Skip to main content
Log in

Using grape pomace powder as a pectin replacer to prepare low water activity bake-stable fruit filling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grape pomace is the main by-product of grape processing industries which is a good source of hydrocolloids such as pectin and fibers. The possibility of substitution of pectin with the grape pomace powder (GPP) in a fruit filling was evaluated. In terms of rheological point of view, the more GPP content, the more elastic and viscose modulus, loss tangent and the complex viscosity were observed. The closest treatment to the Control sample (0.5 g high-methoxyl pectin), statistically (p < 0.05) was seen to be T3 (7.5 g GPP). The obtained results from confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and the fluorescence microscopy assays were in agreement with the rheological tests. Moreover, the outcomes of the extrusion test revealed that not only increasing the amount of GPP has a direct correlation with the force and total work, but also, after the exposure of filling to heat, Control, T3 and T4 (10 g GPP) showed bake stability features and their physical characteristics before baking had no significant difference (p < 0.05) with their features after baking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset during and analyzed during the current study are available from the first author on reasonable request.

References

  1. E.C. Sousa, A.M.A. Uchôa-Thomaz, J.O.B. Carioca, S.M. de Morais, A. de Lima, C.G. Martins, C.D. Alexandrino, P.A.T. Ferreira, A.L.M. Rodrigues, S.P. Rodrigues, J. do N., Silva, L.L. Rodrigues, Food Sci. Technol. 34, 135 (2014).

  2. S. Ahmadi, B.A. Siahsar, Ciencia E Investigación Agrar. 38, 291 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.A. Razak, R. Karim, R. Sulaiman, N. Hussain, Int. Food Res. J. 25, 1109 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Inbaraj, K. Sridhar, M. Sharma, N.S. Said, I. Fola, Olawuyi, W.Y. Lee, Gels. 9, 732 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Cropotova, S. Popel, L. Parşacova, J. Process. Energy Agric. 17, 20 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P.S. Taoukis, M. Richardson, Water Activity Foods: Fundamentals and Applications, vol 385 (Blackwell, 2020).

  7. J. Cropotova, U. Tylewicz, N. Dellarosa, L. Laghi, S. Romani, and M. Dalla Rosa, Food Chem 195, 71 (2016).

  8. L. Prosky, N.-G. Asp, I. Furda, J.W. Devries, T.F. Schweizer, B.F. Harland, J. AOAC Int. 67, 1044 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Koç, M. Erbaş, J. Food Sci. 87, 2072 (2022)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Müller-Maatsch, M. Bencivenni, A. Caligiani, T. Tedeschi, G. Bruggeman, M. Bosch, J. Petrusan, B. Van Droogenbroeck, K. Elst, S. Sforza, Food Chem. 201, 37 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Carcelli, A. Albertini, E. Vittadini, E. Carini, Int. J. Gastronomy Food Sci. 28, 100545 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Agudelo, P. Varela, T. Sanz, S. Fiszman, Food Hydrocoll. 40, 203 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Ronda, B. Oliete, M. Gómez, P.A. Caballero, V. Pando, J. Food Eng. 102, 272 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. AACC, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul. 11th Editi, (2010).

  15. M. H. F. Felisberto, A. L. Wahanik, C. R. Gomes-Ruffi, M. T. P. S. Clerici, Y. K. Chang, and C. J. Steel, LWT - FOOD SCI TECHNOL. 63, 1049 (2015).

  16. A. Arocas, T. Sanz, S.M. Fiszman, Food Hydrocoll. 23, 2478 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Savary, S. Handschin, B. Conde-Petit, N. Cayot, J.L. Doublier, Food Hydrocoll. 22, 520 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Q. Ruan, X. Yang, L. Zeng, J. Qi, Food Hydrocoll. 95, 53 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Tolve, B. Simonato, G. Rainero, F. Bianchi, C. Rizzi, M. Cervini, G. Giuberti, Foods. 10, 75 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Baldán, M. Riveros, M.P. Fabani, R. Rodriguez, Biomass Convers. Biorefinery. 13, 9997 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M.M. Selani, S.G.C. Brazaca, C.T. Dos Santos Dias, W.S. Ratnayake, R.A. Flores, A. Bianchini, Food Chem. 163, 23 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Y.S. Ma, Y. Pan, Q.T. Xie, X.M. Li, B. Zhang, H.Q. Chen, Food Chem. 274, 319 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. A.B.B. Bender, C.S. Speroni, P.R. Salvador, B.B. Loureiro, N.M. Lovatto, F.R. Goulart, M.T. Lovatto, M.Z. Miranda, L.P. Silva, N.G. Penna, J. Culin. Sci. Technol. 15, 143 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S.K. Giri, M.K. Tripathi, N. Kotwaliwale, J. Food Sci. Technol. 55, 1667 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. J.F. Douglas, Gels. 4, 19 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Quintanilla, H. Zhang, J. Powers, S.S. Sablani, Food Bioprocess Technol. 14, 804 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Farzad Saberi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-Original draft, Writing - Review & Editing. Mostafa Karami: Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision. Azam Shiri: Validation, Formal analysis and Methodology. Mousa Rasouli: Resources, Writing - Review & Editing, Rouhollah Karimi: Resources, Visualization, Investigation. Marek Kieliszek: Visualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing-review, editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mostafa Karami, Azam Shiri or Marek Kieliszek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Neither ethics approval nor consent is needed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saberi, F., Karami, M., Shiri, A. et al. Using grape pomace powder as a pectin replacer to prepare low water activity bake-stable fruit filling. Food Measure (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02495-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02495-w

Keywords

Navigation