Skip to main content
Log in

High-Strain Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Thermomechanically Treated Rebar

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior of a thermomechanically treated Fe 500 grade rebar has been evaluated under high-strain ranges to understand its seismic performance. The total strain-controlled LCF tests have been performed at five different strain (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0%) ranges at ambient temperature until failure maintaining a constant true strain rate of 1 × 10−3 s−1 and a fixed strain ratio of − 1. Fatigue data have been analyzed following strain-life relationship; while, macro- and micro-features of the failed specimens have been critically examined under SEM. Evaluation of fatigue behavior has been supplemented by microstructural characterization apart from measurements of hardness and tensile property. Continued cyclic softening has been observed till failure, and the cyclic yield strength is found to be significantly lower than the monotonic one. Cross-sectional microhardness measurements of rebar before and after fatigue reveals significant reduction in hardness specifically in the rim region with tempered martensite microstructure. The strain-life relationship accurately predicts the cyclic plastic behavior of the selected rebar which also exhibits non-Masing behavior. The fatigue crack is always found to initiate from the transverse rib root and propagates along the rim region following the rib.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.K. Paul, S. Majumder, S. Kundu, Low cycle fatigue behaviour of thermo mechanically treated bar. Mater. Des. 58, 402–411 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G.A. Chang, J.B. Mander, Seismic Energy Based Fatigue Damage Analysis of Bridge Columns: Part I—Evaluation of Seismic Capacity, Technical Report NCEER-94-0006, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, 1994

  3. A. Apostolopoulos, T. Matikas, G. Kodzhaspirov, Structural integrity of steel bar under seismic loads. Mater. Phys. Mech. 25, 22–29 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. F.C. Filipou, E.P. Popov, V.V. Bertero, Effect of Bond Deterioration on Hysteretic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Joints, Report UCB/EERC-83/19, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California, 1983

  5. S.K. Kunnath, A. Kanvinde, Y. Xiao, G. Zhang, Effects of Buckling and Low Cycle Fatigue on Seismic Performance of Reinforcing Bars and Mechanical Couplers for Critical Structural Members, Technical Report, University of California, 2009

  6. V. Goryany, V. Radsinsky, Thermomechanical treatment of reinforcing steel. J. Mining Metall. 38(3–4), 171–177 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Ray, D. Mukerjee, S.K. Sen, A. Bhattacharya, S.K. Dhua, M.S. Prasad, N. Banerjee, A.M. Popli, A.K. Sahu, Microstructure and properties of thermomechanically strengthened reinforcement bars: a comparative assessment of plain-carbon and low-alloy steel grades. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 6, 335–343 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Helgason, J.M. Hanson, N.F. Somes, W.G. Corley, E. Hongestad, Fatigue Strength of High-Yield Reinforcing Bars, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1976

  9. H. Zheng, A. Abel, Stress Concentration and fatigue of profiled reinforcing steels. Int. J. Fatigue 10, 763–773 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.A. Apostolopoulos, M.P. Papadopoulos, Tensile and low cycle fatigue behavior of corroded reinforcing steel bars S400. Constr. Build. Mater. 21(4), 855–864 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R.A. Hawileh, J.A. Abdalla, F. Oudah, K. Abdelrahman, Low-cycle fatigue life behaviour of BS 460B and BS B500B steel reinforcing bars. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 33, 397–407 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Shi, M. Wang, Y. Wang, Experimental and constitutive model study of structural steel under cyclic loading. J. Constr. Steel. Res. 67(8), 1185–1197 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G.M. Sheng, S.H. Gong, Investigation of low cycle fatigue behavior of building structural steels under earthquake loading. Acta Metall. Sinica 10(1), 51–55 (1997)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G.W. Butcher, Seismic problems in structural engineering (Int. Steel Seismic Des. Semin, Christchurch, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI318R-08), American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 318, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 2008

  16. J.A. Abdalla, R.A. Hawileh, F. Oudah, K. Abdelrahman, Energy-based prediction of low cycle fatigue life of BS460B And BS500B steel bars. Mater. Des. 30, 4405–4413 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Jha, A.K. Singh, N. Bandyopadhyay, O.N. Mohanty, Seismic resistant reinforcing bars. Prac. Fail. Anal. 1(5), 53–56 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.K. Paul, P.K. Rana, D. Das, S. Kundu, High and low cycle fatigue performance comparison between micro-alloyed and TMT rebar. Constr. Build. Mater. 54, 170–179 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C.A. Apostolopoulos, Mechanical behavior of corroded reinforcing steel bars S500s tempcore under low cycle fatigue. Constr. Build. Mater. 21(7), 1447–1456 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Y. Lv, G. Sheng, Z. Huang, High strain and low cycle fatigue behaviors of rebars produced by QST and V-N microalloying technology. Constr. Build. Mater. 48, 67–73 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Instron Company, 825 University Ave Norwood, MA, 02062-2643, USA, 1946

