Skip to main content
Log in

Envelope theorems in Banach lattices and asset pricing

  • Published:
Mathematics and Financial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop envelope theorems for optimization problems in which the value function takes values in a general Banach lattice. We consider both the special case of a convex choice set and a concave objective function and the more general case case of an arbitrary choice set and a general objective function. We apply our results to discuss the existence of a well-defined notion of marginal utility of wealth in optimal discrete-time, finite-horizon consumption-portfolio problems with an unrestricted information structure and preferences allowed to display habit formation and state dependency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One can for instance take \(Y=L^{p}\) for some \(p\ge 1\). If the set \(\left( F(\theta ,u)\right) _{\theta \in \varTheta }\) is bounded from above in \(L^{q}\) with \(q<p\) but not in \(L^{p}\), then \(V(u)\in L^{q}\) but it does not belong to \(L^{p}\).

  2. Weaker definitions of differentiability can also be given (see, for instance, Papageorgiou [17]) and bounds derived for the differential of the value function as is done by Morand, Reffet, Tarafdar [15] for the real-valued case, when the value function is not sufficiently smooth.

  3. \(B(u^*,r)\) denotes as usual the open ball with center \(u^*\) and radius \(r\).

  4. In an order complete Banach lattice, the norm convergence is equivalent to relative uniform star convergence, which in turn implies order convergence. As a consequence, if a sequence \(x_{n}\) converges in norm to \(x\) , then there exist a subsequence which is order convergent to \(x\) (see Birkhoff [4], Chap. 15, Theorems 19 and 20).

  5. For the notion of \(o\)-Lipschitz function see also Papageorgiou [16, 17].

  6. Similar requirements of equi-differentiability with respect to the choice parameter and of boundedness of the derivative of \(F\) are made by Milgrom and Segal [14] to obtain the continuity and the differentiability of the value function for the case in which the objective function takes values in \(\mathfrak {R}\).

  7. The function \(u{:}\mathfrak {R}^{t+1} {\rightarrow } \mathfrak {R}\) is strictly increasing if \(u(c_0, \ldots , c_t) > u(\tilde{c}_0, \ldots , \tilde{c}_t)\) for every pair \((c_s)_{0\le s \le t}, (\tilde{c}_s)_{0\le s \le t}\) such that \(c_s \ge \tilde{c}_s\) for all \(s\) and \(c_{\bar{s}} > \tilde{c}_{\bar{s}}\) for at least one \(\bar{s}\).

  8. Existence and uniqueness of such a random variable are guaranteed by Riesz representation theorem (see also Duffie and Skiadas [10] for the definition of state-price densities by the Riesz representation property of the utility gradient).

  9. An example is the standard money market account.

References

  1. Aliprantis, C.D., Border, K.C.: Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Battauz, A., De Donno, M., Ortu, F.: Intertemporal asset pricing and the marginal utility of wealth. J. Math. Econ. 47(2), 227–244 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benveniste, L.M., Scheinkman, J.A.: On the differentiability of the value function in dynamic models of economics. Econometrica 47(3), 727–732 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkhoff, G.: Lattice theory, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 25. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer, New York (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Borwein, J.M.: Continuity and differentiability properties of convex operators. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 44, 420–444 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell, J.Y., Cochrane, J.H.: By force of habit: a consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. J. Polit. Econ. 2, 205–251 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruz-Suárez, H., Montes-de-Oca, R.: An envelope theorem and some applications to discounted Markov decision processes. Math. Methods. Oper. Res. 67, 299–321 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Duffie, D.: Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Duffie, D., Skiadas, C.: Continuous-time security pricing: a utility gradient approach. J. Math. Econ. 23(2), 107–131 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Follmer, H., Schied, A.: Stochastic Finance: an Introduction in Discrete Time. de Gruyter, Berlin (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindenstrauss, J., Preiss, D.: On Fréchet differentiability of Lipschitz maps between Banach spaces. Ann. Math. 157, 257–288 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Luenberger, D.G.: Optimization by vector space methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Milgrom, P., Segal, I.: Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica 70(2), 583–601 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Morand, O., Reffet, K., Tarafdar, S.: A non smooth approach to Envelope Theorems. Discussion Paper 11–03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi (2011)

  16. Papageorgiou, N.: Nonsmooth analysis on partially ordered vector spaces: Part I—convex case. Pac. J. Math. 107(2), 403–458 (1983a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Papageorgiou, N.: Nonsmooth analysis on partially ordered vector spaces: Part II—nonconvex case, Clarke’s theory. Pac. J. Math. 109(2), 463–495 (1983b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rincón-Zapatero, J.P., Santos, M.S.: Differentiability of the value function without interiority assumptions. J. Econ. Theory 144(5), 1948–1964 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockafellar, R.T.: Convex Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Skiadas, C.: Asset Pricing Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Valadier, M.: Sous différentiabilité de fonctions convexes à valeurs dans un espace vectoriel ordonné. Math. Scand. 30, 65–74 (1972)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fulvio Ortu.

