Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to examine the species diversity and structure of the strongylid community in domestic horses in Eastern Slovakia. Also, an analysis of the impact of age, sex, and collection location factors on the strongyid communities was performed.
Methods
Twenty-seven horses 1.5–21 years old from two farms in eastern Slovakia with different horse-management conditions were studied. Strongylids were collected after horse treatments with Noromectin (0.2 mg ivermectin); 66,170 specimens were collected and identified. Faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) was performed following fenbendazole (FBZ) and ivermectin (IVM) treatments.
Results
Twenty-four strongylid species were found; horses were infected with 6 to 16 (average = 11.7) species. Six cyathostomin species (Cylicocyclus nassatus, Cyathostomum catinatum, C. pateratum, Cylicostephanus longibursatus, C. goldi, C. calicatus) were the most prevalent; C. catinatum was the dominant species in both farms (Berger-Parker index 0.34 and 0.42). The structure of the strongylid community was multimodal with dominant, subdominant, background, and rare species. The Mantel test showed that horse age and sex did not significantly affect the nematode infracommunity composition (p > 0.05), while the impact of the collection location (farm) was significant (p = 0.03). Additionally, C. longibursatus was identified as the species contributing significantly to the observed farm differences. Strong resistance to FBZ was documented on both farms (FECRT was 36.4% and 22.7%); IVM resistance was not observed (FECRT = 100%).
Conclusion
This study presents the first report on the strongylids parasitizing domestic horses in Eastern Slovakia and gives basic information for further studies of horse parasites and their control in the region.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Among more than 90 species that parasitize equids [1], strongylid nematodes are by far one of the most widespread and pathogenic group of parasites [2,3,4,5,6]. Strongylids parasitize all wild and domestic equids worldwide and can cause severe health problems, including loss of weight, colic, watery diarrhoea and ventral oedema, decreasing the productivity and breeding qualities of horses [7,8,9,10]. The pathogenic influence of different strongylids species in the horse is different; large strongylids (subfamily Strongylinae), especially representatives of the genus Strongylus, are the most pathogenic because they have complex tissue migrations through different abdominal organs over several months causing severe tissue damage and can lead to life-threatening complications [11,12,13,14]. Pathogenicity of small strongylids (subfamily Cyathostominae) is not as severe; usually, cyathostomin infection in horses is asymptomatic. However, synchronous emerging of cyathostomin parasitic larvae from the intestinal wall can cause a life-threatening syndrome known as ‘‘larval cyathostominosis’’ with a case-fatality rate reported up to 50% [10, 15, 16].
An individual horse may be co-infected with as many as 15–25 species of strongylids [5, 6, 17,18,19]. Accordingly, the horse strongylid community has a complex structure [5, 8; 20,21,22,23,24,25]. The prevalence and proportion of each species in the strongylid community may vary depending on the age, sex, and horse-management conditions, in particular, the frequency of anthelmintic treatments [5, 22]. The proportion of large strongylids in the communities of domestic horses is remarkably low– from less than 1–2% [5, 23]; small strongylids (Cyathostominae) comprise more than 95% of the overall strongylid communities. In recent decades, due to the frequent use of highly effective anthelmintics, the proportion of large strongylids in the communities has been decreasing, and cyathostomins have become the main group of horse parasites [2, 4, 6, 26,27,28,29,30]. Moreover, cyathostomins have developed resistance to various groups of anthelmintics worldwide [27; 31,32,33]. It has been shown that not all strongylid species were found to be resistant; so far, resistance to benzimidazole (BZ) drugs has been documented for 10–11 cyathostomin species [34,35,36,37,38], while seven cyathostomin species demonstrated ivermectin (IVM) resistance [35]. Therefore, for effective parasitological monitoring and the elaboration of efficient parasite control methods, it is imperative to know the species composition of the strongylid community on particular horse farms.