  22. B.K. Panigrahi, S.K. Jain, Impact toughness of high strength low alloy TMT reinforcement ribbed bar. Build. Mater. Sci. 4, 319–324 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Modi, D.A. Hindolia, R. Sharma, Sequential improvement of quenching-selftempering-thermal-treatment rolling process for a modern manufacturing system—a case study, Int. J. Innov. Eng. Technol. 4, 100–111 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Kundu, A. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chatterjee, S. Chandra, Modelling of microstructure and heat transfer during controlled cooling of low carbon wire rod. ISIJ Int. 44(7), 1217–1223 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. R.W. Hertzberg, Deformation and fracture mechanics of engineering materials (Wiley, New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Schijve, The stress intensity factor of small cracks at notches. Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct. 5(1), 77–90 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Polak, M. Klesnil, P. Lukas, On the cyclic stress-strain curve evaluation in low cycle fatigue. Mater. Sci. Eng. 28, 109–117 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. D.E. Laughlin, K. Hono, Physical Metallurgy, 5th edn. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. Das, A. Singh, Understanding strain controlled low cycle fatigue response of P91 steel through experiment and cyclic plasticity modeling. Fusion Eng. Des. 138, 125–137 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. H.J. Roven, E. Nes, Cyclic deformation of ferritic steel–I. Stress–strain response and structure evolution. Acta Metall. 39(8), 1719–1733 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. D. Ye, S. Matsouka, N. Nagashima, N. Suzuki, The low-cycle fatigue, deformation and final fracture behaviour of an austenitic stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 415, 104–117 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. H.-F. Chai, C. Laird, Mechanisms of cyclic softening and cyclic creep in low carbon steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. 93, 159–174 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. S.K. Paul, S. Sivaprasad, S. Dhar, S. Tarafder, Key issues in cyclic plastic deformation: experimentation. Mech. Mater. 43, 705–720 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A. Plumtree, H.A. Abdel-Raouf, Cyclic stress–strain response and substructure. Int. J. Fatigue 23, 799–805 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. S.C. Roy, S. Goyal, R. Sandhya, S.K. Ray, Low cycle fatigue life prediction of 316 L(N) stainless steel based on cyclic elasto-plastic response. Nucl. Eng. Des. 253, 219–225 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. P.V.R. Narendra, K. Prasad, E.H. Krishna, V. Kumar, K.D. Singh, Low cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior and cyclic plasticity modeling of E250A mild steel. Structures 20, 594–606 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. L.F. Coffin Jr., A Study of The Effects of Cyclic Thermal Stresses on A Ductile Metal, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, University of Michigan, Michigan, 1953

  38. Y. Zhang, C.L. Hu, Z. Zhao, A.P. Li, X.L. Xu, W.B. Shi, Low cycle fatigue behaviour of A Cr–Mo–V matrix-type high-speed steel used for cold forging. Mater. Des. 44, 612–621 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. P.C. Chakraborti, M.K. Mitra, Microstructural response on the room temperature low cycle fatigue behaviour of two high strength duplex ferrite–martensite steels and a normalised ferrite-pearlite steel. Int. J. Fatigue 28, 194–202 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. K. Parmar, H. Rathod, Comparison of A rebar with a plain surface and a deformed axis over HYSD rebars, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 1(7) (2012)

  41. S. Majumdar, R. Ali, A. Kumar, A. Deb, Optimum rib design in TMT rebars to enhance fatigue life while retaining bond strength, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 30(3), 04017313 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. J. Schijve, Fatigue of Structures and Materials (Springer, Dordrecht, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  43. B. Das, Md. A. Bakkar, N. Khutia, D. Das, Low Cycle Fatigue Performance of TMT Rebar, in 5th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization, India, 2017

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank for the support and cooperation received from the Centre of Excellence on Microstructurally Designed Advanced Materials Development, TEQIP-II and also providing all the necessary facilities for carrying out this study. Authors would also like to acknowledge the Tata Steel, Jamshedpur, India, for supplying the material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bishal Kanrar or Debdulal Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakkar, M.A., Kanrar, B., Saha, R. et al. High-Strain Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Thermomechanically Treated Rebar. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 20, 1029–1037 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00911-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00911-z

Keywords

Navigation