Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge building: aligning education with needs for knowledge creation in the digital age

  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the alignment of education with the needs for knowledge creation in the digital age using the Knowledge Building model and Knowledge Forum® technology. Knowledge Building is akin to knowledge creation as practiced in research laboratories and other frontier-advancing organizations, with added focus on value to the individual, community, and society. Knowledge Forum has evolved with theory and pedagogy over the years, and makes knowledge-creation processes available to school-aged students. Despite reform efforts, misalignments for educational innovation continue to prevail in schooling, and changes often create more disruptions. Without a coherent framework and sustained progressive change, innovations may fail to make their way into policy and practice, creating an endless catching-up game and fragmentation at different levels. This paper draws from the Knowledge Building model and research to discuss alignments for knowledge creation in seven areas: (1) views of knowledge; (2) 21st-century educational competencies; (3) education and equity; (4) pedagogy and technology integration; (5) assessment, learning and collaboration; (6) teacher learning; and (7) student learning outcomes. Through decades of sustained design implementation research, using a systemic approach involving school-university-government alliances and globally distributed hubs of innovation, Knowledge Building teams have engaged in the reconstruction of educational practices to establish self-improving systems for continual alignments in knowledge creation. The mobilization of educational stakeholders worldwide, such as the EduSummIT, provides opportunities for bridging research and practice and educational improvements. Implications of Knowledge Building for developing self-improving systems and communities that leverage technology for realigning education in knowledge creation are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5–22). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2005). Design research: The way forward. Education Canada, 46(1), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2010). Can children really create knowledge? Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 36(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, B., & Bielaczyc, K. (2001). Knowledge forum: Altering the relationship between students and scientific knowledge. Education, Communication and Information, 1, 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 147–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. K., Lai, K.-W., Bielaczyc, K., Tan, S. C., Ma, L., Scardamalia, M. et al. (2020). Knowledge building/Knowledge creation in the classroom, school, and beyond. In P. Fisser & M. Phillips (Eds.), Learners and learning contexts: New alignments for the digital age (pp. 101–108). EduSummIT.

  • Chan, C. K. K., Lam, I. C. K., & Leung, R. W. H. (2012). Can collaborative knowledge building promote both scientific processes and science achievement? International Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(3), 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. K. & Yang, Y. (2018). Developing scientific inquiry in technology-enhanced learning environments. In Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Lai, K. W. (Eds.), Second international handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 161–180). Springer.

  • Chan., M., Teo., C. L., & Lee., Y. L. (2016). Knowledge building pedagogy and technology: Enacting principle-based design in history classroom. In Looi, C. K., Polman, J. L., Cress, U., & Reimann, P (Ed.), Transforming learning, empowering learners: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 1, 1310–1313.

  • Chen, B. (2017). Fostering scientific understanding and epistemic beliefs through judgements of promisingness. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51, 266–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., & Zhang, J. (2016). Analytics for Knowledge Creation: Towards Epistemic Agency and Design-Mode Thinking. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 139–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Boston, MA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuy, M., Resendes, M., Tarchi, C., Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2011). Ways of contributing to an explanation-seeking dialogue in science and history. QWERTY-Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 6(2), 242–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. J., & Laferrière, T. (Eds.) (2019). The Action Agendas of EDUsummIT2019. https://edusummit2019.fse.ulaval.ca/sites/edusummit2019.fse.ulaval.ca/files/edusummit2019_actionagendas.pdf.

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical perspective. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, B., & Davis, E. A. (2006). Teacher learning research and the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 535–550). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science studies and Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (2010). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hakkarainen, K. A. I. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2), 199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harasim, L., & Calvert, T., (2002). Seven Years of TeleLearning Research in Canada. Journal of Distance Education/ Revue de l'enseignement à distance.17: 1–3.

  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (2010). Knowledge Society Network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2MG6P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, M. (2010). A special issue of the Canadian journal of learning and technology on knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2Q59N.

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 217–239). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laferrière, T. (2018). Boundary crossings resulting in active learning in preservice teacher education: A chat analysis revealing the tensions and springboards between partners. Frontiers in ICT. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laferrière, T., Montane, M., Gros, B., Alvarez, I., Bernaus, M., Breuleux, A., & Lamon, M. (2010). Partnerships for knowledge building: An emerging model. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1).

  • Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., and Allaire, S. (2013). Learning to teach in a networked classroom: A systemic approach. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco CA.

  • Laferrière, T., Allaire, S., Breuleux, A., Hamel, C., Law, N., Montané, M., & Scardamalia, M. (2015). The knowledge building international project (KBIP): Scaling up professional development using collaborative technology. In C.-K. Looi & L. W. Teh (Eds.), Scaling Educational Innovations (pp. 255–276). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K., Voogt, J., Knezek, G., & Gibson, D. (2016). EDUsummIT: A global knowledge building community for educational researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. Y., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 277–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, C., & Chan, C. K. (2018). Developing metadiscourse through reflective assessment in knowledge building environments. Computers & Education, 126, 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F., & Chan, C. K. (2018). Promoting elementary students’ epistemology of science through computer-supported knowledge-building discourse and epistemic reflection. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 668–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Matsuzawa, Y., & Scardamalia, M. (2016). Rotating leadership and collective responsibility in a grade 4 knowledge building classroom. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, 4(1–2), 54–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., & Scardamalia, M. (in press). Teachers as designers in knowledge building innovation networks. In M-C. Shanahan, B. Kim, K. Koh, A. P. Preciado-Babb, & M. A. Takeuchi (Eds.), The learning sciences in conversation: Theories, methodologies, and boundary spaces. Routledge.

  • Montané, M. (2006). De les comunitats d'aprenentatge a les comunitats de coneixement en xarxa. Revista catalana de pedagogia, 113–123.

  • Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2010). Knowledge building and mathematics: Shifting the responsibility for knowledge advancement and engagement. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1). https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26368/19550.

  • Niu, H., & van Aalst, J. (2009). Participation in knowledge-building discourse: An analysis of online discussions in mainstream and honours social studies courses. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(1). Retrieved from https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/26403/19585.

  • OECD. (2013). New sources of growth: knowledge-based capital – key analyses and policy conclusions – synthesis report. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/knowledge-based-capital-synthesis.pdf.

  • Oshima, J., Oshima, R., & Matsuzawa, Y. (2012). Knowledge building Discourse Explorer: a social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse. Education Technology, Research & Development, 60, 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9265-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2014). Trialogical approach for knowledge creation. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 53–73). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., & Martin, C. (2015, April). Design-based implementation research as a strategy for expanding opportunity to learn in school districts. Paper presented at the Research Conference of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Boston, MA.

  • Popper, K. (1972). The logic of scientific discovery. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S., & Main, K. (2018). Teachers as drivers of their professional learning through design teams, communities, and networks. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Second Handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 433–448). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Educational technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.

  • Scardamalia, N., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 397–417). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Brett, C., Burtis, P. J., Calhoun, C., & Lea, N. S. (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive learning environments, 2(1), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and learning of 21st century skills (pp. 231–300). Dordrecht: Springer Science Business Media B.V.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, H. J., Seah, L. H., & Toh-Heng, H. L. (2010). Designing collaborative knowledge building environments accessible to all learners. Computers & Education, 54, 479–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. C., Chue, S., & Teo, C. L. (2016). Teacher learning in a professional learning community: Potential for a dual-layer knowledge building. In C. K. Looi, J. Polman, U. Cress & P. Reimann (Eds.) Transforming learning, empowering learners. 12th international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 178–185). Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences Inc.

  • Tan, S. C., & Lee, A. V. Y. (2018). Online learning communities in K-12 settings. In Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Lai, K. W. (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 737–758). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., & Zhang, J. (2018). Forming shared inquiry structures to support knowledge building in a grade 5 community. Instructional Science, 46, 563–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarchi, C., Chuy, M., Donoahue, Z., Stephenson, C., Messina, R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Knowledge building and Knowledge Forum: Getting started with pedagogy and technology. LEARNing Landscapes. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v6i2.623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Technology, CJo. L. A. (2010). A special issue of the Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology on Knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2Q59N.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, C. L. (2014). Conceptual shifts within problem spaces for knowledge-building practice within a teacher community. In S. C. Tan, H. J. So, & J. Yeo (Eds.), Knowledge creation in education (pp. 205–226). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, C. L. (2019). Community-Based Design Research to Sustain Classroom Innovation with ICT. In D. Hung, S. S. Lee, Y. Toh, A. Jamaludin, & L. Wu (Eds.), Innovations in Educational Change (pp. 103–118). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Newyork: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, S., Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., & Breuleux, A. (2010). Multilevel innovation in remote networked schools. Systemic practice and action research, 23(4), 285–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). Towards Knowledge Societies: UNESCO World Report. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141843.

  • UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000213475_eng.

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Aalst, J. & Chan, C. K. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolio. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., & Pareja Roblin, N. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Laferriere, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, B. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43, 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, G. (2020). Socio-cognitive dynamics of Knowledge Building communities: A high-school physics case study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2018). The future of jobs report 2018. Switzerland, World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2018.pdf

  • Wu, Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Research trends in technology-enhanced knowledge building pedagogies: a review of selected empirical research from 2006 to 2015. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2019). Dynamics of reflective assessment and knowledge building for academically low-achieving students. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219872444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Morley, E. A., & Teo, C. L. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R., & Reeve, R. (2007). Sociocognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-yearolds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39(4), 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Tao, D., Chen, M. H., Sun, Y., Judson, D., & Naqvi, S. (2018). Coorganizing the collective journey of inquiry with idea thread mapper. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27, 390–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher-order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore, 637616, Singapore

    Seng Chee Tan

  2. University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

    Carol Chan

  3. Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA

    Katerine Bielaczyc

  4. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1V6, USA

    Leanne Ma, Marlene Scardamalia & Carl Bereiter

Authors
  1. Seng Chee Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carol Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katerine Bielaczyc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leanne Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marlene Scardamalia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Carl Bereiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seng Chee Tan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, S.C., Chan, C., Bielaczyc, K. et al. Knowledge building: aligning education with needs for knowledge creation in the digital age. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 2243–2266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09914-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09914-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation