Abstract
We prove K-stability of smooth Fano 3-folds of Picard rank 3 and degree 20 that satisfy very explicit generality condition.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Let \(S={\mathbb {P}}^1\times {\mathbb {P}}^1\), let C be a smooth curve in S of degree (5, 1), and let \(\epsilon :C\rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1\) be the morphism induced by the projection \(S\rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1\) to the first factor. Then \(\epsilon \) is a finite morphism of degree five, and we may assume that the points ([1 : 0], [0 : 1]) and ([0 : 1], [1 : 0]) are among its ramifications points. This assumption implies that the curve C is given by
for some \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(a_3\), \(b_1\), \(b_2\), \(b_3\), where ([u : v], [x : y]) are coordinates on S. Note that the ramification index of the point ([1 : 0], [0 : 1]) can be computed as follows:
Likewise, we can compute the ramification index of the point ([0 : 1], [1 : 0]). We may assume that
-
([1 : 0], [0 : 1]) has the largest ramification index among all ramifications points of \(\epsilon \)
-
the ramification index of the point ([0 : 1], [1 : 0]) is the second largest index.
If both these indices are 5, then \(a_1=a_2=a_3=b_1=b_2=b_3=0\), the morphism \(\epsilon \) does not have other ramification points, and the equation of the curve C simplifies as
In this case, we have \(\textrm{Aut}(S,C)\cong {\mathbb {C}}^*\rtimes {\mathbb {Z}}/2{\mathbb {Z}}\). In all other cases, this group is finite [5, Corollary 2.7].
Now, we consider embedding \(S\hookrightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1\times {\mathbb {P}}^2\) given by
and identify S and C with their images in \({\mathbb {P}}^1\times {\mathbb {P}}^2\). Let \(\pi :X\rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1\times {\mathbb {P}}^2\) be the blow up of the curve C. Then X is a smooth Fano threefold in the deformation family № 3.5 in the Mori–Mukai list and every smooth member of this family can be obtained in this way. We know from [2, Section 5.14], that
-
X is K-stable if the numbers \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(a_3\), \(b_1\), \(b_2\), \(b_3\) are general enough,
-
X is K-polystable if \(a_1=a_2=a_3=b_1=b_2=b_3=0\).
However, for some \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(a_3\), \(b_1\), \(b_2\), \(b_3\), the threefold X is not K-polystable.
Example 1
If \((a_1,a_2,a_3)=(0,0,0)\ne (b_1,b_2,b_3)\), then X is not K-polystable [2, Lemma 7.6].
Note also that it follows from the proof of [5, Lemma 8.7] that \(\textrm{Aut}(X)\cong \textrm{Aut}(S,C)\). In particular, we conclude the group \(\textrm{Aut}(X)\) is finite if and only if \((a_1,a_2,a_3,b_1,b_2,b_3)\ne (0,0,0,0,0,0)\). In this case, the threefold X is K-polystable if and only if it is K-stable. Moreover, we have
Conjecture 1
([2]) The Fano threefold X is K-stable if and only if \((a_1,a_2,a_3)\ne (0,0,0)\).
Geometrically, this conjecture says that the following two conditions are equivalent:
-
(1)
the threefold X is K-stable,
-
(2)
the morphism \(\epsilon :C\rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1\) does not have ramification points of ramification index five.
The goal of this paper is to prove the following (slightly weaker) result:
MainTheorem
If all ramification points of \(\epsilon \) have ramification index two, then X is K-stable.
Let \(\textrm{pr}_1: {\mathbb {P}}^1\times {\mathbb {P}}^2 \rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^1\) be the projection to the first factor and \(\phi _1=\textrm{pr}_1\circ \pi \). Then \(\phi _1\) is a fibration into del Pezzo surfaces of degree four, and every singular fiber of this fibration has Du Val singular points of types \({\mathbb {A}}_1\), \({\mathbb {A}}_2\), \({\mathbb {A}}_3\) or \({\mathbb {A}}_4\), and we have the following possibilities for the singularities of a given singular fiber
-
(1)
one singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\),
-
(2)
two singular points of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\),
-
(3)
one singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_2\),
-
(4)
one singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\) and one singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_2\),
-
(5)
one singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_3\),
-
(6)
one singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_4\).
