Abstract
Background
Metabolic networks are complex and system of highly connected chemical reactions and hence it needs a system level computational approach to identify the genotype- phenotype relationship. The study of essential genes and reactions and synthetic lethality of genes and reactions plays a crucial role in explaining functional links between genes and gene function predictions.
Methods
Flux balance analysis (FBA) has been developed as a powerful method for the in silico analyses of metabolic networks. In this study, we present the comparative analysis of the genomic scale metabolic networks of the four microorganisms i.e. Salmonella typhimurium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Helicobacter pylori. The fluxes of all reaction were obtained and the growth rate of the organism was calculated by setting the biomass reaction as the objective function.
Results & Conclusions
The average lethality fraction of all the four organisms studied ranged from 0.2 to 0.6. It was also observed that there are very few metabolites which are highly connected. Those metabolites that are highly connected are supposed to be the ‘global players’ similar to the hub protein in the protein–protein interaction network.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feist and Palsson (2008). The growing scope of applications of genomescale metabolic reconstructions using Escherichia coli. Nature Biotechnol, 226(6): 659–667
Alper H, Jin Y S, Moxley J F, Stephanopoulos G (2005). Identifying gene targets for the metabolic engineering of lycopene biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng, 7(3): 155–164
Plaimas K, Eils R, König R. Identifying essential genes in bacterial metabolic networks with machine learning methods. BMC systems biology. 2010 May 3;4(1):1
Chowdhury R, Chowdhury A, Maranas C D (2015). Using gene essentiality and synthetic lethality information to correct yeast and CHO cell genome-scale models. Metabolites, 5(4): 536–570
Becker S A, Palsson B Ø (2005). Genome-scale reconstruction of the metabolic network in Staphylococcus aureus N315: an initial draft to the two-dimensional annotation. BMC Microbiol, 5(1): 8
Schilling C H, CovertMW, Famili I, Church G M, Edwards J S, Palsson B O (2002). Genome-scale metabolic model of Helicobacter pylori 26695. J Bacteriol, 184(16): 4582–4593
Deutscher D, Meilijson I, Kupiec M, Ruppin E (2006). Multiple knockout analysis of genetic robustness in the yeast metabolic network. Nat Genet, 38(9): 993–998
Edwards J S, Ramakrishna R, Palsson B O (2001). Characterizing the metabolic phenotype: a phenotype phase plane analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng, 77(1): 27–36
Hamilton J J, Reed J L (2012). Identification of functional differences in metabolic networks using comparative genomics and constraintbased models. PLoS One, 7(4): e34670
Heinemann M, Kummel A, Ruinatscha R, Panke S (2005). In silico genome-scale reconstruction and validation of the Staphylococcus aureus metabolic network. Biotechnol Bioeng, 92(7): 850–64
Jamshidi N, Palsson B Ø (2007). Investigating the metabolic capabilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv using the in silico strain iNJ661 and proposing alternative drug targets. BMC Syst Biol, 1(1): 26
Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming R M, Thiele I, Orth J D, Feist A M, Zielinski D C, Bordbar A, Lewis N E, Rahmanian S, Kang J, Hyduke D R, Palsson B Ø (2011). Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc, 6(9): 1290–1307
Keating S M (2006). SBMLToolbox: an SBML toolbox for MATLAB users. Bioinformatics, 22(10): 1275–1277
Masel J, Siegal ML (2010). Robustness: mechanisms and consequences. Trends Genet, 25(9): 395–403
Raman K, Chandra N (2009). Flux balance analysis of biological systems: applications and challenges. Brief Bioinform, 10(4): 435–449
Kauffman K J, Prakash P, Edwards J S(2003). Advances in flux balance analysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 14(5): 491–496
McClelland M, Sanderson K E, Spieth J, Clifton S W, Latreille P, Courtney L, Porwollik S, Ali J, Dante M, Du F, Hou S, Layman D, Leonard S, Nguyen C, Scott K, Holmes A, Grewal N, Mulvaney E, Ryan E, Sun H, Florea L, Miller W, Stoneking T, Nhan M, Waterston R, Wilson R K (2001). Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature, 413(6858): 852–856
Nijman S M B (2011). Synthetic lethality: general principles, utility and detection using genetic screens in human cells. FEBS Lett, 585(1): 1–6
Pratapa A, Balachandran S, Raman K (2015). Fast-SL: an efficient algorithm to identify synthetic lethal sets in metabolic networks. Bioinformatics, 31(20): 3299–3305
Raghunathan A, Reed J, Shin S, Palsson B, Daefler S (2009). Constraintbased analysis of metabolic capacity of Salmonella typhimurium during host-pathogen interaction. BMC Syst Biol, 3(1): 38
Raman K, Rajagopalan P, Chandra N (2005). Flux balance analysis of mycolic acid pathway: targets for anti-tubercular drugs. PLOS Comput Biol, 1(5): e46
Suthers P F, Zomorrodi A, Maranas C D (2009). Genome-scale gene/reaction essentiality and synthetic lethality analysis. Mol Syst Biol, 5: 301
Thiele I, Hyduke D R, Steeb B, Fankam G, Allen D K, Bazzani S, Charusanti P, Chen F C, Fleming R M, Hsiung C A, De Keersmaecker S C, Liao Y C, Marchal K, Mo M L, Özdemir E, Raghunathan A, Reed J L, Shin S I, Sigurbjörnsdóttir S, Steinmann J, Sudarsan S, Swainston N, Thijs I M, Zengler K, Palsson B O, Adkins J N, Bumann D (2011). A community effort towards a knowledgebase and mathematical model of the human pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium LT2. BMC Syst Biol, 5: 8
Thiele I, Vo TD, Price ND, Palsson B Ø (2005). Expanded metabolic reconstruction of Helicobacter pylori (iIT341 GSM/GPR): an in silico genome-scale characterization of single- and double-deletion mutants. J Bacteriol, 187(16): 5818–5830
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gaurav, K., Hasija, Y. Comparative analysis of metabolic network of pathogens. Front. Biol. 12, 139–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-017-1440-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-017-1440-8