Abstract
The aerodynamic noise of high-speed trains increases significantly under crosswinds. Researches have typically focused on the characteristics of aerodynamic loads and the corresponding safety issues, with less attention to flow-induced noise characteristics. In the present paper, the near-field unsteady flow behaviour around a pantograph was analysed using a large eddy simulation. The far-field aerodynamic noise from a pantograph was predicted using the Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings acoustic analogy. The results showed that asymmetric characteristics of the flow field could be observed using the turbulent kinetic energy and the instantaneous vortexes in crosswind conditions. Vortex shedding, flow separation and recombination around the pantograph were the key factors for aerodynamic noise generation. The directivity of the noise radiation was inclined towards the leeward side of the pantograph. The aerodynamic noise propagation pattern can be considered as a typical point source on spherical waves when the transverse distance from the pantograph geometrical centre is farther than 8 m. The sound pressure level grew approximately as the 6th power of the pantograph speed. The peak frequency exhibited a linear relationship with the crosswind velocity. The numerical simulation results and wind tunnel experiments had high consistency in the full frequency domain, namely, the peak frequency distribution range, the main frequency amplitude and the spectral distribution shape.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Talotte C. Aerodynamic noise: A critical survey. J Sound Vib, 2000, 231: 549–562
Talotte C, Gautier P E, Thompson D J, et al. Identification, modelling and reduction potential of railway noise sources: A critical survey. J Sound Vib, 2003, 267: 447–468
Shen Z Y. Dynamic environment of high-speed train and its distinguished technology. J China Railw Soc, 2006, 28: 1–5
Poisson F. Railway noise generated by high-speed trains. In: Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2015. 457–480
Thompson D J, Latorre Iglesias E, Liu X, et al. Recent developments in the prediction and control of aerodynamic noise from high-speed trains. Int J Rail Transpation, 2015, 3: 119–150
Moritoh Y, Zenda Y. Aerodynamic noise of high-speed railway cars. Jpn Railw Eng, 1994, 130: 5–9
Mellet C, Létourneaux F, Poisson F, et al. High speed train noise emission: Latest investigation of the aerodynamic/rolling noise contribution. J Sound Vib, 2006, 293: 535–546
Zhang W H. Study on top-level design specifications of high-speed train. J China Railw Soc, 2012, 34: 15–19
Zhang Y D, Zhang J Y, Li T. Research on aerodynamic noise source characterization and noise reduction of high-speed trains vehicle. J China Railw Soc, 2016, 38: 40–49
Nagakura K. Localization of aerodynamic noise sources of Shinkansen trains. J Sound Vib, 2006, 293: 547–556
Zhang J, Xiao X, Wang D, et al. Source contribution analysis for exterior noise of a high-speed train: Experiments and simulations. Shock Vib, 2018, 2018: 1–13
Latorre Iglesias E, Thompson D J, Smith M G. Component-based model to predict aerodynamic noise from high-speed train pantographs. J Sound Vib, 2017, 394: 280–305
Baldauf W, Blaschko R, Behr W, et al. Development of an actively controlled, acoustically optimised single arm pantograph. In: Proceedings of the World Congress of Railway Research WCRR. Cologne, 2001
Grosche F R, Meier G E A. Research at DLR Göttingen on bluff body aerodynamics, drag reduction by wake ventilation and active flow control. J Wind Eng Industrial Aerodyn, 2001, 89: 1201–1218
Ikeda M, Suzuki M, Yoshida K. Study on optimization of panhead shape possessing low noise and stable aerodynamic characteristics. Q R RTRI, 2006, 47: 72–77
Sueki T, Ikeda M, Takaishi T. Aerodynamic noise reduction using porous materials and their application to high-speed pantographs. Q R RTRI, 2009, 50: 26–31
Mitsumoji T, Sato Y, Ikeda M, et al. A basic study on aerodynamic noise reduction techniques for a pantograph head using plasma actuators. Q R RTRI, 2014, 55: 184–189
