Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a hydrodynamic model and the corresponding virtual software for dual-loop circulating fluidized beds

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dual-loop circulating fluidized bed (CFB) reactors have been widely applied in industry because of their good heat and mass transfer characteristics and continuous handling ability. However, the design of such reactors is notoriously difficult owing to the poor understanding of the underlying mechanisms, meaning it has been heavily based on empiricism and stepwise experiments. Modeling the gas-solid CFB system requires a quantitative description of the multiscale heterogeneity in the sub-reactors and the strong coupling between them. This article proposed a general method for modeling multiloop CFB systems by utilizing the energy minimization multiscale (EMMS) principle. A full-loop modeling scheme was implemented by using the EMMS model and/or its extension models to compute the hydrodynamic parameters of the sub-reactors, to achieve the mass conservation and pressure balance in each circulation loop. Based on the modularization strategy, corresponding interactive simulation software was further developed to facilitate the flexible creation and fast modeling of a customized multi-loop CFB reactor. This research can be expected to provide quantitative references for the design and scale-up of gas-solid CFB reactors and lay a solid foundation for the realization of virtual process engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

acceleration, m · s−2

C d :

constant

D :

diameter, m

d b :

bubble diameter, m

f :

volume fraction of the clusters

f b :

volume fraction of the bubble phase

G s :

solids circulation rate or solids flux, kg · m−2 · s

g :

gravity acceleration, m · s−2

H :

height, m

I m :

solid inventory, kg

M s :

mass flow rate, kg · s−1

N gs :

Nst mass-specific energy dissipation rate for suspending and transporting particles, J · kg−1 · s

N gs0 :

Nst0 normalized Ngs or Nst

N T :

total energy dissipation rate with respect to unit mass of particles, J · kg−1 · s

r, R :

radius, m

U s :

superficial velocity, m · s−1

W gs, W st :

volume-specific energy dissipation rate for suspending and transporting particles, J · m−3 · s

Δp :

pressure drop, kPa

\({\overline \varepsilon _{\rm{r}}}\) :

average voidage between zero and r

ε :

voidage

ϕ :

degree of valve opening

μ :

shear viscosity, Pa · s

ρ :

density, kg ·m−3

τ :

interfacial shear stress, N·m−2

ζ :

empirical coefficient

b:

bubble phase

c:

dense phase

e:

emulsion phase

f:

dilute phase

g:

gas

i:

interphase

max:

maximum

mf:

minimum fluidization

p:

particle

r:

radial location

w:

wall

z:

axial coordinate

References

  1. Grace J, Avidan A, Knowlton T. Circulating Fluidized Beds. London: Chapman & Hall Press, 1997, 1–18

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang X. Gas-solid flow patterns of a dual-loop FCC riser with varying diameter. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Beijing: Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2006, 33–64

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi J, Nandakumar K. Computational modeling of multiphase reactors. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 2015, 6: 347–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang N, Lu B, Wang W, Li J. 3D CFD simulation of hydrodynamics of a 150 MWe circulating fluidized bed boiler. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 162(2): 821–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu S, Liu X. A general EMMS drag model applicable for gas-solid turbulent beds and cocurrent downers. Chemical Engineering Science, 2019, 205: 14–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu S, Liu X. A CFD-PBM-EMMS integrated model applicable for heterogeneous gas-solid flow. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 383: 123122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu B, Zhang N, Wang W, Li J, Chiu J, Kang S. 3-D full-loop simulation of an industrial-scale circulating fluidized-bed boiler. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2013, 59(4): 1108–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikolopoulos A, Nikolopoulos N, Charitos A, Grammelis P, Kakaras E, Bidwe A, Varela G. High-resolution 3-D full-loop simulation of a CFB carbonator cold model. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 90: 137–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Syamlal M, Guenther C, Cugini A, Ge W, Wang W, Yang N, Li J. Computational science: Enabling technology development. Chemical Engineering Progress, 2011, 107(1): 23–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ge W, Guo L, Liu X, Meng F, Xu J, Huang W, Li J. Mesoscience-based virtual process engineering. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2019, 126: 68–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li J, Kwauk M. Exploring complex systems in chemical engineering: the multi-scale methodology. Chemical Engineering Science, 2003, 58: 521–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Guo L, Xia Z, Lu B, Zhao M, Meng F, Liu Z, Li J. Harnessing the power of virtual reality. Chemical Engineering Progress, 2012, 108(7): 28–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu S, Liu X, Zhang N, Li J, Ge W, Wang W. Quantifying cluster dynamics to improve EMMS drag law and radial heterogeneity description in coupling with gas-solid two-fluid method. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 307: 326–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pallares D, Johnsson F. Macroscopic modelling of fluid dynamics in large-scale circulating fluidized beds. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(5): 539–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Werther J, Hartge E, Ratschow L, Wischnewski R. Simulation-supported measurements in large circulating fluidized bed combustors. Particuology, 2009, 7(4): 324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haus J, Hartge E, Heinrich S, Werther J. Dynamic flowsheet simulation of gas and solids flows in a system of coupled fluidized bed reactors for chemical looping combustion. Powder Technology, 2016, 316: 628–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu X, Hu S, Jiang Y, Li J. Extension and application of energy-minimization multi-scale (EMMS) theory for full-loop hydrodynamic modeling of complex gas-solid reactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 278: 492–503

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Kwauk M. Particle-fluid two-phase flow: the energy-minimization multi-scale method. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1994, 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu X, Jiang Y, Liu C, Wang W, Li J. Hydrodynamic modeling of gas-solid bubbling fluidization based on energy-minimization multiscale (EMMS) theory. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(7): 2800–2810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Z, Hu S, Liu X, Zhao H. Modeling the hydrodynamics of cocurrent gas-solid downers according to energy-minimization multi-scale theory. Particuology, 2016, 29: 110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu J, Liu X, Zhang Z, Zhao H, Ge W. Modeling the axial hydrodynamics of gas-solid counter-current downers. Particuology, 2020, 50: 135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hu S, Liu X, Li J. Steady-state modeling of axial heterogeneity in CFB risers based on one-dimensional EMMS model. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 96: 165–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li J, Tung Y, Kwauk M. Axial voidage profiles of fast fluidized beds in different operating regions. In: Basu P, Large J F, eds. The 2nd International Conference on Circulating Fluidized Beds. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1988, 193–203

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Rhodes M, Geldart D. A model for the circulating fluidized bed. Powder Technology, 1987, 53(3): 155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwauk M, Li H. Handbook of Fluidization. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2008, 584–609

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bi X, Liu X. High density and high solids flux CFB risers for steam gasification of solids fuels. Fuel Processing Technology, 2010, 91(8): 915–920

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jones D, Davidson J. The flow of particles from a fluidised bed through an orifice. Rheologica Acta, 1965, 4(3): 180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Herbert P, Reh L. ETH-CFB Measurement Database: General Description and Operations Manual, 1999, 1–29

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDA07080400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1710251) for their financial support. Many thanks to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions, which were extremely helpful in improving this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinhua Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, S., Liu, X. Development of a hydrodynamic model and the corresponding virtual software for dual-loop circulating fluidized beds. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 15, 579–590 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1953-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1953-6

Keywords

Navigation