Abstract
The well-known Sauer-Freise flux equation is derived analytically for the general case of a multiphase, multicomponent diffusion couple with variable molar volume. Discontinuities in concentration versus distance data are specifically treated. Fluxes with respect to the local center of volume are employed if the partial molar volumes are constants. Fluxes with respect to the local center of moles are employed for the more general case of variable partial molar volumes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Once the position of the Matano interface is established, one often adjusts the origin of x to make \(x_0 = 0\). Here we retain a general coordinate system in the interest of flexibility.
We could equally well have said that they depend on mole fraction. Since \(c_3 = (1-\bar{V}_1 c_1 - \bar{V}_2 c_2)/\bar{V}_3\), the mole fractions are given by \(X_1 = c_1 \bar{V}_3/[1 + c_1(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_1) + c_2(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_2)]\) and \(X_2 = c_2 \bar{V}_3/[1 + c_1(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_1) + c_2(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_2)]\).
We know this because the concentrations, and hence the \(D_{ij}^3\), are approximately constants over long distances near the ends of the couple, so we can use the well-known properties of error function solutions for constant diffusivities near those regions to show that these derivatives go exponentially to zero.
Note that the units of n are concentration times distance. We could divide the right hand side of Eq 51 by some constant concentration to make n have the units of length, but we omit such a factor because it only clutters the equations.
References
Q. Zhang and J.-C. Zhao, Extracting Interdiffusion Coefficients from Binary Diffusion Couples Using Traditional Methods and a Forward-Simulation Method, Intermetallics, 2013, 34, p 132-141
Y. Adda and J. Philibert, La Diffusion dans les Solides, 2 vols, P.U.F, Paris, 1966
J. Philibert, Atom Movements, Diffusion and Mass Transport in Solids, Les Editions de Physique Les Ulis, France, 1991
L. Boltzmann, About the Integration of the Diffusion Equation with Variable Coefficients. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1894, 53, p 959-964
C. Matano, On the Relation Between the Diffusion Coefficients of Solid Metals. Jpn. J. Phys., 1933, 8, p 109-113
A. Vignes and J.P. Sabatier, Ternary Diffusion in Fe-Co-Ni Alloys, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 1969, 245, p 1795-1802
F. Sauer and V. Freise, Diffusion in Binären Gemischen mit Volumeänderung”. Zeitschrift für Electrochemie, 1962 (in German), 66, p 353-362
F.J.A. den Broeder, A General Simplification and Improvement of the Matano-Boltzmann Method in the Determination of the Interdiffusion Coefficient in Binary Systems. Scripta Metall., 1969, 3, p 321-326
C. Wagner, The Evaluation of Data Obtained with Diffusion Couples of Binary Single-Phase and Multiphase Systems. Acta Metall., 1969, 17, p 99-107
R.W. Balluffi, On the Determination of Diffusion Coefficients in Chemical Diffusion. Acta Metall., 1960, 8, 871-873
M. Appel, Solution for Fick’s 2nd Law with Variable Diffusivity in a Multi-phase system. Scripta Metall., 1968, 2, p 217-221
E.R. Wallach, Interdiffusion Coefficients and the Calculation of Phase Widths in Bi-Metallic Diffusion Couples. Scripta Metall., 1977, 11, p 361-366
R.F. Sekerka, Similarity Solutions for a Binary Diffusion Couple with Diffusivity and Density Dependent on Composition. Progr. Mater. Sci., 2004, 49, p 511-536
R.F. Sekerka, Ternary Diffusion Notes, unpublished, July 15, 2014
G.K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967, p 75-79
Acknowledgments
William J. Boettinger acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, under financial assistance award 70NANB15H279.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Further insight regarding the effect of a variable molar volume can be gained by integrating Eq 51 at constant t to obtain
Here we have defined \(x_0(t) = x(n_0,t)\), which gives the trajectory of the material marking the initial discontinuity of the diffusion couple at \(n = n_0\). Since \(h(\uplambda ^*)\) is a monotonically increasing function of \(\uplambda ^*\), we can define an equivalent similarity variable \(\uplambda _x := h(\uplambda ^*)\) in which case \((x-x_0(t))/t^{1/2} = \uplambda _x\). At constant t, \(d\uplambda ^* = c d\uplambda _x = (c/t^{1/2})dx\). When \(n=n_0\), \(\uplambda ^* =0\) and \(h(\uplambda ^*) = \uplambda _x =0\).
By taking the total derivative of Eq 71 with respect to time, we obtain
But
Substitution into Eq 72 results in
These last two terms can be combined by integration by parts, resulting in
Equation 75 shows that the formerly eliminated velocity \(v^*(x,t)\) can be related directly to the fact that the molar volume is variable. For markers near the right end of the diffusion couple, we have \(v^* = d x_R/d t \) and we can take \(\uplambda ^* = \infty \) to obtain
where we have integrated by parts with \( d V_m/d \uplambda ^{*'} = d [V_m- V_m(\infty )]/d \uplambda ^{*'} \). Similarly, at the left end,
By eliminating \( d x_0/d t \) and integrating on time, we find
which shows how the distance between distant markers changes with time. Similarly, by integrating Eq 77 we obtain
Note that Eq 78-79 only give relative values of \(x_L(t)\), \(x_0(t)\) and \(x_R(t)\). Values with respect to an observer depend on forces that act on the diffusion couple in the x direction. If such forces were zero, the center of mass of the couple would not change its state of motion and could remain fixed with respect to the reference frame of an observer. Alternatively, one end, say the left end of the couple, could be clamped to the reference frame of the observer. Then \(x_L(0)= x_L(t) =0\) and Eq 79 becomes simply \(x_0(t) = x_0(0) + t^{1/2}g^-\).
When the molar volume is a constant, the right hand side of Eq 75 vanishes and \(v^*(x,t) = d x_0(t)/d t \) becomes independent of position x. In that case, the diffusion couple is rigid and one can work in a reference frame in which \( d x_0(t)/d t =0\).
We also note that in the case of constant partial molar volumes it can be shown that the quantity g + + g − in Eq 78 vanishes by virtue of Eq 64, which is equivalent to the usual equal area construction for the Matano interface position in this case. Thus the length of the couple, as measured by the distance between distant markers that track the center of moles, does not change if the partial molar volumes are constant. Finally, we note that for constant partial molar volumes the center of mole velocity is the same as the center of volume velocity in the ends where the fluxes vanish.[13,14]
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sekerka, R.F., McFadden, G.B. & Boettinger, W.J. Analytical Derivation of the Sauer-Freise Flux Equation for Multicomponent Multiphase Diffusion Couples with Variable Partial Molar Volumes. J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 37, 640–650 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-016-0500-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-016-0500-0