Abstract
Environmental sustainability relies on the adequate financing of biodiversity conservation—increasingly from the private sector. Meanwhile, corporate sustainability relies on the effective management of natural capital and ecosystem services used in production. Payments for ecosystem services (PES) offers an important practical mechanism for addressing these issues. However, the uptake of corporate-financed PES has been underwhelming, implying that companies may face institutional and motivational challenges to participate in PES. This article presents an assessment framework to determine the conduciveness of PES to real-world corporate environmental strategies and actions, be they (a) voluntary or compliance-based, (b) reactive or proactive, (c) requiring low or high amounts of data, (d) seeking a direct or indirect return on investment (ROI), (e) conducted proximal to or far from the operation site, (f) short-term or long-term, and (g) utilising internal or external resources. Interview data elicited from public, private, and civil sector actors in Thailand and the Philippines highlights key barriers to corporate-financed PES. Results imply companies may be: (1) hesitant to get involved with unknown or uncertain concepts such as ecosystem services; (2) reluctant to fund the technical studies and repeat payments that PES requires; (3) disinterested in direct ROI—instead content with philanthropic projects that can boost public relations; and (4) bound by protocols that restrict the spatial and temporal scales at which PES can operate. To overcome these challenges, policy makers could devise reputational and economic incentives, and incorporate ecosystem services into existing institutions such as environmental impact assessments (EIAs) and ISO 14001. Meanwhile, PES practitioners (government agencies and NGOs) should use quick and simple metrics to quantify ecosystem services, and tolerate buyer willingness-to-pay. Increasing corporate ecosystem service demand, and participation in PES, will likely require firm-level institutional change, and business strategies to improve supply chain management and mitigate the negative effects of environmental and climate change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilar-støen M (2015) Exploring participation in new forms of environmental governance: a case study of payments for environmental services in Nicaragua. Environ Dev Sustain 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9582-1
Aguiling-Dalisay G, Sarmiento-Enrile L (2011) Searching for roots of corporate social responsibility in Filipino values. In: corporate social responsibility: from corporation to transformation. League of Corporate Foundations, Makati
Arena M, Azzone G, Mapelli F (2018) What drives the evolution of corporate social responsibility strategies? An institutional logics perspective. J Clean Prod 171:345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.245
Armsworth PR, Armsworth AN, Compton N, Cottle P, Davies I, Emmett BA, Fandrich V, Foote M, Gaston KJ, Gardiner P, Hess T, Hopkins J, Horsley N, Leaver N, Maynard T, Shannon D (2010) The ecological research needs of business. J Appl Ecol 47:235–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01792.x
Banerjee S, Secchi S, Fargione J, Polasky S, Kraft S (2013) How to sell ecosystem services: a guide for designing new markets. Front Ecol Environ 11:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1890/120044
Berkowitz H, Bucheli M, Dumez H (2016) Collectively designing CSR through meta-organizations: a case study of the oil and gas industry. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3073-2
Brouwer R, Tesfaye A, Pauw P (2011) Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services. Environ Conserv 38:380–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000543
Bruton GD, Ahlstrom D, Li HL (2010) Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrep Theory Pract 34:421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x
Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
Business Sustainability Review (BSR) (2013) Private sector uptake of ecosystem services concepts and frameworks: the current state of play. p 27. https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Private_Sector_Uptake_Ecosystem_Services.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2018
Chaplin-Kramer R, Jonell M, Guerry A, Lambin EF, Morgan AJ, Pennington D, Smith N, Franch JA, Polasky S (2015) Ecosystem service information to benefit sustainability standards for commodity supply chains. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1355:77–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12961
Chinangwa L, Gasparatos A, Saito O (2017) Forest conservation and the private sector: stakeholder perceptions towards payment for ecosystem service schemes in the tobacco and sugarcane sectors in Malawi. Sustain Sci 12:727–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0469-6
Clarkson MBE (1995) Stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev 20:92–117
Corbett J, Webster J, Jenkin TA (2018) Unmasking corporate sustainability at the project level: exploring the influence of institutional logics and individual agency. J Bus Ethics 147:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2945-1
Dauvergne P, Lister J (2012) Big brand sustainability: Governance prospects and environmental limits. Glob Environ Chang 22:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.007
de Lima LS, Krueger T, García-Marquez J (2017) Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 27:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.005
