Skip to main content
Log in

Apple fruit quality monitoring at room temperature using sol–gel spin coated Ni–SnO2 thin film sensor

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The application of metal oxides based gas sensors in the field of food and fruits quality measurement can significantly reduce the spoilage of food by monitoring the quality. In the present work, rotten apple has been monitored by detecting the ethylene (C2H4) gas efflux using a thin film Ni–SnO2 sensor. The sensor is prepared by simple and cost-effective sol–gel spin coating technique. Structural characteristics, surface morphology and elemental analysis of the deposited Ni–SnO2 layer have been studied through X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), respectively. The response of the sensor is found appreciably high with ~ 82% sensitivity, high selectivity along with appreciable response and recovery time towards the rotten apple at room temperature (RT) in 50% relative humidity (RH) condition. High sensitivity and selectivity of the fabricated sensor towards the rotten apple is verified by observing the response towards the fresh apple, decayed banana, decayed kiwi and decayed non-climacteric fruits like oranges and grapes under similar conditions. The sensing behavior of the sensor is also analyzed for room temperature (25 °C) as well on higher temperatures (up to 50 °C) and humidity (50% RH–90% RH) to cover the higher ambient conditions. The obtained results are indicating that the fabricated Ni–SnO2 sensor has a great potential and may be used as a promising apple fruit quality monitoring device at room temperature with appreciable sensitivity and selectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Brezmes, E. Llobet, X. Vilanova, J. Orts, G. Saiz, X. Correig, Sens Actuators B 80, 41–50 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Janssen et al., Trans. R. Soc. A, 372, 20130304 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Janick, J.N. Cummins, S.K. Brown, M. Hemmat, Fruit Breed I, 1–77 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.T. Okun, C.R. Lane, I.A. Williamson, D.A. Pinkert, K. Laney-cummings, B. Lynch, Industry & Trade Summary (2010)

  5. S. Renfu Lu, Instrum. Food Qual. 1, 19–27 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Srivastava, S. Sadisatp, J. Food Meas. Charact. 10, 1–15 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Kuswandi, E. Ayu, J. Food Meas. Charact. 11, 2180–2194 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Mohapatra, S. Panigrahi, J. Amamcharla, J. Food Meas. Charact. 9, 121–129 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dias et al., J. Food Meas. Charact. 10, 264–273 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Martinsdo, E.H. Jo, J. Agric. Food Chem. 45, 2654–2659 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Taurino, S. Capone, C. Distante, M. Epifani, R. Rella, P. Siciliano, Thin Solid Films 418, 59–65 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Fuertes, I. Soto, R. Carrasco, M. Vargas, J. Sabattin, C. Lagos, J. Sens. 2016, 4046061 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Srivastava, S. Sadistap, J. Food Meas. Charact. 12, 497–526 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Hossein, N. Shahin, R. Mahmood, R. Golzarian, J. Food Meas. Charact. 10, 493–506 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Kuswandi, Y. Wicaksono, M. Ahmad, Sens. Instrum. Food Qual. 5, 137–146 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Konduru, G.C. Rains, C. Li, Sensors 15, 1252–1273 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Matindoosta et al., Sens. Rev. 36, 169–183 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M.M. Rahman, A. Jamal, S.B. Khan, M. Faisal, Biosens. Bioelectron. 28, 127–134 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. X. Ye, W. Zhang, Q. Liu, S. Wang, Y. Yang, H. Wei, New J. Chem. 39, 130–135 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. X. Liu, S. Cheng, H. Liu, S. Hu, D. Zhang, H. Ning, Sensors (Basel) 12, 9635–9665 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Arshak, E. Moore, G.M. Lyons, J. Harris, S. Clifford, Sens. Rev. 24, 181–198 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. X. Pan, X. Zhao, J. Chen, A. Bermak, Z. Fan, Sens. Actuators B 206, 764–771 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. N.M. Shaalan, M. Rashad, M.A. Abdel-Rahim, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 56, 260–264 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Z. Ling, C. Leach, Sens. Actuators B 102, 102–106 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is sponsored by Indian Institute of Information Technology—Allahabad, under seed money research grant with file no. -GRN-IIIT-A/DR(F&A)/Seed Money/2017/Int.85.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Beniwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beniwal, A., Sunny Apple fruit quality monitoring at room temperature using sol–gel spin coated Ni–SnO2 thin film sensor. Food Measure 13, 857–863 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9998-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9998-7

Keywords

Navigation