Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perturbation Methods for Real-Time In Situ Evaluation of Hot-Side Thermal Resistances in Thermoelectric Energy Recovery Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thermoelectric (TE) power systems in high-temperature industrial, transportation, and military energy systems require high-performance hot-side and cold-side heat transfer to provide the critical temperature differential and transfer the required thermal energy to create the power output. Hot- and cold-side heat transfer performance is typically characterized by the hot-side and cold-side thermal resistance, R h,th and R c,th, respectively. This heat transfer performance determines the hot-side temperature, T h, and cold-side temperature, T c, conditions when operating in energy recovery environments with available temperature differentials characterized by an external driving temperature, T src, and ambient temperature, T amb. It is crucial to monitor and track the hot-side thermal performance at all times during TE energy recovery system operation, thereby allowing one to track the system “health,” predict future expected system performance, and anticipate/prevent system failures. This paper describes the use of a perturbation methodology and a direct coupling between the TE current, voltage, and hot-side energy flow to extract a real-time in situ evaluation of hot-side thermal resistances. External measurable TE parameters, either system current or T src, can be perturbed during system operation, and the resulting TE system response can then be coupled mathematically to the hot-side thermal transfer performance (i.e., thermal resistance). This paper discusses the mathematical formalism of this technique, and TE module experimental data showing successful application of real-time current perturbation. This technique provides a pathway for developing faster, real-time system monitoring and diagnostics to alleviate system performance degradation, or prevent system damage from dramatic changes in hot-side thermal transfer conditions in industrial, transportation, and spacecraft TE power systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Thermoelectric element area (m2)

I :

TE device current (A)

K :

TE device total thermal conductance (W/K)

L :

Thermoelectric element length (m or mm)

m :

Resistance ratio (=R o/R i)

N :

Number of TE couples

P :

Power (W)

R i :

Internal resistance of TE device (Ω)

R contact :

Electrical contact resistance across TE couple (Ω)

R o :

External load resistance (Ω)

R h,th :

TE hot-side thermal resistance (K/W)

R c,th :

TE cold-side thermal resistance (K/W)

T :

Temperature (K)

V :

Voltage (V)

q :

Heat flow (W)

α T :

Total Seebeck coefficient, α n  + α p (V/K)

ΔT :

Temperature differential (K)

κ :

Thermal conductivity of thermoelectric material [W/(m K)]

ρ :

Electrical resistivity of thermoelectric material (Ω m)

ω :

Generic thermoelectric property in temperature-integrated property averaging equation

amb:

Associated with ambient environment

c:

TE cold side

h:

TE hot side

i:

Internal to TE device

HEX:

Heat exchanger

Loss:

Associated with heat loss

max:

Maximum power condition

n :

n-Type TE material property

o:

Associated with external resistance

p :

p-Type TE material property

oc:

Open-circuit conditions

src:

Associated with heat source

References

  1. Transportation Energy Data Book, 29th edn., U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicles Technology Program, ORNL-6985, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (2010), http://cta.ornl.gov/data/index.shtml, accessed December 2014.

  2. Energy Use, Loss and Opportunities Analysis: U.S. Manufacturing and Mining, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Industrial Technologies Program, Energetics, Inc. & E3M, Inc. (2004).

  3. T.J. Hendricks and W.T. Choate, Engineering Scoping Study of Thermoelectric Generator Packages for Industrial Waste Heat Recovery, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office (2006), http://www.eere.energy.gov/industry/ imf/analysis.html, accessed December 2014.

  4. T.J. Hendricks, T.P. Hogan, E.D. Case, C.J. Cauchy, N.K. Karri, J. D’Angelo, C.-I. Wu, A.Q. Morrison, and F. Ren, in Energy HarvestingFrom Fundamentals to Devices, ed. by H. Radousky, J. Holbery, L. Lewis, F. Schmidt (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 1218E, Warrendale, PA, 2010), Paper ID # 1218-Z07-02. (Proc. of the Mater. Res. Soc. 2009 Fall Meeting, Symposium Z, Paper ID # 1218-Z07-02, Boston, MA, 2009).

  5. T.J. Hendricks, N.K. Karri, T.P. Hogan, and C.J. Cauchy, Proceedings of the 44th Power Sources Conference, Inst. of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Power Sources Publication, Technical Pap. #28.2, (2010), pp. 609–612.

  6. D.T. Crane, J. Electron. Mater. 40, 5 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.T. Crane and L.E. Bell, J. Energy Resour. ASME 131, 012401-1 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.T. Crane and G.S. Jackson, Int. J. Energy Convers. Manag. 45, 9 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D.T. Crane, J.W. LaGrandeur, and L.E. Bell, J. Electron. Mater. 39, 9 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.R. Salvador, J.Y. Cho, Z. Ye, J.E. Moczygemba, A.J. Thompson, J.W. Sharp, J.D. König, R. Maloney, T. Thompson, J. Sakamoto, H. Wang, A.A. Wereszczak, and G.P. Meisner, J. Electron. Mater. 42, 7 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T.J. Hendricks, J. Energy Resour. ASME 129, 3 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T.J. Hendricks, N.K. Karri, T.P. Hogan, and C.J. Cauchy, J. Electron. Mater. 42, 7 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.J. Hendricks, (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 1642, MRS On-Line Proceedings Library, Cambridge University Press, 2014), Paper #mrsf13-1642-BB02-04, (Proceedings of the Mater. Res. Soc. 2013 Fall Meeting, Session BB02-04, Symp. BB, Paper #mrsf13-1642-BB02-04, Boston, MA, 2014).

  14. D.T. Crane, V. Jovovic, and C.R. Koripella, J. Electron. Mater. 41, 6 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T.J. Hendricks and D.T. Crane, in Thermoelectrics and Its Energy HarvestingModules, Systems, and Applications in Thermoelectrics, ed. by D.M. Rowe, (CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, 2012), Book 2, Section 3, Chapter 22.

  16. S.W. Angrist, Direct Energy Conversion, 4th ed. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.H. Cobble, in CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics, ed. By D.M. Rowe (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995), Chapter 39, pp. 489–502.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out under NASA Space Act Agreement No. 43-17508, a contract between NASA and General Motors with funding from the US Department of Energy, at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry J. Hendricks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hendricks, T.J. Perturbation Methods for Real-Time In Situ Evaluation of Hot-Side Thermal Resistances in Thermoelectric Energy Recovery Systems. J. Electron. Mater. 44, 1909–1918 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-014-3591-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-014-3591-6

Keywords

Navigation