Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic Handsewn Gastrojejunostomy Revision of Gastrojejunal Anastomosis with Takedown of Gastro-gastric Fistula

  • Multimedia Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Marginal ulcer (MU) and gastro-gastric fistula (GGF) are well-described complications following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The incidence of MU ranges from 0.6 to 25% and the incidence of GGF following divided RYGB has been reported as high as 6%. MU has been shown to be associated with GGF with a 53% incidence of MU in patients with GGF versus 4% in patients without GGF. Other risk factors for developing GGF previously identified in the literature include incomplete gastric transection, staple-line leak, and foreign body erosion. Management of GGF begins with aggressive medical therapy aimed at decreasing acid production, and surgical intervention is indicated for persistent symptoms such as weight gain or persistent ulcers. Endoscopic therapy is not recommended given risk of failure in setting of chronic inflammation.

Methods

To demonstrate the operative management of gastro-gastric fistula from chronic marginal ulcer. A 52-year-old female who had previous robotic RYGB in 2012 developed a chronic marginal ulcer and was diagnosed with a gastro-gastric fistula in 2017. She had a suspected perforation of her marginal ulcer in 2018, although no ulcer was found on laparoscopic exploration. She was taken to the OR for revision in 2018 for chronic marginal ulcer and strictures. Two gastro-gastric fistulas were found and resected, and a redo gastrojejunostomy was performed.

Results

We used a handsewn RYGB technique in this patient, and other options include circular or linear techniques to create the gastrojejunal anastomosis [GJA]. We have found the rate of both stricture and marginal ulcer higher after circular stapled GJA technique. She did well post-operatively and did not have any further issues with marginal ulcers or strictures.

Conclusions

A significant number of patients with GGF will fail maximal medical therapy and will require surgical treatment. Laparoscopic resection of GGF is the most well-described surgical technique, with or without revision of the gastrojejunostomy depending on presence of anastomotic stricture, marginal ulcer, or involvement with GG fistula. Surgical therapy has been shown to lead to good outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coblijn UK, Goucham AB, Lagarde SM, Kuiken SD, Van Wagensveld BA. Development of ulcer disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, incidence, risk factors, and patient presentation: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014 24 2 299 309 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-1118-5

  2. Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Surgical management of gastro-gastric fistula after divided laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(12):1673–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0341-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrodeguas L, Szomstein S, Soto F, et al. Management of gastrogastric fistulas after divided Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: analysis of 1292 consecutive patients and review of literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005 1 5 467 474 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOARD.2005.07.003

  4. Kumbhari V. Endoscopic evaluation and management of late complications after bariatric surgery: a narrative review. Published online 2021.

  5. Sundaresan N, Hiticas BA, Sullivan M, Hui BY, Poliakin L, Thompson KJ, McKillop IH, Barbat S, Kuwada TS, Gersin KS, Nimeri A Gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of anastomotic technique at a single institution. Obes Surg. 2021 31 11 4947 4952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05678-2 Epub 2021 Sep 13.PMID: 34518993

  6. Sundaresan N, Sullivan M, Hiticas BA, Hui BY, Poliakin L, Thompson KJ, McKillop IH, Barbat S, Kuwada TS, Gersin KS, Nimeri A Impacts of gastrojejunal anastomotic technique on rates of marginal ulcer formation and anastomotic bleeding following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2021 31 7 2921 2926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05292-2. Epub 2021 May 3.PMID: 33939060

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelrahman Nimeri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Nimeri is on the speakers’ bureau of Medtronic.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Marginal ulcer (MU) is associated with gastro-gastric fistula (GGF) formation.

• A significant number of patients with GGF will require surgical intervention.

• Laparoscopic resection of GGF is the most well-described surgical technique, with or without revision of the gastrojejunostomy depending on presence of anastomotic stricture, marginal ulcer, or involvement with GG fistula, and is associated with good outcomes.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 297693 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okorji, L.M., Nimeri, A. Laparoscopic Handsewn Gastrojejunostomy Revision of Gastrojejunal Anastomosis with Takedown of Gastro-gastric Fistula. OBES SURG 32, 1403–1404 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05941-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05941-0

Navigation