Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine Irrigation in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite most bariatric procedures are actually performed by laparoscopic approach, management of postoperative pain remains a major challenge. The aim of this study was to analyze the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal ropivacaine infusion in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Methods

A prospective randomized clinical trial of all the patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) between January and November 2015 was performed. Patients were randomized to experimental (EG: those patients undergoing intraperitoneal ropivacain irrigation) and control groups (CG: those undergoing intraperitoneal irrigation with normal saline).

Results

One hundred ten patients were included, 83 LRYGB (75.5 %) and 27 LSG (24.5 %). Mean pain, as measured by VAS score, was 21.7 ± 14.5 mm in CG and 13.3 ± 10.9 mm in EG (p = 0.002). Morphine needs during the first 24 h postoperatively were 21.8 % in CG and 3.6 % in EG (p = 0.01). Early taking of fluids by mouth was possible 6 h after surgery in 76.4 % in EG vs 34.5 % in CG (p = 0.001). Early mobilization ability (6 h after surgery) was feasible in 72.7 % in EG and 32.7 % in CG (p = 0.001). Median hospital stay was 3 days (range 2–10 days) in CG and 2 days (2–7 days) in EG (p = 0.009).

Conclusions

The intraoperative peritoneal infusion with ropivacaine in patients undergoing bariatric surgery is associated with a reduction in postoperative pain, lower morphine needs, earlier mobilization and earlier oral intake of fluids after surgery, and a shorter hospital stay.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02641288

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Srinivasa S, et al. Br J Surg. 2011;98:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandez AZ, Demaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for death following gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2004;239:698–703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology 2012;116:248–273.

  5. Kehlet H, Liu SS. Continuous local anesthetic wound infusion to improve postoperative outcome: back to the periphery? Anesthesiology. 2007;107:369–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marks JL, Ata B, Tulandi T. Systematic review and metaanalysis of intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetics for reduction of pain after gynecologic laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:545–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McDermott AM, Chang KH, Mieske K, et al. Aerosolized intraperitoneal local anesthetic for laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. World J Surg. 2015;39:1681–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, et al. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20:287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burns AJ, Pachnis V. Development of the enteric nervous system: bringing together cells, signals and genes. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21:100–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grundy D, Al-Chaer ED, Aziz Q, et al. Fundamentals of neurogastroenterology: basic science. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1391–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ingelmo PM, Bucciero M, Somaini M, et al. Intraperitoneal nebulization of ropivacaine for pain control after laparoscopic choelcystectomy: a doublé-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Anaesthesia. 2013;110:800–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinsson T, Oda T, Fernvik E, et al. Ropivacaine inhibits leukocyte rolling, adhesión and CD11/CD18 expression. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;283:59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins GG, Gadzinski JA, Fitzgeral GD, et al. Surgical pain control with ropivacaine by atomized delivery (spray): a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2015.07.018.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahokehr A, Sammour T, Soop M, et al. Intraperitoneal use of local anesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:637–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pappas-Gogos G, Tsimogiannis KE, Zikos N, et al. Preincisional and intraperitoneal ropivacaine plus normal saline infusion for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic choelcystectomy: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2036–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Male DK, Champion B, Cooke, A et al. Cell troffic and inflammation. In: Advance Immunology. 2ª ed. Gower London-New York, 1991: pp. 123–142.

  17. Gonzalez LA, Molina JF. Laboratory evaluation of inflammation. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2010;17:35–47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Ruiz-Tovar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests in the preparation of this manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Statement of human rights

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruiz-Tovar, J., Gonzalez, J., Garcia, A. et al. Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine Irrigation in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. OBES SURG 26, 2616–2621 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2142-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2142-z

Keywords

Navigation