Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. are zoonotic protozoan parasites that infect humans and animals [1]. Cryptosporidiosis is mainly presented by chronic diarrhea, especially in people with weak immune systems [2]. The disease causes huge economic losses by affecting the intestines of cattle, sheep, and goats. Cryptosporidium spp. can also be detected in the conjunctiva, respiratory system, and bursa fabricius of poultry [3].

The most common species in cattle are Cryptosporidium parvum, C. andersoni, C. bovis, and C. ryanae. Although cryptosporidiosis is mainly asymptomatic in adult cattle, it can cause death in neonatal calves due to diarrhea. While C. parvum is highly pathogenic in neonatal calves, C. bovis and C. ryanae can also cause clinical diarrhea [4]. Other species rarely produce clinical symptoms in calves [5].

One of the most important causes of newborn calf deaths is diarrhea. The main causative agents responsible for calf diarrhea are Cryptosporidium spp., Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., rotavirus, and coronavirus [6]. There are studies reporting from Europe that 30% of calf diarrhea is caused by Cryptosporidium spp. [7].

Treatment costs increase because of diarrhea caused by cryptosporidiosis in calves. In addition, malabsorption due to intestinal damage leads to significant yield loss. As a result of diarrhea and malabsorption, feed utilization rate decreases in calves and target live weight and milk yield may not be reached in farms [8].

Microscopy, serological, and molecular tests are being used to diagnose the cryptosporidiosis in calves and cattle. Special staining methods, such as Ziehl–Neelsen and Kinyoun acid fast, are used in microscopic diagnosis [8]. Serological tests are based on the detection of antigen or antibody in the stool [9]. In molecular diagnosis, conventional PCR, nested PCR, and Real-Time PCR are used most frequently, and 18S rRNA, gp60, COWP, hsp70 and β-tubulin are most frequently targeted genes during diagnosis [10].

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a nucleic acid amplification technique with high sensitivity and specificity. It can be applied quickly, easily, and is suitable for use in field conditions since it can operate at a single temperature. In addition, there is no need for advanced laboratory equipment and highly experienced personnel during the application of the LAMP technique [11]. For these reasons, LAMP can be a very useful diagnostic tool to detect Cryptosporidium spp. in calves under field conditions.

LAMP tests have been designed to detect Cryptosporidium spp. in different samples, such as water and feces samples [1] cattle, sheep and horse feces samples [12], water samples [13], wastewater samples [14], human feces samples [15,16,17], and cattle and water buffalo feces samples [18].

Hence, in this study, we aimed to develop a novel colorimetric LAMP test named “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” to detect Cryptosporidium spp. 18S rRNA gene in feces samples of newborn calves, for the first time. Importantly, in this novel test, diagnosis can be achieved with the naked eye without using any device. The analytical performance of this test was evaluated using control plasmids and the clinical sensitivity of the “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was determined using feces samples of newborn calves. The results were compared with the Real-Time PCR targeting Cryptosporidium spp. COWP gene.

Materials and Methods

Samples and DNA Isolation

Feces samples were collected from 127 calves between 2020 and 2021 from farms located in İzmir and Manisa provinces of Türkiye. Feces samples were collected from calves under 1 year of age with diarrhea or the ones who had previously diagnosed with diarrhea. The 67 stool samples were obtained from Manisa province, and the 60 stool samples were obtained from Izmir province (Fig. 1). The RTA DNA Isolation Kit from Stool (İstanbul, Türkiye) was used to extract genomic DNA from feces samples with minor modification [19]. Briefly, 100 mg of feces was added to the purple-capped sample preparation tube containing STL solution (inhibitor breaker) and vortexed at high speed for 30 s. The top cap of the sample preparation tube was opened, and the liquid sample was transferred to a 2 ml centrifuge tube. Samples were incubated at 95 °C for 20 min. After incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 18,000×g for 3 min. The supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml centrifuge tube and centrifuged again. The supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 ml centrifuge tube, 25 µl proteinase K was added, and vortex and spin-down was performed. Then, 500 µl of solution B was added, vortexed for 5 s, and incubated at 70 °C for 10 min. The 650 µl absolute ethanol was added to the samples and vortex spin-down was performed. The samples were added to the filter tubes of the kit and centrifuged at 18,000×g for 30 s. Then, the filter tubes were washed with 700 µl of W1 and W2 solutions, respectively, by centrifuging for 30 s at 18,000×g. After the filter tubes were opened and kept at 70 °C for 5 min, the empty filter tube was centrifuged at 18,000×g for 1 min. The filter tubes were placed on new 1.5 ml centrifuge tubes, 100 µl of solution E was added and waited at room temperature for 3 min. Finally, the tube was centrifuged at 18,000×g for 1 min and 30 s, respectively. The obtained genomic DNA was stored at -20 °C until Real-Time PCR was performed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geographic map of the study area

