Skip to main content
Log in

Analytical Derivation of the Sauer-Freise Flux Equation for Multicomponent Multiphase Diffusion Couples with Variable Partial Molar Volumes

  • Published:
Journal of Phase Equilibria and Diffusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The well-known Sauer-Freise flux equation is derived analytically for the general case of a multiphase, multicomponent diffusion couple with variable molar volume. Discontinuities in concentration versus distance data are specifically treated. Fluxes with respect to the local center of volume are employed if the partial molar volumes are constants. Fluxes with respect to the local center of moles are employed for the more general case of variable partial molar volumes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Once the position of the Matano interface is established, one often adjusts the origin of x to make \(x_0 = 0\). Here we retain a general coordinate system in the interest of flexibility.

  2. We could equally well have said that they depend on mole fraction. Since \(c_3 = (1-\bar{V}_1 c_1 - \bar{V}_2 c_2)/\bar{V}_3\), the mole fractions are given by \(X_1 = c_1 \bar{V}_3/[1 + c_1(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_1) + c_2(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_2)]\) and \(X_2 = c_2 \bar{V}_3/[1 + c_1(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_1) + c_2(\bar{V}_3 -\bar{V}_2)]\).

  3. We know this because the concentrations, and hence the \(D_{ij}^3\), are approximately constants over long distances near the ends of the couple, so we can use the well-known properties of error function solutions for constant diffusivities near those regions to show that these derivatives go exponentially to zero.

  4. Note that the units of n are concentration times distance. We could divide the right hand side of Eq 51 by some constant concentration to make n have the units of length, but we omit such a factor because it only clutters the equations.

References

  1. Q. Zhang and J.-C. Zhao, Extracting Interdiffusion Coefficients from Binary Diffusion Couples Using Traditional Methods and a Forward-Simulation Method, Intermetallics, 2013, 34, p 132-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Adda and J. Philibert, La Diffusion dans les Solides, 2 vols, P.U.F, Paris, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Philibert, Atom Movements, Diffusion and Mass Transport in Solids, Les Editions de Physique Les Ulis, France, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Boltzmann, About the Integration of the Diffusion Equation with Variable Coefficients. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 1894, 53, p 959-964

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Matano, On the Relation Between the Diffusion Coefficients of Solid Metals. Jpn. J. Phys., 1933, 8, p 109-113

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Vignes and J.P. Sabatier, Ternary Diffusion in Fe-Co-Ni Alloys, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 1969, 245, p 1795-1802

  7. F. Sauer and V. Freise, Diffusion in Binären Gemischen mit Volumeänderung”. Zeitschrift für Electrochemie, 1962 (in German), 66, p 353-362

    Google Scholar 

  8. F.J.A. den Broeder, A General Simplification and Improvement of the Matano-Boltzmann Method in the Determination of the Interdiffusion Coefficient in Binary Systems. Scripta Metall., 1969, 3, p 321-326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Wagner, The Evaluation of Data Obtained with Diffusion Couples of Binary Single-Phase and Multiphase Systems. Acta Metall., 1969, 17, p 99-107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R.W. Balluffi, On the Determination of Diffusion Coefficients in Chemical Diffusion. Acta Metall., 1960, 8, 871-873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Appel, Solution for Fick’s 2nd Law with Variable Diffusivity in a Multi-phase system. Scripta Metall., 1968, 2, p 217-221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. E.R. Wallach, Interdiffusion Coefficients and the Calculation of Phase Widths in Bi-Metallic Diffusion Couples. Scripta Metall., 1977, 11, p 361-366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R.F. Sekerka, Similarity Solutions for a Binary Diffusion Couple with Diffusivity and Density Dependent on Composition. Progr. Mater. Sci., 2004, 49, p 511-536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.F. Sekerka, Ternary Diffusion Notes, unpublished, July 15, 2014

  15. G.K. Batchelor, An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967, p 75-79

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

William J. Boettinger acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, under financial assistance award 70NANB15H279.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. B. McFadden.

Appendix

Appendix

Further insight regarding the effect of a variable molar volume can be gained by integrating Eq 51 at constant t to obtain

$$ x(n,t) - x_0(t) = \int _{n_0}^n \frac{dn'}{c(n',t)} = t^{1/2}\int _0^{\uplambda ^*(n,t)}\frac{d\uplambda ^{*'}}{c(\uplambda ^{*'})}=:t^{1/2}h(\uplambda ^*). $$
(71)

Here we have defined \(x_0(t) = x(n_0,t)\), which gives the trajectory of the material marking the initial discontinuity of the diffusion couple at \(n = n_0\). Since \(h(\uplambda ^*)\) is a monotonically increasing function of \(\uplambda ^*\), we can define an equivalent similarity variable \(\uplambda _x := h(\uplambda ^*)\) in which case \((x-x_0(t))/t^{1/2} = \uplambda _x\). At constant t, \(d\uplambda ^* = c d\uplambda _x = (c/t^{1/2})dx\). When \(n=n_0\), \(\uplambda ^* =0\) and \(h(\uplambda ^*) = \uplambda _x =0\).

By taking the total derivative of Eq 71 with respect to time, we obtain

$$ \frac{d x}{d t} - \frac{d x_0(t)}{d t} = \frac{1}{2t^{1/2}}\int _0^{\uplambda ^*(n,t)}\frac{d\uplambda ^{*'}}{c(\uplambda ^{*'})}+ \frac{t^{1/2}}{c(\uplambda ^*)}\frac{d \uplambda ^*(n,t)}{d t}. $$
(72)

But

$$ \frac{d \uplambda ^*}{d t} = \frac{d }{d t}\frac{(n-n_0)}{t^{1/2}} = -\frac{\uplambda ^*}{2t} +\frac{c}{t^{1/2}} \left[ \frac{d x}{d t} -v^*\right] . $$
(73)

Substitution into Eq 72 results in

$$ v^*(x,t) - \frac{d x_0}{d t} = \frac{1}{2t^{1/2}}\int _0^{\uplambda ^*}\frac{d\uplambda ^{*'}}{c(\uplambda ^{*'})} - \frac{\uplambda ^*}{2c\,t^{1/2}}. $$
(74)

These last two terms can be combined by integration by parts, resulting in

$$ v^*(x,t) - \frac{d x_0}{d t} = - \frac{1}{2t^{1/2}}\int _0^{\uplambda ^*}\uplambda ^{*'}\frac{d V_m(\uplambda ^{*'})}{d \uplambda ^{*'}}d\uplambda ^{*'}. $$
(75)

Equation 75 shows that the formerly eliminated velocity \(v^*(x,t)\) can be related directly to the fact that the molar volume is variable. For markers near the right end of the diffusion couple, we have \(v^* = d x_R/d t \) and we can take \(\uplambda ^* = \infty \) to obtain

$$ \frac{d x_R}{d t} - \frac{d x_0}{d t} = -\frac{1}{2t^{1/2}}\int _0^{\infty }\uplambda ^{*'}\frac{d V_m(\uplambda ^{*'})}{d \uplambda ^{*'}}d\uplambda ^{*'} =\frac{1}{2t^{1/2}}\int _0^\infty [V_m(\uplambda ^{*'})-V_m(\infty )]d\uplambda ^{*'}:= \frac{1}{2t^{1/2}} g^+, $$
(76)

where we have integrated by parts with \( d V_m/d \uplambda ^{*'} = d [V_m- V_m(\infty )]/d \uplambda ^{*'} \). Similarly, at the left end,

$$ \frac{d x_L}{d t} - \frac{d x_0}{d t} = \frac{1}{2t^{1/2}}\int _{-\infty }^{0}\uplambda ^{*'}\frac{d V_m(\uplambda ^{*'})}{d \uplambda ^{*'}}d\uplambda ^{*'} =-\frac{1}{2t^{1/2}}\int _{-\infty }^0 [V_m(\uplambda ^{*'})-V_m(-\infty )]d\uplambda ^{*'}:= -\frac{1}{2t^{1/2}} g^-. $$
(77)

By eliminating \( d x_0/d t \) and integrating on time, we find

$$ x_R(t) -x_L(t) = x_R(0) -x_L(0) + t^{1/2}(g^- + g^+), $$
(78)

which shows how the distance between distant markers changes with time. Similarly, by integrating Eq 77 we obtain

$$ x_0(t) -x_L(t) = x_0(0) -x_L(0) + t^{1/2}g^- . $$
(79)

Note that Eq 78-79 only give relative values of \(x_L(t)\), \(x_0(t)\) and \(x_R(t)\). Values with respect to an observer depend on forces that act on the diffusion couple in the x direction. If such forces were zero, the center of mass of the couple would not change its state of motion and could remain fixed with respect to the reference frame of an observer. Alternatively, one end, say the left end of the couple, could be clamped to the reference frame of the observer. Then \(x_L(0)= x_L(t) =0\) and Eq 79 becomes simply \(x_0(t) = x_0(0) + t^{1/2}g^-\).

When the molar volume is a constant, the right hand side of Eq 75 vanishes and \(v^*(x,t) = d x_0(t)/d t \) becomes independent of position x. In that case, the diffusion couple is rigid and one can work in a reference frame in which \( d x_0(t)/d t =0\).

We also note that in the case of constant partial molar volumes it can be shown that the quantity g + + g in Eq 78 vanishes by virtue of Eq 64, which is equivalent to the usual equal area construction for the Matano interface position in this case. Thus the length of the couple, as measured by the distance between distant markers that track the center of moles, does not change if the partial molar volumes are constant. Finally, we note that for constant partial molar volumes the center of mole velocity is the same as the center of volume velocity in the ends where the fluxes vanish.[13,14]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekerka, R.F., McFadden, G.B. & Boettinger, W.J. Analytical Derivation of the Sauer-Freise Flux Equation for Multicomponent Multiphase Diffusion Couples with Variable Partial Molar Volumes. J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 37, 640–650 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-016-0500-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-016-0500-0

Keywords

Navigation