Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraluminal Anastomotic Assessment Using Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Imaging for Left-Sided Colonic and Rectal Resections: a Systematic Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) has been used in colorectal surgery to assess anastomotic perfusion and reduce the risks of anastomotic leaks. The main objective of this paper is to review the data on the transanal application of ICG-FA for the intraluminal assessment of colorectal anastomosis.

Methods

A literature search was conducted for articles published between 2011 and 2021 using PubMed and Cochrane databases, related to the application of ICG for the intraluminal assessment of colorectal anastomosis. Original scientific manuscripts, review articles, meta-analyses, and case reports were considered eligible.

Results

A total of 305 studies have been identified. After abstract screening for duplicates, 285 articles remained. Of those, 271 were not related to the topic of interest, 4 were written in a language other than English, and 4 had incomplete data. Six articles remained for the final analysis. The intraluminal assessment of colorectal anastomosis with ICG-FA is feasible, safe, and may reduce the incidence of leaks.

Conclusion

The intraluminal assessment of anastomotic perfusion via ICG-FA may be a promising novel application of ICG technology. More data is needed to support this application further to reduce leak rates after colorectal surgery, and future randomized clinical trials are awaited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its appendix.

References

  1. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, et al. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015; 102:462–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pommergaard HC, Gessler B, Burcharth J et al. Pre‐operative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 16: 662–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, et al. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg. 2013; 257:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen H, Jørgensen T et al. Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: Risk Factors; Colorectal Dis. 2010; 12:37-43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanellos I, Vasiliadis K, Angelopoulos S et al. Anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2004; 8: s79–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goto S, Hasegawa K, Hida K, et al. Multicenter analysis of impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term oncologic outcomes after curative resection of colon cancer. Surgery. 2017; 162: 317–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramphal W, Boeding JRE, Gobardhan PD, et al; Oncologic Outcome and Recurrence Rate Following Anastomotic Leakage After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer; Surg Oncol. 2018; 27:730-736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mongin C, Maggiori L, Agostini J, et al. Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014; 29:459e467

  9. Vallance A, Wexner S, Berho M et al. A Collaborative Review of the Current Concepts and Challenges of Anastomotic Leaks in Colorectal Surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2017; 19:01-012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 2015 European Society of Coloproctology collaborating group. The relationship between method of anastomosis and anastomotic failure after right hemicolectomy and ileo-caecal resection: An international snapshot audit. Colorectal Dis. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220:186–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qu H, Liu Y, Bi DS. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29:3608–3617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148:65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer J, Naiken S, Christou N, et al. Reducing anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: The old dogmas and the new challenges. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25: 5017-5025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW. Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49:1719-1725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ2021;372:n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160 pmid:33781993

  17. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ2016;355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 pmid:27733354

  18. Sherwinter DA. Transanal Near-Infrared Imaging of Colorectal Anastomotic Perfusion. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012; 22:433-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherwinter DA, Gallagher J, Donkar T. Intra-operative transanal near infrared imaging of colorectal anastomotic perfusion: a feasibility study. Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jan;15(1):91-6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03101.x. PMID: 22632448

  20. Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, et al. Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220:82–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Amagai H, Miyauchi H, Muto Y, et al. Clinical utility of transanal indocyanine green near‐infrared fluorescence imaging for evaluation of colorectal anastomotic perfusion. Surg Endosc. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07315-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mizrahi I, De Lacy FB, Abu Gazala M et al. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer With Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography; Tech Coloproctol. 2018; 22:785-791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Otero-Piñeiro AM, de Lacy F B, Van Laarhoven JJ et al. The Impact of Fluorescence Angiography on Anastomotic Leak Rate Following Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Comparative Study. Surg Endosc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07442-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vignali A, Giannotti L, Braga M, et al. Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 ; 43 :76-82

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hellan M, Spinoglio G, Pigazzi A, et al. The influence of fluorescence imaging on the location of bowel transection during robotic left-sided colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28:1695–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ris F, Hompes R, Cunningham C et al. Near-infrared (NIR) perfusion angiography in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28:2221–2226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jafari MD, Lee KH, Halabi WJ, et al. The use of indocyanine green fluorescence to assess anastomotic perfusion during robotic assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27:3003-3008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim JC, Lee JL, Yoon YS, et al. Utility of indocyanine-green fluorescent imaging during robot-assisted sphincter-saving surgery on rectal cancer patients. Int J Med Robot. 2016; 12:710–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanco-Collino R, Espin-Basany E. Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis; Tech Coloproctol. 2018; 22:15-23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ris F, Liot E, Buchs NC et al. Multicentre phase II trial of near-infrared imaging in elective colorectal surgery. BR J Surg. 2018 ; 105 :1359-1367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kin C, Vo H, Welton L, et al. Equivocal effect of intraoperative fluorescence angiography on colorectal anastomotic leaks. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015; 58:582–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Nardi P, Elmore U, Maggi G, Maggiore R, Boni L, Cassinotti E et al. Intraoperative angiography with indocyanine green to assess anastomosis perfusion in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34:53-60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Peeters KCMJ, Tollenaar RAEM, Marijnen CAM, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005; 92:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, et al. NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24:1205–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, et al Incidence and Risk Factors for Anastomotic Failure in 1594 Patients Treated by Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision: Results From the International TaTME Registry. Ann Surg. 2019; 269:700-711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Armstrong G, Croft J, Corrigan N, et al. IntAct: intra‐operative fluorescence angiography to prevent anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2018; 20: O226-O234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Lauricella.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

No ethical approval is required for this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4

Table 4 PRISMA 2020 checklist

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lauricella, S., Peyser, D., Carrano, F.M. et al. Intraluminal Anastomotic Assessment Using Indocyanine Green Near-Infrared Imaging for Left-Sided Colonic and Rectal Resections: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 615–625 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05564-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05564-x

Keywords

Navigation