Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?

  • Special Feature: Original Article
  • Pathways towards sustainable landscapes
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape approaches are widely applied in attempts to reconcile tradeoffs amongst different actors with conflicting demands on land and water resources. Key principles for landscape approaches have been endorsed by inter-governmental processes dealing with climate change mitigation and adaptation and biodiversity conservation.

We review experiences from seven landscapes located in the Congo Basin, Eastern Indonesia and Northern Australia. Landscape initiatives were applied in situations where large-scale extractive industries, local peoples’ livelihoods and global biodiversity objectives were in conflict. We found that common published principles for landscape approaches are not applied systematically in the areas studied. Practitioners draw upon landscape approach principles selectively and adapt them to deal with local conditions. We consider that landscape approaches do not provide silver bullet solutions to these situations nor do they provide an operational framework for large-scale land management. Landscape approaches do, however, provide an organising framework for disentangling the complexity of the landscape and facilitating the investigation of impacts of different courses of action. They enable alternative scenarios for what future landscapes might look like to be investigated and they create the space for multi-stakeholder negotiations. Outcomes from landscape scale approaches are determined by the power differentials amongst stakeholders and the existence, or otherwise, of functional institutions to take decisions and enforce agreements. Landscape approaches cannot overcome disparities in power or entrenched interests nor can they substitute for institutions with authority to establish and legitimise property and resource rights. They can, however, provide a mechanism around which civil society can be mobilised to achieve better land use outcomes. Landscape approaches are successful when they have strong leadership, sustained long-term and facilitated processes, good governance, adequate budgets and adequate metrics for assessing progress. Private sector engagement is necessary and all parties must have sufficient shared interest in outcomes to motivate their participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boedhihartono A, Gunarso P, Levang P, Sayer J (2007) The principles of conservation and development: do they apply in Malinau? Ecol Soc 12:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet I, Smith DM (2007) Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: a social–ecological framework. Landsc Urban Plan 80:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma J (2009) The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050? How to feed the World in 2050. Proceedings of a technical meeting of experts, Rome, Italy, 24–26 June 2009. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 1–33

  • Brussaard L, Caron P, Campbell B, Lipper L, Mainka S, Rabbinge R, Babin D, Pulleman M (2010) Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: scientific challenges for a new agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B, Sayer JA, Frost P, Vermeulen S, Pérez M R, Cunningham A, Prabhu R (2003) Assessing the performance of natural resource systems. Integrated natural resource management: linking productivity, environment and development. Conserv Ecol 5(2):22

  • Campbell BM, Sayer JA, Walker B (2010) Navigating trade-offs: working for conservation and development outcomes. Ecol Soc 15(2):16

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL, Harvey CA, Komar O, Griffith DM, Ferguson BG, Martínez-Ramos M, Morales H, Nigh R, Soto-Pinto L, van Breugel M (2009) Beyond reserves: A research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41:142–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conservation InternatioNAL (2010) Optimizing conservation and production—a collaboration between conservation and business. Conservation International, Arlington Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale A (2014) World Heritage and the Northern Psyche. Springer, Beyond the North-South Culture Wars

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dale A, Mcdonald G, Weston N (2008) Integrating effort for regional natural resource outcomes: the wet tropics experience. In: Living in a dynamic tropical forest landscape. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 398–410

  • Dale AP, Ryan S, Broderick K (Forthcoming) Integrated natural resource governance across multiple scales: a national health check from a regional perspective. In: Daniels K (ed) Multi-level governance. ANU Press, Canberra

  • De Wasseige C, Devers D, De Marcken P, Eba’a Atyi R, Nasi R, Mayaux P (2010) The Forests of the Congo Basin: State of the Forest 2008. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Defries R, Rosenzweig C (2010) Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:19627–19632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endamana D, Boedhihartono A, Bokoto B, Defo L, Eyebe A, Ndikumagenge C, Nzooh Z, Ruiz-Perez M, Sayer J (2010) A framework for assessing conservation and development in a Congo Basin forest landscape. Trop Conserv Sci 3:262–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. In: International series in operations research and management science, vol 78. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Leeuwis C, Andersson JA, Andriesse W, Brouwer A, Frost P, Hebinck P, Heitkönig I, van Ittersum MK, Koning N (2008) Competing claims on natural resources: what role for science. Ecol Soc 13:34

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG (2014) Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends Ecol Evol 29:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer D, Hobbs RJ, Montague-Drake R, Alexandra J, Bennett A, Burgman M, Cale P, Calhoun A, Cramer V, Cullen P (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett 11:78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Milder JC, Buck LE, Declerck F, Scherr SJ (2012) Landscape approaches to achieving food production, natural resource conservation, and the millennium development goals. Integrating ecology and poverty reduction. In: Integrating ecology and poverty reduction. Springer, New York, pp 77–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett A, Sarkar S (2006) Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: a minireview with recommendations. Divers Distrib 12:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2001) Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landsc Urb Plan 57:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Bottrill MC (2009) Approaches to landscape-and seascape-scale conservation planning: convergence, contrasts and challenges. Oryx 43:464–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HW, Webber MM (1973) 2.3 Planning Problems are Wicked. Polity 4:155–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandker M, Suwarno A, Campbell BM (2007) Will forests remain in the face of oil palm expansion? simulating change in Malinau, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 12:37

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandker M, Campbell BM, Nzooh Z, Sunderland T, Amougou V, Defo L, Sayer J (2009) Exploring the effectiveness of integrated conservation and development interventions in a Central African forest landscape. Biodivers Conserv 18:2875–2892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Maginnis S, Laurie M (2005) Forests in landscapes: ecosystem approaches to sustainability. Earthscan/James & James, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Campbell B, Petheram L, Aldrich M, Perez MR, Endamana D, Dongmo Z-LN, Defo L, Mariki S, Doggart N (2007a) Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 16:2677–2694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Campbell B, Petheram L, Aldrich M, Perez MR, Endamana D, Dongmo ZLN, Defo L, Mariki S, Doggart N (2007b) Assessing environment and development outcomes in conservation landscapes. Biodivers Conserv 16:2677–2694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Bull G, Elliott C (2008) Mediating forest transitions:’Grand design’or’Muddling through’. Conserv Soc 6:320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Endamana D, Ruiz-Perez M, Boedhihartono A, Nzooh Z, Eyebe A, Awono A, Usongo L (2012) Global financial crisis impacts forest conservation in cameroon. Int For Rev 14:90–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer J, Sunderland T, Ghazoul J, Pfund J-L, Sheil D, Meijaard E, Venter M, Boedhihartono AK, Day M, Garcia C (2013) Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:8349–8356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ, McNeely JA (2008) Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: towards a new paradigm of ‘ecoagriculture’landscapes. Philos Trans Royal Soc B: Biol Sci 363:477–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, Newhaven, Connecticut, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart RE, Desai A, Walters LC (2011) Wicked environmental problems: managing uncertainty and conflict. Island Press, Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork N, Turton, SM (2009) Living in a dynamic tropical forest landscape. Blackwell, Oxford, UK

  • Stork NE, Turton SM, Hill R, Lane MB (2014) Revisiting crisis, change and institutions in the tropical forests: the multifunctional transition in Australia’s wet tropics. J Rural Stud 36:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland TC, Ehringhaus C, Campbell B (2007) Conservation and development in tropical forest landscapes: a time to face the trade-offs? Environ Conserv 34:276–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland TC, Sayer J, Hoang MH (2012) Evidence-based conservation: lessons from the lower Mekong. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenberg E, Iwan R, Limberg G, Moeliono M, Rhee S, Sudana M (2007) Facilitating cooperation during times of chaos: spontaneous orders and muddling through in Malinau District, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 12(1):3

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants in a workshop held at Cape Tribulation, Queensland, Australia in July 2014 which provided the inspiration for this paper. Mike Berwick, Penny Johnson, Maria Jose Montano, Rebecca Riggs, Vilbert Vabi Vamiloh, Benny Purnama, Marcellena Prastiwi, James Langston, John Garcia, Lucy McHugh, Hilda Lionata, Adi Widyanto and Emma Carson. The workshop was funded by the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and James Cook University Tropical Landscapes Joint Venture and the Center for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science of James Cook University. The work was also supported by the Australian Government Northern Futures Collaborative Research Network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Sayer.

Additional information

Handled by Iris C. Bohnet, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayer, J., Margules, C., Boedhihartono, A.K. et al. Landscape approaches; what are the pre-conditions for success?. Sustain Sci 10, 345–355 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0281-5

Keywords

Navigation