Abstract
The chloroaluminate species distribution of the EMIC–AlCl3 system was modeled using thermodynamic data in temperatures ranging from 90 °C to 110 °C and 0 to 1 mole fraction of AlCl3. A thermodynamic model was developed considering the activity (ai) of species and equilibrium constant (K) for the polymeric reactions. The model species distribution results were compared with the available literature data. The main anion species existing from 0 to 0.5 mole fractions of AlCl3 (\(X_{{{\text{AlCl}}_{3} }}\)) are Cl− and AlCl4−, and Al2Cl7−, Al3Cl10− and Al4Cl13− species exist at higher concentrations of AlCl3. At all temperatures, the distribution peak maxima of AlCl4−, Al2Cl7−, Al3Cl10−, and Al4Cl13− occur at 0.5, 0.67, 0.75, and 0.8 mole fractions of AlCl3, respectively. With the increase in temperature, the mole fractions of Al2Cl7−, Al3Cl10−, and Al4Cl13− peak maxima decrease. These species distribution data were used to analyze the change in ionic melts' physical properties, such as electrical conductivity, diffusion coefficient, density, and kinematic viscosity. Electrical conductivity data showed that when AlCl4− mole fraction declined from 0.50 to 0.07, conductivity decreased from 5.58 to 3.94 S/m. The concentration of AlCl4− species was found to be critical in regulating the electrolyte's electrical conductivity. Diffusion coefficient data increased from 1.3 × 10−11 to 2.16 × 10−11 m2/s2 with \(X_{{{\text{AlCl}}_{3} }}\) depicting the importance of Al2Cl7− concentration for better diffusion coefficient in the electrolyte. Al2Cl7− was also found significant for obtaining higher density. Finally, reduced kinematic viscosity was obtained at lower AlCl4− concentration due to the diminishing effect of strong anion–cation interaction between AlCl4− and EMIC+.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Galiński, A. Lewandowski, and I. Stepniak: Electrochim. Acta, 2006, vol. 51(26), pp. 5567–80.
J. Dupont, R.F. De Souza, and P.A.Z. Suarez: Chem. Rev., 2002, vol. 102(10), pp. 3667–92.
X. Han and D.W. Armstrong: Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, vol. 40(11), pp. 1079–86.
W. Miao and T.H. Chan: Org. Lett., 2003, vol. 5(26), pp. 5003–05.
A.N. Ahmed and R. Reddy: TMS 2021 150th Annu. Meet. Exhib. Suppl. Proc., 2021, pp. 1036–43.
D. Pradhan, D. Mantha, and R.G. Reddy: Electrochim. Acta, 2009, vol. 54(26), pp. 6661–67.
D.R. MacFarlane, M. Forsyth, E.I. Izgorodina, A.P. Abbott, G. Annat, and K. Fraser: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, vol. 11(25), pp. 4962–67.
H. Weingärtner: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, vol. 47(4), pp. 654–70.
Z.J. Karpinski and R.A. Osteryoung: Inorg. Chem., 1984, vol. 23(10), pp. 1491–94.
H.A. Øye, M. Jagtoyen, T. Oksefjell, and J.S. Wilkes: Mater. Sci. Forum, 1991, vol. 73–75, pp. 183–90.
N.A. Gokcen and R.G. Reddy: Thermodynamics, 2nd ed. Plenum Press, New York, 1996, p. 264.
P. Shinde, A.N. Ahmed, M.K. Nahian, Y. Peng, and R.G. Reddy: ECS Trans., 2020, vol. 98(10), pp. 129–39.
Y. Peng, P.S. Shinde, and R.G. Reddy: J. Electroanal. Chem., 2021, vol. 895, p. 115363.
V.A. Elterman, P.Y. Shevelin, L.A. Yolshina, E.G. Vovkotrub, and A.V. Borozdin: J. Mol. Liq., 2020, vol. 320, p. 114482.
D. Pradhan and R.G. Reddy: Mater. Chem. Phys., 2014, vol. 143(2), pp. 564–69.
Y. Zheng, Y. Zheng, Q. Wang, Z. Wang, and D. Tian: J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2017, vol. 62(11), pp. 4006–14.
Y. Zheng, K. Dong, Q. Wang, J. Zhang, and X. Lu: J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2013, vol. 58, pp. 32–42.
G. Zhu, M. Angell, C.J. Pan, M.C. Lin, H. Chen, C.J. Huang, J. Lin, A.J. Achazi, P. Kaghazchi, B.J. Hwang, and H. Dai: RSC Adv., 2019, vol. 9, pp. 11322–30.
C. Robelin: Fluid Phase Equilib., 2016, vol. 409, pp. 482–94.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) Award Number 1762522 and ACIPCO for this research project. Authors also thank the Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, the University of Alabama for providing the experimental and analytical facilities.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, A.N., Nahian, M.K. & Reddy, R.G. Impact on Physical Properties of Chloroaluminate Species Distribution in 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIC)–Aluminum Chloride (AlCl3) System. Metall Mater Trans B (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-024-03064-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-024-03064-8