Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Bio- and Organic Fertilizers on Potato Yield, Quality and Tuber Weight Loss After Harvest

  • Published:
Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess whether organic fertilization alone or with bio-fertilization could replace mineral fertilization in potato production with no adverse effect on quantity or quality. Therefore, two field experiments were conducted at Maba Farm, Cairo—Alexandria Desert Road in Egypt to evaluate the impact of mineral, organic, and bio-fertilizers on a sandy soil on yield, quality, and weight loss after harvest of potato tubers. Control plots were treated with recommended rates of mineral fertilizer + 11.9 t ha−1 compost and the other treatments were 23.8 t ha−1 compost, 23.8 t ha−1 compost + bio-fertilizer, 11.9 t ha−1 compost + bio-fertilizer, 50% of mineral fertilizers + 23.8 t ha−1 compost, 50% of mineral fertilizers + 23.8 t ha−1 compost + bio-fertilizer, 50% of mineral fertilizers + 11.9 t ha−1 compost + bio-fertilizer, and 35.7 t ha−1 compost. There were significant increases in the total and marketable yield of potato crops from plots treated with 50% of the recommended mineral fertilizers plus 23.8 t ha−1 compost with or without bio-fertilizer as well as from plots that received compost at the rate of 35.7 t ha−1, compared with plots treated with full dose of mineral fertilizer plus 11.9 t ha−1 compost (control). Compost at 23.8 t ha−1 + bio-fertilizer resulted in a significant increase in marketable yield. Nevertheless, total yield obtained from plots treated with compost at 23.8 t ha−1 alone or plus bio-fertilizer did not differ significantly from the conventional control treatment. Compared with conventional fertilizer treatment, plots receiving compost at 23.8 t ha−1 alone or at 11.9 t ha−1 plus 50% mineral fertilizers and bio-fertilizer showed a lower nitrate content in potato tubers. Bio-fertilizer + organic fertilizer at a rate of 11.9 t ha−1 reduced marketable yield by 11.8% and total yield by 9.2%, compared with using organic fertilizer at a rate of 23.8 t ha−1 compost. So, for export of organic potato, which is characterized by 2–3-fold higher product prices, bio-fertilizer in the present study could not be an alternative to organic fertilizer. The highest nitrate content of tubers was obtained in control plots and plots that received 35.7 t ha−1 compost. Conventional fertilizer showed significantly higher weight loss of potato tubers during cold storage than all other treatments. Tuber K content was low in organic potato, whereas no effect was recorded on tuber N, P, or starch content. Hence, these results suggest that organic production of potato (at the level of 23.8 t ha−1 compost) could be an alternative to conventional production without significant reduction in yield, and with low nitrate content and better storability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A.O.A.C. methods (1990). Official method of analysis of official agriculture chemist, 15th Ed. Washington, D.C.

  • Abou El-Khair EE, Nawar DAS (2010) Effect of phosphorus and some biostimulants on growth yield phosphorus use efficiency and tuber quality of potato plants growth in sandy soil. Zagazig J of Agric Res 37(5):1077–1103

    Google Scholar 

  • Abou-Hussein SD, El-Oksh II, El-Shorbagy T, El-Behairy UA (2002) Effect of chicken manure, compost and biofertilizers on vegetative growth, tuber characteristics and yield of potato crop. Egypt J Hortic 29(1):135–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Abou-Zeid MY, Bakry MAA (2011) Integrated effect of bio-organic manures and mineral fertilizers on potato productivity and the fertility status of a calcareous soil. Austr J Basic & Applied Sci 5(8):1385–1399

    Google Scholar 

  • Amber DM, Nora LO, Anna MC, April BL (2011) Residual effects of fresh and composted dairy manure applications on ppotato production. Am J Pot Res 88:324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arafa MM, El-Maghraby TA (2004) Effect of bio and chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and chemical composition of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) under sandy soil conditions. Ann Agric Sci Moshtohor 42:2017–2032

    Google Scholar 

  • Atimanav G, Adholeya A (2002) AM inoculation of five tropical fodder crops and inoculum production in unfertilized soil amended with organic matter. Biol Fert Soil 35:214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad EM (2002) Effect of compost and some bio-fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of potato crops (Solanum tubeorsum, L.). J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ 27(8):5525–5537

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartova V, Diviš J, Barta J, Brabcova A, Svajnerova M (2013) Variation of nitrogenous components in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers produced under organic and conventional crop management. Eur J Agron 49:20–31

