Skip to main content
Log in

The flavor quality of dried Lentinus edodes with different species and drying methods (charcoal roasting and naturally drying)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different species and processing methods have different impacts on the flavor quality of dried Lentinus edodes. To investigate the effect of species (four species of Qingyuan: 241-4, Qingke 20, Qingke 212, and Qingke 135) and drying method (slow charcoal roasting and natural drying) on dried L. edodes, the present study quantitatively analyzed the volatile compounds, particularly lenthionine, 1-octen-3-ol, and cyclic sulfur compounds, and compared 10 L. edodes varieties using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). A total of 136 volatiles from the 10 L. edodes varieties were quantitatively identified. 1-Octen-3-ol, lenthionine, and associated dispersion products, including dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl trithioether, and dimethyl tetrathioether, were selected as L. edodes flavor indexes. In addition, the electronic tongue results were consistent with the results of the sensory evaluation. The flavor quality of the dried L. edodes could be objectively evaluated by GC–MS and the electronic tongue for 1-octen-3-ol and lenthionine, their dispersion products, and the umami taste. The results showed that the flavor quality of L. edodes after a long period of charcoal roasting was improved. Although the quantity of volatile substances was reduced during charcoal roasting, the variety of volatiles was increased and the umami was improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Ağlarırmak, Food Chem. 105, 1188 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Antmann, G. Ares, P. Lema, C. Lareo, Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 49, 164 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Chen, J. Yu, H. Cui, S. Xia, X. Zhang, B. Yang, Molecules 23, 247 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y.D. Sik, R.L. Shewfelt, L. Kyu-Seong, S.J. Kays, J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 2780 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Yin, C. Venkitasamy, Z. Pan, W. Wei, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 33, 78 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Wang, J. Mao, X. Meng, L.I. Xiaozhong, Y. Liu, H. Feng, Food Control 44, 58 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Tian, Y. Zhao, J. Huang, H. Zeng, B. Zheng, Food Chem. 197, 714 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Dermiki, N. Phanphensophon, D.S. Mottram, L. Methven, Food Chem. 141, 77 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Fei, W. Yang, M. Ning, F. Yong, L. Zhao, X. An, Z. Xin, Q. Hu, LWT Food Sci. Technol. 72, 343 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Li, T. Feng, F. Zhou, S. Zhou, Y. Liu, W. Li, R. Ye, Y. Yang, Food Chem. 166, 358 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Ming, X. Han, T. Kang, L. Pan, T. Jian, T. Lin, L. Peng, Z. Ge, Q. Zhong, Z. Xiong, Food Control 26, 564 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Combet, J. Henderson, D.C. Eastwood, K.S. Burton, Mycoscience 47, 317 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Pein, C. Eckert, M. Preis, J.J. Breitkreutz, Pharm. Biomed. 83, 157 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Koppel, D.H. Chambers, J. Food Sci. 77, S177 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Zhu, C.A. Sims, H.J. Klee, P.J. Sarnoski, J. Food Sci. 83, 153 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Huang, C. Guo, Y. Yuan, X. Luo, T. Yue, Food Control 51, 270 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Woertz, C. Tissen, P. Kleinebudde, J. Breitkreutz, Int. J. Pharm. 417, 256 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Ito, M. Toyoda, H. Suzuki, M. Iwaida, J. Food Sci. 43, 1287 (1978)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y.-L. Lee, S.-Y. Jian, J.-L. Mau, LWT Food Sci. Technol. 42, 594 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Liu, X.Y. Lei, L.F. Chen, Y.B. Bian, H. Yang, S.A. Ibrahim, W. Huang, Sci. Rep. 5, 10047 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Yasumoto, Iwami K. Methods Enzymol. 1987, 434 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Chen, S. Liu, C. Wu, C. Ho, Biogeneration of Aromas, (1986), p. 176

  23. B. Li, B.M. Kimatu, F. Pei, S. Chen, X. Feng, Q. Hu, L. Zhao, Int. J. Food. Prop. 20, S2532 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Phat, B. Moon, C. Lee, Food. Chem. 192, 1068 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31771945), the Modern Agricultural Technical System Foundation (CARS-42–25), the Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2018C02051), Ningbo Natural Science Foundation (2018A610338), Science and Technology Planning Project of Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province (2019C10065) and the K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yali Dang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, T., Liu, H., Wu, Q. et al. The flavor quality of dried Lentinus edodes with different species and drying methods (charcoal roasting and naturally drying). Food Measure 14, 613–622 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00377-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-020-00377-5

Keywords

Navigation