Abstract
Objective
To determine effectiveness of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) alone and combined with Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) in adult patients for significant coronary artery stenosis by using computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) as reference standard.
Methods
Two thousand twenty-one patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent CACS test and CTCA. Patients were examined with dual-source CT and were grouped according to their age, gender, CACS, and estimated SCORE risk. Coronary plaque existence and degree of stenosis were assessed with CTCA. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curves were analyzed.
Results
CACS was the single independent variable in estimating relative risk of critical stenosis and had superior outcome when compared with SCORE risk in logistic regression and ROC curve. Area under the ROC curve was greatest in the interval between 50-59 years. When SCORE was combined with CACS in patients with zero CACS, percentage of significant stenosis increased from 1.4% to 7.0% in patients with high or very high SCORE risk, and decreased to 0.9 % in patients with low or moderate SCORE risk.
Conclusions
CACS combination with SCORE risk predicts coronary artery stenosis. When CACS is zero, CTCA can be performed in patients with high or very high SCORE risk.
Key Points
• CACS is the major predictor of significant stenosis in the sixth and seventh decade.
• CACS has superior outcome when compared with SCORE.
• Zero CACS is the most important negative predictor for significant CAS.
• Zero CACS, with SCORE better predicts significant CAS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CTCA:
-
Computed tomography coronary angiography
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- CACS:
-
Coronary artery calcium score
- SCORE:
-
Systematic coronary risk evaluation
- CAS:
-
Coronary artery stenosis
- AUC:
-
Area under the ROC curve
References
Rubinshtein R, Gaspar T, Halon DA, Goldstein J, Peled N, Lewis BS (2007) Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome. Am J Cardiol 99:472–475
Sosnowski M, Pysz P, Szymanski L, Gola A, Tendera M (2011) Negative calcium score and the presence of obstructive coronary lesions in patients with intermediate CAD probability. Int J Cardiol 148:e16–e18
Canpolat U, Yorgun H, Aytemir K et al (2012) Cardiovascular risk and coronary atherosclerotic plaques detected by multidetector computed tomography: Framingham and SCORE risk models underestimate coronary atherosclerosis in the symptomatic low-risk Turkish population. Coron Artery Dis 23:195–200
O'Malley PG, Taylor AJ, Jackson JL, Doherty TM, Detrano RC (2000) Prognostic value of coronary electron-beam computed tomography for coronary heart disease events in asymptomatic populations. Am J Cardiol 85:945–948
European Association for Cardiovascular P, Rehabilitation, Z R et al (2011) ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: the Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J 32:1769–1818
Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832
Schroeder S, Kopp AF, Baumbach A et al (2001) Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1430–1435
Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A et al (2006) Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:672–677
Detrano RC, Wong ND, Doherty TM et al (1999) Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near-term future coronary events in high-risk adults. Circulation 99:2633–2638
Kondos GT, Hoff JA, Sevrukov A et al (2003) Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adults. Circulation 107:2571–2576
Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, Doherty TM, Detrano RC (2004) Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 291:210–215
Shemesh J, Apter S, Itzchak Y, Motro M (2003) Coronary calcification compared in patients with acute versus in those with chronic coronary events by using dual-sector spiral CT. Radiology 226:483–488
Arad Y, Spadaro LA, Goodman K, Newstein D, Guerci AD (2000) Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1253–1260
Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, Berman DS, Callister TQ (2003) Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology 228:826–833
Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr, Mitrani RM, Kessler KM, Castellanos A (1997) Frequency of sudden cardiac death and profiles of risk. Am J Cardiol 80:10F–19F
Raggi P, Cooil B, Shaw LJ et al (2003) Progression of coronary calcium on serial electron beam tomographic scanning is greater in patients with future myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 92:827–829
Wong ND, Hsu JC, Detrano RC, Diamond G, Eisenberg H, Gardin JM (2000) Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events. Am J Cardiol 86:495–498
Blaha M, Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ et al (2009) Absence of coronary artery calcification and all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:692–700
Cheng VY, Lepor NE, Madyoon H, Eshaghian S, Naraghi AL, Shah PK (2007) Presence and severity of noncalcified coronary plaque on 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with zero and low coronary artery calcium. Am J Cardiol 99:1183–1186
Yoo DH, Chun EJ, Choi SI et al (2011) Significance of noncalcified coronary plaque in asymptomatic subjects with low coronary artery calcium score: assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27(Suppl 1):27–35
Acknowledgments
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Deniz Akata MD, Professor. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Prof. Ergun Karaağaoğlu and Jale Karakaya kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was not required for this study because it was a retrospective study. Methodology: retrospective, cross sectional study, performed at one institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durhan, G., Hazırolan, T., Sunman, H. et al. Does coronary calcium scoring with a SCORE better predict significant coronary artery stenosis than without? Correlation with computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 25, 776–784 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3477-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3477-2