers/alumina short fibers: processing and characterization. Journal of Composite Materials, 2010, 44(16): 1929–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu J, Khan U, Coleman J, et al. Graphene oxide and graphene nanosheet reinforced aluminium matrix composites: Powder synthesis and prepared composite characteristics. Materials & Design, 2016, 94: 87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mahesh V P, Nair P S, Rajan T P D, et al. Processing of surfacetreated boron carbide-reinforced aluminum matrix composites by liquid-metal stir-casting technique. Journal of Composite Materials, 2011, 45(23): 2371–2378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rohatgi P K, Gupta N, Alaraj S. Thermal expansion of aluminum–fly ash cenosphere composites synthesized by pressure infiltration technique. Journal of Composite Materials, 2006, 40(13): 1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Motozuka S, Tagaya M, Ikoma T, et al. Preparation of copper–graphite composite particles by milling process. Journal of Composite Materials, 2012, 46(22): 2829–2834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Singhal S K, Lal M, Sharma I, et al. Fabrication of copper matrix composites reinforced with carbon nanotubes using a combination of molecular-level-mixing and high energy ball milling. Journal of Composite Materials, 2013, 47(5): 613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jagannadham K. Volume fraction of graphene platelets in copper–graphene composites. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 2013, 44(1): 552–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jagannadham K. Thermal conductivity of copper–graphene composite films synthesized by electrochemical deposition with exfoliated graphene platelets. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B: Process Metallurgy and Materials Processing Science, 2012, 43(2): 316–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rashad M, Pan F, Tang A, et al. Improved strength and ductility of magnesium with addition of aluminum and graphene nanoplatelets (Al+ GNPs) using semi powder metallurgy method. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2015, 23: 243–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saboori A, Novara C, Pavese M, et al. An investigation on the sinterability and the compaction behavior of aluminum/graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) prepared by powder metallurgy. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2017, 26(3): 993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou J, Wang Q, Sun Q, et al. Ferromagnetism in semihydrogenated graphene sheet. Nano Letters, 2009, 9(11): 3867–3870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kwon H, Kawasaki A. In: Attaf B, ed. Advances in Composite Materials for Medicine and Nanotechnology. InTech,2011, 429–444

  41. Jamaati R, Amirkhanlou S, Toroghinejad M R, et al. Comparison of the microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast A356/SiC MMC processed by ARB and CAR methods. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2012, 21(7): 1249–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kovácik J, Emmer Š. Thermal expansion of Cu/graphite composites: effect of copper coating. Kovove Materialy, 2011, 49(6): 411–416

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chawla N, Shen Y. Mechanical behavior of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2001, 3(6): 357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chu K, Jia C. Enhanced strength in bulk graphene–copper composites. Physica Status Solidi A: Applications and Materials Science, 2014, 211(1): 184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J W, et al. Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science, 2008, 321(5887): 385–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dorfman S, Fuks D. Carbon diffusion in copper-based metal matrix composites. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 1995, 51(1): 13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdollah Saboori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saboori, A., Pavese, M., Badini, C. et al. Development of Al- and Cu-based nanocomposites reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets: Fabrication and characterization. Front. Mater. Sci. 11, 171–181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-017-0377-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-017-0377-9

Keywords

Navigation