Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein Levels in Postoperative Infectious Complications After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bariatric surgery involves the risk of postoperative infectious complications, in particular, anastomotic leaks and intra-abdominal abscesses. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a nonspecific marker of inflammation which has gained attention as a test to predict postoperative infectious complications. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of CRP to detect postoperative infectious complications after bariatric surgery.

Methods

Search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and PubMed databases were performed. Articles measuring serum CRP postoperatively in patients with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery were included. Main outcomes included diagnostic value of postoperative serum CRP (area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)). Diagnostic accuracy of included studies was assessed using QUADAS-2.

Results

Six studies including 2770 patients met the inclusion criteria. The derived CRP cutoff values were 71.4 mg/dL, 130.3 mg/dL, and 118.7 mg/dL on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 5, respectively. Pooled AUC was similar across PODs 1, 3, and 5 with AUC being highest on POD 5 (0.88 ± 0.07). PPV was between 19 and 21%, and NPV was between 98 and 99%. CRP levels were significantly higher (P < .0001) in postoperative infectious complication group versus the no complication group on PODs 3 and 5.

Conclusions

High NPV and moderately high sensitivity on PODs 1, 3, and 5 may help predict patients who are at a low risk of infectious complication following bariatric surgery. High specificity on PODs 1 and 3 also indicates that it can be useful for early diagnosis of postoperative infectious complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA. 2003;289:76–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23:427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2009;23:930–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakran N, Goitein D, Raziel A, et al. Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2,834 patients. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2013;27:240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellorin O, Abdemur A, Sucandy I, et al. Understanding the significance, reasons and patterns of abnormal vital signs after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21:707–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aurora AR, Khaitan L, Saber AA. Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2012;26:1509–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pepys MB, Hirschfield GM. C-reactive protein: a critical update. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1805–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Adamina M, Steffen T, Tranatino I, et al. Meta-analysis of the predictive value of C-reactive protein for infectious complications in abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2015;102:590–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simon L, Gauvin F, Amre DK, et al. Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:206–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh PP, Zeng ISL, Srinivasa S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101:339–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Csendes A, Burgos AM, Roizblatt D, et al. Inflammatory response measured by body temperature, C-reactive protein and white blood cell count 1, 3, and 5 days after laparotomic or laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2009;19:890–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Albanopoulos K, Alevizos L, Natoudi M, et al. C-reactive protein, white blood cells, and neutrophils as early predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2013;27:864–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Folie P, et al. C-reactive protein 2 days after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery reliably indicates leaks and moderately predicts morbidity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1128–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Romain B, Chemaly R, Meyer N, et al. Diagnostic markers of postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2014;399:503–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dib F, Parenti LR, Boutten A, et al. Diagnostic performance of C-reactive protein in detecting post-operative infectious complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. Obes Surg. 2017;27:3124–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruiz-Tovar J, Muñoz JL, Gonzalez J, et al. C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and procalcitonin levels as early markers of staple line leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2017;31:5283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kröll D, Nakhostin D, Stirnimann G, et al. C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1: a predictor of early intra-abdominal infections after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2760–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol BioMed Cent. 2014;14:135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon AC, Cross AJ, Foo EW, et al. C-reactive protein is a useful negative predictor of anastomotic leak in oesophago-gastric resection. ANZ J Surg. 2018;88:223–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frask A, Orłowski M, Dowgiałło-Wnukiewicz N, et al. Clinical evaluation of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for the early detection of postoperative complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Videosurgery Other Miniinvasive Tech. 2017;2:160–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kassir R, Blanc P, Tibalbo LMB, et al. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for the early detection of postoperative complications after sleeve gastrectomy: preliminary study in 97 patients. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1439–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang K, Xi H, Wu X, et al. Ability of serum C-reactive protein concentrations to predict complications after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner PL, Saager L, Dalton J, et al. A nomogram for predicting surgical complications in bariatric surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2011;21:655–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen NT, Goldman CD, Ho HS, et al. Systemic stress response after laparoscopic and open gastric bypass. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194:557–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Inaba CS, Koh CY, Sujatha-Bhaskar S, et al. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass: an analysis of metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:868–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Andrea McLellan, an expert medical librarian, for her assistance with the literature search strategy development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Hong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yung Lee and Tyler McKechnie are joint first authors

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 2468 kb)

Appendix. Complete search strategy

Appendix. Complete search strategy

1 exp bariatric surgery/

2 bariatric*.mp.

3 gastroplast*.mp.

4 ((gastric or jejunoileal or jejuno-ileal or ileojejunal or ileo jejunal or gastroileal or roux-en-y) adj2bypass*).mp.

5 gastrojejunostom*.mp.

6 intestinal bypass*.mp.

7 lipectomy/

8 lipectom*.mp.

9 lipoplasty/

10 lipoplast*.mp.

11 lipolysis/

12 lipolysis.mp.

13 liposuction/

14 liposuction*.mp.

15 gastric band*.mp.

16 biliopancreatic bypass/

17 bilio-pancreatic diversion.mp.

18 biliopancreatic diversion*.mp.

19 exp gastrectomy/

20 gastrectom*.mp.

21 duodenal switch.mp.

22 gastric plication.mp.

23 gastric placation.mp.

24 gastric balloon/

25 gastric bubble*.mp.

26 ballobes balloon*.mp.

27 duodenal ileostomy.mp.

28 or/1-27

29 exp C-Reactive Protein/

30 CRP.mp.

31 C Reactive Protein.mp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y., McKechnie, T., Doumouras, A.G. et al. Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein Levels in Postoperative Infectious Complications After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. OBES SURG 29, 2022–2029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03832-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03832-5

Keywords

Navigation