Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Instability of loose sand in constant volume direct simple shear tests in relation to particle shape

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post-peak flow instability of six sands notably different in terms of average particle shape characteristics, gradation, and mineralogy was investigated. Tests were carried out under constant volume condition using a NGI-type direct simple shear apparatus. The testing program covers wide ranges of initial void ratios and vertical effective stresses. Experimental findings confirm that the critical state parameters of the test sands depend strongly on the average particle morphologic characteristic factors. For specimens in loose state, it is shown that stress ratio at the onset of flow instability, normalized constant volume peak shear strength, brittleness index, and the normalized pore water pressure of the tested sands are interrelated with the particles’ morphologic factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

(Data after Sahebkar-khorasani [42])

Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alipour MJ, Lashkari A (2018) Sand instability under constant shear drained stress paths. Int J Solids Struct 150:66–82

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrade JE, Ramos AM, Lizcano A (2013) Criterion for flow liquefaction instability. Acta Geotech 8:525–535

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barati S (2018) Improvement of Golgohar mine tailings for construction purposes. M.Sc. thesis, Shiraz University, Iran

  4. Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35(2):99–112

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop AW (1971) Shear strength parameters for undisturbed and remoulded soil specimens. In: Parry RHG (ed.) Proceedings on Roscoe Memorial symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–58

  6. Bobei DC, Lo SR, Wanatowski D, Gnanendran CT, Rahman MM (2009) Modified state parameter for characterizing static liquefaction of sand with fines. Can Geotech J 46:281–295

    Google Scholar 

  7. Budhu M (1988) Failure state of a sand in simple shear. Can Geotech J 23:395–400

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cho G, Dodds J, Santamarina JC (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness and strength: natural and crushed sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(5):591–602

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chu J, Wanatowski D (2009) Effect of loading mode on strain softening and instability of sand in plane-strain tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(1):108–120

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chu J, Wanatowski D (2014) Difficulties in the determination of post-liquefaction strength for sand. Géotech Lett 4:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chu J, Leroueil S, Leong WK (2003) Unstable behavior of sand and its implication for slope instability. Can Geotech J 40:873–885

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dai BB, Yang J, Zhou CY (2016) Observed effects of interparticle friction and particle size on shear behavior of granular materials. Int J Geomech 16:1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyvik R, Berre T, Lacasse S, Raadim B (1987) Comparison of truly undrained and constant volume direct simple shear tests. Géotechnique 37(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fear CD, Robertson PK (1995) Estimating the undrained strength of sand: a theoretical framework. Can Geotech J 32(5):859–870

    Google Scholar 

  15. Finn WDL, Vaid YP (1977) Liquefaction potential from drained constant volume cyclic simple shear tests. In: Proceedings on 6th world conference on earthquake engineering, New Delhi, pp 2157–2162

  16. Hubler JF, Athanasopoulos-Zekkos A, Zekkos D (2017) Monotonic, cyclic, and postcyclic simple shear response of three uniform gravels in constant volume condition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquake. Géotechnique 43(3):351–414

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISO (2008) ISO 9276-6:2008. Representation of results of particle size analysis—part 6: descriptive and quantitative representation of particle shape and morphology. ISO, Geneva

  19. Jefferies M, Been K (2006) Soil liquefaction: a critical state approach. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jerves AX, Kawamoto RY, Andrade JE (2016) Effects of grain morphology on critical state: a computational analysis. Acta Geotech 11(3):493–503

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang MD, Yang ZX, Barreto D, Xie YH (2018) The influence of particle-size distribution on critical state behavior of spherical and non-spherical particle assemblies. Granular Matter 20:80

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kato S, Ishihara K, Towhata I (2001) Undrained shear characteristics of saturated sand under anisotropic consolidation. Soils Found 41(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ladd R (1978) Preparing test specimens using undercompaction. Geotech Test J 1(1):16–23

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lade PV, Nelson RB, Ito YM (1988) Instability of granular materials with nonassociated flow. J Eng Mech 14:2173–2191

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lashkari A (2014) Recommendations for extension and re-calibration of an existing sand constitutive model taking into account varying non-plastic fines content. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 61–62:212–238

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lashkari A, Karimi A, Fakharian K, Kaviani-Hamamedani F (2017) Prediction of undrained behavior of isotropically and anisotropically consolidated Firoozkuh sand: instability and flow liquefaction. Int J Geomech 17(10):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lashkari A, Yaghtin MS (2018) Sand flow liquefaction instability under shear-volume coupled strain paths. Géotechnique 68(11):1002–1024

