Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Outcomes of Aged Infertile Women Who Failed to Get Pregnant in the First IVF/ ICSI Cycle: A Self-controlled Study

  • Published:
Current Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This study aimed to explore the outcomes of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol (PPOS) in aged infertile women who failed to get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET cycles with GnRH-a long protocol. A self-controlled study was conducted to retrospectively investigate the clinical outcomes of 104 aged infertile patients who didn't get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET treatment by stimulating with GnRH-a long protocol (non-PPOS group), and underwent PPOS protocol (PPOS group) in the second cycle between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate of frozen-thawed embryos transfer (FET) in PPOS group, and good-quality embryo rate in both groups. The secondary outcomes were fertilization rate, egg utilization rate and cycle cancellation rate. The results showed that there were no significant differences in basal follicle stimulating hormone (bFSH), antral follicle count (AFC), duration and total dosage of gonadotropin (Gn), number of oocytes retrieved, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) rate, fertilization rate, and cycle cancellation rate between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the oocyte utilization rate and good-quality embryo rate in PPOS group were significantly higher than those in non-PPOS group (P<0.05). By the end of April 2017,62 FET cycles were conducted in PPOS group. The clinical pregnancy rate and embryo implantation rate were 22.58% and 12.70%, respectively. In conclusion, PPOS protocol may provide better clinical outcomes by improving the oocyte utilization rate and good-quality embryo rate for aged infertile patients who failed to get pregnant in the first IVF/ICSI-ET cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Serour G, Mansour R, Serour A, et al. Analysis of 2,386 consecutive cycles of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection using autologous oocytes in women aged 40 years and above. Fertil Steril, 2010,94(5): 1707–1712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoldemir T. Fertility in midlife women. Climacteric, 2016,19(3): 240–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ou J, Xing W, Li Y, et al. Short versus long gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue suppression protocols in IVF/ICSI cycles in patients of various age ranges. PLoS One, 2015,10(7): el33887

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marinakis G, Nikolaou D. National survey of the current management of infertility in women aged 40 and over in the UK. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2012,32(4):375–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daya S. Gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary desensitization in in vitro fertilization and gamete intrafallopian transfer cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2000(2):D1299

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huirne JA, Lambalk CB, van Loenen AC, et al. Contemporary pharmacological manipulation in assisted reproduction. Drugs, 2004,64(3):297–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baerwald AR, Adams GP, Pierson RA. A new model for ovarian follicular development during the human menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril, 2003,80(1):116–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuang Y, Hong Q, Chen Q, et al. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation is feasible for producing competent oocytes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment, with optimal pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril, 2014,101(1):105–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuang Y, Chen Q, Hong Q, et al. Double stimulations during the follicular and luteal phases of poor responders in IVF/ICSI programmes (Shanghai protocol). Reprod Biomed Online, 2014,29(6):684–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin N, Chen Q, Hong Q, et al. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril, 2016,106(2):334–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuang Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, et al. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is an effective oral alternative for preventing premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril, 2015,104(1):62–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cummins JM, Breen TM, Harrison KL, et al. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf, 1986,3(5):284–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Otten AB, Smeets H J. Evolutionary defined role of the mitochondrial DNA in fertility, disease and ageing. Hum Reprod Update, 2015,21(5):671–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moragianni VA, Penzias AS. Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2010,22(3): 189–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu HJ, Ji XW, Hong Y, et al. Mini-dose GnRH-a long versus short protocol in patients >35 years old undergoing in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2014,30(7):498–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendriks DJ, Kwee J, Mol BW, et al. Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in I VF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. Fertil Steril, 2007,87(4):764–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Samantha P, Samantha B, Daniel D, et al. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 2015,103(3):e9–el7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Chen Q, Wang N, et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation using medroxyprogesterone acetate and hMG in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: A double-blind randomized crossover clinical trial. Medicine, 2016,95(9):e2939

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Borman SM, Chaffin CL, Schwinof KM, et al. Progesterone promotes oocyte maturation, but not ovulation, in nonhuman primate follicles without a gonadotropin surge. Biol Reprod, 2004,71(l):366–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morgan PM, Boatman DE, Bavister BD. Relationships between follicular fluid steroid hormone concentrations, oocyte maturity, in vitro fertilization and embryonic development in the rhesus monkey. Mol Reprod Dev, 1990,27(2):145–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang N, Wang Y, Chen Q, et al. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional ovarian stimulation in patients with normal ovarian reserve treated for IVF: a large retrospective cohort study. Clin Endocrinol, 2016,84(5):720–728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ubaldi FM, Capalbo A, Vaiarelli A, et al. Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation. Fertil Steril, 2016,105(6):1488–1495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang S, Chen Y, Wang X, et al. Analysis of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and atypical mild stimulation during IVF treatment in poor ovarian response women. Reprod Contracept, 2016,12(36):981–985

    Google Scholar 

  24. Massin N. New stimulation regimens: endogenous and exogenous progesterone use to block the LH surge during ovarian stimulation for IVF. Hum Reprod Update, 2017,23(2):211–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gross KM, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ. Differential control of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone secretion by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone pulse frequency in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1987,64(4):675–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wildt L, Hutchison JS, Marshall G, et al. On the site of action of progesterone in the blockade of the estradiolinduced gonadotropin discharge in the rhesus monkey. Endocrinology, 1981,109(4): 1293–1294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Richter TA, Robinson JE, Lozano JM, et al. Progesterone can block the preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinising hormone surge in the ewe by a direct inhibitory action on oestradiol-responsive cells within the hypothalamus. J Neuroendocrinol, 2005,17(3):161–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, et al. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril, 2008,89(6):1657–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, et al. Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized siblingoocyte study. Hum Reprod, 2010,25(l):66–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, et al. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril, 2015,103(5):1190–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen H, Wang Y, Lyu Q, et al. Comparison of livebirth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril, 2015,103(5):1194–1201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang B, Hu D, Qian K, et al. Is frozen embryo transfer cycle associated with a significantly lower incidence of ectopic pregnancy? An analysis of more than 30,000 cycles. Fertil Steril, 2014,102(5):1345–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the staff in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University for their assistance in the collection and processing of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing-zhen Xie.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.l471456), and Guidance Foundation of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (No. RMYD2018Zl3).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Ym., Qi, Qr., Xie, Qz. et al. Effect of Progestin-primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol on Outcomes of Aged Infertile Women Who Failed to Get Pregnant in the First IVF/ ICSI Cycle: A Self-controlled Study. CURR MED SCI 38, 513–518 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-018-1908-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-018-1908-z

Key words

Navigation