Skip to main content
Log in

Perforation as the First Manifestation of Marginal Ulcer Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Multicenter Case Series and Review of Literature

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has attracted increasing attention over the past decades due to its higher safety, simplicity, and efficacy over other bariatric techniques. Marginal ulcers (MUs) after OAGB are usually asymptomatic, potentially leading to life-threatening conditions, such as bleeding and perforation. However, the precise mechanisms and predisposing factors of perforation at the anastomotic site of OAGB remain unknown. In this study, we report six patients with a history of laparoscopic OAGB presenting with an acute abdomen and pneumoperitoneum. All patients underwent an open surgical intervention after the initial resuscitation. All patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Four patients were treated with omental patch repair. For one of them, Braun’s side-to-side jejunojejunostomy was also performed. One patient converted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one patient converted to normal anatomy. Five out of six patients showed favorable outcomes after management. However, one of the patients, which presented with septic shock, expired 24 h after the emergent exploratory laparotomy. The mean interval between OAGB and MU perforation was 19 months, and the mean size of perforation was 2.08 cm. Perforation of an anastomotic ulcer after OAGB is rare and should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with an acute abdomen following OAGB; this may even occur years after OAGB. Patients can present with a perforated MU as the first manifestation. Adequate fluid resuscitation, along with administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and antibiotics, should be considered in the primary management. Surgical options (oversewing, conversion to RYGB, and conversion to normal anatomy) vary according to the patient’s general condition, size and location of the perforation, and degree of contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Quan Y, Huang A, Ye M, Xu M, Zhuang B, Zhang P, Yu B, Min Z (2015) Efficacy of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass for obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015:152852. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/152852

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, Diamantis T, Tsigris C, Psaltopoulou T (2014) Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(5):984–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parmar CD, Mahawar KK (2018) One anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass is now an established bariatric procedure: a systematic review of 12,807 patients. Obes Surg 28(9):2956–2967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3382-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sverdén E, Mattsson F, Sondén A, Leinsköld T, Tao W, Lu Y, Lagergren J (2016) Risk factors for marginal ulcer after gastric bypass surgery for obesity: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg 263(4):733–737. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G (2019) One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: an updated meta-analysis. Obes Surg 29(9):2721–2730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04005-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang FG, Yan WM, Yan M, Song MM (2018) Outcomes of mini vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int J Surg 56:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown WA, Johari Halim Shah Y, Balalis G, Bashir A, Ramos A, Kow L, Herrera M, Shikora S, Campos GM, Himpens J, Higa K (2020) IFSO position statement on the role of esophago-gastro-duodenal endoscopy prior to and after bariatric and metabolic surgery procedures. Obes Surg 30(8):3135–3153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04720-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, Ortiz-de-Solórzano J, Pérez-Miranda M, Castro-Alija MJ (2017) Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg 27(5):1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2428-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Debs T, Petrucciani N, Kassir R, Chassang M, Havet J, Piche T, Amor IB, Gugenheim J (2017) Double perforation of marginal ulcers after one anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliary peritonitis. Obes Surg 27(11):2993–2995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2860-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nimeri A, Maasher A, Al ST (2017) Efferent limb obstruction and unexpected perforated marginal ulcer in a pregnant patient after one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 13(4):713–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia DPC, Dos Reis CF, de Figueiredo LO, Mota GVM, Guimarães LQ, Santos FAV, Alberti LR, Furtado TA (2019) Perforated gastric ulcer post mini gastric bypass treated by laparoscopy: a case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 17(49):24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abou Hussein B, Al Marzouqi O, Khammas A (2020) Anastomotic gastro-jejunal ulcer perforation following one anastomosis gastric bypass: clinical presentation and options of management-case series and review of literature. Obes Surg 30(6):2423–2428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04423-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson WH, Fernanadez AZ, Farrell TM, Macdonald KG, Grant JP, McMahon RL, Pryor AD, Wolfe LG, DeMaria EJ (2007) Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(1):37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2006.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aviran E, Rayman S, Yehuda AB, Goitein D (2021) Marginal ulcer causing delayed anastomotic perforation following one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Surg Obes Relat Dis 17(2):379–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussain A, El-Hasani S (2021) Anastomotic gastrojejunal ulcer perforation following one anastomosis gastric bypass. Obes Surg 31(3):1334–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04979-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Zabihi-Mahmoudabadi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Najjari, K., Samimi, M., Jangjoo, A. et al. Perforation as the First Manifestation of Marginal Ulcer Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Multicenter Case Series and Review of Literature. Indian J Surg (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03234-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03234-x

Keywords

Navigation