Differentiability and concavity in normed vector spaces

Differentiability and concavity in normed vector spaces

In this section we summarize the main definition and results for cone-concave functions on vector spaces and, in particular, on the relation between concavity and differentiability. Let \(X\), \(Y\) be normed vector spaces and \(G\) a mapping defined on an open domain \(U\subset X\), with values in \(Y\).

Definition 4

We say that \(G\) admits derivative at a point \(u\in U\) in a direction \(x\in X\) if the limit:

$$\begin{aligned} G^{\prime }(u;x):=\lim _{h\rightarrow 0^{+}}\dfrac{G(u+hx)-G(u)}{h} \end{aligned}$$
(5.1)

exists, where the limit is meant in \(Y\)-norm.

The function \(G\) is said to be Gateaux differentiable at \(u\) if it is directional differentiable at \(u\) in every direction \(x\in X\) and the directional derivative \(G^{\prime }(u;\, \cdot \,):X\rightarrow Y\) is a continuous and linear operator. In this case, we denote this operator with \(DG(u)\) (namely, \(DG(u)(x) = G^{\prime }(u;x)\)) and call it the Gateaux differential of \(G\) at \(u\).

Definition 5

We say that \(G\) is Fréchet-differentiable at \(u\) if there exists a continuous and linear operator \(DG(u):X\rightarrow Y\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{\Vert x\Vert _{X}\rightarrow 0}\dfrac{\left\| G(u+x)-G(u)-DG(u)(x)\right\| _{Y}}{\left\| x\right\| _{X}}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(5.2)

The operator \(DG(u)\) is called the Fréchet differential of \(G\) at \(u\).

The results which follow can be found in [6, 16, 21]. Usually, definition and results are stated for convex function. Since we work under a concavity assumption, we reformulated them in the appropriate form for concave functions with values in the order complete Banach lattice \( (Y,C,\ge ),\) where \(C\) is the positive cone of \(Y\).

Definition 6

A function \(F:X \rightarrow Y\) is \(C\) -concave (or simply concave) if for all \(x,y\in X\), \(\lambda \in [0,1]\)

$$\begin{aligned} F(\lambda x + (1-\lambda ) y) \ge \lambda F(x) + (1-\lambda ) F(y), \end{aligned}$$

namely, \(F(\lambda x + (1-\lambda ) y) - \lambda F(x) + (1-\lambda ) F(y) \in C \).

The sets of points at which \(F\) is finite is called the essential domain of \(F\) and denoted by \(domF\). The algebraic interior of \(F\) is denoted \(coreF\).

Proposition 8

(Borwein [6], Proposition 2.3) Let \(G:X \rightarrow \bar{Y}\) be concave. Assume that there exists a function \(F:X \rightarrow \bar{Y}\) such that \( G(x) \ge F(x)\) for all \(x\in X\). If \(F\) is continuous at some point \(x_0 \in X\), then \(G\) is continuous at \(x_0\).

Let now \(\mathcal {L}(X,Y)\) denote the set of continous and linear operators between \(X\) and \(Y\) and let \(F\) be a concave function from \(X\) to \(\bar{Y}\).

Definition 7

An operator \(L\in \mathcal {L}(X,Y)\) is called a superdifferential for \(F\) at \(x_0\) if for all \(x \in X\)

$$\begin{aligned} L(x) \ge F(x_0 + x) - F(x_0). \end{aligned}$$

The superdifferential set is denoted by \(\partial F(x_0)\).

Proposition 9

(Borwein [6], Proposition 3.2 (a) and Proposition 3.7 (a)) If \(F: X \rightarrow \bar{Y}\) is concave, with \(x_0 \in core F\), then

$$\begin{aligned} F^> (x_0,x) = \sup _{h>0} \frac{F(x_0 + hx) - F(x_0)}{h} \end{aligned}$$

exists and is everywhere finite and superlinear.

Proposition 10

(Valadier [21], Proposition 4 and Théorème 6) If \( F:X \rightarrow \bar{Y}\) is concave and \(x_0 \in core F\) then:

  1. (i)

    \(L\in \mathcal {L}(X,Y)\) is a superdifferential for \(F\) at \(x_0\) if and only if \(L(x) \ge F^> (x_0,x)\) for all \(x \in X\);

  2. (ii)

    if in addition \(F\) is continuous at \(x_0\), then \(\partial F(x_0)\) is non-empty, convex and equicontinuous in \(\mathcal {L}(X,Y)\) and

    $$\begin{aligned} F^> (x_0,x) = \min \{L(x): L \in \partial F(x_0)\}. \end{aligned}$$

Proposition 11

(Papageorgiou [16], Theorem 4.6) Let \(F:X \rightarrow \bar{Y}\) be a concave function. If \(F\) is continuous at \(x_0\), then \(F\) is Gateaux-differentiable at \(x_0\) if and only if \(\partial F(x_0)\) is a singleton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Battauz, A., De Donno, M. & Ortu, F. Envelope theorems in Banach lattices and asset pricing. Math Finan Econ 9, 303–323 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-015-0145-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-015-0145-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation