Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the flow behaviour and aerodynamic noise characteristics of a high-speed pantograph under crosswinds

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aerodynamic noise of high-speed trains increases significantly under crosswinds. Researches have typically focused on the characteristics of aerodynamic loads and the corresponding safety issues, with less attention to flow-induced noise characteristics. In the present paper, the near-field unsteady flow behaviour around a pantograph was analysed using a large eddy simulation. The far-field aerodynamic noise from a pantograph was predicted using the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings acoustic analogy. The results showed that asymmetric characteristics of the flow field could be observed using the turbulent kinetic energy and the instantaneous vortexes in crosswind conditions. Vortex shedding, flow separation and recombination around the pantograph were the key factors for aerodynamic noise generation. The directivity of the noise radiation was inclined towards the leeward side of the pantograph. The aerodynamic noise propagation pattern can be considered as a typical point source on spherical waves when the transverse distance from the pantograph geometrical centre is farther than 8 m. The sound pressure level grew approximately as the 6th power of the pantograph speed. The peak frequency exhibited a linear relationship with the crosswind velocity. The numerical simulation results and wind tunnel experiments had high consistency in the full frequency domain, namely, the peak frequency distribution range, the main frequency amplitude and the spectral distribution shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talotte C. Aerodynamic noise: A critical survey. J Sound Vib, 2000, 231: 549–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Talotte C, Gautier P E, Thompson D J, et al. Identification, modelling and reduction potential of railway noise sources: A critical survey. J Sound Vib, 2003, 267: 447–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen Z Y. Dynamic environment of high-speed train and its distinguished technology. J China Railw Soc, 2006, 28: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poisson F. Railway noise generated by high-speed trains. In: Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2015. 457–480

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson D J, Latorre Iglesias E, Liu X, et al. Recent developments in the prediction and control of aerodynamic noise from high-speed trains. Int J Rail Transpation, 2015, 3: 119–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moritoh Y, Zenda Y. Aerodynamic noise of high-speed railway cars. Jpn Railw Eng, 1994, 130: 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mellet C, Létourneaux F, Poisson F, et al. High speed train noise emission: Latest investigation of the aerodynamic/rolling noise contribution. J Sound Vib, 2006, 293: 535–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang W H. Study on top-level design specifications of high-speed train. J China Railw Soc, 2012, 34: 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y D, Zhang J Y, Li T. Research on aerodynamic noise source characterization and noise reduction of high-speed trains vehicle. J China Railw Soc, 2016, 38: 40–49

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nagakura K. Localization of aerodynamic noise sources of Shinkansen trains. J Sound Vib, 2006, 293: 547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang J, Xiao X, Wang D, et al. Source contribution analysis for exterior noise of a high-speed train: Experiments and simulations. Shock Vib, 2018, 2018: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Latorre Iglesias E, Thompson D J, Smith M G. Component-based model to predict aerodynamic noise from high-speed train pantographs. J Sound Vib, 2017, 394: 280–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baldauf W, Blaschko R, Behr W, et al. Development of an actively controlled, acoustically optimised single arm pantograph. In: Proceedings of the World Congress of Railway Research WCRR. Cologne, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grosche F R, Meier G E A. Research at DLR Göttingen on bluff body aerodynamics, drag reduction by wake ventilation and active flow control. J Wind Eng Industrial Aerodyn, 2001, 89: 1201–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikeda M, Suzuki M, Yoshida K. Study on optimization of panhead shape possessing low noise and stable aerodynamic characteristics. Q R RTRI, 2006, 47: 72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sueki T, Ikeda M, Takaishi T. Aerodynamic noise reduction using porous materials and their application to high-speed pantographs. Q R RTRI, 2009, 50: 26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitsumoji T, Sato Y, Ikeda M, et al. A basic study on aerodynamic noise reduction techniques for a pantograph head using plasma actuators. Q R RTRI, 2014, 55: 184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitsumoji T, Sueki T, Yamazaki N, et al. Aerodynamic noise reduction of a pantograph panhead by applying a flow control method. In: Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2015. 515–522

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Noger C, Patrat J C, Peube J, et al. Aeroacoustical study of the TGV pantograph recess. J Sound Vib, 2000, 231: 563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee J, Cho W. Prediction of low-speed aerodynamic load and aeroacoustic noise around simplified panhead section model. P I Mech Eng F-J Rail Rapid Transit, 2008, 222: 423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. King III W F. A précis of developments in the aeroacoustics of fast trains. J Sound Vib, 1996, 193: 349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu H H, Li J C, Zhang H Q. On aerodynamic noises radiated by the pantograph system of high-speed trains. Acta Mech Sin, 2013, 29: 399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao Y G, Shi Y. Aerodynamic noise calculation and shape optimization of high-speed train pantograph insulators. J Railw Sci Eng, 2012, 9: 72–76

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Li T, et al. Research on aerodynamic noise reduction for high-speed trains. Shock Vib, 2016, 2016: 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim H, Hu Z W, Thompson D J. Unsteady aerodynamics of high speed train pantograph cavity flow control for noise reduction. In: Proceedings of 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Lyon: AIAA, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shi L, Zhang C C, Wang J, et al. Numerical analysis of aerodynamic noise of a high-speed pantograph. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation. Qingdao: IEEE, 2013. 837–841

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tan X M, Yang Z G, Tan X M, et al. Vortex structures and aeroacoustic performance of the flow field of the pantograph. J Sound Vib, 2018, 432: 17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu X W, Hu Z W, Thompson D J, et al. Reduction of aerodynamic noise from square bars by introducing spanwise waviness. J Sound Vib, 2018, 435: 323–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y D, Zhang J Y, Li T, et al. Investigation of the aeroacoustic behavior and aerodynamic noise of a high-speed train pantograph. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 561–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qin D, Li T, Zhang J Y, et al. Effect of operation height on aerodynamic performance of train pantograph (in Chinese). Sci Sin Tech, 2019, 49: 335–345

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baker C. The flow around high speed trains. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 2010, 98: 277–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li T, Hemida H, Zhang J Y, et al. Comparisons of shear stress transport and detached eddy simulations of the flow around trains. J Fluids Eng, 2018, 140: 111108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tian H Q. Research progress in railway safety under strong wind condition in China. J Cent South Univ, 2010, 41: 2435–2443

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hemida H, Krajnovic S. LES study of the influence of the nose shape and yaw angles on flow structures around trains. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 2009, 98: 34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Williams J E F, Hawkings D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 1969, 264: 321–342

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu J Y, Hu Z W, Thompson D J. Flow simulation and aerodynamic noise prediction for a high-speed train wheelset. Int J Aeroacoustics, 2014, 13: 533–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li T, Qin D, Zhang J Y. Effect of RANS turbulence model on aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind. Chin J Mech Eng, 2019, 32: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. European Committee for Standardization. ISO 3095: 2013 Railway application-acoustics-measurement of noise emitted by rail bound vehicles. London: British Standards Institution, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang Y D, Zhang J Y, Zhang W H. Analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristic of high-speed pantograph. J China Railw Soc, 2017, 39: 47–56

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YaDong Zhang.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFE0205200), the High-Speed Railway Basic Research Fund Key Project of China (Grant No. U1234208), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11972179, 51475394) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M662201).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Zhang, J. & Sheng, X. Study on the flow behaviour and aerodynamic noise characteristics of a high-speed pantograph under crosswinds. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 977–991 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1500-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1500-2

Keywords

Navigation