Note that \(\phi _1\) has at most two singular fibers that have singular points of type \({\mathbb {A}}_4\). Moreover, if \(\phi _1\) has two singular fibers with singular points of type \({\mathbb {A}}_4\) then all numbers \(a_i\) and \(b_j\) vanish, so that X is K-polystable. Vice versa, if \(\phi _1\) has exactly one singular fiber with a point type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\), then the authors of [2] proved that X is not K-polystable. Moreover, they conjectured that X is K-stable in all remaining cases. Now Main Theorem and Conjecture 1 can be restated as follows:
MainTheorem
If every singular fiber of \(\phi _1\) has only singular points of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\), then X is K-stable.
Conjecture 2
The Fano threefold X is K-stable if and only if every singular fiber of \(\phi _1\) has only singular points of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\), \({\mathbb {A}}_2\) or \({\mathbb {A}}_3\).
2 The Proof
To prove Main Theorem, we suppose that each singular fiber of the fibration \(\phi _1\) has one or two singular points of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\). Note that this fiber is a del Pezzo surface of degree 4 with Du Val singularities. We know ( [7, 9]) that the Fano threefold X is K-stable if and only if for every prime divisor \({\textbf{F}}\) over X we have
where \(A_X({\textbf{F}})\) is the log discrepancy of the divisor \({\textbf{F}}\), and
To show this, we fix a prime divisor \({\textbf{F}}\) over X. Then we set \(Z=C_{X}({\textbf{F}})\). If Z is an irreducible surface, then it follows from [8] that \(\beta ({\textbf{F}})>0\), see also [2, Theorem 3.17]. Therefore, we may assume that
-
either Z is an irreducible curve in X,
-
or Z is a point in X.
In both cases, we fix a point \(O\in Z\). Let \({\overline{T}}\) be the fiber of \(\phi _1\) which contains O. Then \({\overline{T}}\) is a del Pezzo surface with at most Du Val singularities. Set
For \(u \in [0, \tau ({\overline{T}}) ]\) let P(u) be the positive part of the Zariski decomposition of the divisor \(-K_X-u{\overline{T}}\), and let N(u) be its negative part. We denote \({\widetilde{S}}\) to be the proper transform on X of the surface S. Then we have
which gives
Now, for every prime divisor F over the surface \({\overline{T}}\), we set
Then, following [1, 2], we let
where the infimum is taken by all prime divisors over the surface \({\overline{T}}\) whose center on \({\overline{T}}\) contains O. Then it follows from [1, 2] that
Therefore, if \(\beta ({\textbf{F}})\leqslant 0\), then \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet })\leqslant 1\).
Let’s prove that \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet }) > 1\). To estimate \(\delta _O(T,W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet })\), we set \({\overline{D}}=P(u)\vert _{{\overline{T}}}\). We have
where \({\overline{C}}_2:={\widetilde{S}}|_{{\overline{T}}}\). Then \({\overline{D}}\) is ample for \(u\in [0,2)\), and
By [2, Lemma 5.68] and [2, Lemma 5.69] we have
Lemma 1
If \(O\in {\widetilde{S}}\) then \(\delta _O(X) > 1\).
Lemma 2
If \({\overline{T}}\) is smooth then \(\delta _O(X)>1\).
Thus, to prove Main Theorem, we may assume that \(O\not \in {\widetilde{S}}\) and \({\overline{T}}\) is singular. Recall that
where the infimum is taken by all prime divisors over \({\overline{T}}\) whose center on \({\overline{T}}\) contain O, and \(S_{{\overline{D}}}(F)~=~\frac{1}{{\overline{D}}^2}\int \limits _0^{\infty }\textrm{vol}\big ({\overline{D}}-vF\big )dv\). Usually \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},-K_{{\overline{T}}})\) is denoted by \(\delta _O({\overline{T}})\).
Note that since \(O\not \in {\widetilde{S}}\) then for any divisor F over \({\overline{T}}\) then we get
Thus, if \(\delta _O({\overline{T}})>6/5\), then \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet })>1\). To estimate \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet })\) in the case when \(\delta _O({\overline{T}})\le 6/5\), we define the following positive continuous function on [1, 2]:
where a is a root of \(3u^3 - 9u^2 + 3u + 5\) on [1, 2]. More precisely, \(a\in [1.355,1.356]\). In the appendix we prove that for each O such that \(\delta _O({\overline{T}})\le \frac{6}{5}\) we have \(\delta _{O}({\overline{T}},{\overline{D}})\ge f(u)\) for every \(u\in [1,2]\). So we obtain
Thus \(\frac{A_{{\overline{T}}}(F)}{S\big (W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet };F\big )}\ge \frac{100}{99}\) for every prime divisor F over \({\overline{T}}\) whose support on F contains O, so that \(\delta _O(W^{{\overline{T}}},F)\ge \frac{100}{99}\), which implies \(\beta ({\textbf{F}})>0\) and X is K-stable.
Remark 1
If O were a singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_2\) in \({\overline{T}}\), this approach would not work, because as is shown in Appendix A.3 we have \(\delta _O({\overline{T}}, {\overline{D}}) = \frac{15-3u^2}{u^3 - 6u^2 + 19}\) and there is prime divisor F over \({\overline{T}}\) such that \(A_{{\overline{T}}}(F) = 1\) and \(S(W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet }; F) = \frac{83}{80}\), which implies that \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet }) \le \frac{80}{83}\).
Availability of data and material
Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
References
Abban, H., Zhuang, Z.: \(K\)-stability of Fano varieties via admissible flags. In: Forum of Mathematics, Pi, vol. 10, p. e15 (2022)
Araujo, C., Castravet, A.-M., Cheltsov, I., Fujita, K., Kaloghiros, A.-S., Martinez-Garcia, J., Shramov, C., Süß, H., Viswanathan, N.: The Calabi problem for Fano threefolds. In: LMS Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 485. Cambridge University Press (2023)
Belousov, G., Loginov, K.: \(K\)-stability of Fano threefolds of rank 4 and degree 24 (2022). arXiv:2206.12208
Cheltsov, Ivan: \(K\)-stability of Fano 3-folds of Picard rank 3 and degree 22 (2024). arXiv:2401.02818
Cheltsov, I., Przyjalkowski, V., Shramov, C.: Fano threefolds with infinite automorphism groups. Izv. Math. 83, 860–907 (2019)
Denisova, E.: \(\delta \)-invariant of Du Val del Pezzo surfaces of degree \(\geqslant 4\) (2023). arXiv:2304.11412
Fujita, K.: A valuative criterion for uniform \(K\)-stability of \({\mathbb{Q}}\)-Fano varieties. J. Reine Angew. Math. 751, 309–338 (2019)
Fujita, K.: On \(K\)-stability and the volume functions of \({\mathbb{Q}}\)-Fano varieties. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 113, 541–582 (2016)
Li, C.: \(K\)-semistability is equivariant volume minimization. Duke Math. J. 166, 3147–3218 (2017)
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to my supervisor Professor Ivan Cheltsov for the introduction to the topic and his continuous support.
Funding
The author is a PhD student at the University of Edinburgh who receives a studentship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The research was done and written by the author of the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Throughout this paper, all varieties are assumed to be projective and defined over \({\mathbb {C}}\).
Appendix A. Polarized \(\delta \)-invariant via Kento Fujita’s formulas
Appendix A. Polarized \(\delta \)-invariant via Kento Fujita’s formulas
Let us use notations from Section 2. Recall that \({\overline{T}}\) is a Du Val del Pezzo surface, and the blow up \(\pi \) induces a birational morphism \(\upsilon :{\overline{T}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {P}}^2\). We assume that \({\overline{T}}\) is singular. We have the following commutative diagram
Suppose that \(u\in [1,2]\). Recall that \({\overline{D}}=-K_{{\overline{T}}}-(1-u){\overline{C}}_2\). Observe that \({\overline{C}}_2\) is contained in the smooth locus of the surface \({\overline{T}}\). Let \(C_2\) be the strict transform of the curve \({\overline{C}}_2\) on the surface T, set \(D=-K_T-(1-u)C_2\). Note that \(D=\sigma ^*({\overline{D}})\) so the divisor D is big and nef for \(u\in [1,2]\). Recall
where the infimum is run over all prime divisor F over \({\overline{T}}\) such that \(O\in C_{{\overline{T}}}(F)\). For every point \(P\in T\), we also define
where the infimum is run over all prime divisor E over T such that \(P\in C_T(E)\). Since \(D=\sigma ^*({\overline{D}})\) and \(K_T=\sigma ^*(K_{{\overline{T}}}),\) we have
So, to estimate \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},{\overline{D}})\) it is enough to estimate \(\delta _P(T,D)\) for P all points P such that \(\sigma (P)=O\).
Let \({\mathcal {C}}\) be a smooth curve on T containing P. Set
For \(v\in [0,\tau ]\), let P(v) be the positive part of the Zariski decomposition of the divisor \(-K_T-{\mathcal {C}}\), and let N(v) be its negative part. Then we set
where
We will estimate \(\delta _P(T,D)\) in the following using the notations above for a suitable choice of the curve \({\mathcal {C}}\), \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})\), P(v) and N(v) later in special cases.
A similar approach was taken in [3] and [4].
1.1 Polarized \(\delta \)-invariant on Del Pezzo surface of degree 4 with \({\mathbb {A}}_1\) singularity.
Suppose that \({\overline{T}}\) has one singular point and this point is a singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\). Then \(\eta \) is a blow up of \({\mathbb {P}}^2\) at points \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\) and \(P_4\) in general position and a point \(P_5\) which belongs to the exceptional divisor corresponding to \(P_4\) and no other negative curve. Suppose \({\textbf{E}}:=L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{24}\cup E_5\). By [6, Section 6.2] we have:
where \(E_1\), \(E_2\), \(E_3\), \(E_4\), \(E_5\) are exceptional divisors corresponding to \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\) respectively, \(C_{2}\) is a strict transform of a \((-1)\)-curve coming from the conic on \({\mathbb {P}}^2\), \(L_{ij}\) are strict transforms of the lines passing through \(P_i\) and \(P_j\) for \((i,j)\in \{(1,2),(1,3),(1,4),(2,3),(2,4),(3,4)\}\) and \(L_{45}\) a strict transform of a \((-1)\)-curve coming from a line on \({\mathbb {P}}^2\). The dual graph of \((-1)\) and \((-2)\)-curves is given in the following picture:
Lemma A.1
Suppose P is a point on T and \(D=-K_{T}-(u-1)C_2\) with \(D^2=5-u^2\) then
and
and
where a is a root of \(3u^3 - 9u^2 + 3u + 5\) on [1, 2], b is a root of \(8u^3 - 24u^2 + 12u + 7\) on [1, 3/2]. Note that \(a\in [1.355,1.356]\), \(b\in [1.261,1.262]\).
Proof
Step 1. Suppose \(P\in E_4\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= E_4\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=3-u\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vE_4\) is given by:
and
Moreover,
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{16 + 3 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}\) for \(P\in E_4\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in E_4\backslash (E_5\cup L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34})\)
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}2v^2\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(5-u-2v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P=E_4\cap E_5\)
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}2v^2\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(2 - u + v) (u + 3 v - 2)}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(u + 1) (5-u - 2 v)}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P\in E_4\cap (L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34})\)
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}2v^2\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(3 - u) (5-u - 2 v)}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$
So we have
-
if \(P\in E_4\backslash (E_5\cup L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34})\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} 2v^2 dv\\&\quad +\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2} dv+\int _{1}^{3-u} \frac{(5-u-2v)^2}{2} dv\Big )\\&=\frac{9 + 6 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}{15 - 3 u^2}\le \frac{16 + 3 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P=E_4\cap E_5\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} 2v^2 dv+\int _{2-u}^1\frac{(2 - u + v) (u + 3 v - 2)}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{3-u} \frac{(u + 1) (5-u - 2 v)}{2} dv\Big )=\frac{11 - u^3}{15-3u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P\in E_4\cap (L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34})\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} 2v^2 dv+\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{3-u} \frac{(3 - u) (5-u - 2 v)}{2}dv\Big )\\&=\frac{13 + 3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u}{15 - 3u^2}\\ {}&\le \frac{16 + 3 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
and
where a is a root of \(3u^3 - 9u^2 + 3u + 5\) on [1, 2]. Note that \(a\in [1.355,1.356]\).
Step 2. Suppose \(P\in E_5\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= E_5\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=2\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vE_5\) is given by:
and
Moreover,
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{11 - u^3}\) for \(P\in E_5\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in E_5\backslash (E_4\cup C_2\cup L_{45})\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,1]\\ \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,u]\\ \frac{(3-3v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [u,2] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P=E_5\cap C_2\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,1]\\ \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,u]\\ \frac{ 3 (2 - v) (6 -4 u + v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [u,2] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= E_5\cap L_{45}\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,1]\\ \frac{(6-2 u - v) (2-2 u + 3 v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [1,u]\\ \frac{3(2 - v) (v + 2)}{8}\text { for }v\in [u,2] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$
So we have
-
if \(P\in E_5\backslash (E_4\cup C_2\cup L_{45})\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{1} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2} dv+\int _{1}^u \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{u}^{2} \frac{(3-3v/2)^2}{2} dv\Big )=\frac{21 + 6 u - 18 u^2 + 5 u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{11 - u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= E_5\cap C_2\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{1} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2} dv+\int _{1}^u \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{u}^{2} \frac{ 3 (2 - v) (6 -4 u + v)}{8} dv\Big )=\frac{45 - 30 u + 2 u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{11 - u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= E_5\cap L_{45}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{1} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^u \frac{(6-2 u - v) (2-2 u + 3 v)}{8}dv\\&\quad +\frac{3(2 - v) (v + 2)}{8} dv\Big )=\frac{26 - 12 u^2 + 3 u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{11 - u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
Step 3.1. Suppose \(P\in L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34}\) and \(u\in [1,3/2]\). Without loss of generality, we can assume that \(P\in L_{14}\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= L_{14}\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=3-u\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vL_{14}\) is given by:
and
Moreover
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}\) for \(P\in L_{14}\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(4 - u - 3v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,4-2u]\\ 2(3 - u - v)^2\text { for }v\in [4-2u,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14} \cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(6 - 2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (2 u + v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [1,4-2u]\\ (3-u - v)\text { for }v\in [4-2u,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (4 -2 u + v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [1,4-2u]\\ 2 (2 - u) (3 - u - v)\text { for }v\in [4-2u,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$
So we have
-
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{4-2u} \frac{(4 - u - 3v/2)^2}{2} dv+ \int _{4-2u}^{3-u} 2(3 - u - v)^2 dv\Big )\\&=\frac{21-u^3 - 6u}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(6 - 2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8} dv \\&\quad +\int _{1}^{4-2u} \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (2 u + v)}{8} dv\\&\quad + \int _{4-2u}^{3-u}(3-u - v) dv\Big )=\frac{19 - 2u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^1\frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{4-2u} \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (4 -2 u + v)}{8} dv\\&\quad + \int _{4-2u}^{3-u} 2 (2 - u) (3 - u - v) dv\Big )\\&=\frac{26 - 12u^2 + 3u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
and
where b is a root of \(8u^3 - 24u^2 + 12u + 7\) on [1, 3/2]. Note that \(b\in [1.261,1.262]\).
Step 3.2. Suppose \(P\in L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34}\) and \(u\in [3/2,2]\). Without loss of generality, we can assume that \(P\in L_{14}\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= L_{14}\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=3-u\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vL_{14}\) is given by:
and
Moreover
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{3u^3 - 12u^2 + 6u + 13}\) for \(P\in L_{14}\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(1+ v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,4-2u]\\ \frac{(5 - 2u - v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [4-2u,1]\\ 2(3 - u - v)^2\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14} \cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(1+ v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{ (6 -2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8}\text { for }v\in [2-u,4-2u]\\ \frac{(v + 1) (5 -2 u - v)}{2}\text { for }v\in [4-2u,1]\\ 2 (3-u - v)\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(1+ v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,4-2u]\\ \frac{(5 - 2u - v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [4-2u,1]\\ 2 (2 - u) (3 -u - v)\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^{4-2u} \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{4-2u}^1 \frac{(5-2u-v)^2}{2} dv+ \int _{1}^{3-u} 2(3 - u - v)^2 dv\Big )\\&=\frac{7u^3 - 36u^2 + 48u - 6}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{2-u}^{4-2u} \frac{ (6 -2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8} dv\\&\quad +\int _{4-2u}^1 \frac{(v + 1) (5 -2 u - v)}{2} dv+ \int _{1}^{3-u} 2 (3-u - v) dv\Big )\\&=\frac{3u^3 - 18u^2 + 27u - 4}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^{4-2u} \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{4-2u}^1 \frac{(5-2u-v)^2}{2} dv+ \int _{1}^{3-u} 2 (2 - u) (3 -u - v) dv\Big )\\&=\frac{3u^3 - 12u^2 + 26}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
and
\(\square \)
Corollary A.1
Let P be a point in T that is contained in \(L_{12}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34}\cup E_4 \cup E_5\) then
Corollary A.2
Suppose O is a point on a del Pezzo surface \({\overline{T}}\) with \({\mathbb {A}}_1\) singularity and \(\delta _O(T)\le \frac{6}{5}\) then
1.2 Polarized \(\delta \)-invariant on Del Pezzo surface of degree 4 with two \({\mathbb {A}}_1\) singularities.
Suppose that \({\overline{T}}\) has two singular points and these points are singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_1\). Then \(\eta \) is a blow up of \({\mathbb {P}}^2\) at points \(P_1\), \(P_2\), and \(P_4\) in general position and after that blowing up a point \(P_3\) which belongs to the exceptional divisor corresponding to \(P_2\) and a point \(P_5\) which belongs to the exceptional divisor corresponding to \(P_4\) and no other negative curve. By [6, Section 6.2] we have:
where \(E_1\), \(E_2\), \(E_3\), \(E_4\), \(E_5\) are exceptional divisors corresponding to \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\) respectively, \(C_{2}\) is a strict transform of a \((-1)\)-curve coming from the conic on \({\mathbb {P}}^2\), \(L_{ij}\) are strict transforms of the lines passing through \(P_i\) and \(P_j\) for \((i,j)\in \{(1,2),(1,4)\}\) and \(L_{45}\) and \(L_{23}\) are strict transforms of a \((-1)\)-curve coming from lines passing through \(P_2\) and \(P_4\) respectively on \({\mathbb {P}}^2\). The dual graph of \((-1)\) and \((-2)\)-curves is given in the following picture:
Lemma A.2
Suppose P is a point on T and \(D=-K_{T}-(u-1)C_2\) with \(D^2=5-u^2\) then
and
and
where a is a root of \(3u^3 - 9u^2 + 3u + 5\) on [1, 2], b is a root of \(8u^3 - 24u^2 + 12u + 7\) on [1, 3/2]. Note that \(a\in [1.355,1.356]\), \(b\in [1.261,1.262]\).
Proof
Step 1. Suppose \(P\in E_2\cup E_4\). Without loss of generality we can assume that \(P\in E_4\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= E_4\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=3-u\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vE_4\) is given by:
and
Moreover,
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{16 + 3 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}\) for \(P\in E_4\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in E_4\backslash (E_5\cup L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34})\)
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}2v^2\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(5-u-2v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P=E_4\cap E_5\)
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}2v^2\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(2 - u + v) (u + 3 v - 2)}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(u + 1) (5-u - 2 v)}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P\in E_4\cap (L_{14}\cup L_{24})\)
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)\le {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll}2v^2\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(5-u - 2 v) (1 -u + 2 v)}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$
So we have
-
if \(P\in E_4\backslash (E_5\cup L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup L_{34})\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} 2v^2 dv+\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{3-u} \frac{(5-u-2v)^2}{2} dv\Big )\\&=\frac{9 + 6 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}{15 - 3 u^2}\le \frac{16 + 3 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P=E_4\cap E_5\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} 2v^2 dv+\int _{2-u}^1\frac{(2 - u + v) (u + 3 v - 2)}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{3-u} \frac{(u + 1) (5-u - 2 v)}{2} dv\Big )=\frac{11 - u^3}{15-3u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P\in E_4\cap (L_{14}\cup L_{24})\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} 2v^2 dv+\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(2-u+v)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{3-u} \frac{(5-u - 2 v) (1 -u + 2 v)}{2}dv\Big )\\&=\frac{2u^3 - 6u^2 + 8}{15 - 3u^2}\le \frac{16 + 3 u - 9 u^2 + 2 u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
and
where a is a root of \(3u^3 - 9u^2 + 3u + 5\) on [1, 2]. Note that \(a\in [1.355,1.356]\).
