Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetics of the Reduction of Hematite Concentrate Particles by Carbon Monoxide Relevant to a Novel Flash Ironmaking Process

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel ironmaking process is under development at the University of Utah to produce iron directly from iron oxides concentrates by the gas–solid flash reaction using gaseous fuels and reductants. This process will reduce energy consumption and minimize carbon dioxide emissions. Having investigated the hydrogen reduction kinetics of magnetite and hematite concentrate particles relevant to the novel flash ironmaking process, the carbon monoxide reduction kinetics of hematite concentrate particles (average particle size 21 µm) was determined in the temperature range 1473 K to 1623 K (1200 °C to 1350 °C) under various carbon monoxide partial pressures. At 1623 K (1350 °C) and residence time 5 seconds, the reduction degree of hematite concentrate particles was more than 90 pct under a pure carbon monoxide. This is slower than reduction by hydrogen but still significant, indicating that CO will contribute to the reduction of hematite concentrate in the flash process. The kinetics of CO reduction separately from hydrogen is important for understanding and analyzing the complex kinetics of hematite reduction by the H2 + CO mixtures. The nucleation and growth rate equation with the Avrami parameter n = 1.0 adequately described the carbon monoxide reduction kinetics of hematite concentrate particles. The reduction rate is of 1st order with respect to the partial pressure of carbon monoxide and the activation energy of the reaction was 231 kJ/mol, indicating strong temperature dependence. The following complete rate equation was developed that can satisfactorily predict the carbon monoxide reduction kinetics of hematite concentrate particles and is suitable for the design of a flash reactor \( \frac{{{\text{d}}X}}{{{\text{d}}t}} = 1.91 \times 10^{7} \times e^{{\frac{ - 231000}{\text{RT}}}} \times \left( {p{\text{CO}} - \frac{{p{\text{CO}}_{2} }}{K}} \right) \times (1 - X), \) where X is the fraction of oxygen removed from iron oxide, R is 8.314 J/mol K, T is in K, p is in atm, and t is in seconds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.Y. Sohn: Steel Times Int., 2007, vol. 31 (4), pp. 68-72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.E. Choi and H.Y. Sohn: Ironmaking Steelmaking, 2010, vol. 37 (2), pp. 81-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H.K. Pinegar, M.S. Moats and H.Y. Sohn: Steel Res. Int., 2011, vol. 82 (8), pp. 951–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.Y. Mohassab Ahmed: Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2013.

  5. M.Y. Mohassab-Ahmed and H.Y. Sohn: JOM, 2013, vol. 65 (11), pp. 1559–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.Y. Mohassab-Ahmed and H.Y. Sohn: Steel Res. Int., 2014, vol. 85 (5), pp. 875–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.Y. Mohassab-Ahmed and H.Y. Sohn: Ironmak. Steelmak., 2014, vol. 41 (9), pp. 665–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H.S. Ray and N. Kundu: Thermochim. Acta, 1986, vol. 101 pp. 107–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.K. Dutta and A. Ghosh: ISIJ Int., 1993, vol. 33 (11), pp. 1168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Piotrowski, K. Mondal, T. Wiltowski, P. Dydo and G. Rizeg: Chem. Eng. J., 2007, vol. 131 (1-3), pp. 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Bonalde, A. Henriquez and M. Manrique: ISIJ Int., 2005, vol. 45 (9), pp. 1255–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C.D. Bohn, J.P. Cleeton, C.M. Müller, S.A. Scott and J.S. Dennis: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, 2009, pp. 555–61.

  13. K. Mondal, H. Lorethova, E. Hippo, T. Wiltowski and S.B. Lalvani: Fuel Process. Technol., 2004, vol. 86 (1), pp. 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Corbari and R.J. Fruehan: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2009, vol. 41B, pp. 318–29.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Wang and H.Y. Sohn: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2013, vol. 44B, pp. 133–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.E. Choi, H.Y. Sohn, and G. Han: in Sohn International Symposium Advanced Processing of Metals and Materials Vol. 2—Thermo and Physicochemical Principles: Iron and Steel Making, F. Kongoli and R.G. Reddy, eds., TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society), Warrendale, PA, pp. 105–10, 2006.

  17. F. Chen, Y. Mohassab, M. Olivas-Martinez, T. Jiang and H.Y. Sohn: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, in press.

