Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of Appointment Scheduling Policies: a Study in a Bariatric Clinic

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Appointment scheduling systems traditionally book patients at fixed intervals, without taking into account the complexity factors of the health system. This paper analyzes several appointment scheduling policies of the literature and proposes the most suitable to a bariatric surgery clinic, considering the following complexity factors: (i) stochastic service times, (ii) patient unpunctuality, (iii) service interruptions, and (iv) patient no-shows.

Materials and Methods

We conducted the study using data collected in a bariatric surgery clinic located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The dataset presented 1468 appointments from June 29, 2015, to June 29, 2016. We comparatively evaluate the main literature policies through a discrete event simulation (DES).

Results

The proposed policy (IICR) provides a 30% increase in attendance and allows a decrease in the total cost, maintaining the level of service in terms of average waiting time.

Conclusion

IICR was successfully implemented, and the practical results were very close to the simulated ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhattacharjee P, Ray PK. Simulation modelling and analysis of appointment system performance for multiple classes of patients in a hospital: a case study. Oper Res Health Care. 2016;8:71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cayirli T, Veral E. Outpatient scheduling in health care: a review of literature. Prod Oper Manag. 2003;12(4):519–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cayirli T, Yang KK, Quek SA. A Universal appointment rule in the presence of no-shows and walk-ins. Prod Oper Manag. 2012;21(4):682–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta D, Denton B. Appointment scheduling in health care: challenges and opportunities. IIE Trans. 2008;40(9):800–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salzarulo PA, Bretthauer KM, Côté MJ, et al. The impact of variability and patient information on health care system performance. Prod Oper Manag. 2011;20(6):848–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klassen KJ, Yoogalingam R. Appointment system design with interruptions and physician lateness. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2013;33(4):394–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klassen KJ, Yoogalingam R. Strategies for appointment policy design with patient unpunctuality. Decis Sci. 2014;45(5):881–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cayirli T, Veral E, Rosen H. Designing appointment scheduling systems for ambulatory care services. Health Care Manag Sci. 2006;9(1):47–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klassen KJ, Yoogalingam R. Improving performance in outpatient appointment services with a simulation optimization approach. Prod Oper Manag. 2009;18(4):447–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. LaGanga LR, Lawrence SR. Clinic overbooking to improve patient access and increase provider productivity*. Decis Sci. 2007;38(2):251–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cayirli T, Yang KK. A Universal appointment rule with patient classification for service times, no-shows, and walk-ins. Serv Sci. 2014;6(4):274–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Celio A, et al. Postoperative follow-up after bariatric surgery: effect on weight loss. Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):900–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wheeler E, Prettyman A, Lenhard MJ, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):515–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sockalingam S, Cassin S, Hawa R, et al. Predictors of post-bariatric surgery appointment attendance: the role of relationship style. Obes Surg. 2013;23(12):2026–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Toussi R, Fujioka K, Coleman KJ. Pre- and postsurgery behavioral compliance, patient health, and postbariatric surgical weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(5):996–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pontiroli AE, Fossati A, Vedani P, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcome of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1492–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dantas LF, Hamacher S, Cyrino Oliveira FL, et al. Predicting patient no-show behavior: a study in a bariatric clinic. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cayirli T, Veral E, Rosen H. Assessment of patient classification in appointment system design. Prod Oper Manag. 2008;17(3):338–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dantas LF, Fleck JL, Cyrino Oliveira FL, et al. No-shows in appointment scheduling – a systematic literature review. Health Policy. 2018;122(4):412–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmadi-Javid A, Jalali Z, Klassen KJ. Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: a review of optimization studies. Eur J Oper Res. 2017;258(1):3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gómez-Ambrosi J, Salvador J, Páramo JA, et al. Involvement of leptin in the association between percentage of body fat and cardiovascular risk factors. Clin Biochem. 2002;35(4):315–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Catalán V, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Rodríguez A, et al. Expression of caveolin-1 in human adipose tissue is upregulated in obesity and obesity-associated type 2 diabetes mellitus and related to inflammation. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;68(2):213–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gómez-Ambrosi J, Salvador J, Rotellar F, et al. Increased serum amyloid a concentrations in morbid obesity decrease after gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16(3):262–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gallego-Escuredo JM, Gómez-Ambrosi J, Catalan V, et al. Opposite alterations in FGF21 and FGF19 levels and disturbed expression of the receptor machinery for endocrine FGFs in obese patients. Int J Obes. 2015;39(1):121–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all the clinic staff for their help with data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [grant numbers 306802/2015-5 and 403863/2016-3 to SH; 304843/2016-4 to FLCO; 311316/2018-2 to SDJB], Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation (FAPERJ) [grant number 202.673/2018 to FLCO], the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)—Finance Code 001, and the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fábio Viegas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 75 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 57 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 32 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peres, I.T., Hamacher, S., Cyrino Oliveira, F.L. et al. Simulation of Appointment Scheduling Policies: a Study in a Bariatric Clinic. OBES SURG 29, 2824–2830 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03898-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03898-1

Keywords

Navigation