Skip to main content
Log in

Empathy Among Physicians and Nurses in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Empathy with patients improves clinical outcomes. Although previous studies have shown no significant differences in empathy levels between physicians and nurses, investigations have not considered differences in cultural backgrounds and related factors of healthcare providers at the individual level.

Objective

This study compares empathy between physicians and nurses in Japan and identifies relevant factors that contribute to these differences.

Design

A cross-sectional survey design was used in the study. The online survey was conducted using the Nikkei Medical Online website.

Participants

A total of 5441 physicians and 965 nurses in Japan who were registered as members of Nikkei Medical Online were included.

Main Measures

Empathy was measured by the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE).

Key Results

Cronbach’s α was 0.89. The mean JSE score for Japanese physicians was significantly lower at 100.05 (SD = 15.75) than the mean score of 110.63 (SD = 12.25) for nurses (p<0.001). In related factors, higher age (increasing by one year) (+0.29; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.32; p<0.001), self-identified female gender (+5.45; 95% CI 4.40 to 6.49; p<0.001), having children (+1.20; 95% CI 0.30 to 2.10; p=0.009), and working at a hospital with 20–99 beds (+1.73; 95% CI 0.03 to 3.43; p=0.046) were significantly associated with higher scores, whereas those whose mother is a physician (−6.65; 95% CI −8.82 to −4.47; p<0.001) and father is a nurse (−9.53; 95% CI −16.54 to −2.52; p=0.008) or co-medical professional (−3.85; 95% CI −5.49 to −2.21; p<0.001) were significantly associated with lower scores.

Conclusions

Physicians had significantly lower scores on the JSE than nurses in Japan. Higher age, self-identified female gender, having children, working at a small hospital, having a mother who is a physician, and having a father who is a nurse or co-medical professional were factors associated with the level of empathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability:

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the General Medicine Center of Shimane University Hospital (e-mail: shimanegp@gmail.com).

References

  1. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):359-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182086fe1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamiani G, Dordoni P, Vegni E, Barajon I. Caring for critically ill patients: clinicians’ empathy promotes job satisfaction and does not predict moral distress. Front Psychol. 2020;10:2902. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Del Canale S, Louis DZ, Maio V, et al. The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: an empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1243-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182628fbf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Maio V, Gonnella JS. Empathy and health care quality. Am J Med Qual. 2013;28(1):6-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860612464731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogle J, Bushnell JA, Caputi P. Empathy is related to clinical competence in medical care. Med Educ. 2013;47(8):824-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(9):1563-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1171-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffrey D. Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter? J R Soc Med. 2016;109(12):446-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076816680120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Samarasekera DD, Lee SS, Yeo JHT, Yeo SP, Ponnamperuma G. Empathy in health professions education: what works, gaps and areas for improvement. Med Educ. 2023;57(1):86-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14865. Epub 2022 Jul 16. PMID: 35790499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. LeVasseur J, Vance DR. Doctors, nurses, and empathy. In: Spiro HM, Curnen M McC MG, eds. Empathy and the Practice of Medicine: beyond Pills and the Scalpel. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1993.

  11. Pedersen R. Empirical research on empathy in medicine-a critical review. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76(3):307-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baumann AO, Deber RB, Silverman BE, Mallette CM. Who cares? Who cures? The ongoing debate in the provision of health care. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(5):1040-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00809.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fields SK, Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Mangione S, Kane G, Magee M. Comparisons of nurses and physicians on an operational measure of empathy. Eval Health Prof. 2004;27(1):80-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278703261206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikkei Medical Online website. Available at: https://medical.nikkeibp.co.jp. Accessed June 7, 2023.

  15. Hojat M, DeSantis J, Shannon SC, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy: a nationwide study of measurement properties, underlying components, latent variable structure, and national norms in medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(5):899-920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9839-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas Jefferson University website. Available at: https://www.jefferson.edu/academics/colleges-schools-institutes/skmc/research/research-medical-education/jefferson-scale-of-empathy.html Accessed November 12, 2023.

  17. Hojat M, DeSantis J, Shannon SC, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy: a nationwide study of measurement properties, underlying components, latent variable structure, and national norms in medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018;23(5):899-920. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9839-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasan S, Al-Sharqawi N, Dashti F, et al. Level of empathy among medical students in Kuwait University, Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22(4):385-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000348300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kataoka HU, Koide N, Hojat M, Gonnella JS. Measurement and correlates of empathy among female Japanese physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuo JC, Cheng JF, Chen YL, Livneh H, Tsai TY. An exploration of empathy and correlates among Taiwanese nurses. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2012;9(2):169-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7924.2011.00199.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Simmenroth-Nayda A, Görlich Y. Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors? BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0354-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Christov-Moore L, Simpson EA, Coudé G, Grigaityte K, Iacoboni M, Ferrari PF. Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;46(Pt 4):604-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Costa Martins M, Santos C, Fernandes M, Veríssimo M. Attachment and the development of prosocial behavior in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Children (Basel). 2022;9(6):874. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9060874.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Watari T, Nagai N, Kono K, Onigata K. Background factors associated with academic motivation for attending medical school immediately after admission in Japan: a single-center study. J Gen Fam Med. 2022;23(3):164-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.528.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi C, Cleofas JV. Professional commitment and willingness to care for people living with HIV among undergraduate nursing students: the mediating role of empathy. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;119:105610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shariat SV, Eshtad E, Ansari S. Empathy and its correlates in Iranian physicians: a preliminary psychometric study of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Med Teach. 2010;32(10):e417-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.498488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hojat M, Gonnella JS. Eleven years of data on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Student Version (JSE-S): proxy norm data and tentative cutoff scores. Med Princ Pract. student version. 2015;24(4):344-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000381954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Assing Hvidt E, Søndergaard J, Wehberg S, Hvidt NC, Andersen CM. A cross-sectional study of student empathy across four medical schools in Denmark-associations between empathy level and age, sex, specialty preferences and motivation. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):489. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03532-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hampson E, Anders Van S, Mullin L. A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evol Hum Behav. 2006;27(6):401-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Christov-Moore L, Simpson EA, Coudé G, Grigaityte K, Iacoboni M, Ferrari PF. Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;46(Pt 4):604-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Brien E, Konrath SH, Grühn D, Hagen AL. Empathic concern and perspective taking: linear and quadratic effects of age across the adult life span. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013;68(2):168-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park C, Lee YJ, Hong M, et al. A multicenter study investigating empathy and burnout characteristics in medical residents with various specialties. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31(4):590-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.4.590.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nightingale F. Notes on nursing: what it is, and what it is not. New York: Harrison; 1860.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Newton BW, Barber L, Clardy J, Cleveland E, O’Sullivan P. Is there hardening of the heart during medical school? Acad Med. 2008;83(3):244-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, et al. An empirical study of decline in empathy in medical school. Med Educ. 2004;38(9):934-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01911.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kataoka HU, Koide N, Ochi K, Hojat M, Gonnella JS. Measurement of empathy among Japanese medical students: psychometrics and score differences by gender and level of medical education. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1192-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b180d4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Riess H, Kelley JM, Bailey RW, Dunn EJ, Phillips M. Empathy training for resident physicians: a randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1280-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2063-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements:

We would like to thank all those who assisted us in completing this study. In particular, we appreciate the generous cooperation of the Nikkei Medical Online staff. We also thank the members of the Shimane University Center for General Medicine for their support in conducting this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Academic Research Grant Fund (JSPS KAKENHI: 20H03913). The sponsor of the study had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, or manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.W. served as the principal investigator of the entire study. T.O., Y.N., D.Y., M.M., and T.W. collaborated on designing the study, formulating the main conceptual ideas, and outlining the proof. Data collection through a web survey was conducted by T.O., T.W., K.S., Y.S., T.Y., M.M., D.Y., and H.K. The gathered data was subsequently analyzed and visualized by T.O., S.K., Y.S., T.E., S.O., H.K., and T.W. The results were interpreted by T.O., K.S., T.E., S.O., and T.W. The manuscript was authored by T.O. and T.W. with the assistance of the others. N.H., H.K., Y.S., Y.T., and T.W. provided supervision for this study. The manuscript underwent revisions by T.O., T.W., Y.T., N.H., and H.K. All authors discussed the results and provided feedback on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Watari MD, MHQS, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest. All authors have reviewed and agreed to the content of the manuscript, and there are no financial interests to declare.

Consent for Publication:

All authors have reviewed and agreed to publish the whole content of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

Question: What are the differences in levels of empathy between physicians and nurses in Japan and the factors influencing them?

Findings: In this cross-sectional study that included 6406 participants, the mean Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE) score for Japanese physicians was significantly lower than that for nurses. In terms of related factors, higher age, self-identified female gender, having children, and working at a small hospital were significantly associated with higher scores, whereas those whose mother is a physician and father is a nurse had significantly lower scores.

Meaning

Higher age, self-identified female gender, having children, working at a small hospital, having a mother who is a physician, and having a father who is a nurse were factors associated with the level of empathy.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otsuka, T., Sakaguchi, K., Houchens, N. et al. Empathy Among Physicians and Nurses in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study. J GEN INTERN MED 39, 960–968 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08620-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08620-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation