Abstract
Background
To minimize morbidity and mortality associated with surgery risks in the obese patient, algorithms offer planning operative strategy. Because these algorithms often classify patients based on inadequate category granularity, outcomes may not be predicted accurately. We reviewed patient factors and patient outcomes for those who had undergone bariatric surgical procedures to determine relationships and developed a nomogram to calculate individualized patient risk.
Methods
From the American College of Surgeons National Security Quality Improvement Program database, we identified 32,426 bariatric surgery patients meeting NIH criteria and treated between 2005 and 2008. We defined a composite binary outcome of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. A predictive model based on preoperative variables was developed using multivariable logistic regression; a multiple imputation procedure allowed inclusions of observations with missing data. Model performance was assessed using the C-statistic. A calibration plot graphically assessed the agreement between predicted and observed probabilities in regard to 30-day morbidity/mortality.
Results
The nomogram model was constructed for maximal predictive accuracy. The estimated C-statistic [95% confidence interval] for the predictive nomogram was 0.629 [0.614, 0.645], indicative of slight to moderate discriminative ability beyond that of chance alone, and the greatest impacts on the estimated probability of morbidity/mortality were determined to be age, body mass index, serum albumin, and functional status.
Conclusions
By accurately predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality, this nomogram may prove useful in patient preoperative counseling on postoperative complication risk. Our results additionally indicate that neither age nor presence of obesity-related comorbidities should exclude patients from bariatric surgery consideration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Colquitt J, Clegg A, Sidhu M, et al. Surgery for morbid obesity (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane library, issue 3. Oxford: Update Software; 2003.
Fisher BL, Schauer P. Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. Am J Surg. 2002;184:9S–16S.
Balsiger BM, Murr MM, Poggio JL, et al. Bariatric surgery: surgery for weight control in patients with morbid obesity. Med Clin North Am. 2000;84:477–89.
Jones KB, Afram JD, Benotti PN, et al. Open versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparative study of over 25, 000 open cases and the major laparoscopic bariatric reported series. Obes Surg. 2006;16:721–7.
Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JAB, et al. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.
Zingmond DS, McGory ML, Ko CY. Hospitalization before and after gastric bypass surgery. JAMA. 2005;294:1918–24.
Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2006;294:1909–17.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.
Buchwald H. A bariatric surgery algorithm. Obes Surg. 2002;12:733–46.
Tam V, Frost SA, Hillman KM, et al. Using administrative data to develop a nomogram for individualising risk of unplanned admission to intensive care. Resuscitation. 2008;79:241–8.
Denis LJ, Gospodarowicz MK. Conclusions and reflections. Cancer. 2009;115:3160–2.
Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, et al. Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Ann Surg. 2005;242:463–71.
Beebe M, Dalton JA, Espronceda M, et al. CPT 2007 standard edition: current procedural terminology. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2006.
Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.
Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer; 2001.
Gray RJ. Flexible methods for analyzing survival data using splines, with applications to breast cancer prognosis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992;87:942–51.
Le Cessie S, van Houwelingen JC. Ridge estimators in logistic regression. Appl Statist. 1992;41:191–201.
Verweij P, van Houwelingen HC. Penalized likelihood in Cox regression. Stat Med. 1994;13:2427–36.
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
Harrell F. Hmisc: functions for data analysis, high-level graphics, utility operations, computing sample size and power, importing datasets, imputing missing values, advanced table making, variable clustering, character string manipulation, conversion of S objects to LaTeX code, and recording variables. 2008. Programs available at http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/Hmisc.
Harrell F. Design: functions for regression modeling, testing, estimation, validation, graphics, prediction, and typesetting by storing enhanced model design attributes in the fit. Design is a collection of about 180 functions that assist and streamline modeling, especially for biostatistical and epidemiologic applications. 2008. Programs available at http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/wiki/Main/Design.
Jamal MK, DeMaria EJ, Johnson JJ, et al. Impact of major co-morbidities on mortality and complications after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1:511–6.
Campos GM, Ruxandra C, Rogers SJ, et al. Spectrum of risk factors of complications after gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2007;142:969–75.
Rubino F, Forgione A, Cummings DE, et al. The mechanism of diabetes control after gastrointestinal bypass surgery reveals a role of the proximal small intestine in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Ann Surg. 2006;244:741–9.
Wickremesekera K, Miller G, Naotunne TD, et al. Loss of insulin resistance after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a time course study. Obes Surg. 2005;14:474–81.
Wu YK, Kao KC, Hsu KH, et al. Predictors of successful weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation in Taiwan. Resp Med. 2009;103:1189–95.
Hess CT. Monitoring laboratory values: protein and albumin. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22:48.
Ernst B, Thurnheer M, Schmid SM, et al. Evidence for the necessity to systematically assess micronutrient status prior to bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2009;19:66–73.
DeMaria EJ, Murr M, Byrne TK, et al. Validation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score in a multicenter study proves it stratifies mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2007;246:578–84.
Acknowledgments
We extend our gratitude to those individuals vital to executing this study. In particular, we thank Daniel Zhu, Research Assistant, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center for his statistical acumen and advice, and Rosemary Klein for her conscientious editing assistance.
Disclosures
This study was supported in part by the Claude H. Organ, MD, FACS Fellowship of the American College of Surgeons. Additionally, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS-NSQIP are the source of data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, P.L., Saager, L., Dalton, J. et al. A Nomogram for Predicting Surgical Complications in Bariatric Surgery Patients. OBES SURG 21, 655–662 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0325-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0325-6