Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of microwave-vacuum drying of pomegranate arils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pomegranate arils (Punica granatum L.) were dried in a microwave-vacuum drier up to a final moisture content of around 5–6 % (d.b.). The effect of microwave power level (25–95 W), vacuum pressure (25–195 mm Hg) and sample mass (65–235 g) on drying efficiency and some quality attributes (color, texture, rehydration ratio and sensory score) of dried pomegranate arils were analyzed by means of response surface methodology. A rotatable central composite design was used to develop models for the responses. Analysis of variance showed that a second order polynomial model predicted well the experimented data. All three process parameters microwave power, vacuum pressure and sample mass strongly affected quality attributes of dried pomegranate arils and drying efficiency. A lower vacuum pressure during drying resulted in better quality products. Optimum drying conditions of microwave power level of 80 W, vacuum pressure of 60 mm Hg and sample mass of 193.7 g were established for microwave-vacuum drying of pomegranate arils. Separate validation experiment was conducted at the derived optimum conditions to verify the predictions and adequacy of the models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

β :

Regression coefficient

\( \beta_{0} \) :

Constants of regression coefficients

β j :

Linear regression coefficients

β jj :

Quadratic regression coefficients

β ij :

Cross product regression coefficients

X:

Independent variable

Y:

Observed value of response

ξ :

Statistical error/residuals

d i :

Response

∆E:

Color difference between fresh and dried pomegranate arils

∆t:

Drying time (s)

k:

Total number of experiments

n:

Number of independent variables

µ:

Number of centre points

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

C.V.:

Coefficient of variance

CCRD:

Central composite rotatable design

d.b.:

Dry basis

DE:

Drying efficiency (%)

f :

Unknown function of response

H:

Hardness (N)

L*, a*, b*:

Color value of fresh pomegranate arils

L, a, b:

Color value of dried pomegranate arils

m:

Sample mass (g)

MVD:

Microwave-vacuum drying

mw :

Mass of water evaporated (g)

P:

Vacuum pressure (mm Hg)

p :

Probability level

Q:

Microwave power (W)

r :

Total number of responses

R2 :

Coefficient of determination

RR:

Rehydration ratio

RSM:

Response surface methodology

SS:

Sensory score

λw :

Latent heat of vaporization (J/g)

References

  1. D.B. Singh, A.R.P. Kingsly, Indian J Hort 65(4), 413–416 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.E. Drouzas, H. Schubert, J Food Eng 28(2), 203–209 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T.M. Lin, T.D. Durance, C.H. Scam, Food Res Int 31(2), 111–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Z.W. Cui, S.Y. Xu, D.W. Sun, Dry Technol 21(7), 1173–1184 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S.K. Giri, S. Prasad, Dry Technol 25(5), 901–911 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Wang, L. Li, Z. Li, C. Li, M. Chen, Int J Food Eng 4(6), 4 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A.K.S. Chauhan, A.K. Srivastava, Dry Technol 27(6), 761–769 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Ranganna, Manual of analysis of fruits and vegetable products (Tata Mc Graw Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.H. Tong, R.R. Lentz, D.B. Lund, Biotechnol Progr 9(5), 488–496 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T.N. Tulsidas (1994) Combined convective and microwave drying of grapes. Ph.D thesis, Mc Graw Hill University, Canada

  11. P. Mitra, V. Meda, Dry Technol 27(10), 10891096 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Deniz, I.H. Boyaci, J Food Eng 78(3), 836–845 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Lee, L. Ye, W.O. Laden, R.R. Eithenmiller, J Food Comp Anal 13(1), 45–47 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Weng, W. Liu, W. Lin, Asian Austral J Anim 14(10), 1470–1476 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments (Wiley, New York, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Haber, R. Ruynon, General Statistics, 3rd edn. (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Mayers, D.C. Montogomery, Response surface methodology (Wiley, New York, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Mousa, M. Farid, Dry Technol 20(10), 2055–2066 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P.S. Sunjaka, T.J. Rennie, C. Beaudry, G.S.V. Raghavan, Dry Technol 22(5), 1217–1231 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.T. Kiranoudis, E. Tasmi, Z.B. Maroulis, Dry Technol 10(4), 1813–1817 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.I. Wardsworth, L. Velupillai, L.R. Verma, Trans ASAE 33(1), 199–210 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Director, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi and Dean, University College of Science, M. L. Sukhadia University, Udaipur for providing necessary facilities for the experimentation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish Dak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dak, M., Jain, M.K. & Jat, S.L. Optimization of microwave-vacuum drying of pomegranate arils. Food Measure 8, 398–411 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-014-9205-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-014-9205-4

Keywords

Navigation