Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Improved CFD Modeling of the Whole-Cell Side Ledge Behavior in Aluminum Electrolysis Cell

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 14 June 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed based on the start-up, operation, and temperature fluctuations of the industrial aluminum electrolysis cell to forecast the shape, thickness, and transient behavior of the whole-cell side ledge. Results indicate a strong correlation between the shape and thickness of the side ledge and melt flow. Driven by electromagnetic force (EMF) and bubble disruption, the side ledge attached to the electrolyte is rough and uneven, whilst the toe adjacent to the metal is flatter. The modeling reliability is validated against autopsy and test data in an industrial cell. During the anode effect (AE), the electrolyte temperature and superheat increase significantly and return to normal after 30 min. The side ledge demonstrates a rapid response to the overheating, with a melting speed of 0.02 m3 K−1 within 30 seconds AE, and the side ledge volume is reduced by 16.9 pct to the minimum value after AE. The side ledge can self-regulate against thermal fluctuation, but it needs a long time to recover. The modeling results also show that during the AE, adjusting the thermal balance by enhancing the external convective heat transfer is insufficient in a short time and that other strategies should be implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. R.K. Jain, M.P. Taylor, S.B. Tricklebank, and B.J. Welch: Molten Salt Chem. Technol., 1982, vol. 59, pp. 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Choate and J. Green: Light Metals, TMS, San Diego, CA, 2006, pp. 1070–75.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Solheim: Light Metals, TMS, San Diego, CA, 2011, pp. 381–86.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V.A. Khokhlov, E.S. Filatov, A. Solheim, and J. Thonstad: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 501–06.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.S. Severe and V. Gusberti: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2009, pp. 309–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Dupuis: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998, pp. 409–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Dupuis: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1994, pp. 339–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Dupuis: Light Metals, TMS, Nashville, TN, 2000, pp. 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Yang, J. Li, H.L. Zhang, Z. Zou, and Y.Q. Lai: Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 2017, vol. 27, pp. 162–70. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Dupuis and V. Bojarevics: Light Metals, TMS, San Francisco, CA, 2005, pp. 499–54.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Dupuis, V. Bojarevics, and J. Freibergs: Light Metals, TMS, Charlotte, NC, 2004, pp. 453–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.V. Romerio, M. Flueck, J. Rappaz, and Y. Safa: Light Metals, TMS, San Francisco, CA, 2005, pp. 461–68.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Safa, M. Flueck, and J. Rappaz: Appl. Math Model., 2009, vol. 33, pp. 1479–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H.L. Zhang, L. Ran, J.D. Liang, T.S. Li, K.N. Sun, and J. Li: Light Metals, TMS, Phoenix, AZ, 2018, pp. 587–96.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Bojarevics and K. Pericleous: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2009, pp. 569–74.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Zhou, C. Meiand, and N.J. Zhou: Acta Metall. Sin, 2004, vol. 40, pp. 77–82. (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. V.R. Voller and C. Prakash: Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer., 1987, vol. 30, pp. 1709–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Fallah-Mehrjardi, P.C. Hayes, and E. Jak: Metall Mater. Trans. B, 2014, vol. 45B, pp. 1232–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M.P. Taylor, B.J. Welch and M.J. O'Sullivan: Chemeca 83, Proceedings of the Eleventh Australian Chemical Engineering Conference, Brisbane, 1983, pp. 493–500.

  20. M.P. Taylor, B.J. Welch, and J.T. Keniry: J. Electroanal. Chem. Interf. Electrochem., 1984, vol. 168, pp. 179–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Solheim, H. Gudbrandsen, and S. Rolseth: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2009, pp. 411–19.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.M. Ali and H. Kvande: JOM, 2017, vol. 69, pp. 266–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Liu, M. Taylor, and M. Dorreen: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2018, vol. 49B, pp. 238–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Liu, S. Wei, and M. Taylor: JOM, 2019, vol. 71, pp. 514–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. P. Lavoie, S. Namboothiri, M. Dorreen, J.J. Chen, D.P. Zeigler, and M.P. Taylor: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2011, pp. 367–74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Namboothiri, P. Lavoie, D. Cotton, and M.P. Taylor: Light Metals, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2009, pp. 317–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. H. Zhang, L. Ran, Z. Zou, G. He, Y. Tang, and J. Li: J. Sustain. Metall., 2018, vol. 4, pp. 359–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFB3304902), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Yunnan Province (No.202202AB080017), the Joint Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U2202253), the Strategic Research and Consulting Project of Chinese Academy of Engineering (No. 2022-XY-143), the Frontier Cross Project of Central South University (No. 2023QYJC007), and the Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Project of Hunan Province (No. CX20220223).

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, P.R. China

    Ling Ran, Qiyu Wang, Jie Li, Jingkun Wang & Hongliang Zhang

  2. National Engineering Research Center of Low-Carbon Nonferrous Metallurgy, Changsha, 410083, P.R. China

    Ling Ran, Qiyu Wang, Jie Li, Jingkun Wang & Hongliang Zhang

Authors
  1. Ling Ran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jingkun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongliang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongliang Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ran, L., Wang, Q., Li, J. et al. Improved CFD Modeling of the Whole-Cell Side Ledge Behavior in Aluminum Electrolysis Cell. Metall Mater Trans B 54, 1122–1130 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-023-02747-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-023-02747-y

Search

Navigation