Abstract
Sustainability Science Journal celebrated its 10th anniversary in 2016, and we see this milestone as an opportunity to reflect on its decade of sustainability science research. All the published articles from 2006 to 2015 were reviewed in this study using qualitative and quantitative methods to (a) assess scope, diversity, and representativeness in the publications, (b) analyse the trends and dominance in the content, and (c) evaluate cross-disciplinary collaboration and knowledge transfer along with the practice of transdisciplinarity in sustainability science research. Our assessment shows that the journal has transformed from publishing more uniform contributions into a more diverse international journal demonstrating greater breadth in the range of contributing authors, case studies, and field of studies. We observed a progressive transition in the content of the journal from the domination of natural sciences contributions to cross-disciplinary and sustainability science research. A growing collaboration amongst authors from different disciplines also suggests that researchers from an array of backgrounds are increasingly working together, combining knowledge and advancing sustainability science. Although researchers still base their work largely on their own disciplinary knowledge, there is an increasing trend to cite cross-disciplinary research with the aim of addressing complex sustainability problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Online at http://www.fas.harvard.edu/pages/academic-divisions (accessed 18th Nov 2016).
Online at http://www.ox.ac.uk/ (accessed 18th Nov 2016).
Online at https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/by-subject (accessed 18th Nov 2016).
Economics is separated as a separate discipline to highlight the role of Finance and Business sector in Sustainability Science.
Bringing several disciplines together but not necessarily integrating them.
Integrating knowledge and methods from different disciplines.
Transcending disciplinary boundaries for combined and collective integration of knowledge, methods and approaches.
Here, we refer to articles that have sustainability science theories, ideas, concepts, methods and practices as central theme than merely integration of more than two disciplines.
Organisation here refers to institutional publications where organisational names are referred to as authors and the organisation’s primary field of research could not be determined.
Online at http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank (accessed 7th Jan 2016).
The total percentage exceeds 100 here as some articles have more than one theme (Table 3).
References
Agyeman J (2008) Toward a ‘just’sustainability? Cont: J Media Cult Stud 22(6):751–756
Barth M, Michelsen G (2013) Learning for change: an educational contribution to sustainability science. Sustain Sci 8(1):103–119
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity, vol 17. Sage, London
Bettencourt LM, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19540–19545
Bogardi JJ, Dudgeon D, Lawford R, Flinkerbusch E, Meyn A, Pahl-Wostl C, Vörösmarty C (2012) Water security for a planet under pressure: interconnected challenges of a changing world call for sustainable solutions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(1):35–43. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2011.12.002
Bordons M, Morillo F, Gómez I (2005) Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. Springe, New York, pp 437–456
Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F, Luederitz C, Lang DJ, Newig J, von Wehrden H (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15
Clark WC (2007) Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(6):1737
Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8059–8061. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231333100
Conference Board of Canada. (2016). Gender Gap in Tertiary Education. http://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/details/education/gender-gap-tertiary.aspx. Accessed 10 Nov 2016
Funtowicz S, Ravetz JR (1994) Emergent complex systems. Futures 26(6):568–582
Harding SG (1991) Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Hummel D, Adamo S, de Sherbinin A, Murphy L, Aggarwal R, Zulu L, Knight K (2013) Inter-and transdisciplinary approaches to population—environment research for sustainability aims: a review and appraisal. Popul Environ 34(4):481–509
Ioannidis J, Boyack K, Klavans R (2014) Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101698
Jerneck A, Olsson L, Ness B, Anderberg S, Baier M, Clark E, Persson J (2011) Structuring sustainability science. Sustain Sci 6(1):69–82. doi:10.1007/s11625-010-0117-x
Kajikawa Y, Tacoa F, Yamaguchi K (2014) Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research. Sustain Sci 9(4):431–438. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0244-x
Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(49):19449–19450
Klein JT, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (2012) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society: an effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser, Basal
Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1(1):1–6
Lang D, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Thomas C (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7(1):25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Larivière V, Gingras Y, Ni C, Sugimoto CR, Cronin B (2013) Global gender disparities in science. Nature 504(7479):211–213. doi:10.1038/504211a
Mutz R, Bornmann L, Daniel H-D (2015) Cross-disciplinary research: what configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today? Res Eval 24(1):30–36
Onuki M, Mino T (2009) Sustainability education and a new master’s degree, the master of sustainability science: the Graduate Program in Sustainability Science (GPSS) at the University of Tokyo. Sustain Sci 4(1):55–59
PNAS (2016) Sustainability science. http://sustainability.pnas.org/page/about. Accessed 2 Feb 2016
Pohl C, Hadorn GH, Zimmermann AB (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. oekom Munich, Munich
Pooley SP, Mendelsohn JA, Milner-Gulland EJ (2014) Hunting down the chimera of multiple disciplinarity in conservation science. (Report). Conserv Biol 28(1):22
Qin J, Lancaster FW, Allen B (1997) Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences. JASIS 48(10):893–916
Rapport DJ (2007) Sustainability science: an ecohealth perspective. Sustain Sci 2(1):77–84
Rhoten D (2003) A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration. Final Report, National Science Foundation BCS-0129573
Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Schellnhuber HJ (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475
Scholz R, Steiner G (2015a) The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations. Sustain Sci 10(4):527–544. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4
Scholz R, Steiner G (2015b) Transdisciplinarity at the crossroads. Sustain Sci 10(4):521–526. doi:10.1007/s11625-015-0338-0
Sustainability Science (2016) Sustainability Science Journal. http://en.ir3s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publications/sustainability-science-journal/. Accessed 05 Feb 2016
Takeuchi K, Osamu S, Lahoti S, Gondor D (2017) Growing up: 10 years of publishing sustainability science research. Sustain Sci. doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0484-7
Van Leeuwen T, Tijssen R (2000) Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows. Res Eval 9(3):183–187
Wheater HS, Gober P (2015) Water security and the science agenda. Water Resour Res 51(7):5406–5424
Wiek A, Ness B, Schweizer-Ries P, Brand FS, Farioli F (2012) From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustain Sci 7(1):5–24
Wuelser G, Pohl C, Hadorn GH (2012) Structuring complexity for tailoring research contributions to sustainable development: a framework. Sustain Sci 7(1):81–93
Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L, Ness B, Rotmans J (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7(1):101–113
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Ms. Julie Terry and Ms. Veronica Santafe Troncoso for their initial contribution in data analysis and preliminary research design. The first five authors received financial support from Canadian Excellence Research Chair in Water Security through Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan. The authors are also thankful to School of Environment and Sustainability of University of Saskatchewan and Dr. Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt for encouragement and support. In addition, we are also grateful to anonymous reviewers who provided helpful and constructive comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handled by Osamu Saito, United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Japan.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rokaya, P., Sheikholeslami, R., Kurkute, S. et al. Multiple factors that shaped sustainability science journal: a 10-year review. Sustain Sci 12, 855–868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0495-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0495-4