Dempsey J, Suarez DC (2017) Arrested development? The Promises And Paradoxes Of “Selling Nature To Save It”. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 106:653–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1140018
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Soc Rev 48:147–160
Dragomir VD (2012) The disclosure of industrial greenhouse gas emissions: a critical assessment of corporate sustainability reports. J Clean Prod 29–30:222–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.024
Du X, Chang Y, Zeng Q, Du Y, Pei H (2016) Corporate environmental responsibility (CER) weakness, media coverage, and corporate philanthropy: evidence from China. Asia Pacific J Manag 33:551–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9449-5
Dyllick T, Hockerts K (2002) Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strateg Environ 11:130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 65:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
Ezzine-De-Blas D, Wunder S, Ruiz-Perez M, del P Moreno-Sanchez R (2016) Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services. PLoS One 11(3):e0149847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149847
Franks DM, Davis R, Bebbington AJ, Ali SH, Kemp D, Scurrah M (2014) Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:7576–7581. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405135111
Friess DA, Phelps J, Garmendia E, Gómez-Baggethun E (2015) Payments for ecosystem services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors. Glob Environ Chang 30:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.013
Gatti L, Seele P (2014) Evidence for the prevalence of the sustainability concept in European corporate responsibility reporting. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0233-5
Green JMH, Cranston GR, Sutherland WJ, Tranter HR, Bell SJ, Benton TG, Blixt E, Bowe C, Broadley S, Brown A, Brown C, Burns N, Butler D, Collins H, Crowley H, DeKoszmovszky J, Firbank LG, Fulford B, Gardner TA, Hails RS, Halvorson S, Jack M, Kerrison B, Koh LSC, Lang SC, McKenzie EJ, Monsivais P, O’Riordan T, Osborn J, Oswald S, Thomas EP, Raffaelli D, Reyers B, Srai JS, Strassburg BBN, Webster D, Welters R, Whiteman G, Wilsdon J, Vira B (2017) Research priorities for managing the impacts and dependencies of business upon food, energy, water and the environment. Sustain Sci 12:319–331
Gren I, Aklilu AZ (2016) Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: a review of the literature. For Policy Econ 70:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.008
Groza MD, Pronschinske MR, Walker M (2011) Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. J Bus Ethics 102:639–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0834-9
Guerry AD, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Griffin R, Ruckelshaus M, Bateman IJ, Duraiappah A, Elmqvist T, Feldman MW, Folke C, Hoekstra J, Kareiva PM, Keeler BL, Li S, McKenzie E, Ouyang Z, Reyers B, Ricketts TH, Rockström J, Tallis H, Vira B (2015) Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7348–7355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503751112
Hahn T, Pinkse J, Preuss L, Figge F (2015) Tensions in corporate sustainability: towards an integrative framework. J Bus Ethics 125:297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5
Hamel P, Bryant BP (2017) Uncertainty assessment in ecosystem services analyses: seven challenges and practical responses. Ecosyst Serv 24:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.008
Hanson C, Ranganathan J, Iceland C, Finisdore J (2012) The corporate ecosystem services review: guidelines for identifying business risks and opportunities arising from ecosystem change, Version 2.0. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. https://www.wbcsd.org/Clusters/Natural-Capital-and-Ecosystems/Resources/Guidelines-for-identifying-business-risks-and-opportunities-arising-from-ecosystem-change. Accessed 1 Mar 2018
Hayes T, Murtinho F, Camacho LMC, Crespo P, McHugh S, Salmerón D (2015) Can conservation contracts co-exist with change? Payment for ecosystem services in the context of adaptive decision-making and sustainability. Environ Manage 55:69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0380-1
Hejnowicz AP, Raffaelli DG, Rudd MA, White PCL (2014) Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework. Ecosyst Serv 9:83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.001
Houdet J, Trommetter M, Weber J (2012) Understanding changes in business strategies regarding biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 73:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.013
Huber-Stearns HR, Goldstein JH, Duke EA (2013) Intermediary roles and payments for ecosystem services: a typology and program feasibility application in Panama. Ecosyst Serv 6:104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.006
Jamali D (2010) The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: global, local, substantive or diluted? J Bus Ethics 93:181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0560-
Jarungrattanapong R, Mahasuweerachai P, Nabangchang O (2016) Payments for ecosystem services in Thailand and Laos PDR. EEPSEA SRG Report NO. 2016-SRG3. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, Laguna
Jaung W, Bull GQ, Sumaila UR et al (2018) Estimating water user demand for certification of forest watershed services. J Environ Manage 212:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.042
Kajikawa Y (2008) Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustain Sci 3:215–239
Kapoor GK, Dhamija S (2017) Mandatory CSR spending—Indian experience. Emerging Econ Stud 3:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394901517696645
Kareiva PM, McNally BW, McCormick S, Miller T, Ruckelshaus M (2015) Improving global environmental management with standard corporate reporting. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7375–7382. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408120111
Kim H, Park K, Ryu D (2015) Corporate environmental responsibility: a legal origins perspective. J Bus Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2641-1
Kovács G (2008) Corporate environmental responsibility in the supply chain. J Clean Prod 16:1571–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.013
Kronenberg J, Mieszkowicz J (2011) Planting trees for publicity-how much are they worth? Sustainability 3:1022–1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3071022
Lambooy T, Levashova Y (2011) Opportunities and challenges for private sector entrepreneurship and investment in biodiversity, ecosystem services and nature conservation. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 7:301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.629632
Larson ER, Howell S, Kareiva P, Armsworth PR (2015) Constraints of philanthropy on determining the distribution of biodiversity conservation funding. Conserv Biol 30:206–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12608
Lee SY, Klassen RD (2016) Firms’ response to climate change: the interplay of business uncertainty and organizational capabilities. Bus Strateg Environ 25:577–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1890
Leimona B, van Noordwijk M, de Groot R, Leemans R (2015) Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia. Ecosyst Serv 12:16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.012
Linnenluecke MK, Griffiths A (2013) Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Glob Environ Chang 23:382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.007
Mace GM (2014) Whose conservation? Science 345:1558–1560. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254704
Makov T, Newman GE (2016) Economic gains stimulate negative evaluations of corporate sustainability initiatives. Nat Clim Chang 6:844–847. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE3033
Massoud MA, Fayad R, El-Fadel M, Kamleh R (2010) Drivers, barriers and incentives to implementing environmental management systems in the food industry: a case of Lebanon. J Clean Prod 18:200–209
McElwee P, Tuyen N, Hue L, Huong V, Nghi T (2014) Payments for environmental services and contested neoliberalisation in developing countries: a case study from Vietnam. J Rural Stud 36:423–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.08.003
Miller DC, Agrawal A, Roberts JT (2013) Biodiversity, governance, and the allocation of international aid for conservation. Conserv Lett 6:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00270.x
Montiel I (2008) Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Organ Environ 21:245–269
Montiel I, Delgado-ceballos J (2014) Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: are we there yet? Organ Environ 27:113–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614526413
Muradian R, Corbera E, Pascual U, Kosoy N, May PH (2010) Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ 69:1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006
Naeem BS, Ingram JC, Varga A, Agardy T, Barten P, Bennett G, Bloomgarden E, Bremer LL, Burkill P, Cattau M, Ching C, Colby M, Cook DC, Costanza R, Declerck F, Freund C, Gartner T, Gunderson J, Jarrett D, Kinzig AP, Kiss A, Koontz A, Kumar P, Lasky JR, Masozera M, Meyers D, Milano F, Nichols E, Olander L, Olmsted P, Perge E, Perrings C, Polasky S, Potent J, Prager C, Quétier F, Redford K, Saterson K, Thoumi G, Vargas MT, Vickerman S, Weisser W, Wilkie D, Wunder S (2015) Get the science right when paying for nature’s services. Science 347:1206–1207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1403
O’shea T, Golden JS, Olander L (2013) Sustainability and earth resources: life cycle assessment modeling. Bus Strateg Environ 441:429–441
Orlitzky M, Siegel DS, Waldman DA (2011) Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Bus Soc 50:6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310394323
Ortas E, Álvarez I, Jaussaud J, Garayar A (2015) The impact of institutional and social context on corporate environmental, social and governance performance of companies committed to voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives. J Clean Prod 108:673–684
Perrot-Maître D (2014) The Vittel Case: A public-private partnership in the mineral water industry. 2014. Case studies on Remuneration of Positive Externalities (RPE)/Payments for Environmental Services (PES), prepared for the Multi-stakeholder dialogue 12–13 September 2013, FAO, Rome. pp 8
Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84:78–92
Rainey HJ, Pollard EHB, Dutson G, Ekstrom JMM, Livingstone SR, Temple HJ, Pilgrim JD (2014) A review of corporate goals of no net loss and net positive impact on biodiversity. Oryx 49:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605313001476
Rangan K, Chase LA, Karim S (2012) Why every company needs a csr strategy and how to build it. Harvard Bus Sch Work Pap No 12–088:1–31
Rao P, Singh AK, La O’Castillo O, Intal PS, Sajid A (2009) A metric for corporate environmental indicators … for small and medium enterprises in the Philippines. Bus Strateg Environ 18:14–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.555
Reed MS, Allen K, Attlee A, Dougill AJ, Evans KL, Kenter JO, Hoy J, Mcnab D, Stead SM, Twyman C, Scott AS, Smyth MA, Stringer LC, Whittingham MJ (2017) A place-based approach to payments for ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 43:92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.009