Mitsumoji T, Sueki T, Yamazaki N, et al. Aerodynamic noise reduction of a pantograph panhead by applying a flow control method. In: Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems. Berlin: Springer, 2015. 515–522
Noger C, Patrat J C, Peube J, et al. Aeroacoustical study of the TGV pantograph recess. J Sound Vib, 2000, 231: 563–575
Lee J, Cho W. Prediction of low-speed aerodynamic load and aeroacoustic noise around simplified panhead section model. P I Mech Eng F-J Rail Rapid Transit, 2008, 222: 423–431
King III W F. A précis of developments in the aeroacoustics of fast trains. J Sound Vib, 1996, 193: 349–358
Yu H H, Li J C, Zhang H Q. On aerodynamic noises radiated by the pantograph system of high-speed trains. Acta Mech Sin, 2013, 29: 399–410
Xiao Y G, Shi Y. Aerodynamic noise calculation and shape optimization of high-speed train pantograph insulators. J Railw Sci Eng, 2012, 9: 72–76
Zhang Y, Zhang J, Li T, et al. Research on aerodynamic noise reduction for high-speed trains. Shock Vib, 2016, 2016: 1–21
Kim H, Hu Z W, Thompson D J. Unsteady aerodynamics of high speed train pantograph cavity flow control for noise reduction. In: Proceedings of 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Lyon: AIAA, 2016
Shi L, Zhang C C, Wang J, et al. Numerical analysis of aerodynamic noise of a high-speed pantograph. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation. Qingdao: IEEE, 2013. 837–841
Tan X M, Yang Z G, Tan X M, et al. Vortex structures and aeroacoustic performance of the flow field of the pantograph. J Sound Vib, 2018, 432: 17–32
Liu X W, Hu Z W, Thompson D J, et al. Reduction of aerodynamic noise from square bars by introducing spanwise waviness. J Sound Vib, 2018, 435: 323–349
Zhang Y D, Zhang J Y, Li T, et al. Investigation of the aeroacoustic behavior and aerodynamic noise of a high-speed train pantograph. Sci China Tech Sci, 2017, 60: 561–575
Qin D, Li T, Zhang J Y, et al. Effect of operation height on aerodynamic performance of train pantograph (in Chinese). Sci Sin Tech, 2019, 49: 335–345
Baker C. The flow around high speed trains. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 2010, 98: 277–298
Li T, Hemida H, Zhang J Y, et al. Comparisons of shear stress transport and detached eddy simulations of the flow around trains. J Fluids Eng, 2018, 140: 111108
Tian H Q. Research progress in railway safety under strong wind condition in China. J Cent South Univ, 2010, 41: 2435–2443
Hemida H, Krajnovic S. LES study of the influence of the nose shape and yaw angles on flow structures around trains. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 2009, 98: 34–46
Williams J E F, Hawkings D L. Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Philos Trans R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci, 1969, 264: 321–342
Zhu J Y, Hu Z W, Thompson D J. Flow simulation and aerodynamic noise prediction for a high-speed train wheelset. Int J Aeroacoustics, 2014, 13: 533–552
Li T, Qin D, Zhang J Y. Effect of RANS turbulence model on aerodynamic behavior of trains in crosswind. Chin J Mech Eng, 2019, 32: 1–12
European Committee for Standardization. ISO 3095: 2013 Railway application-acoustics-measurement of noise emitted by rail bound vehicles. London: British Standards Institution, 2013
Zhang Y D, Zhang J Y, Zhang W H. Analysis of aerodynamic noise characteristic of high-speed pantograph. J China Railw Soc, 2017, 39: 47–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFE0205200), the High-Speed Railway Basic Research Fund Key Project of China (Grant No. U1234208), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11972179, 51475394) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M662201).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Zhang, J. & Sheng, X. Study on the flow behaviour and aerodynamic noise characteristics of a high-speed pantograph under crosswinds. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 63, 977–991 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1500-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-1500-2