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lashkari A, Khodadadi M, Binesh SM, Rahman MdM (2019) Instability of particulate assemblies under constant shear drained stress path: DEM approach. ASCE Int J Geomech 19(6):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li G, Liu Y-J, Dano C, Hicher P-Y (2014) Grading-dependent behavior of granular materials: from discrete to continuous modeling. J Eng Mech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Yang Y, Yu H-S, Roberts G (2017) Monotonic direct simple shear tests on sand under multidirectional loading. Int J Geomech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Monkul MM, Gültekin C, Gülver M, Akın Ö, Eseller-Bayat E (2015) Estimation of liquefaction potential from dry and saturated sandy soils under drained constant volume cyclic simple shear loading. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 75:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  33. Muir Wood D, Maeda K (2008) Changing grading of soil: effect on critical states. Acta Geotech 3:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  34. Najma A, Latifi M (2017) Predicting flow liquefaction, a constitutive model approach. Acta Geotech 12(4):793–808

    Google Scholar 

  35. Olson SM, Stark TD (2002) Liquefied strength ratio from liquefaction flow failure case histories. Can Geotech J 39:629–647

    Google Scholar 

  36. Olson SM, Stark TD, Walton WH, Castro GC (2000) 1907 static liquefaction flow failure of the north dike of Wachusett dam. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(12):1184–1193

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rahman MdM, Lo SR, Baki MdAL (2011) Equivalent granular state parameter and undrained behavior of sand-fines mixtures. Acta Geotech 6:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rousé PC, Fannin RJ, Shuttle DA (2008) Influence of roundness on the void ratio and strength of uniform sand. Géotechnique 58(3):227–231

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sadrekarimi A (2013) Influence of state and compressibility on liquefied strength of sands. Can Geotech J 50(10):1067–1076

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sadrekarimi A (2014) Effect of mode of shear on static liquefaction analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sadrekarimi A, Olson SM (2011) Yield strength ratios, critical strength ratios, and brittleness of sandy soils from laboratory tests. Can Geotech J 48:493–510

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sahebkar-Khorasani SS (2019) Experimental study of the influence of non-plastic silts on the constant volume behavior of Firoozkuh sand under direct simple shear mode. M.Sc. thesis, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran

  43. Shafiee A, Stewart JP, Venugopal R, Brandenberg SJ (2017) Adaptation of broadband simple shear device for constant volume and stress-controlled testing. Geotech Test J 40(1):15–28

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sladen JA, D’Hollander RD, Krahn J (1985) The liquefaction of sands, a collapse surface approach. Can Geotech J 22:564–578

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thornton C (2000) Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Géotechnique 50(1):43–53

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vahidi-Nia F, Lashkari A, Binesh SM (2015) An insight into the mechanical behavior of binary granular soils. Particuology 21:82–89

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wadell H (1932) Volume, shape and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 40(5):443–451

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wanatowski D, Chu J (2007) Static liquefaction of sand in plane strain. Can Geotech J 44:299–313

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wei LM, Yang J (2014) On the role of grain shape in static liquefaction of sand-fine mixtures. Géotechnique 64(9):740–745

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wood DM, Drescher A, Budhu M (1979) On the determination of the stress state in the simple shear apparatus. Geotech Test J 2(4):211–221

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xiao Y, Long L, Evans M, Zhou H, Liu H, Stuedlein AW (2019) Effect of particle shape on stress-dilatancy responses of medium-dense sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145(2):04018105

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yang J (2002) Non-uniqueness of flow liquefaction line for loose sand. Géotechnique 52(10):757–760

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yang J, Wei LM (2012) Collapse of loose sand with the addition of fines: the role of particle shape. Géotechnique 62(12):1111–1125

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yang J, Luo XD (2015) Exploring the relationship between critical state and particle shape for granular materials. J Mech Phys Solids 84:196–213

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yang J, Luo XD (2018) The critical state friction angle of granular materials: does it depend on grading? Acta Geotech 13(3):535–547

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yoshimine M, Ishihara K, Vargas W (1998) Effects of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on undrained shear behavior of sand. Soil Found 38(3):179–188

    Google Scholar 

  57. Yoshimine M, Robertson PK, Wride CE (1999) Undrained shear strength of clean sands to trigger flow liquefaction. Can Geotech J 36:891–906

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zheng J, Hryciw RD (2015) Traditional soil particle sphericity, roundness and surface roughness by computational geometry. Géotechnique 65(6):494–506

    Google Scholar 

  59. Zheng J, Hryciw RD (2018) Identification and characterization of particle shapes from images of sand assemblies using pattern recognition. J Comput Civ Eng 04018016:1–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the technical support of Global MTM Company concerning the apparatus and technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz, Iran

    A. Lashkari, S. R. Falsafizadeh, P. T. Shourijeh & M. J. Alipour

Authors
  1. A. Lashkari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. R. Falsafizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. T. Shourijeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Alipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lashkari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 43 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lashkari, A., Falsafizadeh, S.R., Shourijeh, P.T. et al. Instability of loose sand in constant volume direct simple shear tests in relation to particle shape. Acta Geotech. 15, 2507–2527 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00909-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00909-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation