Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy: a modern technique and review of outcomes

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Achalasia is a debilitating esophageal motility disorder characterized by incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and lack of peristalsis. Manometry is the gold standard for diagnosis and laparoscopic Heller myotomy has been the gold standard for definitive therapy. However, current advances in surgical technology have introduced the robotic platform as a viable approach for this procedure. The safety and efficacy has been clearly established with comparable operative times to laparoscopy in experienced hands. Importantly, the rate of resolution of dysphagia postoperatively is over 80 % which is comparable to laparoscopic outcomes. Moreover, some literature suggests lower esophageal perforation rates utilizing the robotic platform. Nevertheless, costs remain one of the largest barriers to widespread use of the robotic platform and future studies should aim to identify strategies in cost reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Podas T, Eaden J, Mayberry M, Mayberry J (1998) Achalasia: a critical review of epidemiologic studies. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2345–2347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crookes PF, Corkin S, DeMeester TR (1997) Gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia. When is reflux really reflux? Dig Dis Sci 42:1354–1361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chino O, Kijima H, Shimada H et al (2000) Clinicopathological studies of esophageal carcinoma in achalasia: analyses of carcinogenesis using histological and immunohistochemical procedures. Anticancer Res 20:3717–3722

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schima W, Stacher G, Pokieser P (1992) Esophageal motor disorders: videofluoroscopic and manometric evaluation-prospective study in 88 symptomatic patients. Radiology 185:487–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Williams VA, Peters JH (2009) Achalasia of the esophagus: a surgical disease. J Am Coll Surg 208:151–162. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Torres-Villalobos G, Martin-del-Campo LA (2013) Surgical treatment for achalasia of the esophagus: laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013:708327. doi:10.1155/2013/708327708327

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galvani C, Gorodner MV, Moser F, Baptista M, Donahue P, Horgan S (2006) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia facilitated by robotic assistance. Surg Endosc 20:1105–1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Melvin WS, Dundon JM, Talamini M, Horgan S (2005) Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery minimizes esophageal perforation during Heller myotomy. Surgery 138:553–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaligram A, Unnirevi J, Simorov A, Kothari VM, Oleynikov D (2012) How does the robot affect outcomes? A retrospective review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 26:1047–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horgan S, Galvani C, Gorodner MV et al (2005) Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: multicenter study. J Gastrointest Surg 9:1020–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Perry KA, Kanji A, Drosdeck JM, Linn JG, Chan A, Muscarella P, Melvin WS (2014) Efficacy and durability of robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia: patient symptoms and satisfaction at long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 28:3162–3167. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3576-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huffmanm LC, Pandalai PK, Boulton BJ et al (2007) Robotic Heller myotomy: a safe operation with higher postoperative quality of life indices. Surgery 142:613–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, Blasco JA, Guerra M, Andradas E, Plana MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Igbal A, Haider M, Desai K, Garg N, Kavan J, Mittal S, Filipi CJ (2006) Technique and follow-up of minimally invasive Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 20:394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruurda JP, Gooszen HG, Broeders IA (2004) Early experience in robot-assisted laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Scand J Gastroenterol Supp 241:4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Talamini M, Campbell K, Stanfield C (2002) Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: early experience and system description. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Cheguevara Afaneh, Brendan Finnerty, Jonathan Abelson, and Rasa Zarnegar declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasa Zarnegar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afaneh, C., Finnerty, B., Abelson, J.S. et al. Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy: a modern technique and review of outcomes. J Robotic Surg 9, 101–108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0506-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0506-3

Keywords

Navigation