Of 64 strongylid species described to date [3], domestic horses are parasitized by more than 40 species [3, 5, 8]. Meta-analysis of published data collected worldwide revealed that three cyathostomin species (Cylicocyclus nassatus, Cylicostephanus longibursatus, and Cyathostomum catinatum) were the most prevalent and relatively abundant species of equine strongylids [6]. Simultaneously, the species composition of strongylid communities varies in different countries [25]. In Europe, horse strongylid studies have been performed in different countries for more than 50 years [5, 8, 20, 22, 23, 28,29,30, 40,41,42,43,44]. Despite the horse industry being widely developed in the Slovak Republic, where more than 22,500 horses of 40 breeds are kept and bred [45], studies of the species diversity and structure of strongylid communities have not been carried out. In the late 1950s, a study of strongylids was performed in former Czechoslovakia [40]; as a result, 35 strongylid species were found in domestic horses. Later, a study of equine strongylids in Slovakia was conducted using the Reverse line blot hybridization assay for the species-specific identification of cyathostomins [46]. Through this method, 13 cyathostomin species were detected in faecal samples from domestic horses; information on the prevalence or proportion of these species in the strongylid community has not been documented. Several studies of strongylids in Slovak horse farms have been carried out using coprological methods, presumably to examine the distribution of anthelmintic resistance [47,48,49,50,51]. However, an analysis of all available literature sources revealed that data on the species composition of the equine strongylid communities in Slovakia have not been published to date. This study aimed to examine the species diversity and structure of the strongylid community in domestic horses in Eastern Slovakia, along with evaluating the impact of various factors, including age, sex, and the collection location (farm with different horse-management conditions), on the strongylid communities. Furthermore, investigating the efficacy of anthelmintic treatment and the presence of anthelmintic resistance emerged as an additional area of interest within the scope of this research.
Materials and methods
Locations and Horses Examined
The study was conducted in April–May and August 2023 in two horse farms in Eastern Slovakia, each having different horse-management conditions. Farm #1 had 20 horses used for sport and recreational riding. The horses were housed in stables and had limited access to small individual paddocks (0.2–0.4 ha) for 4–6 h per day. At this farm, regular stable cleaning and regular deworming of all horses 2–3 times per year were practised. Farm #2 had about 40 horses used for breeding; these horses were kept in stables for 8–12 h at night and had access to grazing on large permanent pastures (20.0–29.9 ha) for 12–16 h per day. At this farm, irregular stable cleaning and irregular deworming of all horses two times per year were practised.
Twenty-seven horses 1.5–21 years old were used for the study: nine horses from Farm #1 and 18 from Farm #2 (Table 1). All horses had not been dewormed with any anthelmintic drugs for more than three months before the experimental treatment. Clinical signs of parasitoses were not observed in the horses before and during the study.
Experimental Design: Collection of Strongylid Nematodes
Strongylid nematodes were collected using the in vivo method of diagnostic deworming [44] with a modification. Faecal egg counts (FEC) using the McMaster technique [52] with a sensitivity of 25 eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) were performed for every horse before treatment. Only horses with EPG > 200 were selected for the study.
All 27 horses selected were treated with the macrocyclic lactone drug Noromectin (140 mg/g IVM, Norbrook Laboratories Ltd, Monaghan, Ireland). Faecal samples (500 g per sample) were collected from each horse 24, 36, and 48 h after treatment; because less than 5% of the total nematode number nematodes were expelled from the horse intestine 48 h after treatment, faecal samples were not collected at 60 h and 72 h after treatment. Larger faecal samples– 500 g instead of 200 g in the original description of the method [44], were collected because the samples from horses with low EPG values contained an insufficient number of nematodes. The faecal samples were washed with 0.9% saline and examined under a magnifying glass to collect strongylids. All strongylids expelled were collected manually and fixed in 70% ethanol. Faecal egg counts were performed 14 days after treatment; strongylid eggs were not found in any samples. Thus, all intestinal-lumen stages of strongylids were expelled from the horse intestines and available for examination. All strongylids collected were stored in 70% ethanol, clarified with lactophenol (25% lactic acid, 25% phenol, 25% glycerine, 25% distilled water), and identified under a light microscope using the following morphological criteria: the size of nematode, size and shape of the buccal capsule, mouth collar, cephalic papillae, internal and external leaf-crowns, the shape of extra-chitinous supports external leaf-crown and oesophagal funnel as well as the shape of posterior ends of females and bursa of males [3].
Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT)
The faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) [53] was used to define the efficacy of anthelmintic treatment and determine the presence or absence of resistance to benzimidazole (BZ) or macrocyclic lactone (ivermectin, IVM) anthelmintics in strongylids. For the FECRT, the faecal egg counts were carried out a day before anthelmintic treatment (Day 0) and ten days (Day 10) for BZ (fenbendazole)-treated horses, or 14 days (Day 14) for IVM-treated horses, after treatment using the McMaster technique [52]. The calculation of FECRT results was performed using the formula of Coles et al. [53]:
where EPGi was faecal egg count data on Day 0 (before treatment), EPGt– faecal egg count data on Day 10 or 14 (after treatment).
All 27 experimental horses were treated with the BZ drug Panacur (187.5 mg/g fenbendazole, Intervet). This part of the study was performed four months before the strongylid collection. All horses underwent an assessment of IVM efficacy using FECRT simultaneously with the collection of adult strongylids.
Data Analysis
The prevalence (P) of each strongylid species was separately calculated following the methodology described by Bush et al. [54]. Since the study did not involve horse dissection, we could not use the terms “intensity of infection” or “mean intensity of infection” for our data. The alternative term “mean intensity per sample” was chosen to quantify the number of nematodes in faecal samples from a single horse. Additionally, the proportion of each species in the strongylid community was estimated as the percentage of specimens of particular species in the entire helminth sample. Previous research [5] has revealed substantial differences in the strongylid communities of old horses, specifically those over 15 years, compared with younger horses. Due to the minimal number of old horses in the dataset used for this study (2 horses), they were omitted from this analysis to avoid potential bias. Nonetheless, the relevant sections of the Results detailed observations regarding helminths in the excluded horses.
All data analysis was conducted with the R programming language [55]. The tidyverse packages collection was employed for data manipulation and visualization [56]. Initially, univariate statistical tests were conducted to compare helminth community metrics across the two farms. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was utilized to compare species richness, bootstrap t-tests [57] for the number of strongylid individuals per sample and the EPG, and Hutcheson’s t-test for the Shannon index [58]. The choice of these tests was guided by the non-parametric nature of the data under consideration. After the execution of the individual tests, the resulting p-values were adjusted using the Holm method. Then, the relationship between EPG and the number of strongylid individuals per sample from an individual horse was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation.
Subsequently, the Mantel tests [59] were used to assess the association between helminth infracommunities and several variables, including the collection location (farm), age, and sex of the horses. Based on the abundance matrix that contained data on the quantity of each helminth species in each horse, a dissimilarity matrix was produced using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity. Afterwards, three Mantel tests were conducted to sequentially compare this matrix with the distance matrices for a collection location (farm), horse age, and sex. The distance matrices for the collection location and sex were computed using Gower’s distance, while Euclidean distance was used for age. Following the Mantel tests, Holm correction was applied to adjust the p-values obtained, ensuring a robust assessment of statistical significance across multiple comparisons. Then, a model-based approach to analyzing the multivariate abundance data [60] was employed to additionally examine the effects of the collection site on the number of different helminth species within horses. An analysis of the variance table was computed using the likelihood ratio test (LRT) to evaluate the statistical significance of the findings. Finally, a non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) analysis was performed to visualize the patterns of helminth community composition across horses [59].
The supplementary material linked to this article includes technical details on the statistical analysis (see Supplementary data).
Results
Characteristics of the General Strongylid Sample
All horses were infected with strongylid nematodes; in total, 66,170 specimens were collected in the study. On average, 2,646.8 strongylids were found per sample, with the number of specimens per sample ranging from 24 to 8,245 and a median equal to 2,081. Twenty-four strongylid species from 10 genera were recorded (Table 2), including three species of large strongylids (subfamily Strongylinae) and 21 species of small strongylids (subfamily Cyathostominae). On average, horses were infected with 11.7 species, with the median number of species per horse being 11 and ranging from 6 to 16.
The full dataset, which includes information on two communities, exhibited moderate diversity, as indicated by the Shannon diversity index of 1.83. Six cyathostomin species (C. nassatus, C. catinatum, C. longibursatus, C. goldi, C. calicatus, and C. pateratum) were the most prevalent in the sample (Fig. 1). These species accounted for approximately 85% of the total strongylids collected. The most abundant species was C. catinatum, with a Berger-Parker dominance index of 0.41.
Additionally, on Farm #1, two horses older than 14 years were found to have very low infection with strongylids; 197 specimens of nine species (C. nasssatus, C. catinatum, С. leptostomum, C. calicatus, C. aswhorthi, C. longibursatus, C. goldi, C. minutus, C. coronatus) were collected from these horses.
The distribution of 24 strongylid species found in our study in ten prevalence classes revealed that the structure of the strongylid community is multimodal with eight dominant (P > 80–100%), four subdominant (P = > 50–80%), three background (P = > 20–50%) and eight rare ( P≤ 20%) species (Fig. 2).
Comparison of the Strongylid Communities between Two Farms
On Farm #1, 7,968 strongylid specimens were collected and identified. The community exhibited an average number of strongylid individuals per sample of 1,138.3, with a median of 396, ranging from 24 to 3,569 nematode individuals per sample. Meanwhile, Farm #2 had a more abundant strongylid community. In total, 58,202 specimens were collected. The number of strongylid individuals per sample on this farm varied from 301 to 8,245, with an average of 3,233.4 specimens per sample and a median of 2,295. However, a statistical comparison of the number of strongylid individuals per sample between these two farms showed no significant differences (Bootstrap Welch Two Sample t-test; p = 0.074).
Nineteen species of strongylids were documented at Farm #1, whereas Farm #2 showed a marginally higher species count, with 21 strongylids species identified (Table 2). The species richness on Farm #1 averaged 10.4 species per horse, with a median of 8 species and a range from 6 to 16 species. In comparison, Farm #2 demonstrated a higher species richness, averaging 12.2 species per horse, with the median reaching 12.5 species and ranging from 7 to 16 species. The comparison of the species richness between both farms did not show any significant differences (Wilcoxon rank sum test; W = 44.5, p = 0.816).
Both farms demonstrated moderate levels of species diversity, with Farm #1 having a Shannon diversity index of 1.80 and Farm #2 slightly higher, at 1.81. Hutcheson’s t-test for comparing the diversity indices yielded no significant difference in species diversity between the farms; t = -0.2, p = 0.842. Cyathostomum catinatum was identified as the dominant species in both farms, exhibiting a Berger-Parker index of 0.34 in Farm #1 and 0.42 in Farm #2.
The Mantel test showed a significant impact of the collection location (farm) on nematode infracommunities composition (r = 0.28, p = 0.03), indicating subtle differences between the farms. Conversely, the age and sex of the horses did not significantly affect the composition of the nematode infracommunities in this study, as evidenced by Mantel tests: r = -0.06, p = 1, and r = -0.03, p = 1, respectively. Further analysis using a model-based approach confirmed the significance of the collection site’s impact on differences in infracommunities (LRT = 57.66, p ≪ 0.001). Within this analytical approach, when evaluating the impact of individual nematode species on the differences, only C. longibursatus emerged as the species that significantly influenced these differences (p = 0.042). The visualization of infracommunity similarities revealed a weak clustering by collection site (Fig. 3), which corresponded with the results of the Mantel test.
Assessment of Anthelmintic Efficacy against Strongylids
The faecal egg counts (FEC) before anthelmintic treatment for horses on Farm #1 ranged from 300 to 2,475 EPG, averaging 1032.1 EPG (SD = 734.5). On Farm #2, the FEC ranged from 450 to 4,250 EPG, averaging 1,379.2 EPG (SD = 991.7). A comparison of FECs between these two farms using the bootstrap t-test revealed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.816). The correlation analysis indicated a significant and moderate positive relationship between EPG value and the number of strongylid individuals per sample (Spearman’s rank correlation; r = 0.55, p = 0.004).
Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRT) conducted at both farms indicated the substantial reduction of efficacy of FBZ against strongylids. Specifically, at Farm #1, the FECRT was 36.4% (from 0 to 83.3%); in Farm #2, the FECRT was 22.7% (from 0 to 94.6%), which was considered as the presence of strong BZ resistance on both farms. Reduction of IVM efficacy was not observed at either farm; on Day 14, after IVM treatment, strongylid eggs were not observed in faecal samples from any of the horses, indicating the FECRT of 100%.
Discussion
This research is the first analysis explicitly focused on the strongylid parasite communities in domestic horses in Slovakia. Previous studies carried out by coprological methods assessed only the level of horse infection or determined the distribution of anthelmintic resistance in strongylids [47,48,49,50], identified only some cyathostomin species [46] or examined the strongylid community simultaneously in the Czech and Slovak Republics [40]. In our study, 24 strongylid species were found in horses from two farms in Eastern Slovakia. Approximately the same number of species (19–25 species) was found to parasitize domestic horses in neighbouring areas– in Poland and western Ukraine [22, 23, 28, 61, 62]. Previously, the horse strongylid communities in the same region had higher species richness– 35 strongylid species were documented in domestic horses in former Czechoslovakia [40], 30 species were found in Poland [20], 34 species were observed in domestic horses in Ukraine in 1960–1970th [8]. More recent studies conducted in Poland and western Ukraine [23, 62] showed a significant decrease in the species richness of the strongylid communities to 19–25 species or less, which we assumed to be associated with the massive use of highly effective anthelmintic drugs during last decades [29, 62]. As a result, most species of large strongylids previously found in domestic horses (Strongylus spp., Triodontophorus spp., Oesophagodontus robustus, Craterostomum acuticaudatum, Bidentostomum ivashkini) were eliminated from the strongylid community. Our results showed the same trends on horse farms in Slovakia. In the present study, only 5.6% of horses were infected with Strongylus spp.; two species of the genus Triodontophorus were found in 14.3–16.7% of horses; while in 1960th more than 71.4% of horses in Czechoslovakia were infected with Strongylus spp. and 33.8% with Triodontophorus spp. [40]. Thus, in this study, we could observe the same tendency of decreasing the proportion of large strongylids in the horse parasite community and the dominance of cyathostomins, as was indicated in recent decades worldwide [5, 6, 25,26,27; 30]. Also, we could observe an increase in the dominance of one of the most prevalent cyathostomin species, C. catinatum (the Berger-Parker dominance index of 0.41). We assume that this indicates gradual changes in the strongylid community under the influence of anthelmintic drugs.
The distribution of the strongylid species found in our study into ten prevalence classes revealed a multimodal strongylid community mode with dominant, subdominant, background, and rare species, which is typical for strongylids in the wild and domestic equids rarely treated with anthelmintics drugs [21, 24, 38, 64,65,66]. However, we could observe a tendency for the gradual destruction of the multimodal structure of the community (see Fig. 2) when the number of background species (with prevalence > 20–50%) was markedly reduced. As this tendency had been observed in strongylid communities of frequently dewormed horses [5, 21, 24, 66], we assumed that due to the massive use of highly effective anthelmintics in Slovak horse farms, the strongylid communities would gradually decrease, and its structure gradually becomes bimodal (so-called “core-satellite mode”). This phenomenon also could be connected with the spreading of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomins registered in Slovakia before [48,49,50].
Additionally, we compared strongylid communities on two farms to analyze the influence of factors, such as age, sex, and collection location on the strongylid community. A significant moderate positive relationship between EPG value and the number of strongylid individuals per sample was recorded on both farms. Early studies performed in different countries observed no direct correlation between egg count (EPG) and the number of adult strongylids in a horse’s large intestine [4, 18, 67] due to variations in egg productivity of different strongylid species simultaneously parasitize a horse [68]. Other relationships might exist between these parameters [4]; however, more data are necessary to analyze these relations.
The level of horse infection (EPG value) and the average number of strongylid individuals found per sample differed on both farms (on Farm #1, horses were less infected than on Farm #2); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, C. catinatum was identified as the dominant species in both farms. Our analysis of the influence of age and sex on the strongylid communities showed that these two factors were not as essential as the effect of the collection location (farm), which was most probably connected with differences in horse management conditions as it was observed in other studies [5, 22, 24, 38, 62]. On the infracommunity level, the strongylid communities in horses from Farm #1 with no pasture access (only short-term access to individual paddocks) and more regular anthelmintic treatment significantly differed from infracommunities in horses from Farm #2 with less regular anthelmintic treatment and access to permanent pastures (see Fig. 3). One cyathostomin species, C. longibursatus, emerged as the species that significantly influenced these differences. This species was found to be the most widespread and abundant species of equine strongylids worldwide [6]. Even though almost nothing is known about the epidemiology and bionomics of separate cyathostomin species parasitize horses [13], we can assume that transmission of C. longibursatus is more dependent on horse access to pasture grazing than the transmission of other cyathostomin species. However, more data on the epidemiology and bionomics of separate cyathostomin species are necessary to fit the models that will test this assumption precisely.
Thus, our results present the first report on the strongylid community structure in domestic horses in Slovakia. Even though the study was performed on a small number of horses, it can be used as the basis for planning further studies of equine parasites in the region. New information on resistant strongylid species obtained from this study can potentially be used to extend our knowledge of strongylid epidemiology and will be useful for developing effective methods for horse parasite control in the country.
Data Availability
The original datasets are available upon request to the corresponding author.
