Skip to main content
Log in

Atlas-based segmentation of temporal bone surface structures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a time-efficient automated segmentation approach that could identify surface structures on the temporal bone for use in surgical simulation software and preoperative surgical training.

Methods

An atlas-based segmentation approach was developed to segment the tegmen, sigmoid sulcus, exterior auditory canal, interior auditory canal, and posterior canal wall in normal temporal bone CT images. This approach was tested in images of 20 cadaver bones (10 left, 10 right). The results of the automated segmentation were compared to manual segmentation using quantitative metrics of similarity, Mahalanobis distance, average Hausdorff distance, and volume similarity.

Results

The Mahalanobis distance was less than 0.232 mm for all structures. The average Hausdorff distance was less than 0.464 mm for all structures except the posterior canal wall and external auditory canal for the right bones. Volume similarity was 0.80 or greater for all structures except the sigmoid sulcus that was 0.75 for both left and right bones. Visually, the segmented structures were accurate and similar to that manually traced by an expert observer.

Conclusions

An atlas-based approach using a deformable registration of a Gaussian-smoothed temporal bone image and refinements using surface landmarks was successful in segmenting surface structures of temporal bone anatomy for use in pre-surgical planning and training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Powell KA, Liang T, Hittle B, Stredney D, Kerwin T, Wiet GJ (2017) Atlas-based segmentation of temporal bone anatomy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12(11):1937–1944

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JPW (2010) Elastix: a toolbox for intensity based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:196–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shamonin DP, Bron EE, Lelieveldt BPF, Smits M, Klein S, Staring M (2014) Fast parallel image registration on CPU and GPU for diagnostic classification of Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neuroinformatics 7:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klein S, Staring M (2014) Elastix the manual (http://elastix.isi.uu.nl/)

  5. Liao PS, Chen TS, Chung PC (2001) A fast algorithm for multilevel thresholding. J Inf Sci Eng 17:713–727

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danielsson PE (1980) Euclidean distance mapping. Comput Graph Image Process 14:227–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_neighborhood. Accessed 29 Jan 2019

  8. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Pearson Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taha AA, Hanbury A (2015) Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med Imaging 15(29):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kerwin T, Wiet G, Stredney D, Shen HW (2012) Automatic scoring of virtual mastoidectomies using expert examples. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7(1):1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiet G, Hittle B, Kerwin T, Stredney D (2012) Translating surgical metrics into automated assessments. Stud Health Technol Inform 173:543–548

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by NIDCD/NIH 1R01-DC011321 and by funding from Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimerly A. Powell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ohio State University Institutional Review Board and have been performed in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

This study was funded by NIDCD/NIH 1R01-DC011321.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Powell, K.A., Kashikar, T., Hittle, B. et al. Atlas-based segmentation of temporal bone surface structures. Int J CARS 14, 1267–1273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01978-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-01978-2

Keywords

Navigation