Skip to main content
Log in

Finite Element-Based Simulation of Metal Fused Filament Fabrication Process: Distortion Prediction and Experimental Verification

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building end-use functional metal parts by metal fused filament fabrication (MF3) is an emerging topic in additive manufacturing. MF3 involves extrusion of polymer filaments that are highly filled with metal powder to print three-dimensional parts, followed by debinding and sintering to eliminate the polymer binder and get a fully dense metal part, respectively. Material properties, part design and processing conditions have a significant influence on the quality of MF3 printed parts. Part distortion and dimensional variations are significant quality challenges that hinder the acceptance of printed parts in potential functional applications. Trial-and-error experiments to find the best conditions are commonly used for defect avoidance, though they are time-consuming and expensive. Hence, computational simulation and design solutions are required for MF3 to enable a virtual analysis of the process outcome and reduce dependency on experimental methods. This paper investigates the applicability of a thermo-mechanical model for finite element simulation of the MF3 printing process. The quantitative influence of material properties on MF3 printed part quality was estimated using a simulation platform. The simulation results of two materials, a Ti-6Al-4V filled polymer and an unfilled ABS copolymer, were compared to experiments. It was determined that the unfilled polymer showed greater shrinkage and warpage than the Ti-6Al-4V filled polymer in simulations and experiments. Further, the trend in the distribution of warpage was consistent between experiments and simulation results for both materials. Finally, warpage compensation algorithms showed improvement in dimensional control for both materials in simulations and were consistent with experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.G. Gutierrez, S. Cano, S. Schuschnigg, C. Kukla, J. Sapkota and C. Holzer, Additive Manufacturing of Metallic and Ceramic Components by the Material Extrusion of Highly-Filled Polymers: A Review and Future Perspectives, Materials, 2018, 11(5), p 840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H.A. Hegab, Design for Additive Manufacturing of Composite Materials and Potential Alloys: A Review, Manuf. Rev., 2016, 3, p 11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Lengauer, I. Duretek, M. Fürst, V. Schwarz, J.G. Gutierrez, S. Schuschnigg, C. Kukla, M. Kitzmantel, E. Neubauer, C. Lieberwirth and V. Morrison, Fabrication and Properties of Extrusion-Based 3D-Printed Hardmetal and Cermet Components, Int. J. Refract. Metal Hard Mater., 2019, 82, p 141–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Thompson, J.G. Gutierrez, C. Kukla and P. Felfer, Fused Filament Fabrication, Debinding and Sintering as a Low Cost Additive Manufacturing Method of 316L Stainless Steel, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 30, p 100861.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Wu, N.A. Langrana, R. Sadanji and S. Danforth, Solid Freeform Fabrication of Metal Components Using Fused Deposition of Metals, Mater. Des., 2002, 23(1), p 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Zhou, G. Xiong, T. Nyberg, and D. Liu, Temperature Analysis in the Fused Deposition Modeling Process, 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering (ICISCE), Beijing, China, 2016, p 678-682. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCE.2016.150.

  7. A. Cattenone, S. Morganti, G. Alaimo and F. Auricchio, Finite Element Analysis of Additive Manufacturing Based on Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): Distortions Prediction and Comparison with Experimental Data, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2019, 141(011010), p 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Armillotta, M. Bellotti and M. Cavallaro, Warpage of FDM Parts: Experimental Tests and Analytic Model, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 2018, 50, p 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Watanabe, M.L. Shofner, N. Treat, and D.W. Rosen, A Model for Residual Stress and Part Warpage Prediction in Material Extrusion with Application to Polypropylene. Int Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 2016, Austin, 27th Edition: p.2437-2455

  10. D. Croccolo, M. DeAgostinis and G. Olmi, Experimental Characterization and Analytical Modelling of the Mechanical Behaviour of Fused Deposition Processed Parts Made of ABS-M30, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2013, 79, p 506–518.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D.D. Phan, J.S. Horner, Z.R. Swain, Z.R. Swain, A.N. Berisa and M.E. Mackay, Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of the Melting Process in the Fused Filament Fabrication Additive Manufacturing Technique, Addit. Manuf., 2020, 33, p 101161.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Zhang, X.Z. Wang, W.W. Yu and H.D. Yu, Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Process Conditions on the Temperature Variation in fused Deposition Modeling, Mater. Design, 2017, 130, p 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Brenken, E. Barocio, A. Favaloro, V. Kunc and R.B. Pipes, Development and Validation of Extrusion Deposition Additive Manufacturing Process Simulations, Addit. Manuf., 2019, 25, p 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Li, J.F. Liu, X.Y. Fang and Y.B. Guo, Efficient Predictive Model of Part Distortion and Residual Stress in Selective Laser Melting, Addit. Manuf., 2017, 17, p 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Song, W. Wu, L. Zhang, H. Beibei, L. Lin, N. Xiaoqing, L. Qianlei and Z.L. Guoliang, Role of Scanning Strategy on Residual Stress Distribution in Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Prepared by Selective Laser Melting, Optik—Int. J. Light Electron. Optics, 2018, 170, p 342–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Abel, U. Scheithauer, T. Janics, S. Hampel, S. Cano, A. Müller-Köhn, A. Günther, C. Kukla and T. Moritz, Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) of Metal-Ceramic Components, J. Vis. Exp, 2019, 143, p e57693.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Nikzad, S.H. Masood and I. Sbarski, Thermo-Mechanical Properties of a Highly Filled Polymeric Composites for Fused Deposition Modeling, Mater. Des., 2011, 32(6), p 3448–3456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Singh, Q. Shaikh, V.K. Balla, S.V. Atre and K.H. Kate, Estimating Powder-Polymer Material Properties Used in Design for Metal Fused Filament Fabrication (DfMF3), J. Miner., Metals Mater. Soc., 2020, 72, p 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Singh, V.K. Balla, A. Tofangchi, S.V. Atre and K.H. Kate, Printability Studies of Ti-6Al-4 V by Metal Fused Filament Fabrication (MF3), Int. J. Refract Metal Hard Mater., 2020, 91, p 105249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. e-Xstream, Digimat-AM Simulation Solution for Additive Manufacturing, https://www.e-xstream.com/product/digimat-am. Accessed 10 September 2020

  21. Y. Zhang and Y.K. Chou, 3D FEA Simulations of Fused Deposition Modeling Process, Int. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Conf., 2006, 47624, p 1121–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Domingo-Espin, J.M. Puigoriol-Forcada, A.A. Garcia-Granada, L. Jordi, B. Salvador and R. Guillermo, Mechanical Property Characterization and Simulation of Fused Deposition Modeling Polycarbonate Parts, Mater. Des., 2015, 83, p 670–677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A.E. Moumen, M. Tarfaoui and K. Lafdi, Modelling of the Temperature and Residual Stress Fields During 3D Printing of Polymer Composites, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 104, p 1661–1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S.F. Costa, F.M. Duarte and J.A. Covas, Thermal Conditions Affecting Heat Transfer in FDM/FFE: A Contribution Towards the Numerical Modelling of the Process, Virtual Physical Prototyping, 2015, 10(1), p 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R.Q. de Macedo, R.T.L. Ferreira and K. Jayachandran, Determination of Mechanical Properties of FFF 3D Printed Material by Assessing Void Volume Fraction, Cooling Rate and Residual Thermal Stresses, Rapid Prototyping J., 2019, 25(10), p 1661–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Q. Sun, G.M. Rizvi, C.T. Bellehumeur and P. Gu, Effect of Processing Conditions on the Bonding Quality of FDM Polymer Filaments, Rapid Prototyping J., 2008, 14(2), p 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Bellehumeur, L. Li, Q. Sun and P. Gu, Modeling of Bond Formation Between Polymer Filaments in the Fused Deposition Modeling Process, SME J. Manuf. Process., 2004, 6(2), p 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the funding from the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) that supported this research work. The Digimat simulation platform was provided by MSC Software/Hexagon. KEYENCE Corp. provided support with VR-5000 for surface profilometry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sundar V. Atre.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This invited article is part of a special topical focus in the Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance on Additive Manufacturing. The issue was organized by Dr. William Frazier, Pilgrim Consulting, LLC; Mr. Rick Russell, NASA; Dr. Yan Lu, NIST; Dr. Brandon D. Ribic, America Makes; and Caroline Vail, NSWC Carderock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaikh, M.Q., Singh, P., Kate, K.H. et al. Finite Element-Based Simulation of Metal Fused Filament Fabrication Process: Distortion Prediction and Experimental Verification. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 30, 5135–5149 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05733-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05733-0

Keywords

Navigation