References
Lichtenfels JR (1975) Helminths of domestic equids. Illustrated keys to genera and species with emphasis on north American forms. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 42:1–92
Herd RP (1990) The changing world of worms—the rise of the cyathostomes and the decline of Strongylus vulgaris. Com Cont Educ Pract Vet 12:732–736
Lichtenfels JR, Kharchenko VA, Dvojnos GM (2008) Illustrated identification keys to strongylid parasites (strongylidae: Nematoda) of horses, zebras and asses (Equidae). Vet Parasitol 156:4–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.026
Nielsen MK, Baptiste KE, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Lyons ET (2010) Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present. Vet Parasitol 174:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.007
Kuzmina TA, Dzeverin I, Kharchenko VA (2016) Strongylids in domestic horses: influence of horse age, breed and deworming programs on the strongyle parasite community. Vet Parasitol 227:56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.024
Bellaw JL, Nielsen MK (2020) Meta-analysis of cyathostomin species-specific prevalence and relative abundance in domestic horses from 1975–2020: emphasis on geographical region and specimen collection method. Parasit Vectors 13:509. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04396-5
Owen J, Slocombe D (1985) Pathogenesis of helminths in equines. Vet Parasitol 18:139–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(85)90063-9
Dvojnos GM, Kharchenko VA (1994) Strongylida of wild and domestic horses. Naukova Dumka, Kiev. (In Russia
Murphy D, Love S (1997) The pathogenic effects of experimental cyathostome infections in ponies. Vet Parasitol 70:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(96)01153-3
Love S, Murphy D, Mellor D (1999) Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection. Vet Parasitol 85:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00092-8
Enigk K (1970) The development of the three species of Strongylus of the horse during the prepatent period. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Equine Infectious Diseases. Paris (1969) Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger 259–268
Duncan JL, Pirie HM (1975) The pathogenesis of single experimental infections with Strongylus vulgaris in foals. Res Vet Sci 18:82–93
Ogbourne CP, Duncan JL (1985) Strongylus vulgaris in the horse: its biology and veterinary importance. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London
Andersen UV, Howe DK, Olsen SN, Nielsen MK (2013) Recent advances in diagnosing pathogenic equine gastrointestinal helminths: the challenge of prepatent detection. Vet Parasitol 192:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.11.003
Reid SWJ, Mair TS, Hillyer MH, Love S (1995) Epidemiological risk factors associated with a diagnosis of clinical cyathostomiasis in the horse. Equine Vet J 27:127–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1995.tb03048.x
Lawson AL, Malalana F, Mair TS (2023) Larval cyathostominosis: Clinicopathological data and treatment outcomes of 38 hospitalised horses (2009–2020). Eq Vet Edu 35:424–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/eve.13782
Reinemeyer CR, Smith SA, Gabel AA, Herd RP (1984) The prevalence and intensity of internal parasites of horses in the USA. Vet Parasitol 15:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(84)90112-2
Chapman MR, Kearney MT, Klei TR (2003) Equine cyathostome populations: accuracy of species composition estimations. Vet Parasitol 116:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(03)00239-5
Kuzmina TA (2012) Analysis of regional peculiarities of strongylid (Nematoda, Strongylidae) biodiversity in domestic horses in Ukraine. Vest Zool 46(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10058-012-0002-4
Gawor JJ (1995) The prevalence and abundance of internal parasites in working horses autopsied in Poland. Vet Parasitol 58:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)00698-c
Bucknell D, Hoste H, Gasser RB, Beveridge I (1996) The structure of the community of strongyloid nematodes of domestic equids. J Helminthol 70:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x0001539x
Kornaś S, Cabaret J, Skalska M, Nowosad B (2010) Horse infection with intestinal helminths in relation to age, sex, access to grass and farm system. Vet Parasitol 174:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.007
Kuzmina T, Kornaś S, Basiaga M, Kharchenko V, Vyniarska A (2011) Biodiversity of strongylids (Nematoda: Strongylidae) communities in domestic horses from Poland and Ukraine. Helminthol 48:77–84. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-011-0013-7
Slivinska K, Kharchenko V, Wróblewski Z, Gawor J, Kuzmina T (2016) Parasitological survey of Polish primitive horses (Equus caballus gmelini ant.): influence of age, sex and management strategies on the parasite community. Helminthol 53:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/helmin-2016-0023
Boisseau M, Mach N, Basiaga M, Kuzmina T, Laugier C, Sallé G (2023) Patterns of variation in equine strongyle community structure across age groups and gut compartments. Parasit Vectors 16:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-022-05645-5
Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Drudge JH (1999) Historical perspective of cyathostomes; prevalence, treatment and control programs. Vet Parasitol 85:97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00091-6
Matthews JB, Hodgkinson JE, Dowdall SM, Proudman CJ (2004) Recent developments in research into the Cyathostominae and Anoplocephala Perfoliata. Vet Res 35:371–381. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2004026
Sallé G, Kornas S, Basiaga M (2018) Equine strongyle communities are constrained by sex and species dispersal-fecundity trade-off. Parasit Vectors 11:279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2858-9
Bonneau S, Maynard L, Tomczuk K, Kok D, Eun HM (2009) Anthelmintic efficacies of a tablet formula of ivermectin-praziquantel on horses experimentally infected with three Strongylus species. Parasitol Res 105:817–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1460-7
Studzińska MB, Tomczuk K, Demkowska-Kutrzepa M, Szczepaniak K (2012) The Strongylidae belonging to Strongylus genus in horses from southeastern Poland. Parasitol Res 111:1417–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3087-3
Kaplan RM (2004) Drug resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance: a status report. Trends Parasitol 20:477–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2004.08.001
Nielsen MK (2022) Anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: current status and emerging trends. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 20:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2022.10.005
Cai E, Wu R, Wu Y, Gao Y, Zhu T, Li J (2024) A systematic review and meta-analysis on the current status of anthelmintic resistance in equine nematodes: a global perspective. Mol Biochem Parasitol 257:111600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2023.111600
Burger HJ, Bauer C (1987) Efficacy of four anthelmintics against benzimidazole-resistant cyathostomes of horses. Vet Rec 120:293–296. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.120.13.293
Tolliver SC, Lyons ET, Drudge JH, Stamper S, Granstrom DE (1993) Critical tests of thiabendazole, oxibendazole, and oxfendazole for drug resistance of population-B equine small strongyles (1989 and 1990). Am J Vet Res 54:908–913
Lyons E, Tolliver S, Drudge J, Stamper S, Swerczek T, Granstrom D (1996) A study (1977–1992) of population dynamics of endoparasites featuring benzimidazole-resistant small strongyles (population S) in Shetland ponies. Vet Parasitol 66:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(96)00998-3
Osterman Lind E, Kuzmina T, Uggla A, Waller PJ, Höglund J (2007) A field study on the effect of some anthelmintics on cyathostomins of horses in Sweden. Vet Res Commun 31:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-006-3402-5
Kuzmina TA, Kharchenko VO (2008) Anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomins of brood horses in Ukraine and influence of anthelmintic treatments on strongylid community structure. Vet Parasitol 154:277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.03.024
Johnson ACB, Biddle AS (2021) The use of molecular profiling to track equine reinfection rates of cyathostomin species following anthelmintic administration. Anim (Basel) 11:1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051345
Baruš V (1962) Helminthofauna koni v Čescoslovensku. Čescoslov Parasitol 9:15–94
Ogbourne CP (1976) The prevalence, relative abundance and site distribution of nematodes of the subfamily Cyathostominae in horses killed in Britain. J Helminthol 50:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x00027760
Eydal M (1983) Gastrointestinal parasites in horses in Iceland. J Agric Res Iceland 15:3–28
Collobert-Laugier C, Hoste H, Sevin C, Dorchies P (2002) Prevalence, abundance and site distribution of equine small strongyles in Normandy, France. Vet Parasitol 110:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00328-x
Kuzmina TA, Kharchenko VA, Starovir AI, Dvojnos GM (2005) Analysis of the strongylid nematodes (Nematoda: Strongylidae) community after deworming of brood horses in Ukraine. Vet Parasitol 131:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.010
Grácz F (2020) Situácia v chove koní v roku 2019 z pohľadu ZCHKS. [The situation in horse breeding in 2019 from the point of view of ZCHKS]. In: Association of horse breeders in Slovakia. https://agroporadenstvo.sk/zivocisna-vyroba-kone?article=1818
Čerňanská D, Paoletti B, Králová-Hromadová I, Iorio R, Cudeková P, Milillo P, Traversa D (2009) Application of a reverse line blot hybridisation assay for the species-specific identification of cyathostomins (Nematoda, Strongylida) from benzimidazole-treated horses in the Slovak Republic. Vet Parasitol 160:171–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.078
Várady M, Čorba J (1997) Resistance of equine small strongyles to benzimidazoles in Slovak Republic. Helminthol 34:81–85
Várady M, Königová A, Čorba J (2000) Benzimidazole resistance in equine cyathostomes in Slovakia. Vet Parasitol 94:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(00)00366-6
Königová A, Várady M, Čorba J (2001) The prevalence of equine gastrointestinal parasites in the Slovak Republic. Helmintol 38:211–214
