Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of taro-wheat flour and taro-gluten free flour on cake batters and quality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous researches have been still carried out for bakery products to improve their technological and nutritional properties. A well-balanced technological properties and nutritional value is needed to attract consumers. This study investigated the substitution of taro flour for both wheat flour cake (WFC) and gluten free flour cake (GFC) formulation. Taro flour was used as an alternative flour type for WFCs and especially GFCs, due to its nutritional components. Cake batter rheology, cake quality and some nutritional properties were determined and compared with those of control cakes. Significant effect was observed in the higher substitution of taro flour (25%) with wheat flour in terms of storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″). For gluten free formulation, gradual increment for G′ value and notable reduction of damping factor (tan δ) was observed with higher substitution value ranged from 12.5 to 25%. The substitution of taro flour up to 25% into GFC formulation cause no significant increase in hardness value (p > 0.05). Total color difference (ΔE) in the crust and crumb characteristics were not detected for WFC significantly (p > 0.05). The highest ΔE values were obtained for both crust and crumb colour characteristics from substitution level of 18.7% and 25% in GFC formulation (p < 0.05). Sensorial evaluation showed that addition of taro flour up to 25% provided similar quality attributes when compared with control cakes in terms of general acceptability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data interests and material in this study support published claims of the authors and comply with field standards.

Code availability

No software application and custom code was available in this study.

References

  1. M.H. Ertop, R. Atasoy, Ş.S. Akın, J. Food Process. Preserv. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. FAOSTAT. FAO, Statistical database: agricultural production of primary crops (2017). https://apps.fao.org/default.htm. Accessed 15 Nov 2019

  3. P. Kaushal, V. Kumar, H.K. Sharma, J. Food Sci. Technol. 52, 27 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A.S. Huang, C.A. Titchenal, B.A. Meilleur, J. Food Comp. Anal. 13(5), 859–864 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M.S. Ammar, A.E. Hegazy, S.H. Bedeir, World J. Dairy Food Sci. 4(2), 94–99 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Calle, Y. Benavent-Gil, C.M. Rosell, Food Hydrocoll. 98, 105243 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Arıcı, G. Özülkü, B. Kahraman, R.M. Yıldırım, Ö.S. Toker, J. Food Process. Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. Kumar, H.K. Sharma, P. Kaushal, K. Singh, J. Food Meas. Charact. 9(1), 35–51 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Kırbaş, S. Kumcuoglu, S. Tavman, J. Food Sci. Technol. 56, 914 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Osella, M. de La Torre, H. Sánchez, Food Nutr. Sci. 5(09), 787 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.M. Sollid, K.E. Lundin, in The Autoimmune Diseases, ed. by N.R. Rose, I.R. Mackay (Elsevier, London, 2020), pp. 849–869

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. E.M. Clerx, J. Silvester, D. Leffler, M. DeGroote, L.N. Fishman, Dig Liver Dis. 51(8), 1096–1100 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J.P. Singh, A. Kaur, N. Singh, J. Food Sci. Technol. 53(2), 1269–1278 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Arıcı, R.M. Yıldırım, G. Özülkü, B. Yaşar, O.S. Toker, LWT 74, 434–440 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. AACC, Approved Methods of Analysis. Methods: 08-01,46-12,44-19,30-25, 11th edn. (AACC, St. Paul, 2000)

  16. S.C. Lee, L. Prosky, J.W. DeVries, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 75, 395–416 (1992)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. L. Prosky, N.G. Asp, T.F. Schweizer, J.W. DeVries, I. Furda, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 71, 1017–1023 (1988)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis. Method 2002.02, 17th edn. (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, 2010)

  19. AACC, Approved Methods of Analysis. Method 10‐05, 10th edn. (AACC, St. Paul, 2000)

  20. D. Weipert, Cereal Chem. 67(4), 311–317 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Mariotti, M. Lucisano, M. Ambrogina Pagani, P.K.W. Ng, Food Res. Int. 42(8), 963–975 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Bozdogan, S. Kumcuoglu, S. Tavman, J. Food Sci. Technol. 56, 683–694 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Z. Maache-Rezzou, J.M. Bouvier, K. Allaf, C. Patras, J. Food Eng. 35(1), 23–42 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Shevkani, A. Kaur, S. Kumar, N. Singh, LWT Food Sci. Technol. 63(2), 927–933 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Christaki, P. Verboven, T. Van Dyck, B. Nicolaï, P. Goos, J. Claes, J. Cereal Sci. 77, 219–227 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. R.G.M. Van der Sman, S. Renzetti, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 59(14), 2225–2239 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Milner, J.P. Kerry, M.G. O'Sullivan, E. Gallagher, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 59, 102235 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. A.P. Nugent, Nutr. Bull. 30, 27–54 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. X. Hu, Z. Huang, Z. Zeng, C. Deng, S. Luo, C. Liu, Food Hydrocoll. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. K. Tsatsaragkou, G. Gounaropoulos, I. Mandala, LWT-Food. Sci. Technol. 58(1), 124–129 (2014)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. X. Yang, E.A. Foegeding, Food Hydrocoll. 24(2–3), 227–238 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Gomez, F. Ronda, P.A. Caballero, C.A. Blanco, C.M. Rosell, Food Hydrocoll. 21(2), 167–173 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. M.L. Sudha, V. Baskaran, K. Leelavathi, Food Chem. 104(2), 686–692 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. T.M. Lu, C.C. Lee, J.L. Mau, S.D. Lin, Food Chem. 119(3), 1090–1095 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. D. Kocer, Z. Hicsasmaz, A. Bayindirli, S. Katnas, J. Food Eng. 78(3), 953–964 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Shevkani, N. Singh, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49, 2237–2244 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TOVAG, Ankara, Turkey; Project No: 114O391).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, 34220, Istanbul, Turkey

    Muhammet Arıcı, Görkem Özülkü, Burcu Kahraman, Ruşen Metin Yıldırım & Ömer Said Toker

Authors
  1. Muhammet Arıcı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Görkem Özülkü
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Burcu Kahraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruşen Metin Yıldırım
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ömer Said Toker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

In this research, all authors contributed effectively. MA supervised the research project, gave suggestions for experimental design and revised the manuscript. GÖ planned the experiments, evaluated the results and contribute writing of the manuscript. BK conducted the experiments, collected the data and contributed to writing. RMY contributed to the planning, conducting and evaluation of the experiments. ÖST provided technical support for the rheological analysis and experimental design of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammet Arıcı.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

Informed consent

All authors have consent to participate in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arıcı, M., Özülkü, G., Kahraman, B. et al. The effect of taro-wheat flour and taro-gluten free flour on cake batters and quality. Food Measure 15, 531–540 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00656-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00656-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation