Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis and Failure Prevention of Nozzle Check Valves Used for Protection of Rotating Equipment Due to Wear and Tear in the Oil and Gas Industry

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the most common type of check valves: swing, dual plate and nozzle. The pros and cons of each choice will be explained in this review, which can be used as a basis for making the most suitable check valve selection for installation after rotating equipment such as pumps and compressors. Dual plate check valves are compared to nozzle check valves in terms of pressure drop and water hammering. The process and valve information in two case studies are based on two recent Norwegian offshore projects. Dual plate check valves show more than twice the pressure drop and more than three times the water hammering effect in the form of applied pressure to the piping system compared to nozzle check valves. Thus, nozzle check valves are proposed as the best choice for use after pumps and compressors. The most important risk that causes nozzle check valve failure during operation is chattering; this occurs when the fluid can not keep the valve in fully open position and causes wear and tear inside the valve. The second case study of a nozzle check valve in a recent Norwegian project is reviewed in which the minimum flow in the piping system can not fully open the valve. Different solutions such as reducing the size of the valve, reducing the spring torque behind the valve seat and increasing the minimum flow are proposed in this paper. In addition, high fluid velocity is considered as another operational problem that leads to wear and tear of the valve as well as valve failure. Adjusting the narrow area inside the nozzle check valves can reduce the velocity inside the valve to an acceptable limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Smith, R.W. Zappe, Valve Selection Handbook, 5th edn. (Elsevier, New York, NY, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Sotoodeh, Comparing dual plate and swing check valves and the importance of minimum flow for dual plate check valves. Am. J. Ind. Eng. 5(1), 31–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12691/ajie-5-1-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Norwegian Oil Industry Association, Valve Technology. Norsk olje and gass, 2nd revision (2013)

  4. A. Kruisbrink, The need for dynamic characteristics of check valves. Valve World Mag. 15(09), 65–66 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. VALMETALIC, Design and selection of check valves. https://www.valmatic.com/Portals/0/pdfs/DesignSelectionCheckValves.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2020 (2018)

  6. G. Oxler, Non-return valve and/or check valve for pump system-a new approach. Valve World Mag. 14(04), 75–77 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.V. Ballun, A Methodology for Predicting Check Valve Slam. (American Water Works Association (AWWA), Denver, 2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Schmitz, What is water hammer and how do I fix it? Livintanor. https://livinator.com/whats-water-hammer-and-how-do-i-fix-it/. Accessed 6 June 2020 (2018)

  9. American Petroleum Institute (API) 594. Check Valves: Flanged, Lug, Wafer and Butt-welding, 6th edn. Washington, DC (2004)

  10. NORSOK L-001. Piping and valves. Revision 4. Norway, Lysaker (2017)

  11. TR2000. Piping and valve material specification. Equinor. https://www.tr2000.no/TR2000/index.jsp. Accessed 7 June 2020

  12. K. Sotoodeh, Axial flow nozzle check valves for pumps and compressors protection. Valve World Mag. 20(1), 84–87 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Ford, Power industry applications: a valve selection overview. Valve World Mag. 19(8), 96–103 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Gustorf, P. Root, Developments in axial valve design. Valve World Mag. 21(10), 49–53 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Sotoodeh, Challenges associated with the bypass valves of control valves in a seawater service. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-020-00132-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K. Sotoodeh, Valve selection for bypass of control valves: a case study. http://www.valvemagazine.com/web-only/categories/technical-topics/9454-valve-selection-for-bypass-of-control-valves-a-case-study.html. Accessed on 10 Jun 2020 (2018)

  17. B. Nesbitt, Handbook of Valves and Actuators, 2nd rev. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.A. Provoost, The dynamic characteristic of non-return valves, in Conference paper submitted to 11th symposium of the section of hydraulic machinery, equipment and cavitation. Netherlands (1982)

  19. VALMETALIC, Dynamic characteristics of check valves. https://www.valmatic.com/Portals/0/pdfs/DynamicCharacteristicsofCheckValves_18.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2020 (2018)

  20. NORSOK P-001, Process design, edition 5 Lysaker Norway (2006)

  21. CRANE flow energy solutions. Calculations and analysis for dual plate and axial flow check valves. Rev. 03 (2015)

  22. Engineering ToolBox. Pipe class rating and pressure numbers (PN). https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/flanges-pn-pressure-ratings-d_46.html. Accessed 13 June 2020 (2003)

  23. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME B16.34), Valves flanged, threaded and welding ends. USA. New York (2017)

  24. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME B16.05)), Flanges and bolt dimensions Cl150 to 2500. USA. New York (2017)

  25. AkerSolutions, Special item data sheets for non-slam axial flow check valves. Rev. 03 (2015)

  26. Goodwin International Ltd, Pressure drop and line velocity calculation sheets for liquid services. Rev. 1 (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my gratitude to my partner, Tamara Zhunussova, for her constant support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karan Sotoodeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sotoodeh, K. Analysis and Failure Prevention of Nozzle Check Valves Used for Protection of Rotating Equipment Due to Wear and Tear in the Oil and Gas Industry. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 21, 1231–1239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-021-01162-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-021-01162-2

Keywords

Navigation