Skip to main content
Log in

Starch digestibility and quality of cookies made from acid and heat-moisture treated sweet potato starch and wheat flour composites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, resistant starch (RS) has been widely produced using the physical modification methods and applied for producing low-carb foods. In this study, quality and digestibility of cookies supplemented with 20% of native, heat–moisture treated, and citric acid and heat-moisture combined treated starches (NS, HS, and AHS, respectively) were investigated. Composite flours had lowered swelling index and increased water absorption values than did the wheat flour. Both maximum and final viscosities of the paste with 20% AHS substitution were significantly lower than those with 20% NS or 20% HS substitution. Resistant starch contents increased from 8.0% of the control cookie to 10.6%, 18.4% or 25.4% of the cookies substituted with 20% NS, 20% HS or 20% AHS, respectively. The cookie substituted with 20% AHS was a medium Glycemic Index (GI) food, whereas the cookie substituted with 20% NS or HS was the high GI food, similar to the control cookie. Although the cookie substituted with 20% AHS had lower volume than the control cookie, their sensory quality values were not significantly different. Thus, the combined acid and heat–moisture treated sweet potato starch could be substituted for 20% of wheat flour to increase the RS content and reduce the GI values of cookies as compared to those of the native or heat–moisture treated starch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Perego, A. Sordi, R. Guastalli, A. Converti, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 42, 649 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Chevallier, P. Colonna, G. Della Valle, D. Lourdin, J. Cereal Sci. 18, 241 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Macche-Rezzoug, J. Bouvier, K. Alfaf, C. Patras, J. Food Eng. 35, 44 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Mamat, S.E. Hill, Int. Food Res. J. 25, 463 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.M. Mariana, C. Márico, H.N. Elizabeth, J. Food Sci. Technol. 38, 216 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Foster-Powell, S.H. Holt, J.C. Brand-Miller, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, 5 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Brand-Miller, J. McMillan-Price, K. Steinbeck, I. Caterson, J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 28, 446S (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Ai, Y. Jin, J.D. Kelly, P.K.W. Ng, Cereal Chem. 94, 405 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Wang, S. Li, Q. Gao, Food Sci. Technol. Res. 20, 267 (2014)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. P.V. Hung, N.T.M. Huong, N.T. Lan-Phi, N.N.T. Tien, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 95, 302 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.V. Hung, N.T.H. My, N.T. Lan-Phi, Starch Starke 66, 1016 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S.I. Shin, J. Byun, K.H. Park, T.W. Moon, Cereal Chem. 81, 194 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. P.T.B. Trung, L.B.B. Ngoc, P.N. Hoa, N.N.T. Tien, P.V. Hung, Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 105, 1071 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. American Association of Cereal Chemists (2000) Approved methods of the AACC International, 10th edn. Methods 56–81B. The Association, St. Paul, MN 2000

  15. W. Prinyawiwatkul, K.H. McWatters, L.R. Beuchat, R.D. Phillips, J. Agric. Food Chem. 45, 481 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.L. Sudha, R. Vetrimani, K. Leelavathi, Food Chem. 100, 1366 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P.V. Hung, H.T. Chau, N.T. Lan-Phi, Food Chem. 191, 75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T.M.S. Wolever, D.T.A. Jenkins, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 43, 168 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G.E. Inglett, S.C. Peterson, C.J. Carriere, S. Maneepun, Food Chem. 90, 3 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. X. Xie, Q. Liu, S.W. Cui, Food Res. Int. 39, 332 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O.O. Olayinka, K.O. Adebowale, B.I. Olu-Owolabi, Food Hydrocoll. 22, 229 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K.O. Adebowale, T. Henle, U. Schwarzenbolz, T. Doert, Food Hydrocoll. 23, 1954 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R.C. Hoseney, P. Wade, J.W. Finley, Wheat: Chemistry and Technology, 3rd edn. (American Association of Cereal Chemist, Saint Paul, 1988), pp. 407–456

    Google Scholar 

  24. K.F. Finney, W.T. Yamazaki, V.L. Moore, G.L. Rubenthaler, Quality of Hard, Soft, and Durum Wheats, 1st edn. (ASA-CSSA-SSSA Inc, Madison, 1987), pp. 677–748

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Kweon, L. Slade, H. Levine, Cereal Chem. 88, 537 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. N.N.T. Tien, T.N.Q. Anh, N.T. Lan-Phi, P.V. Hung, Starch Starke (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201800069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Foster-Powell, S.H. Holt, J.C. Brand-Miller, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 76, 6 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Brand-Miller, J. McMillan-Price, K. Steinbeck, I. Caterson, J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 28, 448S (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. P. García-Segovia, A. Andrés-Bello, J. Martínez-Monzó, J. Food Eng. 80, 813 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Majzoobi, S. Hedayati, M. Habibi, F. Ghiasi, A. Farahnaky, J. Agric. Sci. Technol Iran 16, 574 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under Grant number 106.99-2018.43.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pham Van Hung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Hung, P., Duyen, T.T.M., Van Thanh, H. et al. Starch digestibility and quality of cookies made from acid and heat-moisture treated sweet potato starch and wheat flour composites. Food Measure 15, 3045–3051 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00892-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-021-00892-z

Keywords

Navigation