Step 2. Suppose \(P\in E_3\cup E_5\). Without loss of generality we can assume that \(P\in E_5\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= E_5\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=2\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vE_5\) is given by:
and
Moreover,
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{11 - u^3}\) for \(P\in E_5\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in E_5\backslash (E_4\cup C_2\cup L_{45})\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,1]\\ \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,u]\\ \frac{(3-3v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [u,2] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P=E_5\cap C_2\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,1]\\ \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,u]\\ \frac{ 3 (2 - v) (6 -4 u + v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [u,2] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= E_5\cap L_{45}\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,1]\\ \frac{(6-2 u - v) (2-2 u + 3 v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [1,u]\\ \frac{3(2 - v) (v + 2)}{8}\text { for }v\in [u,2] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$
So we have
-
if \(P\in E_5\backslash (E_4\cup C_2\cup L_{45})\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{1} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2} dv+\int _{1}^u \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{u}^{2} \frac{(3-3v/2)^2}{2} dv\Big )=\frac{21 + 6 u - 18 u^2 + 5 u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{11 - u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= E_5\cap C_2\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{1} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2} dv+\int _{1}^u \frac{(3-u-v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{u}^{2} \frac{ 3 (2 - v) (6 -4 u + v)}{8} dv\Big )=\frac{45 - 30 u + 2 u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{11 - u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= E_5\cap L_{45}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{1} \frac{(2-u+v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^u \frac{(6-2 u - v) (2-2 u + 3 v)}{8}dv\\&\quad +\frac{3(2 - v) (v + 2)}{8} dv\Big )=\frac{26 - 12 u^2 + 3 u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{11 - u^3}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
Step 3. Suppose \(P\in L_{24}\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= L_{24}\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=3-u\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vL_{24}\) is given by:
and
Moreover,
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{4u^3 - 15u^2 + 6u + 17}\) for \(P\in L_{24}\). If \(P\in L_{24}\backslash (E_2\cup E_4)\) then
So for \(P\in L_{24}\backslash (E_2\cup E_4)\) we have
We obtain that
Step 4.1. Suppose \(P\in L_{12}\cup L_{14}\) and \(u\in [1,3/2]\). Without loss of generality, we can assume that \(P\in L_{14}\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= L_{14}\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=3-u\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vL_{14}\) is given by:
and
Moreover
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}\) for \(P\in L_{14}\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(4 - u - 3v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [1,4-2u]\\ 2(3 - u - v)^2\text { for }v\in [4-2u,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14} \cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(6 - 2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (2 u + v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [1,4-2u]\\ (3-u - v)\text { for }v\in [4-2u,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,1]\\ \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (4 -2 u + v)}{8}\text { for }v\in [1,4-2u]\\ 2 (2 - u) (3 - u - v)\text { for }v\in [4-2u,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$
So we have
-
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{4-2u} \frac{(4 - u - 3v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad + \int _{4-2u}^{3-u} 2(3 - u - v)^2 dv\Big )\\&=\frac{21-u^3 - 6u}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{2-u}^1 \frac{(6 - 2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{4-2u} \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (2 u + v)}{8} dv+ \int _{4-2u}^{3-u}(3-u - v) dv\Big )\\&=\frac{19 - 2u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^1\frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{1}^{4-2u} \frac{(8 -2 u - 3 v) (4 -2 u + v)}{8} dv\\&\quad + \int _{4-2u}^{3-u} 2 (2 - u) (3 - u - v) dv\Big )\\&=\frac{26 - 12u^2 + 3u^3}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
and
where b is a root of \(8u^3 - 24u^2 + 12u + 7\) on [1, 3/2]. Note that \(b\in [1.261,1.262]\).
Step 4.2. Suppose \(P\in L_{12}\cup L_{14}\) and \(u\in [3/2,2]\). Without loss of generality, we can assume that \(P\in L_{14}\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= L_{14}\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=3-u\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vL_{14}\) is given by:
and
Moreover
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{3u^3 - 12u^2 + 6u + 13}\) for \(P\in L_{14}\). Note that we have:
-
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(1+ v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,4-2u]\\ \frac{(5 - 2u - v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [4-2u,1]\\ 2(3 - u - v)^2\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14} \cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(1+ v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{ (6 -2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8}\text { for }v\in [2-u,4-2u]\\ \frac{(v + 1) (5 -2 u - v)}{2}\text { for }v\in [4-2u,1]\\ 2 (3-u - v)\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P= L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned}h_D(v)={\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \frac{(1+ v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [0,2-u]\\ \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [2-u,4-2u]\\ \frac{(5 - 2u - v)^2}{2}\text { for }v\in [4-2u,1]\\ 2 (2 - u) (3 -u - v)\text { for }v\in [1,3-u] \end{array}\right. }\end{aligned}$$
-
if \(P\in L_{14}\backslash (E_4\cup E_1\cup L_{23}\cup E_5)\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^{4-2u} \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{4-2u}^1 \frac{(5-2u-v)^2}{2} dv+ \int _{1}^{3-u} 2(3 - u - v)^2 dv\Big )\\&=\frac{7u^3 - 36u^2 + 48u - 6}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap E_1\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{2-u}^{4-2u} \frac{ (6 -2 u - v ) (2 u + 3 v - 2)}{8} dv\\&\quad +\int _{4-2u}^1 \frac{(v + 1) (5 -2 u - v)}{2} dv+ \int _{1}^{3-u} 2 (3-u - v) dv\Big )\\&=\frac{3u^3 - 18u^2 + 27u - 4}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$ -
if \(P = L_{14}\cap L_{23}\) then
$$\begin{aligned} S_D(W_{\bullet ,\bullet }^{{\mathcal {C}}};P)&=\frac{2}{5-u^2}\Big (\int _0^{2-u} \frac{(v/2 + 1)^2}{2} dv+\int _{2-u}^{4-2u} \frac{(3 - u - v/2)^2}{2} dv\\&\quad +\int _{4-2u}^1 \frac{(5-2u-v)^2}{2} dv+ \int _{1}^{3-u} 2 (2 - u) (3 -u - v) dv\Big )\\&=\frac{3u^3 - 12u^2 + 26}{2(15 - 3 u^2)}\le \frac{3 u^3 - 12 u^2 + 6 u + 13}{15 - 3 u^2} \end{aligned}$$
We obtain that
and
\(\square \)
Corollary A.3
Let P be a point in T that is contained in \( L_{12}\cup L_{14}\cup L_{24}\cup E_2\cup E_3\cup E_4\cup E_4\) then
Corollary A.4
Suppose O is a point on a del Pezzo surface \({\overline{T}}\) with two \({\mathbb {A}}_1\) singularities and nine lines such that \(\delta _O(T)\le \frac{6}{5}\) then
1.3 Polarized \(\delta \)-invariant on Del Pezzo surface of degree 4 with \({\mathbb {A}}_2\) singularity
Now, let us use the notations and assumptions of Section 2 with a minor difference: we assume that \({\overline{T}}\) has a singular point of type \({\mathbb {A}}_2\). Let us show that in the case when O is the singular point of the surface \({\overline{T}}\) we have
which immediately implies that \(\delta _O({\overline{T}},W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet })\le \frac{80}{83}\). In this case, the morphism \(\eta \) is a blow up of \({\mathbb {P}}^2\) at points \(P_1\), \(P_2\), and \(P_3\) in general position; after that blowing up a point \(P_4\) which belongs to the exceptional divisor corresponding to \(P_3\) and no other negative curve and after that a point \(P_5\) which belongs to the exceptional divisor corresponding to \(P_4\) and no other negative curve. By [6, Section 6.5] we have:
where \(E_1\), \(E_2\), \(E_3\), \(E_4\), \(E_5\) are exceptional divisors corresponding to \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(P_4\), \(P_5\) respectively, \(C_{2}\) is a strict transform of a \((-1)\)-curve coming from the conic on \({\mathbb {P}}^2\), \(L_{ij}\) are strict transforms of the lines passing through \(P_i\) and \(P_j\) for \((i,j)\in \{(1,2),(1,3),(2,3)\}\) and \(L_{34}\) is a strict transform of a \((-1)\)-curve coming from a line passing through \(P_3\) on \({\mathbb {P}}^2\). The dual graph of \((-1)\) and \((-2)\)-curves is given in the following picture:
Now let’s prove that:
Lemma A.3
Suppose P is a point on T and \(D=-K_{T}-(u-1)C_2\) with \(D^2=5-u^2\) then
Proof
Suppose \(P\in E_4\backslash (L_{34}\cup E_5)\). In this case we set \({\mathcal {C}}= E_4\). Then \(\tau ({\mathcal {C}})=2\). The Zariski Decomposition of the divisor \(D-vE_4\) is given by:
and
Moreover,
and
Thus,
Thus, \(\delta _P(T,D)\le \frac{15 - 3 u^2}{19+u^3 - 6u^2}\) for \(P\in E_4\). Note that for \(P\in E_4\backslash (E_5\cup L_{34})\) we have:
So we have
So we obtain that
\(\square \)
Corollary A.5
We have \(S(W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet }; E_4) = \frac{83}{80}\), which implies that \(\delta _O({\overline{T}}, W^{{\overline{T}}}_{\bullet ,\bullet }) \le \frac{80}{83}\).
Proof
\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Denisova, E. K-stability of Fano 3-folds of Picard rank 3 and degree 20. Ann Univ Ferrara (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11565-024-00516-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11565-024-00516-6