  • Bin Zakaria, AA (2009) Growth optimization of potassium solubilizing bacteria isolated from biofertilizer. BSc (Biotechnology), Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering Universiti Malaysia Pahang 1–14

  • Bojinova D, Velkova R, Grancharov I, Zhelev S (1997) The bioconversion of Tunisian phosphorite using Aspergillus niger. Nutr Cyc Agroecosyst 47:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boligłowa E, Gleń K (2003) Yielding and quality of potato tubers depending on the kind of organic fertilization and tillage methods. Elec J Pol Agroc Univ Ser Agron 1(6):10–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottini R, Cassán F, Piccoli P (2004) Gibberellin production by bacteria and its involvement in plant growth promotion and yield increase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:497–503

  • Bulluck LR, Brosius M, Evanylo GK, Ristaino JB (2002) Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Appl Soil Ecol 19:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camin F, Moshella A, Miselli F, Parisi B, Versini G, Ranalli P, Bagnaresi P (2007) Evaluation of the markers for the traceability of potato tuber grown in an organic and versus conventional regime. J Sci Food Agric 87:1330–1336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canellas LP, Olivares FL, Okorokova AL, Facanha AR (2000) Humic acids isolated from earthworm compost enhance root elongation, lateral root emergence, and plasma H + − ATPase activity in maize roots. Plant Physiol 130:1951–1957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter MR, Sanderson JB, MacLeod JA (2003) Influence of compost on the physical properties and organic matter fractions of a fine sandy loam throughout the cycle of a potato rotation. Can J Soil Sci 4:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarson D (2004) Potash biofertilizer for ecofriendly agriculture. Agro-clinic and Research Centre, Poovanthuruthu, Kottayam (Kerala), India, pp98-110

  • Cottenie A, Verloo M, Kiekens L, Velghe G, Camerlynck R (1982) Chemical analysis of plant and soil. laboratory of analytical and agrochemistry, State Univ. Ghent Belgium, pp 100–129

  • Delate K, Friedrich H, Lawson V (2003) Organic pepper production using compost and cover crops. Biol Agric Hortic 21:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douds DD, Nagahashi GJ, Reider C, Hepperly PR (2007) Inoculation with AMF arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increases the yield of potatoes in a high P soil. Biol Agric Hortic 25:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater LE, Letourneau DK, Workneh F, Van Bruggen ACH, Shennan C (1995) Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecol 5:1098–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppendorfer WH, Eggum BO, Bille SW (1970) Nutritive value of potato crude protein as influenced by manuring and amino acid composition. J Sci Food Agric 30:361–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhart E, Hartl W, Putz B (2005) Biowaste compost affects yield, nitrogen supply during the vegetation period and crop quality of agricultural crops. Eur J Agron 23:305–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO 2014. FAO, FAOSTAT. Agriculture. Rome (http://faostat.fao.org/), accessed 2-12-2014

  • Finckh MR, Schulte-Geldermann E, Bruns C (2006) Challenges to organic potato farming: disease and nutrient management. Potato Res 49:27–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk K, Ezhekiel R (2006) Storage. In: Handbook of potato production, improvement, and postharvest management. Food Products Press, New York London, pp p489–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajšlová J, Schulzová V, Slanina P, Janné K, Hellenäs KE, Andersson C (2005) Quality of organically and conventionally grown potatoes: four-year study of micronutrients, metals, secondary metabolites, enzymatic browning and organoleptic properties. Food Addit Contam 22:514–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad AMM, Abdel-Ati YY (1998) Reducing of nitrate content of potato tuber via biofertilization with Azospirillum and via mycorrhizal fungi. J Agric Sci Mansoura Univ 23:2597–2610

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamouz K, Lachman J, Dvořák P, Pivec V (2005) The effect of ecological growing on the potatoes yield and quality. Plant Soil Environ 51:397–402

  • Heaton S (2001) Organic farming, food quality and human health: a review of the evidence. Soil Association, Bristol, p 88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse PR (1971) A text book of soil chemical analysis. Juan Murry (Publisher) Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, p 498

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvan M, Edesi L (2009) The effect of cultivation methods on the yield and biological quality of potato. Agron Res 7:289–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Jen-Hshuan C (2006). The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. International workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil-Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertilizer Use 16–20 ppp1-10

  • Kampshake LJ, Hannah SA, Cohen JM (1967) Automated analysis for nitrate by hydrazine reduction. Water Resourc Res 1:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe H, Muller K, Olteanu G, Gorea T (1995) Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatments on weight loss and changes in chemicals composition of potato tubers stored at °C4°C. Potato Res 38:97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lairon D (2009) Nutritional quality and safety of organic food a review. Agron Sustain Dev 30(1):33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang SS (2005) Organic farming produces same corn and soybean yields as conventional farms, but consumes less energy and no pesticides, study finds. Retrieved April 14, 2009, Cornell, Service (http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/July05/organic.farm.vs.other.ssl.html)

