Abstract
This paper presents a proposed numerical model of casting process into electromagnetic crystallizer mold and results obtained when applying it to the analysis of the processes of casting aluminum ingots with a diameter of 25 to 30 mm. The numerical model is based on the calculation of the electromagnetic field by means of user-defined function (UDF) in Fluent software combined with the simulation of processes related to free surface using volume of fluid (VOF) method and crystallization on Kozeny-Carman method. The results of solving the search problem on the determination of a set of parameters ensuring the stable formation of an ingot of the required diameter as well as the results of simulation of emergency and special modes are shown. The article also presents application results of the modes identified on the laboratory installation of casting into electromagnetic crystallizer using ElmaCast® technology for the production of ingots from experimental alloys "Nikalin" and "Alcimac".
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Z.N. Getselev: JOM, 1971, vol. 23(10), pp. 38–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03355734.
J. Sakane, B. Li, and J.W. Evans: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 1988, vol. 19(3), pp. 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02657737.
M.V. Pervukhin: Modern Electrotechnologies for the Production of High-Quality Aluminum Alloys, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, 2015, p. 115.
M. Khatsayuk, V. Timofeev, and D. Mikhaylov: Appl. Mech. Mater., 2015, vol. 698, pp. 181–7. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.698.181.
M. Y. Khatsayuk, M. V. Pervukhin, N. V. Sergeev, V. N. Timofeev, R. M. Khristinich: Russian patent 2477193, 2013
Elmacast. http://elmacast.com. Accessed 20 Aug 2022.
A.V. Minakov, M.V. Pervukhin, D.V. Platonov, and M.Y. Khatsayuk: Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 2015, vol. 12, pp. 2066–79. https://doi.org/10.1134/S096554251512009X.
N.A. Belov, N.O. Korotkova, T.K. Akopyan, and V.N. Timofeev: JOM, 2020, vol. 72(4), pp. 1561–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03875-0.
S.B. Sidelnikov, D.S. Voroshilov, M.M. Motkov, V.N. Timofeev, I.L. Konstantinov, N.N. Dovzhenko, E.S. Lopatina, V.M. Bespalov, R.E. Sokolov, Y.N. Mansurov, and M.V. Voroshilova: Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07054-x.
N.O. Korotkova, S.O. Cherkasov, V.N. Timofeev, and A.A. Aksenov: Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2021, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031918X21060065.
N.A. Belov, T.K. Akopyan, N.O. Korotkova, P.K. Shurkin, V.N. Timofeev, O.A. Raznitsyn, and T.A. Sviridova: J. Alloys Compd., 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161948.
S. Spitans, E. Baake, B. Nacke, and A. Jakovics: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2015, vol. 47(1), pp. 522–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0515-7.
V.B. Demidovich, M.Y. Khatsayuk, I.I. Rastvorova, V.N. Timofeev, and A.A. Maksimov: Magnetohydrodynamics, 2015, vol. 51(4), pp. 785–94. https://doi.org/10.22364/mhd.51.4.11.
J. Vencels, P. Raback, and V. Gega: SoftwareX, 2019, vol. 9, pp. 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.01.00.
M. Klevs, M. Birjukov, P. Zvejnieks, and A. Jakovics: Phys. Fluids, 2021, vol. 33(8), p. 083316.
X. Huang, B. Li, Z. Liu, M. Li, and F. Qi: Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120473.
V. Bojarevics, K. Pericleous, and M. Cross: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2000, vol. 31(1), pp. 179–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-000-0143-7.
V.N. Timofeev and M.Y. Khatsayuk: Magnetohydrodynamics, 2016, vol. 52(4), pp. 495–506. https://doi.org/10.22364/mhd.52.4.6.
A. Sabau, K. Kuwana, S. Viswanathan, K. Saito, L. Davis: Light Metalls, 2004, pp. 667–72.
V. Bojarevics, Y. Freibergs, E.I. Shilova, and E.V. Shcherbinin: Electrically Induced Vortical Flows, 1st ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989, p. 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0999-1_21.
G.A. Ostroumov: Free Convection Under Internal Problem Conditions, Gostekhizdat, Moscow, 1952, p. 286.
F.R. Menter: AIAA J., 1994, vol. 32(8), pp. 1598–605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
C.W. Hirt and B.D. Nicholos: J. Comput. Phys., 1981, vol. 39(1), pp. 201–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.
V.R. Voller, A.D. Brent, and C. Prakash: Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 1989, vol. 32(9), pp. 1719–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(89)90054-9.
V.R. Voller and C. Prakash: Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 1987, vol. 30(8), pp. 1709–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(87)90317-6.
J.E. Hatch: Aluminum: Properties and Physical Metallurgy, 1st ed. ASM International, Novelty, 1984, p. 424.
M. Kirpo: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Latvia, 2008, p. 219.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 22-19-00128 “Evolution of the structure of high-strength aluminum alloys of the Al-Zn-Mg (Ni, Fe, Ca) system obtained by technology of electromagnetic casting”, https://rscf.ru/project/22-19-00128/).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 22825 KB)
Appendix
Appendix
Setting of Two-Phase Zone Constant in the Crystallization Model
For the correct choice of the crystallization model parameters the nonequilibrium crystallization curve for the Nikalin and Alcimac alloys was calculated. The curves were obtained based on the composition of the alloys according to the Scheil-Gulliver model.
Figure A1 illustrates the calculated curves, from which it is clear that the total fraction of solid phases has a non-linear character of the temperature dependence. As can be seen, the alloys under study are characterized by a wide crystallization temperature range. However, in the most part of the crystallization range 480 °C…610 °C, the total proportion of solid phases is > 0.5, that is, the melt contains predominantly solid phases. Obviously, the viscosity in this temperature interval increases significantly, which excludes the occurrence of macroscale intense melt flows.
The numerical calculation assumes a linear dependence of the solid phase fraction on temperature in the interval of \({T}_{liq}\dots {T}_{sol}\), and the presence of other phase components in the alloy is not taken into account. In this case, the intensity of macroscale hydrodynamic flows in the crystallization zone depends on the coefficient \({A}_{\beta }\). Consequently, for the problem setting, parameters \({T}_{liq},{T}_{sol}\) and coefficient \({A}_{\beta }\) should be set so as to exclude the occurrence of macroscale melt flows in the area with the temperature below 660 C (solidus point of pure aluminum). This setting corresponds to the selection \({A}_{\beta }\ge {10}^{6}\). This assumption is valid only for melts with a convex curve, similar to the one shown above.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khatsayuk, M., Vinter, E., Timofeev, V. et al. Numerical Simulation of Process of Electromagnetic Casting and Technology Features. Metall Mater Trans B 54, 1768–1783 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-023-02791-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-023-02791-8