Design of The LAMP Primer Set Targeting Cryptosporidium spp. 18S rRNA Gene

Specific primer set targeting the Cryptosporidium spp. 18S rRNA gene (GenBank No: AF513227.2) was designed using PrimerExplorer V5 software (http://primerexplorer.jp/lampv5e/index.html) (Table 1). The designed primers were confirmed to be gene-specific by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLAST program (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).

Table 1 Primer sets of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test”

Construction of Positive Control Plasmid

Initially, the targeted 18S rRNA gene region was isolated from the DNA sample of a Cryptosporidium-positive feces which was previously confirmed by PCR using external primers F3 and B3 (Table 1) and previously described protocol [20]. The feces sample was obtained from a < 2-month-old calf presenting with diarrhea and Cryptosporidium oocyst were detected in the calf’s stool by microscopy, which was further confirmed by Real-Time PCR and nested PCR. Next, the PCR-positive strain was identified as C. parvum by sequencing [20]. During PCR, the 25 ml amplification reaction included 5 ng template DNA, the F3 and B3 primers (0.4 mM each), 1.25U Taq DNA Polymerase (ThermoScientific), 200 mM dNTPs, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 × Taq reaction buffer. The PCR amplification reaction was performed using the following calculated protocol: 10 min initial denaturation step at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 53 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR product with a final size of 207 bp was visualized by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.

Later, the PCR product was purified with the PCR purification kit (QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit, Qiagen, Germany) and cloned into the pCR 2.1-TOPO vector (Thermoscientific, USA) according to the manufacturers’ protocol. Briefly, 1 μl of purified PCR product, 1 μl of vector, 1 μl of salt solution, and 3 μl of molecular distilled water were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. Then, 50 μl of TOP10 E. coli competent cells were added to the mixture and incubated on ice for 20 min. After incubation, the mixture was heat-shocked at 42 °C for 30 s and 250 µl of S.O.C medium was added quickly and incubated at 225 rpm at 37 °C for 1 h. Cells were then seeded on LB-Agar plates containing 50 µg/ml kanamycin and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Next day, a single colony was selected and inoculated into 3 ml of LB medium containing 50 µg/ml kanamycin and incubated overnight at 37 °C at 225 rpm. Plasmid purification from the obtained colonies was carried out in accordance with the kit protocol (QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit, Qiagen, Germany). The presence of 18S rRNA gene in pCR 2.1.-TOPO vector (named pCR 2.1-Crypto18SrRNA) was confirmed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing [20]. Thereafter, the concentration of pCR 2.1-Crypto18SrRNA in purified sample was determined by Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermoscientific, USA) and the amount of copy plasmid in purified sample was calculated using the following formula “Number of copies = (DNA amount in ng × [6.02 × 1023]) / (pCR 2.1-Crypto18SrRNA plasmid length in bp) × [1 × 109] × 650) [21].

Development of LAMP Test

Development of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was carried out with WarmStart® Colorimetric LAMP 2 × Master Mix kit (NEB, USA). A 15 μl reaction consisted of 7.5 μl of Master Mix, 1 μl of control plasmid (103 copy plasmid/reaction), and 1.75 μl primer mix [containing inner primers outer primers F3 and B3 (0.1 μM each), loop primers LF and LB (0.2 μM each), FIP and BIP (0.8 μM each)]. “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was incubated at 58 °C for 60 min in a Dry Bath Incubator (Major Science, USA). In order to determine the optimal incubation time, LAMP tubes were incubated at 60 °C for 5 to 70 min [22]. The optimum reaction temperature for the LAMP test was determined as 58 °C in our previous study [23].

To assess of analytical sensitivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test”, pCR 2.1-Crypto18SrRNA plasmid with an 8.39 × 1013/μl concentration was initially diluted to 1 × 1013/μl and then diluted with distilled water to make positive controls containing 106–105–104–103-102–10–1–10−1 plasmid copies/reaction. Sterile DNase- and RNase-free distilled water was used as negative control.

Cross-Reactivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP Test”

The cross-reactivity of the “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was determined using DNA samples belonging to Toxoplasma gondii Ankara strain [24]. Leishmania infantum (MHOM/TN/80/IPT1 strain), Plasmodium vivax (ATCC MR4-ATCC), Entamoeba histolytica (ATCC 30459D), Acanthamoeba spp. (Acanthamoeba sp. strain DP/5A with T4 genotype), Giardia intestinalis (microscopy confirmed positive sample), Escherichia coli (BL21 strain), P. jirovecii (PCR confirmed positive control sample) [25], and Trichomonas vaginalis (microscopy confirmed positive control sample) [26]. These DNA samples were investigated by “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” as described in Sect. "Development of LAMP Test".

Real-Time PCR

The 151 bp region of Cryptosporidium spp. COWP gene (GenBank accession number: AF248743.1) was targeted by Real-Time PCR. The hydrolysis probe was 5’- TGCCATACATTGTTGTCCTGACAAATTGAAT -3’-BHQ (31nt, cowp-P702, labeled at the 3’ end with FAM), and the primers were 5’-CAAATTGATACCGTTTGTCCTTCTG-3’ (25nt, cowp-P702 forward primer) and 5’-GGCATGTCGATTCTAATTCAGCT-3’ (23nt, cowp-P702 reverse primer). PCR reaction with a 20 µl final volume consisted of 1 × LightCycler Taqman Master mix, 5 µl DNA template or controls, 0.5 µM from each primer, and 0.1 µM probe. The amplification reaction was performed as follows: 10 min initial denaturation step at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 55 °C, and 15 s at 72 °C [19, 27].

Clinical Sensitivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP Test”

The clinical sensitivity of the developed “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was determined by comparing the LAMP test results of the collected stool samples with the Real-Time PCR test targeting COWP gene [19].

Results

Primer Blast Results

The gene fragments targeted by LAMP primers in 18S rRNA gene were screened with the NCBI BLAST program and it was found that each gene fragment was 100% similar to Cryptosporidium species. Any similarity was not detected with other pathogens (Supplementary material).

Development of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP Test” Using Control Plasmids

As shown in Fig. 2, the “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” product can detect 18S rRNA gene region starting at 30 min both by analyses of test tubes by naked eye (Fig. 2A) which was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis results (Fig. 2B). The most significant color change (i.e., LAMP product) was detected in tube incubated for 50 min (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Optimization of incubation time for the Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test. Each tube contained 103 copy plasmid/reaction. The sample was incubated at 60 °C for 5 to 70 min at 5 min intervals to determine the optimum incubation time. A Colorimetric LAMP results indicated by dye and visualized by eye B Amplified DNA products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. L DNA ladder, N Negative

Analytical Sensitivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP Test”

Analytical sensitivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was determined using serially diluted pCR 2.1-Crypto18SrRNA plasmids. According to the results, the analytical sensitivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was 1 copy plasmid/reaction (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analytical sensitivity of the “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test”. A Results of the “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” as detected by naked eye B Amplified DNA products of LAMP RE assay were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis

Clinical Sensitivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP Test”

As a result of the Real-Time PCR test targeting, the COWP gene of 127 calf feces samples, 49 positive (38.58%) were positive, and 78 samples were negative. “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” detected 51 positive samples among 127 calf feces samples (40.15%). If we use Real-Time PCR targeting COWP gene as a reference method, the clinical sensitivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was 100%, whereas specificity was 97.4% (Table 2). The two samples detected positive by LAMP and negative by Real-Time PCR were collected from calves with diarrhea.

Table 2 Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV (Positive Predictive Value), NPV (Negative Predictive Value), and accuracy values of LAMP assay using Real-Time PCR targeting COWP gene of Cryptosporidium as reference test

Cross-Reactivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP Test”

Cross-reactivity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was determined using DNA samples belonging to Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium vivax, Entamoeba spp., Leishmania infantum, Acanthamoeba spp., Giardia intestinalis, Escherichia coli, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and Trichomonas vaginalis. According to the results, any positive LAMP reaction was not observed in any of the parasites and bacteria analyzed (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Cross-reactivity of the “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test”. A The “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” as detected by naked eye B Amplified DNA products of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. 1: T. gondii, 2: P. vivax, 3: E. histolytica, 4: L. infantum., 5: Acanthamoeba spp., 6: G. intestinalis, 7: E. coli, 8: P. jirovecii 9: T. vaginalis. L DNA ladder, N Negative, P Positive

Discussion

Calf health is vital for sustainable herd health all over the world. Accordingly, a calf birth from each cow is aimed each year for an economical farm management [28]. Diarrhea caused by both infectious agents and other factors  in newborn calves’ results with great economic losses worldwide. Escherichia coli, Cryptosporidium spp., coronavirus, and rotavirus are the most common neonatal diarrhea causing pathogenic agents in calves [29,30,31]. In many studies, it has been stated that frequency of diarrhea in calves is associated with the frequency of Cryptosporidium spp. [32].

The prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in cattle is around 30% worldwide and because of this high prevalence rapid, accurate, and economical diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp. is very important in maintaining and managing herd health [33]. The diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves is achieved by microscopy, serological, or molecular tests. Microscopy has disadvantages such as the need for experienced personnel and it has low sensitivity [19]. In serological diagnosis, the sensitivity is also low [34]. During molecular diagnosis using methods, such as PCR, nested PCR, or Real-Time PCR targeting Cryptosporidium spp., experienced personnel is required and high-cost laboratory setup is an important disadvantage, and for these reasons, their application under field conditions is very limited.

In this study, a “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” was developed which can achieve rapid, accurate, and economical diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves. The test does not require advanced laboratory equipment and has a sensitivity of 1 copy of plasmid/reaction (Fig. 3). In addition, it did not cross-react with other bacteria, parasites, or viruses using bioinformatic analyzes (Fig. 4 and Supplementary material). We used Real-Time PCR targeting COWP gene as a reference method in this study because the COWP gene has high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp. [35]. Accordingly, the clinical sensitivity and the specificity of “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” were 100% and 97.4%, respectively (Table 2). The remaining two samples detected positive by LAMP and negative by Real-Time PCR were collected from claves with diarrhea.

There are a limited number of Cryptosporidium LAMP studies. In a study, the Cryptosporidium parvum gp60 gene-specific LAMP test was developed and its sensitivity was determined as 1 oocyst/reaction. The developed test was found to be more sensitive than PCR. In addition, the developed test was studied with environmental and feces samples that were categorized by the fluorescent antibody test and was found to be compatible with the fluorescent antibody test [1] Among the 270 stool samples that were negative with nested PCR, 79 samples were found positive (29.95%) with LAMP test targeting the SAM-1 gene region [12]. In a previously developed LAMP test targeting other segments of 18S rRNA gene, the detection limit was determined as 6 × 10–3 oocysts, and it was found 3.5 times more sensitive than microscopy in environmental samples [13]. The analytical sensitivity of an LFD-LAMP test targeting the SAM-1 gene was 10 oocysts/ml and it was shown that the test is 10 times more sensitive than the nested PCR test [17]. The sensitivity of the SAM-1 LAMP test modified by adding uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) was found to be 10 oocysts/reaction [16]. LAMP test targeting Cryptosporidium parvum gp60 gene was performed with cattle and buffalo feces samples that were Cryptosporidium-positive with Kinyoun acid fast. However, the sensitivity of this test has not been showed [18].

LAMP tests developed in previous studies work with SYBR green, turbidimeter, or gel electroporation methods, and moreover additional devices, such as electrophoresis device, turbidimeter, or UV lamp, are required to interpret the results. The “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” developed in this study has an important advantage over these approaches by being able to visually diagnose Cryptosporidium spp. with naked eye.

In our previous publication [19], there were 6 positive and 25 negative Cryptosporidium spp. water samples collected from water resources as detected by Real-Time PCR targeting COWP. The “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” developed in this study was applied to these samples, and it showed 100% agreement (Data not shown). For this reason, it was thought that the “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” developed for Cryptosporidium spp. in this study can also work appropriately with water samples, which are important sources of cryptosporidiosis.

Conclusion

As a result, rapid, accurate, and economical diagnosis of Cryptosporidium spp. in feces samples of calves have utmost importance for herd health. “Rapid-Crypto Colorimetric LAMP test” is a diagnostic method that can be applied both by clinician veterinarians and by personnel with basic laboratory knowledge (such as veterinary technicians and biologists) working in basic laboratories established in farms or in the field. With the definitive and rapid diagnosis of the cryptosporidiosis, treatment costs and loss of yield will be reduced, and it will make a positive contribution to both the farm and the country’s economy.