Rescia AJ, Astrada EN, Bono J, Blasco CA, Meli P, Adámoli JM (2006) Environmental analysis in the selection of alternative corridors in a long-distance linear project: a methodological proposal. J Environ Manage 80:266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.008
Rhodes C, Finisdore J, Dvarskas A, Houdet J, Corona J, Maynard S (2018) Final ecosystem services for corporate metrics and performance. In: Lee KH, Schaltegger S (eds) Accounting for sustainability: Asia Pacific perspectives. eco-efficiency in industry and science, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70899-7_7
Rim H, Yang S, Lee J (2016) Strategic partnerships with nonprofits in corporate social responsibility (CSR): the mediating role of perceived altruism and organizational identification. J Bus Res 69:3213–3219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.035
Rode J, Gómez-Baggethun E, Krause T (2015) Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: a review of the empirical evidence. Ecol Econ 117:270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.019
Ryznar M, Woody KE (2015) A framework on mandating versus incentivizing corporate social responsibility. Marquette Law Rev 98:1667–1694
Sajjad A, Eweje G, Tappin D (2015) Sustainable supply chain management: motivators and barriers. Bus Strateg Environ 24:643–655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1898
Sattler C, Trampnau S, Schomers S, Meyer C, Matzdorf B (2013) Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success? Ecosyst Serv 6:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.007
Steurer R (2010) The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: characterising public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Sci 43:49–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9084-4
Sthapitanonda P, Watson T (2016) ‘Pid thong lang phra’—the impact of culture upon Thai CSR concepts and practice: a study of relationships between NGOs and corporations. Asia Pacific Public Relations J 16:1
Thompson BS (2017) Can financial technology innovate benefit distribution in payments for ecosystem services and REDD+? Ecol Econ 139:150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.008
Thompson BS, Primavera JH, Friess DA (2017) Governance and implementation challenges for mangrove forest payments for ecosystem services (PES): empirical evidence from the Philippines. Ecosyst Serv 23:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.007
Torabi N, Bekessy SA (2015) Bundling and stacking in bio-sequestration schemes: opportunities and risks identified by Australian stakeholders. Ecosyst Serv 15:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.001
United Nations (2016) The sustainable development goals report 2016. http://www.un.org.lb/Library/Assets/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2016-Global.pdf
Ureta JCP, Lasco RD, Sajise AJU, Calderon MM (2016) A ridge-to-reef ecosystem-based valuation approach to biodiversity conservation in Layawan Watershed, Misamis Occidental, Philippines. J Environ Sci Manag 19:64–75
van Noordwijk M, Leimona B, Emerton L, Tomich TP, Velarde SJ, Kallesoe M, Sekher M, Swallow B (2007) Criteria and indicators for environmental service compensation and reward mechanisms: realistic, voluntary, conditional and pro-poor: CES Scoping Study Issue Paper no. 2. ICRAF Working Paper no. 37. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry Centre
van den Belt M, Blake D (2015) Investing in natural capital and getting returns: an ecosystem service approach. Bus Strateg Environ 24:667–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1895
Winn MI, Pogutz S (2013) Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: new horizons for management research. Organ Environ 26:203–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026613490173
Wunder S (2015) Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ 117:234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016
Wylie L, Sutton-Grier AE, Moore A (2016) Keys to successful blue carbon projects: lessons learned from global case studies. Mar Policy 65:76–84
Yang S-L (2016) Corporate social responsibility and an enterprise’s operational efficiency: considering competitor’s strategies and the perspectives of long-term engagement. Qual Quant 50:2553–2569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0276-z
Yu F (2012) Participation of firms in voluntary environmental protection programs: an analysis of corporate social responsibility and capital market performance. Contemp Econ Policy 30:13–28
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that have improved this manuscript. I also thank Dr Dan Friess for comments on an earlier draft, and Ms Rujira Pongpluthong for engaging discussions on the topic. I extend these thank to all interview respondents, and Mr Piboon Awasdaruharote for assistance with interpretation and translation. This work was conducted under a President’s Graduate Fellowship from the National University of Singapore (NUS). The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards required by NUS and attained approval from its Independent Review Board (A-16-162, Approval Number: NUS-3075).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handled by Osamu Saito, United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Japan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, B.S. Institutional challenges for corporate participation in payments for ecosystem services (PES): insights from Southeast Asia. Sustain Sci 13, 919–935 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0569-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0569-y