  • Maggio A, Carillo P, Bulmetti GS, Fuggi A, Barbieri Gand De Pascale S (2008) Potato yield and metabolic profiling under conventional and organic farming. Euro J Agron 28:343–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makaraviciute A (2003) Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on the yield and quality of different potato varieties. Agron Res 1:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Malboobi MA, Owlia P et al. (2009) Solubilization of organic and inorganic phosphates by three highly efficient soil bacterial isolates. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25(8):1471–1477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moschella A, Camin F, Miselli F, Parisi B, Versini G, Ranalli P (2005) Markers of characterization of agricultural regime and geographical origin in potato. Agroindustria 4(3):325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourão I, Brito LM, Coutinho J (2008) Yield and quality of organic versus conventional potato crop.16th IFOAM Organic World Congress, Modena, Italy, June 16–20. Archived at http://orgprints.org/12660.

  • Muller K, Hippe J (1987) Influence of differences in nutrition on important quality characteristics of some agricultural crops. Plant Soil 100:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman QA, Clive AE, Peter B, James DM, Stephen L, Christie W (2003) Effects of vermicomposts on growth and marketable fruits of field-grown tomatoes, peppers and strawberries. Pedobiologia 47:731–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterburgski AV (1968) Handbook of agronomic chemistry. Kolop Publishing House, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Pither R, Hall MN (1990) Analytical survey of the nutritional composition of organically grown fruit and vegetables. In Technical memorandum No. 597, MAFF project No. 4350 (p. 31). Gloucestershire: The Campden Food and Drink Research Association

  • Rembialkowska E (1999) Comparison of the contents of nitrates, nitrites, lead, cadmium and vitamin C in potatoes from conventional and ecological farms. Pol J Food Nutrit Sci 8(49):17–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rembialkowska E (2007) Quality of plant products from organic agriculture. J Sci Food Agric 87:2757–2762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L.A., 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. Agric., USA. Handbook, No 60. p. 160.

  • Sheng XF, He LY, Huang WY (2002) The conditions of releasing potassium by a silicate dissolving bacterial strain NBT. Agr Sci China 1:662–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatoados S, Werner M, Buchanam M (1999) Field assessment of soil quality as affected by compost and fertilizer application in a broccoli field (San Benito County, California). Appl Soil Ecol 12:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu B, Balloli SS, Ramakrishna YS (2007) Organic farming in rainfed agriculture. Central Research Institute for Dry Land Agriculture, Hyderabad, p 88

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey KJ (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volterrani M, Pardini G, Gaetani M, Grossi N, Miele S (1996) Effects of application of municipal solid waste compost on horticultural species yield. The Science of Composting Blackie Academic & Professional, London, pp 1385–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Warman PR, Havard KA (1998) Yield, vitamin and mineral contents of organically and conventionally grown potatoes and sweet corn. Agric Ecosyst Environ 68:207–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woese K, Lange D, Boess C, Bogl KW (1997) A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods-result of a review of the relevant literature. J Sci Food Agric 74:281–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wszelaki AL, Delwiche JF, Walker SD, Liggett RE, Joseph C, Scheerens JC, Kleinhenz MD (2005) Sensory quality and mineral and glycoalkaloid concentrations in organically and conventionally grown redskin potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). J Sci Food Agric 85:720–726

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani M, Bahmanyar MA, Pirdashti H, Esmaili MA (2009) Effect of phosphate solubilization micro organisms (PSM) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and yield components of corn (Zea mays L.) Proceedings of world academy science. J Engin Technol: 2070–3740

Download references

Acknowledgements

Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, is gratefully acknowledged for financially supporting this research. The authors would like to thank Dr. Daniel Warnock for reviewing and correcting the language of the paper as well as his valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vegetable Crops Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Sayed F. El-Sayed, Hassan A. Hassan & Mohamed M. El-Mogy

Authors
  1. Sayed F. El-Sayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hassan A. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed M. El-Mogy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed M. El-Mogy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Sayed, S.F., Hassan, H.A. & El-Mogy, M.M. Impact of Bio- and Organic Fertilizers on Potato Yield, Quality and Tuber Weight Loss After Harvest. Potato Res. 58, 67–81 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-014-9272-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-014-9272-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation