Skip to main content
Log in

Conventional and non-conventional approaches for the extraction of rosehip phytocompounds and its bioactive, structural and antimicrobial characterization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rosehip fruit, which is usually discarded, is a potential source of bioactive compounds. A green approach was employed for the efficient extraction of phytocompounds from rosehip. The effect of shaking water bath extraction (SWE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), and ultrasonication-assisted (UAE) techniques on the extraction of phytocompounds from rosehips was evaluated. The Taguchi orthogonal array design was used to design the process parameters for efficient extraction of rosehip phytocompounds. The quantitative and qualitative analysis revealed that total phenolic content (339.9 mg/100mL), total flavonoids (5.15 mg/100mL), antioxidant (75.17%), and antidiabetic (24.84%) activity was observed higher in UAE (300 W; time 30 min; solid-liquid ratio 1:15 and pH 5.5) followed by MAE and SWE. Structural characterization revealed that better structural opening in the UAE results in better extraction and high antimicrobial activity against the food poisoning species. These results demonstrated that ultrasonication improved the extraction yield of bioactive compounds and confirmed the potential of underutilized rosehip fruit as a food ingredient.”

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data generated has been given in the manuscript.

References

  1. D.D. Zagorac, M.M.F. Akšić, V. Glavnik, U.M. Gašić, I. Vovk, Ž.L. Tešić, M.M. Natić, J. Sep. Sci. 43, 1431 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I.G.O. Črnivec, P. Muri, P. Djinović, A. Pintar, Bioresour Technol. 171, 375 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Patel, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 63, 29 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Cunja, M. Mikulic-Petkovsek, A. Zupan, F. Stampar, V. Schmitzer, J. Plant. Physiol. 178, 55 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Demir, N. Acaralı, ACS Omega. 8, 8293 (2023)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Guimaraes, L. Barros, A.M. Carvalho, I. Ferreira, J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 6277 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Lattanzio, E. Greco, D. Carretta, R. Cervellati, P. Govoni, E. Speroni, J. Ethnopharmacol. 137, 880 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Nybom, G. Werlemark, Curr. Bioact Compd. 13, 3 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S.C. Ashtiyani, H. Najafi, S. Jalalvandi, F. Hosseinei, Iran. J Kidney. 7, 290 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Kharazmi, Osteoarthr. Cartil. 16, S5 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Bitwell, I.S. Sen, C. Luke, M.K. Kakoma, Sci. Afr. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Wang, C.L. Weller, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17, 300 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Tapia-Salazar, I.G. Arévalo-Rivera, M. Maldonado-Muñiz, L.E. Garcia-Amezquita, M.G. Nieto-López, D. Ricque-Marie, J. Welti-Chanes, Food Bioproc. Technol. 12, 512 (2019)

  14. A. Pękal, K. Pyrzynska, Food Anal. Methods. 7, 1776 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H.R. de Moraes Barros, T.A.P. de Castro Ferreira, M.I. Genovese, Food chem. 134, 1892 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. L.L. Canabady-Rochelle, C. Harscoat-Schiavo, V. Kessler, A. Aymes, F. Fournier, J.M. Girardet, Food Chem. 183, 129 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Fellegrini, R. Ke, M. Yang, C. Rice-Evans, Meth. Enzymol, Academic Press (1999) pp. 379–389

  18. A. Gupta, R. Kumar, A.K. Pandey, South. Afr. J. Bot. 130, 308 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Stuart, Anal. Tech. Forensic Sci (Wiley, Hoboken, USA, 2021), pp. 145–160

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Perez, Acta Biol. Med. Exp. 15, 113 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. A.A. Casazza, B. Aliakbarian, P. Perego, Nat. Prod. Res. 25, 1751 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Liang, W. Wang, J. Xu, Q. Zhang, Z. Shen, Z. Zeng, Q. Li, L. Food Bioprod. Proc. 104, 57 (2017)

  23. J. Shi, J. Yu, J. Pohorly, J.C. Young, M. Bryan, Y. Wu, J. Food Agric. Environ. 1, 42 (2003)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Bimakr, R.A. Rahman, F.S. Taip, A. Ganjloo, L.M. Salleh, J. Selamat, A. Hamid, I.S.M. Zaidul, Food Bioprod. Process. 89, 67 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Ilaiyaraja, K.R. Likhith, G.S. Babu, F. Khanum, Food chem. 173, 348 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Angelov, S.S. Boyadzhieva, S.S. Georgieva, Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 12, 508 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Pagano, L. Campone, R. Celano, A.L. Piccinelli, L. Rastrelli, J. Chromatogr. A 1651, 462295 (2021)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Z.K. Guo, Q.H. Jin, G.Q. Fan, Y.P. Duan, C. Qin, M.J. Wen, Anal. Chim. Acta. 436, 41 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. J.P. Maran, V. Sivakumar, K. Thirugnanasambandham, R. Sridhar, Carbohydr. Polym. 97, 703 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Kratchanova, I. Panchev, E. Pavlova, Carbohydr. Polym. 56, 181 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Gfrerer, E. Lankmayr, Anal. Chim. Acta. 533, 203 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. X. Zheng, Y.I.N. Fangping, L.I.U. Chenghai, X.U. Xiangwen, J. Northeast Agric. Univ. 18, 79 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. K. Kumar, S. Srivastav, V.S. Sharanagat, Ultrason. Sonochem. 70, 105325 (2021)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Rodrigues, G.A. Pinto, F.A. Fernandes, Ultrason. Sonochem. 15, 869 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Samaram, H. Mirhosseini, C.P. Tan, H.M. Ghazali, S. Bordbar, A. Serjouie, Food Chem. 172, 7 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. S. Dey, V.K. Rathod, Ultrason. Sonochem. 20, 271 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. G.B. Raj, K.K. Dash, Ultrason. Sonochem. 68, 105180 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Balachandran, S.E. Kentish, R. Mawson, M. Ashokkumar, Ultrason. Sonochem. 13, 471 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Z. Ilbay, S. Şahin, Ş.İ. Kırbaşlar, J. Sci. Food Agric. 93, 2804 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Nicolescu, M. Babotă, L. Zhang, C.I. Bunea, L. Gavrilaș, D.C. Vodnar, G. Rocchetti, Antioxidant, 11, 1123 (2022)

  41. M. Ebrahimi Hemmati Kaykha, H. Jooyandeh, B.A. Behbahani, M. Noshad, J. Food Meas. Charac. 16, 6 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. R. Rolta, A. Sharma, A. Sourirajan, P.K. Mallikarjunan, K. Dev, J. Ethnopharmacol. 266, 113420 (2021)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. F. Mazarei, H. Jooyandeh, M. Noshad, M. Hojjati, Int. J. Bio Mac. 95, 224 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. H. Jooyandeh, M. Noshad, R.A. Khamirian, Int. J. Bio Mac. 107, 938 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are highly grateful to Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, 141004, India, for providing financial assistance and infrastructure for the preparation of this review.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS: Analysis and Writing; VK: Project administration, Supervision, Data Curation and Review; RK: Conceptualization, Editing, Visualization, Data Curation, Supervision and Review; SK: Editing; Neha: Provided raw material; SJ: Visualization.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vikas Kumar or Ramandeep Kaur.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saini, A., Kumar, V., Kaur, R. et al. Conventional and non-conventional approaches for the extraction of rosehip phytocompounds and its bioactive, structural and antimicrobial characterization. Food Measure 18, 2834–2845 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02361-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-024-02361-9

Keywords

Navigation