Skip to main content
Log in

Distinct Side Population Cell Subtypes Have Different Stemness Levels in Human Ovarian Cancer Cells

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The stemness of different side population (SP) cell subtypes in ovarian cancer cells was studied, and the heterogeneity of ovarian cancer stem cells was analyzed. The cisplatin-resistant human serous ovarian cancer cell line C13 was stained with the bisbenzimide Hoechst 33342. A flow cytometry-based fluorescence-activated sorting method was used to obtain lower-SP (LSP) cells, upper-SP (USP) cells, and non-SP cells (NSP) based on their sensitivity to the staining time and Hoechst dye concentration. The sphere-forming capability, expression levels of stem cell markers, resistance to high concentrations of cisplatin, and subcutaneous tumorigenicity in NOD/SCID mice of the different cell subtypes were evaluated. The C13 cells contained SP cells with stemness characteristics, and the LSP cell subtype expressed higher levels of stem cell markers, had higher in vitro sphere-forming capability, higher cisplatin resistance and higher in vivo subcutaneous tumorigenesis than USP cells (P<0.05). NSP cells had no stemness. In conclusion, different subtypes of ovarian cancer SP cells have different stemness levels, and ovarian cancer stem cells may be heterogeneous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prager BC, Xie Q, Bao S. Cancer Stem Cells: The Architects of the Tumor Ecosystem. Cell Stem Cell, 2019,24(1):41–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer, 2008,8(10):755–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. rasetyanti PR, Medema JP. Intra-tumor heterogeneity from a cancer stem cell perspective. Mol Cancer, 2017, 16(1):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. von Furstenberg RJ, Buczacki SJ, Smith BJ, et al. Side population sorting separates subfractions of cycling and non-cycling intestinal stem cells. Stem Cell Res, 2014,12(2):364–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Eun K, Ham SW, Kim H, et al. Cancer stem cell heterogeneity: origin and new perspectives on CSC targeting. BMB Reports, 2017,50(3):117–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang S, Balch C, Chan MW, et al. Identification and characterization of ovarian cancer-initiating cells from primary human tumors. Cancer Res, 2008,68(11):4311–4320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Curley MD, Therrien VA, Cummings CL, et al. CD133 Expression Defines a Tumor Initiating Cell Population in Primary Human Ovarian Cancer. Stem Cells, 2009,27(12):2875–2883

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi MF, Jiao J, Lu WG, et al. Identification of cancer stem cell-like cells from human epithelial ovarian carcinoma cell line. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2010,67(22):3915–3925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Alvero AB, Chen R, Fu HH, et al. Molecular phenotyping of human ovarian cancer stem cells unravels the mechanisms for repair and chemoresistance. Cell Cycle, 2009,8(1):158–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen WC, Hsu HP, Li CY, et al. Cancer stem cell marker CD90 inhibits ovarian cancer formation via β3 integrin. Int J Oncol, 2016,49(5):1881–1889

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu TJ, Sun BC, Zhao XL, et al. CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics associates with vasculogenic mimicry in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene, 2013,32(5):544–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Brabletz T, Jung A, Spaderna S, et al. Opinion: migrating cancer stem cells — an integrated concept of malignant tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer, 2005,5(9):744–749

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodell MA, Brose K, Paradis G, et al. Isolation and functional properties of murine hematopoietic stem cells that are replicating in vivo. J Exp Med, 1996,183(4): 1797–1806

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Challen GA, Boles NC, Chambers SM, et al. Distinct hematopoietic stem cell subtypes are differentially regulated by TGF-beta1. Cell Stem Cell, 2010,6(3):265–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saygin C, Matei D, Majeti R, et al. Targeting Cancer Stemness in the Clinic: From Hype to Hope. Cell Stem Cell, 2019,24(1):25–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-yu Wang.

Additional information

This project was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (HUST: No. 2017KFYXJJ122) and a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81672580).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization or corporation or individual that can inappropriately influence this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weng, Yj., Zhang, Xx., Wu, X. et al. Distinct Side Population Cell Subtypes Have Different Stemness Levels in Human Ovarian Cancer Cells. CURR MED SCI 41, 127–132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2327-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-021-2327-0

Key words

Navigation