Königová A, Várady M, Čorba J (2003) Comparison of in vitro methods and faecal egg count reduction test for the detection of benzimidazole resistance in small strongyles of horses. Vet Res Commun 27:281–288. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024079907895
Pilaker A, Goldová M (2008) Parasitic investigation of horses in eastern Slovakia. Folia Vet 52:14–15
Herd RP (1992) Performing equine fecal egg counts. Vet Med 87:240–244
Coles GC, Bauer C, Borgsteede FH, Geerts S, Klei TR, Taylor MA, Waller PJ (1992) World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP) methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Vet Parasitol 44:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(92)90141-u
Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. Revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/3284227
R Core Team (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LD, François R, Grolemund G, Hayes A, Henry L, Hester J, Kuhn M, Pedersen TL, Miller E, Bache SM, Müller K, Ooms J, Robinson D, Seidel DP, Spinu V, Takahashi K, Vaughan D, Wilke C, Woo K, Yutani H (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4:1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
Kohl M (2023) MKinfer: Inferential Statistics. R package version 1.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MKinfer/index.html
Salinas H, Ramirez-Delgado D (2021) ecolTest: Community Ecology Tests. R package version 0.0.1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ecolTest/index.html
Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H, Barbour M, Bedward M, Bolker B, Borcard D, Carvalho G, Chirico M, Caceres MD, Durand S, Evangelista HBA, FitzJohn R, Friendly M, Furneaux B, Hannigan G, Hill MO, Lahti L, McGlinn D, Ouellette MH, Cunha ER, Smith T, Stier A, Braak CJFT, Weedon J (2022) Vegan: community ecology package. https://CRAN.R- proje ct. org/ package = vegan
Wang Y, Naumann U, Wright ST, Warton DI (2012) Mvabund– an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods Ecol Evol 3:471–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00190.x
Kornaś S, Skalska M, Nowosad B, Gawor J, Kharchenko V, Cabaret J (2009) Occurrence of strongyles (Strongylidae) in horses from small farms on the basis of necropsy. Pol J Vet Sci 12:225–230
Gundłach JL, Sadzikowski AB, Tomczuk K, Studzińska MB (2004) Parasites of the alimentary tract of horses from the Lublin district in the light of coproscopic and gross anatomopathological examinations. Medycyna Wet 60:1089–1092
Sobieszewski K (1967) Parasitic nematodes of the alimentary tract of horses in the Lublin Palatinate. Acta Parasitol Pol 15:103–108
Kuzmina TA, Kharchenko VA, Zvegintsova NS (2007) Comparative study of the intestinal strongylid communities of equidae in the Askania-Nova biosphere reserve. Ukraine Helminthol 44:62–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-007-0005-9
Kuzmina ТA, Kuzmin YI (2008) The strongylid community of working donkeys (Equus asinus L.) in Ukraine. Vest Zool 42(2):99–104. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10058-008-0004-4
Kuzmina ТА, Zvegintsova NS, Yasynetska NI, Kharchenko VA (2020) Anthelmintic resistance in strongylids (Nematoda: Strongylidae) parasitizing wild and domestic equids in the Askania Nova Biosphere Reserve, Ukraine. Ann Parasitol 66:49–60. https://doi.org/10.17420/ap6601.237
Duncan JL (1974) Field studies on the epidemiology of mixed strongyle infection in the horse. Vet Rec 94:337–345
Kuzmina TA, Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Dzeverin II, Kharchenko VA (2012) Fecundity of various species of strongylids (Nematoda: Strongylidae)– parasites of domestic horses. Parasitol Res 111:2265–2271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3077-5
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge two anonymous reviewers who kindly improved an earlier version of our manuscript. The authors are grateful to Prof. Terry R. Spraker from Colorado State University, USA, for his valuable comments and corrections to the manuscript. The study was supported by the EU NextGenerationEU through the Recovery and Resilience Plan for Slovakia under projects No. 09I03-03-V01-00015 and No. 09I03-03-V01-00046.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic in cooperation with Centre for Scientific and Technical Information of the Slovak Republic
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Conceptualization: Kuzmina T. A., Syrota Y., Konigova A. Material collection and processing: Kuzmina T. A., Burcakova L. Helminth identifications and data processing: Kuzmina T. A. Data analysis: Syrota Y., Konigova A., Babjak M., Kuzmina T. A. Kuzmina T. A. and Syrota Y. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, while all the other authors provided comments and feedback. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuzmina, T.A., Königová, A., Burcáková, L. et al. Strongylids of Domestic Horses in Eastern Slovakia: Species Diversity and Evaluation of Particular Factors Affecting Strongylid Communities. Acta Parasit. 69, 1284–1294 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-024-00854-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-024-00854-7