  18. M. Avrami: J. Chem. Phys., 1939, vol. 7 (12), pp. 1103–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Avrami: J. Chem. Phys., 1940, vol. 8 (2), pp. 212–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Avrami: J. Chem. Phys., 1941, vol. 9 (2), pp. 177–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Compendium of Chemical Terminology: IUPAC Recommendations, Compiled by A.D. McNaught and A. Wilkinson Blackwell Science Malden, Massachusetts, 1997. pp. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H.Y. Sohn: Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 2014, vol. 45B, pp. 1600–02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Kunii and O. Levenspiel, Fluidization engineering, Wiley, New York, 1969, pp. 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Roine: HSC Chemistry, Ver. 5.11, Outokumpo, Pori, Finland, 2002.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Andrew Laroche, Omar Kergaye, and Mohamed El-Zohiery for help with the chemical analysis using ICP and the experimental runs. In addition, the authors would like thank the staff of Micron Microscopy Core at the University of Utah, especially Dr. Brian Van Devener, for the valuable help with SEM imaging. Feng Chen acknowledges the financial support from China Scholarship Council for her work at the University of Utah. This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Award Number DE-EE0005751 together with the generous cost share contributions by AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute) and the University of Utah.

Disclaimer

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Yong Sohn.

Additional information

Manuscript submitted March 10, 2015.

Appendix: Complete Experimental Data (Excess Carbon Monoxide > 500 pct)

Appendix: Complete Experimental Data (Excess Carbon Monoxide > 500 pct)

Temp. [K (°C)]

K of Fe0.947O Reduction*

pCO (atm)

pCO2 (atm)

Residence Time (s)

Solid Feeding Rate (mg/min)

CO Flow Rate (L/min)**

Fractional Reduction Degree

1473 (1200)

0.3109

0.45

0.007

9.1

49

0.7

0.45

0.006

6.3

84

1.1

0.36

0.004

4.3

115

1.7

0.29

0.60

0.012

8.6

85

1.0

0.46

0.007

6.1

102

1.5

0.34

0.007

4.6

143

2.1

0.37

0.003

3.3

177

3.0

0.18

0.85

0.015

8.7

97

1.4

0.51

0.011

6.0

143

2.2

0.42

0.011

4.5

221

3.0

0.35

1523 (1250)

0.2941

0.30

0.002

6.5

42

0.7

0.26

0.003

4.8

75

1.0

0.28

0.002

2.2

143

2.3

0.18

0.45

0.006

9.1

49

0.7

0.40

0.007

6.3

100

1.1

0.37

0.005

4.3

126

1.7

0.28

0.004

2.5

212

3.0

0.26

0.60

0.011

8.6

70

1.0

0.52

0.011

6.1

122

1.5

0.45

0.007

4.8

128

2.0

0.38

0.003

3.3

121

3.0

0.28

0.85

0.013

8.7

74

1.4

0.59

0.017

6.0

173

2.2

0.53

0.016

4.5

255

3.0

0.45

0.012

3.1

376

4.5

0.35

1573 (1300)

0.2792

0.30

0.005

6.3

56

0.7

0.39

0.005

4.6

84

1.0

0.41

0.002

2.1

120

2.3

0.20

0.45

0.011

8.8

47

0.7

0.73

0.011

6.0

85

1.1

0.64

0.009

4.1

118

1.7

0.55

0.007

2.4

228

3.0

0.44

0.60

0.018

8.4

75

1.0

0.80

0.016

5.9

109

1.5

0.74

0.014

4.2

166

2.2

0.64

0.012

3.2

221

3.0

0.55

0.85

0.026

8.0

109

1.4

0.78

0.027

5.8

163

2.2

0.88

0.022

4.4

197

3.0

0.80

0.019

3.0

308

4.5

0.66

1623 (1350)

0.2657

0.30

0.006

6.2

49

0.7

0.63

0.006

4.5

69

1.0

0.58

0.004

2.1

164

2.3

0.35

0.45

0.012

8.8

44

0.7

0.85

0.014

6.0

85

1.1

0.80

0.011

4.0

117

1.7

0.71

0.010

2.4

223

3.0

0.59

0.85

0.023

7.9

85

1.4

0.91

0.030

5.7

172

2.2

0.91

0.032

4.3

255

3.0

0.89

0.026

3.0

356

4.5

0.78

  1. * HSC 5.11[24] was used to calculate equilibrium constants
  2. ** Flow rates were calculated at 298 K (25 °C) and 0.85 atm (1 atm = 101.32 kPa)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, F., Mohassab, Y., Zhang, S. et al. Kinetics of the Reduction of Hematite Concentrate Particles by Carbon Monoxide Relevant to a Novel Flash Ironmaking Process. Metall Mater Trans B 46, 1716–1728 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0345-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0345-7

Keywords

Navigation